Compressibility and the Algorithmic Theory of Laws
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2019v23n3p461 |
Resumo: | The algorithmic theory of laws claims that the laws of nature are the algorithms in the best possible compression of all empirical data. This position assumes that the universe is compressible and that data received from observing it is easily reproducible using a simple set of rules. However, there are three sources of evidence that suggest that the universe as a whole is incompressible. The first comes from the practice of science. The other two come from the nature of the universe itself: the presence of chaotic behavior and the nature of quantum systems also suggests that the universe is incompressible. This paper evaluates these sources and argues that none provides a convincing case to reject the algorithmic theory of laws. |
id |
UFSC-5_40add3a0f588a396a2ac8458849ca0c0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/70057 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Compressibility and the Algorithmic Theory of LawsCompressibility and the Algorithmic Theory of LawsThe algorithmic theory of laws claims that the laws of nature are the algorithms in the best possible compression of all empirical data. This position assumes that the universe is compressible and that data received from observing it is easily reproducible using a simple set of rules. However, there are three sources of evidence that suggest that the universe as a whole is incompressible. The first comes from the practice of science. The other two come from the nature of the universe itself: the presence of chaotic behavior and the nature of quantum systems also suggests that the universe is incompressible. This paper evaluates these sources and argues that none provides a convincing case to reject the algorithmic theory of laws.The algorithmic theory of laws claims that the laws of nature are the algorithms in the best possible compression of all empirical data. This position assumes that the universe is compressible and that data received from observing it is easily reproducible using a simple set of rules. However, there are three sources of evidence that suggest that the universe as a whole is incompressible. The first comes from the practice of science. The other two come from the nature of the universe itself: the presence of chaotic behavior and the nature of quantum systems also suggests that the universe is incompressible. This paper evaluates these sources and argues that none provides a convincing case to reject the algorithmic theory of laws.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2019-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2019v23n3p46110.5007/1808-1711.2019v23n3p461Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 23 No. 3 (2019); 461-485Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 23 Núm. 3 (2019); 461-485Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 23 n. 3 (2019); 461-4851808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2019v23n3p461/pdfCopyright (c) 2021 Billy Wheelerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWheeler, Billy2020-03-16T13:46:37Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/70057Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2020-03-16T13:46:37Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Compressibility and the Algorithmic Theory of Laws Compressibility and the Algorithmic Theory of Laws |
title |
Compressibility and the Algorithmic Theory of Laws |
spellingShingle |
Compressibility and the Algorithmic Theory of Laws Wheeler, Billy |
title_short |
Compressibility and the Algorithmic Theory of Laws |
title_full |
Compressibility and the Algorithmic Theory of Laws |
title_fullStr |
Compressibility and the Algorithmic Theory of Laws |
title_full_unstemmed |
Compressibility and the Algorithmic Theory of Laws |
title_sort |
Compressibility and the Algorithmic Theory of Laws |
author |
Wheeler, Billy |
author_facet |
Wheeler, Billy |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Wheeler, Billy |
description |
The algorithmic theory of laws claims that the laws of nature are the algorithms in the best possible compression of all empirical data. This position assumes that the universe is compressible and that data received from observing it is easily reproducible using a simple set of rules. However, there are three sources of evidence that suggest that the universe as a whole is incompressible. The first comes from the practice of science. The other two come from the nature of the universe itself: the presence of chaotic behavior and the nature of quantum systems also suggests that the universe is incompressible. This paper evaluates these sources and argues that none provides a convincing case to reject the algorithmic theory of laws. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2019v23n3p461 10.5007/1808-1711.2019v23n3p461 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2019v23n3p461 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2019v23n3p461 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2019v23n3p461/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Billy Wheeler info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Billy Wheeler |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 23 No. 3 (2019); 461-485 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 23 Núm. 3 (2019); 461-485 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 23 n. 3 (2019); 461-485 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435108797710336 |