On validity paradoxes and (some of) their solutions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bezerra, Edson
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/92106
Resumo: Many semantic theories become trivial when extended with a naïve validity predicate due to the validity paradoxes. The non-classical semantic theories are the ones that allegedly preserve the naïveté of the validity predicate while being capable of avoiding the validity paradoxes. This blocking, on the other hand, usually comes at a high cost. In this paper, we argue that the pre-theoretical notion of validity that the naïve validity predicate intends to capture is unattainable.
id UFSC-5_c8421ccebac4e88762270efe52c839be
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/92106
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling On validity paradoxes and (some of) their solutionsParadoxesPredicatesNon-Classical LogicLogical ValidityPhilosophy of LogicMany semantic theories become trivial when extended with a naïve validity predicate due to the validity paradoxes. The non-classical semantic theories are the ones that allegedly preserve the naïveté of the validity predicate while being capable of avoiding the validity paradoxes. This blocking, on the other hand, usually comes at a high cost. In this paper, we argue that the pre-theoretical notion of validity that the naïve validity predicate intends to capture is unattainable.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2023-12-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/9210610.5007/1808-1711.2023.e92106Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2023); 519-538Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 Núm. 3 (2023); 519-538Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 27 n. 3 (2023); 519-5381808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/92106/55064Copyright (c) 2023 Edson Bezerrahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBezerra, Edson2023-12-27T11:00:23Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/92106Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2023-12-27T11:00:23Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On validity paradoxes and (some of) their solutions
title On validity paradoxes and (some of) their solutions
spellingShingle On validity paradoxes and (some of) their solutions
Bezerra, Edson
Paradoxes
Predicates
Non-Classical Logic
Logical Validity
Philosophy of Logic
title_short On validity paradoxes and (some of) their solutions
title_full On validity paradoxes and (some of) their solutions
title_fullStr On validity paradoxes and (some of) their solutions
title_full_unstemmed On validity paradoxes and (some of) their solutions
title_sort On validity paradoxes and (some of) their solutions
author Bezerra, Edson
author_facet Bezerra, Edson
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bezerra, Edson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Paradoxes
Predicates
Non-Classical Logic
Logical Validity
Philosophy of Logic
topic Paradoxes
Predicates
Non-Classical Logic
Logical Validity
Philosophy of Logic
description Many semantic theories become trivial when extended with a naïve validity predicate due to the validity paradoxes. The non-classical semantic theories are the ones that allegedly preserve the naïveté of the validity predicate while being capable of avoiding the validity paradoxes. This blocking, on the other hand, usually comes at a high cost. In this paper, we argue that the pre-theoretical notion of validity that the naïve validity predicate intends to capture is unattainable.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/92106
10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e92106
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/92106
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e92106
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/92106/55064
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Edson Bezerra
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Edson Bezerra
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2023); 519-538
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 Núm. 3 (2023); 519-538
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 27 n. 3 (2023); 519-538
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1799875201239875584

Registros relacionados