The don’t “do-it-yourself” of education: teaching and learning literature as production of collective knowledge
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1999 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ilha do Desterro |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/8162 |
Resumo: | There has been some uproar about the canon, what constitutes it and what it constitutes, how it is instituted and its validity in the teaching of literature.1 As important as thoughts about what literature should be taught are discussions on how it could be taught. Techniques on teaching reading and foreign language in general have a lot to tell us, but not enough. When we come to the study of literary texts, textual linguistics, discourse analysis, theories of interpretation, all are found wanting; hermeneutics and reader-response criticism have investigated the production/discovery of meaning, problematised the locus of significance, questioned the limits of interpretation, the roles of the reader, of the author, of culture, history and society in the process of reading comprehension/interpretation. All this has a lot to do with literature, but the teaching of foreign literature and what happens in literature classrooms still lacks careful study. |
id |
UFSC-9_507215882bd9c56319544f048d8fc094 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/8162 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-9 |
network_name_str |
Ilha do Desterro |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The don’t “do-it-yourself” of education: teaching and learning literature as production of collective knowledgeThe don’t “do-it-yourself” of education: teaching and learning literature as production of collective knowledgeThere has been some uproar about the canon, what constitutes it and what it constitutes, how it is instituted and its validity in the teaching of literature.1 As important as thoughts about what literature should be taught are discussions on how it could be taught. Techniques on teaching reading and foreign language in general have a lot to tell us, but not enough. When we come to the study of literary texts, textual linguistics, discourse analysis, theories of interpretation, all are found wanting; hermeneutics and reader-response criticism have investigated the production/discovery of meaning, problematised the locus of significance, questioned the limits of interpretation, the roles of the reader, of the author, of culture, history and society in the process of reading comprehension/interpretation. All this has a lot to do with literature, but the teaching of foreign literature and what happens in literature classrooms still lacks careful study.There has been some uproar about the canon, what constitutes it and what it constitutes, how it is instituted and its validity in the teaching of literature.1 As important as thoughts about what literature should be taught are discussions on how it could be taught. Techniques on teaching reading and foreign language in general have a lot to tell us, but not enough. When we come to the study of literary texts, textual linguistics, discourse analysis, theories of interpretation, all are found wanting; hermeneutics and reader-response criticism have investigated the production/discovery of meaning, problematised the locus of significance, questioned the limits of interpretation, the roles of the reader, of the author, of culture, history and society in the process of reading comprehension/interpretation. All this has a lot to do with literature, but the teaching of foreign literature and what happens in literature classrooms still lacks careful study.UFSC1999-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/8162Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; No. 37 (1999); 049-059Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; n. 37 (1999); 049-0592175-80260101-4846reponame:Ilha do Desterroinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/8162/7517Copyright (c) 1999 Clarissa Menezes Jordãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJordão, Clarissa Menezes2022-12-07T11:23:12Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/8162Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterroPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/oaiilha@cce.ufsc.br||corseuil@cce.ufsc.br||ilhadodesterro@gmail.com2175-80260101-4846opendoar:2022-12-07T11:23:12Ilha do Desterro - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The don’t “do-it-yourself” of education: teaching and learning literature as production of collective knowledge The don’t “do-it-yourself” of education: teaching and learning literature as production of collective knowledge |
title |
The don’t “do-it-yourself” of education: teaching and learning literature as production of collective knowledge |
spellingShingle |
The don’t “do-it-yourself” of education: teaching and learning literature as production of collective knowledge Jordão, Clarissa Menezes |
title_short |
The don’t “do-it-yourself” of education: teaching and learning literature as production of collective knowledge |
title_full |
The don’t “do-it-yourself” of education: teaching and learning literature as production of collective knowledge |
title_fullStr |
The don’t “do-it-yourself” of education: teaching and learning literature as production of collective knowledge |
title_full_unstemmed |
The don’t “do-it-yourself” of education: teaching and learning literature as production of collective knowledge |
title_sort |
The don’t “do-it-yourself” of education: teaching and learning literature as production of collective knowledge |
author |
Jordão, Clarissa Menezes |
author_facet |
Jordão, Clarissa Menezes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Jordão, Clarissa Menezes |
description |
There has been some uproar about the canon, what constitutes it and what it constitutes, how it is instituted and its validity in the teaching of literature.1 As important as thoughts about what literature should be taught are discussions on how it could be taught. Techniques on teaching reading and foreign language in general have a lot to tell us, but not enough. When we come to the study of literary texts, textual linguistics, discourse analysis, theories of interpretation, all are found wanting; hermeneutics and reader-response criticism have investigated the production/discovery of meaning, problematised the locus of significance, questioned the limits of interpretation, the roles of the reader, of the author, of culture, history and society in the process of reading comprehension/interpretation. All this has a lot to do with literature, but the teaching of foreign literature and what happens in literature classrooms still lacks careful study. |
publishDate |
1999 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1999-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/8162 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/8162 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/8162/7517 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 1999 Clarissa Menezes Jordão http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 1999 Clarissa Menezes Jordão http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; No. 37 (1999); 049-059 Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; n. 37 (1999); 049-059 2175-8026 0101-4846 reponame:Ilha do Desterro instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Ilha do Desterro |
collection |
Ilha do Desterro |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ilha do Desterro - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ilha@cce.ufsc.br||corseuil@cce.ufsc.br||ilhadodesterro@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799875275178115072 |