Peirce sobre analiticidade

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Salatiel, José Renato
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393
Resumo: In this article, I examine the reconstruction that Peirce does on analytic/synthetic Kantian division, supported by his phenomenology, semiotic and pragmatism. The analysis of Peirce’s writings on mathematic suggests a notion of a posteriori and necessary analytical truths, that is, propositions that express one belief justified in experience, but whose generalization is valid for all the possible worlds. This was a new idea the time that Peirce formulated it, in 19th Century, and it contrasts with semantic-analytical tradition from Frege and was contested by Quine in 1950’s. Peirce’s notion of analyticity is a result of his discovery of the logic of relatives, which led the philosopher to revise the deductive reasoning, dividing it into corollarial and theorematic, which in turn allow us to understand why mathematics is, simultaneously, deductive and non-trivial.
id UFSC-5_3f8154cc4e966285479441125bceccf2
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/28040
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Peirce sobre analiticidadePeirce Sobre AnaliticidadeIn this article, I examine the reconstruction that Peirce does on analytic/synthetic Kantian division, supported by his phenomenology, semiotic and pragmatism. The analysis of Peirce’s writings on mathematic suggests a notion of a posteriori and necessary analytical truths, that is, propositions that express one belief justified in experience, but whose generalization is valid for all the possible worlds. This was a new idea the time that Peirce formulated it, in 19th Century, and it contrasts with semantic-analytical tradition from Frege and was contested by Quine in 1950’s. Peirce’s notion of analyticity is a result of his discovery of the logic of relatives, which led the philosopher to revise the deductive reasoning, dividing it into corollarial and theorematic, which in turn allow us to understand why mathematics is, simultaneously, deductive and non-trivial.Neste artigo examinamos a reconstrução que Charles S. Peirce faz da divisão kantiana analítico/sintético, amparada por sua fenomenologia, semiótica e pragmatismo. A análise dos escritos sobre matemática do filósofo sugere uma noção de verdades analíticas a posteriori e necessárias, isto é, de proposições que expressam uma crença justificável na experiência, mas cuja generalização é válida para todos os mundos possíveis. Essa era uma ideia inovadora na ocasião em que Peirce a formulou, no século 19, e contrasta com a tradição analítico-semântica advinda de Frege e contestada por Quine nos anos 1950. A noção de analiticidade de Peirce resulta de sua descoberta da lógica dos relativos, que levou o filósofo a revisar o raciocínio dedutivo, dividindo-o em corolarial e teoremático, e que, por sua vez, permite entender porque a matemática é, ao mesmo tempo, dedutiva e não-trivial.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2012-09-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p39310.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2012); 393-415Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 Núm. 3 (2012); 393-415Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 16 n. 3 (2012); 393-4151808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393/25611Copyright (c) 2021 José Renato Salatielinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSalatiel, José Renato2019-09-13T08:39:53Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/28040Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-13T08:39:53Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Peirce sobre analiticidade
Peirce Sobre Analiticidade
title Peirce sobre analiticidade
spellingShingle Peirce sobre analiticidade
Salatiel, José Renato
title_short Peirce sobre analiticidade
title_full Peirce sobre analiticidade
title_fullStr Peirce sobre analiticidade
title_full_unstemmed Peirce sobre analiticidade
title_sort Peirce sobre analiticidade
author Salatiel, José Renato
author_facet Salatiel, José Renato
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Salatiel, José Renato
description In this article, I examine the reconstruction that Peirce does on analytic/synthetic Kantian division, supported by his phenomenology, semiotic and pragmatism. The analysis of Peirce’s writings on mathematic suggests a notion of a posteriori and necessary analytical truths, that is, propositions that express one belief justified in experience, but whose generalization is valid for all the possible worlds. This was a new idea the time that Peirce formulated it, in 19th Century, and it contrasts with semantic-analytical tradition from Frege and was contested by Quine in 1950’s. Peirce’s notion of analyticity is a result of his discovery of the logic of relatives, which led the philosopher to revise the deductive reasoning, dividing it into corollarial and theorematic, which in turn allow us to understand why mathematics is, simultaneously, deductive and non-trivial.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-09-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393
10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393/25611
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 José Renato Salatiel
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 José Renato Salatiel
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2012); 393-415
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 Núm. 3 (2012); 393-415
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 16 n. 3 (2012); 393-415
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435112519106560