Prevalence and mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in samples of surveillance swabs from patients in a hospital unit in Nova Prata, RS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Saúde (Santa Maria) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistasaude/article/view/71277 |
Resumo: | Objective: To analyze the prevalence and the mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance of isolated bacteria (rectal, nasal and skin samples) of patients in a hospital unit in the city of Nova Prata, RS. Methods: Data were collected from 377 reports from the Serviço de Controle de Infecção Hospitalar (SCIH) issued between January 2018 and December 2021 available in the electronic system of a clinical analysis laboratory located in Nova Prata, RS. Data included the year of sample collection, sample type, microorganisms isolated and their resistance mechanisms. Reports that contained information regarding the initiation of the patient's treatment with antimicrobials were excluded. Results: Overall, the prevalence of positive cases corresponding to isolated bacteria was 39.8% (150/377) over the entire study period. The lowest and highest rates were verified in the years 2018 and 2020, respectively, and in 2018, no sample analyzed was positive. In 2019, 44% (4/9) of the samples were positive, and the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) was the most prevalent, being isolated from 75% of the positive samples (3/4). In 2020, 43% (53/122) of the samples were positive, with the Escherichia coli producer of β-lactamases of extended-spectrum (ESBL) present in 32% (17/53), followed by Enterobacter cloacae ESBL and K. pneumoniae carbapenemase. In the year 2021, 40% (93/230) of the samples had a positive result, and the E. coli ESBL was the most prevalent, present in 57% (53/93) of positive samples. Finally, a higher prevalence of positive samples collected from the rectal and skin sites was found. Final considerations: The present study showed an increase in resistant bacteria in 2020 and 2021, which coincides with the covid-19 pandemic. Thus, it is essential to implement procedures that contribute to improving the control of resistant microorganisms in the municipality. |
id |
UFSM-14_350fb82eed33622475f12795f758f744 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/71277 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-14 |
network_name_str |
Saúde (Santa Maria) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Prevalence and mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in samples of surveillance swabs from patients in a hospital unit in Nova Prata, RSPREVALÊNCIA E MECANISMOS DE RESISTÊNCIA ANTIMICROBIANA EM AMOSTRAS DE SWABS DE VIGILÂNCIA DE PACIENTES INTERNADOS EM UMA UNIDADE HOSPITALAR DE NOVA PRATA, RSAntimicrobialsHospital InfectionBacterial ResistanceAntimicrobianosInfecção HospitalarResistência bacterianaObjective: To analyze the prevalence and the mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance of isolated bacteria (rectal, nasal and skin samples) of patients in a hospital unit in the city of Nova Prata, RS. Methods: Data were collected from 377 reports from the Serviço de Controle de Infecção Hospitalar (SCIH) issued between January 2018 and December 2021 available in the electronic system of a clinical analysis laboratory located in Nova Prata, RS. Data included the year of sample collection, sample type, microorganisms isolated and their resistance mechanisms. Reports that contained information regarding the initiation of the patient's treatment with antimicrobials were excluded. Results: Overall, the prevalence of positive cases corresponding to isolated bacteria was 39.8% (150/377) over the entire study period. The lowest and highest rates were verified in the years 2018 and 2020, respectively, and in 2018, no sample analyzed was positive. In 2019, 44% (4/9) of the samples were positive, and the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) was the most prevalent, being isolated from 75% of the positive samples (3/4). In 2020, 43% (53/122) of the samples were positive, with the Escherichia coli producer of β-lactamases of extended-spectrum (ESBL) present in 32% (17/53), followed by Enterobacter cloacae ESBL and K. pneumoniae carbapenemase. In the year 2021, 40% (93/230) of the samples had a positive result, and the E. coli ESBL was the most prevalent, present in 57% (53/93) of positive samples. Finally, a higher prevalence of positive samples collected from the rectal and skin sites was found. Final considerations: The present study showed an increase in resistant bacteria in 2020 and 2021, which coincides with the covid-19 pandemic. Thus, it is essential to implement procedures that contribute to improving the control of resistant microorganisms in the municipality.Objetivo: Analisar a prevalência e os mecanismos de resistência antimicrobiana de bactérias isoladas em amostras (das regiões retal, nasal e pele) de pacientes internados em uma unidade hospitalar de Nova Prata, RS. Métodos: Foram coletados dados de 377 laudos do Serviço de Controle de Infecção Hospitalar (SCIH) emitidos entre janeiro de 2018 e dezembro de 2021 disponíveis no sistema eletrônico de um laboratório de