Descartes and Cassirer: Unity and methodological discontinuity of substance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/91313 |
Resumo: | This article studies the methodological foundations of Cartesian work as a philosophical antecedent in the structuring of ‘function’ and ‘symbolic form’ in Cassirer’s work. This incorporation would have been developed through two moments: first, it is recognized the value of the scientific and mathematical studies proposed by the Frenchman as an indispensable way for the study of the natural substances of the world; second, it is criticized the lack of methodological continuity used in the study of the human substance. To this end, a comparative analysis is made between the works of Descartes and those of Cassirer. |
id |
UFSC-5_a4b97ee66e74bf935cb3a7811e238c4c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/91313 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Descartes and Cassirer: Unity and methodological discontinuity of substanceDescartes y Cassirer: Unidad y discontinuidad metodológica de la sustanciaFunctionLogical UnityScienceCassirerDescartesFunciónUnidad LógicaCienciaCassirerDescartesThis article studies the methodological foundations of Cartesian work as a philosophical antecedent in the structuring of ‘function’ and ‘symbolic form’ in Cassirer’s work. This incorporation would have been developed through two moments: first, it is recognized the value of the scientific and mathematical studies proposed by the Frenchman as an indispensable way for the study of the natural substances of the world; second, it is criticized the lack of methodological continuity used in the study of the human substance. To this end, a comparative analysis is made between the works of Descartes and those of Cassirer.El presente artículo estudia los fundamentos metodológicos de la obra cartesiana como antecedente filosófico en la estructuración de la ‘función’ y el ‘símbolo’ en la obra de Cassirer. Dicha incorporación se habría desarrollado a través de dos momentos: en el primero se reconoce el valor de los estudios científicos y matemáticos propuestos por el francés como una vía indispensable para el estudio de las sustancias naturales del mundo; el segundo, critica la falta de continuidad metodológica empleada en el estudio de la sustancia humana. Para tales fines, se elabora un análisis comparativo entre las obras de Descartes y las de Cassirer.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2023-12-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/9131310.5007/1808-1711.2023.e91313Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2023); 497-517Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 Núm. 3 (2023); 497-517Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 27 n. 3 (2023); 497-5171808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCspahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/91313/55063Copyright (c) 2023 Gustavo Esparzahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGustavo Esparza2023-12-27T11:00:25Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/91313Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2023-12-27T11:00:25Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Descartes and Cassirer: Unity and methodological discontinuity of substance Descartes y Cassirer: Unidad y discontinuidad metodológica de la sustancia |
title |
Descartes and Cassirer: Unity and methodological discontinuity of substance |
spellingShingle |
Descartes and Cassirer: Unity and methodological discontinuity of substance Gustavo Esparza Function Logical Unity Science Cassirer Descartes Función Unidad Lógica Ciencia Cassirer Descartes |
title_short |
Descartes and Cassirer: Unity and methodological discontinuity of substance |
title_full |
Descartes and Cassirer: Unity and methodological discontinuity of substance |
title_fullStr |
Descartes and Cassirer: Unity and methodological discontinuity of substance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Descartes and Cassirer: Unity and methodological discontinuity of substance |
title_sort |
Descartes and Cassirer: Unity and methodological discontinuity of substance |
author |
Gustavo Esparza |
author_facet |
Gustavo Esparza |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gustavo Esparza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Function Logical Unity Science Cassirer Descartes Función Unidad Lógica Ciencia Cassirer Descartes |
topic |
Function Logical Unity Science Cassirer Descartes Función Unidad Lógica Ciencia Cassirer Descartes |
description |
This article studies the methodological foundations of Cartesian work as a philosophical antecedent in the structuring of ‘function’ and ‘symbolic form’ in Cassirer’s work. This incorporation would have been developed through two moments: first, it is recognized the value of the scientific and mathematical studies proposed by the Frenchman as an indispensable way for the study of the natural substances of the world; second, it is criticized the lack of methodological continuity used in the study of the human substance. To this end, a comparative analysis is made between the works of Descartes and those of Cassirer. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/91313 10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e91313 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/91313 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e91313 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/91313/55063 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Gustavo Esparza http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Gustavo Esparza http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2023); 497-517 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 Núm. 3 (2023); 497-517 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 27 n. 3 (2023); 497-517 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1799875201235681280 |