Peirce sobre analiticidade
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393 |
Resumo: | In this article, I examine the reconstruction that Peirce does on analytic/synthetic Kantian division, supported by his phenomenology, semiotic and pragmatism. The analysis of Peirce’s writings on mathematic suggests a notion of a posteriori and necessary analytical truths, that is, propositions that express one belief justified in experience, but whose generalization is valid for all the possible worlds. This was a new idea the time that Peirce formulated it, in 19th Century, and it contrasts with semantic-analytical tradition from Frege and was contested by Quine in 1950’s. Peirce’s notion of analyticity is a result of his discovery of the logic of relatives, which led the philosopher to revise the deductive reasoning, dividing it into corollarial and theorematic, which in turn allow us to understand why mathematics is, simultaneously, deductive and non-trivial. |
id |
UFSC-5_3f8154cc4e966285479441125bceccf2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/28040 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Peirce sobre analiticidadePeirce Sobre AnaliticidadeIn this article, I examine the reconstruction that Peirce does on analytic/synthetic Kantian division, supported by his phenomenology, semiotic and pragmatism. The analysis of Peirce’s writings on mathematic suggests a notion of a posteriori and necessary analytical truths, that is, propositions that express one belief justified in experience, but whose generalization is valid for all the possible worlds. This was a new idea the time that Peirce formulated it, in 19th Century, and it contrasts with semantic-analytical tradition from Frege and was contested by Quine in 1950’s. Peirce’s notion of analyticity is a result of his discovery of the logic of relatives, which led the philosopher to revise the deductive reasoning, dividing it into corollarial and theorematic, which in turn allow us to understand why mathematics is, simultaneously, deductive and non-trivial.Neste artigo examinamos a reconstrução que Charles S. Peirce faz da divisão kantiana analítico/sintético, amparada por sua fenomenologia, semiótica e pragmatismo. A análise dos escritos sobre matemática do filósofo sugere uma noção de verdades analíticas a posteriori e necessárias, isto é, de proposições que expressam uma crença justificável na experiência, mas cuja generalização é válida para todos os mundos possíveis. Essa era uma ideia inovadora na ocasião em que Peirce a formulou, no século 19, e contrasta com a tradição analítico-semântica advinda de Frege e contestada por Quine nos anos 1950. A noção de analiticidade de Peirce resulta de sua descoberta da lógica dos relativos, que levou o filósofo a revisar o raciocínio dedutivo, dividindo-o em corolarial e teoremático, e que, por sua vez, permite entender porque a matemática é, ao mesmo tempo, dedutiva e não-trivial.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2012-09-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p39310.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2012); 393-415Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 Núm. 3 (2012); 393-415Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 16 n. 3 (2012); 393-4151808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393/25611Copyright (c) 2021 José Renato Salatielinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSalatiel, José Renato2019-09-13T08:39:53Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/28040Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-13T08:39:53Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Peirce sobre analiticidade Peirce Sobre Analiticidade |
title |
Peirce sobre analiticidade |
spellingShingle |
Peirce sobre analiticidade Salatiel, José Renato |
title_short |
Peirce sobre analiticidade |
title_full |
Peirce sobre analiticidade |
title_fullStr |
Peirce sobre analiticidade |
title_full_unstemmed |
Peirce sobre analiticidade |
title_sort |
Peirce sobre analiticidade |
author |
Salatiel, José Renato |
author_facet |
Salatiel, José Renato |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Salatiel, José Renato |
description |
In this article, I examine the reconstruction that Peirce does on analytic/synthetic Kantian division, supported by his phenomenology, semiotic and pragmatism. The analysis of Peirce’s writings on mathematic suggests a notion of a posteriori and necessary analytical truths, that is, propositions that express one belief justified in experience, but whose generalization is valid for all the possible worlds. This was a new idea the time that Peirce formulated it, in 19th Century, and it contrasts with semantic-analytical tradition from Frege and was contested by Quine in 1950’s. Peirce’s notion of analyticity is a result of his discovery of the logic of relatives, which led the philosopher to revise the deductive reasoning, dividing it into corollarial and theorematic, which in turn allow us to understand why mathematics is, simultaneously, deductive and non-trivial. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393 10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p393/25611 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 José Renato Salatiel info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 José Renato Salatiel |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2012); 393-415 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 Núm. 3 (2012); 393-415 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 16 n. 3 (2012); 393-415 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435112519106560 |