Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/67858 |
Resumo: | In the present study we analyze if the risk concept of the hegemonic epidemiology changes its nature in purportedly alternative currents as ecoepidemiology and social epidemiology focused in multilevel analysis.We analyze the way this concept is distinguished in every current and its relationship with other epidemiologic key notions as cause. We find that the risk concept and the notion of cause remain relatively unchanged among the different currents even when there is some theoretical discussion about the complexity of multilevel systems and other explanations for the events. Finally we discuss some consequences about the appropriation of the risk concept in multiple interventions in the health field. We indicate that the fragmented nature of the risk concept is problematic because it can make the social aspects of the disease considered only in a functional perspective. Alternatively to that we develop the vulnerability concept as a knowledge framed in a hermeneutical perspective. The vulnerability concept acts as a mediator knowledge between epidemiology and the interventions in the health field. In the same way we point out some concerns from the anthropological field about the simplification of social senses and omission of meanings about the health of the communities |
id |
UFSC-5_53ff4500176188bb6c801f2c0723d396 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/67858 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currentsConcepto de riesco: (dis)continuidades entre corrientes epidemiológicasConcepto de riesco: (dis)continuidades entre corrientes epidemiológicasIn the present study we analyze if the risk concept of the hegemonic epidemiology changes its nature in purportedly alternative currents as ecoepidemiology and social epidemiology focused in multilevel analysis.We analyze the way this concept is distinguished in every current and its relationship with other epidemiologic key notions as cause. We find that the risk concept and the notion of cause remain relatively unchanged among the different currents even when there is some theoretical discussion about the complexity of multilevel systems and other explanations for the events. Finally we discuss some consequences about the appropriation of the risk concept in multiple interventions in the health field. We indicate that the fragmented nature of the risk concept is problematic because it can make the social aspects of the disease considered only in a functional perspective. Alternatively to that we develop the vulnerability concept as a knowledge framed in a hermeneutical perspective. The vulnerability concept acts as a mediator knowledge between epidemiology and the interventions in the health field. In the same way we point out some concerns from the anthropological field about the simplification of social senses and omission of meanings about the health of the communitiesIn the present study we analyze if the risk concept of the hegemonic epidemiologychanges its nature in purportedly alternative currents as ecoepidemiology and socialepidemiology focused in multilevel analysis.We analyze the way this concept is distinguishedin every current and its relationship with other epidemiologic key notions as cause. We findthat the risk concept and the notion of cause remain relatively unchanged among the differentcurrents even when there is some theoretical discussion about the complexity of multilevelsystems and other explanations for the events. Finally we discuss some consequences aboutthe appropriation of the risk concept in multiple interventions in the health field. We indicatethat the fragmented nature of the risk concept is problematic because it can make thesocial aspects of the disease considered only in a functional perspective. Alternatively to thatwe develop the vulnerability concept as a knowledge framed in a hermeneutical perspective.The vulnerability concept acts as a mediator knowledge between epidemiology and theinterventions in the health field. In the same way we point out some concerns from the anthropologicalfield about the simplification of social senses and omission of meanings aboutthe health of the communities.In the present study we analyze if the risk concept of the hegemonic epidemiology changes its nature in purportedly alternative currents as ecoepidemiology and social epidemiology focused in multilevel analysis.We analyze the way this concept is distinguished in every current and its relationship with other epidemiologic key notions as cause. We find that the risk concept and the notion of cause remain relatively unchanged among the different currents even when there is some theoretical discussion about the complexity of multilevel systems and other explanations for the events. Finally we discuss some consequences about the appropriation of the risk concept in multiple interventions in the health field. We indicate that the fragmented nature of the risk concept is problematic because it can make the social aspects of the disease considered only in a functional perspective. Alternatively to that we develop the vulnerability concept as a knowledge framed in a hermeneutical perspective. The vulnerability concept acts as a mediator knowledge between epidemiology and the interventions in the health field. In the same way we point out some concerns from the anthropological field about the simplification of social senses and omission of meanings about the health of the communitiesFederal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2020-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/6785810.5007/1808-1711.2020v24n3p633Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2020); 633-656Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 24 Núm. 3 (2020); 633-656Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 24 n. 3 (2020); 633-6561808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCspahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/67858/44997Copyright (c) 2021 Carolina Ocampo, Anibal Eduardo Carbajo, Guillermo Folguerahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOcampo, CarolinaCarbajo, Anibal EduardoFolguera, Guillermo2021-09-17T17:35:23Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/67858Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2021-09-17T17:35:23Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents Concepto de riesco: (dis)continuidades entre corrientes epidemiológicas Concepto de riesco: (dis)continuidades entre corrientes epidemiológicas |
title |
Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents |
spellingShingle |
Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents Ocampo, Carolina |
title_short |
Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents |
title_full |
Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents |
title_fullStr |
Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents |
title_sort |
Risk concept: (Dis)continuities between Epidemiological currents |
author |
Ocampo, Carolina |
author_facet |
Ocampo, Carolina Carbajo, Anibal Eduardo Folguera, Guillermo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carbajo, Anibal Eduardo Folguera, Guillermo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ocampo, Carolina Carbajo, Anibal Eduardo Folguera, Guillermo |
description |
In the present study we analyze if the risk concept of the hegemonic epidemiology changes its nature in purportedly alternative currents as ecoepidemiology and social epidemiology focused in multilevel analysis.We analyze the way this concept is distinguished in every current and its relationship with other epidemiologic key notions as cause. We find that the risk concept and the notion of cause remain relatively unchanged among the different currents even when there is some theoretical discussion about the complexity of multilevel systems and other explanations for the events. Finally we discuss some consequences about the appropriation of the risk concept in multiple interventions in the health field. We indicate that the fragmented nature of the risk concept is problematic because it can make the social aspects of the disease considered only in a functional perspective. Alternatively to that we develop the vulnerability concept as a knowledge framed in a hermeneutical perspective. The vulnerability concept acts as a mediator knowledge between epidemiology and the interventions in the health field. In the same way we point out some concerns from the anthropological field about the simplification of social senses and omission of meanings about the health of the communities |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/67858 10.5007/1808-1711.2020v24n3p633 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/67858 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2020v24n3p633 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/67858/44997 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Carolina Ocampo, Anibal Eduardo Carbajo, Guillermo Folguera http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Carolina Ocampo, Anibal Eduardo Carbajo, Guillermo Folguera http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2020); 633-656 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 24 Núm. 3 (2020); 633-656 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 24 n. 3 (2020); 633-656 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435113831923712 |