Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ocampo, Carolina
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Carbajo, Anibal Eduardo, Folguera, Guillermo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/67858
Resumo: In the present study we analyze if the risk concept of the hegemonic epidemiology changes its nature in purportedly alternative currents as ecoepidemiology and social epidemiology focused in multilevel analysis.We analyze the way this concept is distinguished in every current and its relationship with other epidemiologic key notions as cause. We find that the risk concept and the notion of cause remain relatively unchanged among the different currents even when there is some theoretical discussion about the complexity of multilevel systems and other explanations for the events. Finally we discuss some consequences about the appropriation of the risk concept in multiple interventions in the health field. We indicate that the fragmented nature of the risk concept is problematic because it can make the social aspects of the disease considered only in a functional perspective. Alternatively to that we develop the vulnerability concept as a knowledge framed in a hermeneutical perspective. The vulnerability concept acts as a mediator knowledge between epidemiology and the interventions in the health field. In the same way we point out some concerns from the anthropological field about the simplification of social senses and omission of meanings about the health of the communities
id UFSC-5_53ff4500176188bb6c801f2c0723d396
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/67858
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currentsConcepto de riesco: (dis)continuidades entre corrientes epidemiológicasConcepto de riesco: (dis)continuidades entre corrientes epidemiológicasIn the present study we analyze if the risk concept of the hegemonic epidemiology changes its nature in purportedly alternative currents as ecoepidemiology and social epidemiology focused in multilevel analysis.We analyze the way this concept is distinguished in every current and its relationship with other epidemiologic key notions as cause. We find that the risk concept and the notion of cause remain relatively unchanged among the different currents even when there is some theoretical discussion about the complexity of multilevel systems and other explanations for the events. Finally we discuss some consequences about the appropriation of the risk concept in multiple interventions in the health field. We indicate that the fragmented nature of the risk concept is problematic because it can make the social aspects of the disease considered only in a functional perspective. Alternatively to that we develop the vulnerability concept as a knowledge framed in a hermeneutical perspective. The vulnerability concept acts as a mediator knowledge between epidemiology and the interventions in the health field. In the same way we point out some concerns from the anthropological field about the simplification of social senses and omission of meanings about the health of the communitiesIn the present study we analyze if the risk concept of the hegemonic epidemiologychanges its nature in purportedly alternative currents as ecoepidemiology and socialepidemiology focused in multilevel analysis.We analyze the way this concept is distinguishedin every current and its relationship with other epidemiologic key notions as cause. We findthat the risk concept and the notion of cause remain relatively unchanged among the differentcurrents even when there is some theoretical discussion about the complexity of multilevelsystems and other explanations for the events. Finally we discuss some consequences aboutthe appropriation of the risk concept in multiple interventions in the health field. We indicatethat the fragmented nature of the risk concept is problematic because it can make thesocial aspects of the disease considered only in a functional perspective. Alternatively to thatwe develop the vulnerability concept as a knowledge framed in a hermeneutical perspective.The vulnerability concept acts as a mediator knowledge between epidemiology and theinterventions in the health field. In the same way we point out some concerns from the anthropologicalfield about the simplification of social senses and omission of meanings aboutthe health of the communities.In the present study we analyze if the risk concept of the hegemonic epidemiology changes its nature in purportedly alternative currents as ecoepidemiology and social epidemiology focused in multilevel analysis.We analyze the way this concept is distinguished in every current and its relationship with other epidemiologic key notions as cause. We find that the risk concept and the notion of cause remain relatively unchanged among the different currents even when there is some theoretical discussion about the complexity of multilevel systems and other explanations for the events. Finally we discuss some consequences about the appropriation of the risk concept in multiple interventions in the health field. We indicate that the fragmented nature of the risk concept is problematic because it can make the social aspects of the disease considered only in a functional perspective. Alternatively to that we develop the vulnerability concept as a knowledge framed in a hermeneutical perspective. The vulnerability concept acts as a mediator knowledge between epidemiology and the interventions in the health field. In the same way we point out some concerns from the anthropological field about the simplification of social senses and omission of meanings about the health of the communitiesFederal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2020-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/6785810.5007/1808-1711.2020v24n3p633Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2020); 633-656Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 24 Núm. 3 (2020); 633-656Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 24 n. 3 (2020); 633-6561808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCspahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/67858/44997Copyright (c) 2021 Carolina Ocampo, Anibal Eduardo Carbajo, Guillermo Folguerahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOcampo, CarolinaCarbajo, Anibal EduardoFolguera, Guillermo2021-09-17T17:35:23Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/67858Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2021-09-17T17:35:23Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents
Concepto de riesco: (dis)continuidades entre corrientes epidemiológicas
Concepto de riesco: (dis)continuidades entre corrientes epidemiológicas
title Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents
spellingShingle Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents
Ocampo, Carolina
title_short Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents
title_full Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents
title_fullStr Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents
title_full_unstemmed Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents
title_sort Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents
author Ocampo, Carolina
author_facet Ocampo, Carolina
Carbajo, Anibal Eduardo
Folguera, Guillermo
author_role author
author2 Carbajo, Anibal Eduardo
Folguera, Guillermo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ocampo, Carolina
Carbajo, Anibal Eduardo
Folguera, Guillermo
description In the present study we analyze if the risk concept of the hegemonic epidemiology changes its nature in purportedly alternative currents as ecoepidemiology and social epidemiology focused in multilevel analysis.We analyze the way this concept is distinguished in every current and its relationship with other epidemiologic key notions as cause. We find that the risk concept and the notion of cause remain relatively unchanged among the different currents even when there is some theoretical discussion about the complexity of multilevel systems and other explanations for the events. Finally we discuss some consequences about the appropriation of the risk concept in multiple interventions in the health field. We indicate that the fragmented nature of the risk concept is problematic because it can make the social aspects of the disease considered only in a functional perspective. Alternatively to that we develop the vulnerability concept as a knowledge framed in a hermeneutical perspective. The vulnerability concept acts as a mediator knowledge between epidemiology and the interventions in the health field. In the same way we point out some concerns from the anthropological field about the simplification of social senses and omission of meanings about the health of the communities
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/67858
10.5007/1808-1711.2020v24n3p633
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/67858
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2020v24n3p633
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/67858/44997
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Carolina Ocampo, Anibal Eduardo Carbajo, Guillermo Folguera
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Carolina Ocampo, Anibal Eduardo Carbajo, Guillermo Folguera
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2020); 633-656
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 24 Núm. 3 (2020); 633-656
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 24 n. 3 (2020); 633-656
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435113831923712