Davidson on the impossibility of thought without language: comments on Diana I. Pérez
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p489 |
Resumo: | Diana Pérez (2005) criticizes Davidson’s argument for the thesis that there is no thought without language, and offers an alternative defense of that thesis on the basis of empirical studies on developmental psychology. In this comment I argue that more recent studies do not seem to affect Davidson’s argument in the way Pérez suggests, and that her alternative defense of the thesis that there is no thought without language is insufficient. At the end, I offer a sketch of how a weaker and more tenable version of the argument could be articulated. |
id |
UFSC-5_f3e5b0aab18aeb2ac384a485fc2aa22f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/28540 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Davidson on the impossibility of thought without language: comments on Diana I. PérezDavidson on the impossibility of thought without language: comments on Diana I. PérezDiana Pérez (2005) criticizes Davidson’s argument for the thesis that there is no thought without language, and offers an alternative defense of that thesis on the basis of empirical studies on developmental psychology. In this comment I argue that more recent studies do not seem to affect Davidson’s argument in the way Pérez suggests, and that her alternative defense of the thesis that there is no thought without language is insufficient. At the end, I offer a sketch of how a weaker and more tenable version of the argument could be articulated.Diana Pérez (2005) critica o argumento de Davidson em favor da tese de que não há pensamento sem linguagem e oferece uma defesa alternativa dessa mesma tese com base em estudos de psicologia do desenvolvimento. Neste comentário argumento que estudos mais recentes não parecem afetar o argumento de Davidson da maneira sugerida por Pérez e que sua defesa alternativa da tese de que não há pensamento sem linguagem é insuficiente. Ao final, ofereço um esboço de como uma versão mais fraca e defensável do argumento poderia ser articulada.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2012-09-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p48910.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p489Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2012); 489-494Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 Núm. 3 (2012); 489-494Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 16 n. 3 (2012); 489-4941808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p489/25621Copyright (c) 2021 Marcelo Fischborninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFischborn, Marcelo2019-09-13T08:41:59Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/28540Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-13T08:41:59Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Davidson on the impossibility of thought without language: comments on Diana I. Pérez Davidson on the impossibility of thought without language: comments on Diana I. Pérez |
title |
Davidson on the impossibility of thought without language: comments on Diana I. Pérez |
spellingShingle |
Davidson on the impossibility of thought without language: comments on Diana I. Pérez Fischborn, Marcelo |
title_short |
Davidson on the impossibility of thought without language: comments on Diana I. Pérez |
title_full |
Davidson on the impossibility of thought without language: comments on Diana I. Pérez |
title_fullStr |
Davidson on the impossibility of thought without language: comments on Diana I. Pérez |
title_full_unstemmed |
Davidson on the impossibility of thought without language: comments on Diana I. Pérez |
title_sort |
Davidson on the impossibility of thought without language: comments on Diana I. Pérez |
author |
Fischborn, Marcelo |
author_facet |
Fischborn, Marcelo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fischborn, Marcelo |
description |
Diana Pérez (2005) criticizes Davidson’s argument for the thesis that there is no thought without language, and offers an alternative defense of that thesis on the basis of empirical studies on developmental psychology. In this comment I argue that more recent studies do not seem to affect Davidson’s argument in the way Pérez suggests, and that her alternative defense of the thesis that there is no thought without language is insufficient. At the end, I offer a sketch of how a weaker and more tenable version of the argument could be articulated. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p489 10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p489 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p489 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p489 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p489/25621 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Marcelo Fischborn info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Marcelo Fischborn |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2012); 489-494 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 Núm. 3 (2012); 489-494 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 16 n. 3 (2012); 489-494 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435112530640896 |