análises clínicas localizado em Nova Prata, RS. Os dados incluíram ano da coleta da amostra, tipo da amostra, microrganismos isolados e seus mecanismos de resistência. Os laudos que continham informações referentes ao início do tratamento do paciente com antimicrobianos foram excluídos. Resultados: No geral, a prevalência de casos positivos correspondentes a bactérias isoladas foi de 39,8% (150/377) em todo o período de estudo. Os menores e maiores índices foram verificados nos anos de 2018 e 2020, respectivamente, sendo que em 2018, nenhuma amostra analisada foi positiva. Em 2019, 44% (4/9) das amostras foram positivas, sendo a Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) a mais prevalente, isolada de 75% (3/4) das amostras positivas. Em 2020, 43% (53/122) das amostras foram positivas, sendo a Escherichia coli produtora de β-lactamases de espectro estendido (ESBL) presente em 32% (17/53), seguida de Enterobacter cloacae ESBL e de K. pneumoniae KPC. No ano de 2021, 40% (93/230) das amostras tiveram resultado positivo, sendo a E. coli ESBL a mais prevalente, presente em 57% (53/93) das amostras positivas. Por fim, foi verificada uma maior prevalência de amostras positivas coletadas nos sítios retal e de pele. Considerações finais: O presente estudo evidenciou o aumento de bactérias resistentes em 2020 e 2021, período que coincide com a pandemia de covid-19. Desta forma, é indispensável a implementação de condutas que contribuam para a melhoria do controle de microrganismos resistentes no município.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2023-03-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistasaude/article/view/7127710.5902/2236583471277Saúde (Santa Maria); Revista Saúde (Santa Maria). 2022, v. 48, n. 1Saúde (Santa Maria); Revista Saúde (Santa Maria). 2022, v. 48, n. 12236-58340103-4499reponame:Saúde (Santa Maria)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistasaude/article/view/71277/51788Copyright (c) 2023 Genara Cerato Todescatto, Alessandra Lago Salame, Thaís Dalzochioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCerato Todescatto, Genara Lago Salame, AlessandraDalzochio, Thaís2023-03-22T13:03:38Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/71277Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistasaudePUBhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistasaude/oairevistasaude.ufsm@gmail.com || amanda.revsaude@gmail.com || beatriz.revsaude@gmail.com2236-58342236-5834opendoar:2023-03-22T13:03:38Saúde (Santa Maria) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prevalence and mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in samples of surveillance swabs from patients in a hospital unit in Nova Prata, RS PREVALÊNCIA E MECANISMOS DE RESISTÊNCIA ANTIMICROBIANA EM AMOSTRAS DE SWABS DE VIGILÂNCIA DE PACIENTES INTERNADOS EM UMA UNIDADE HOSPITALAR DE NOVA PRATA, RS |
title |
Prevalence and mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in samples of surveillance swabs from patients in a hospital unit in Nova Prata, RS |
spellingShingle |
Prevalence and mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in samples of surveillance swabs from patients in a hospital unit in Nova Prata, RS Cerato Todescatto, Genara Antimicrobials Hospital Infection Bacterial Resistance Antimicrobianos Infecção Hospitalar Resistência bacteriana |
title_short |
Prevalence and mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in samples of surveillance swabs from patients in a hospital unit in Nova Prata, RS |
title_full |
Prevalence and mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in samples of surveillance swabs from patients in a hospital unit in Nova Prata, RS |
title_fullStr |
Prevalence and mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in samples of surveillance swabs from patients in a hospital unit in Nova Prata, RS |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prevalence and mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in samples of surveillance swabs from patients in a hospital unit in Nova Prata, RS |
title_sort |
Prevalence and mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in samples of surveillance swabs from patients in a hospital unit in Nova Prata, RS |
author |
Cerato Todescatto, Genara |
author_facet |
Cerato Todescatto, Genara Lago Salame, Alessandra Dalzochio, Thaís |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lago Salame, Alessandra Dalzochio, Thaís |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cerato Todescatto, Genara Lago Salame, Alessandra Dalzochio, Thaís |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antimicrobials Hospital Infection Bacterial Resistance Antimicrobianos Infecção Hospitalar Resistência bacteriana |
topic |
Antimicrobials Hospital Infection Bacterial Resistance Antimicrobianos Infecção Hospitalar Resistência bacteriana |
description |
Objective: To analyze the prevalence and the mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance of isolated bacteria (rectal, nasal and skin samples) of patients in a hospital unit in the city of Nova Prata, RS. Methods: Data were collected from 377 reports from the Serviço de Controle de Infecção Hospitalar (SCIH) issued between January 2018 and December 2021 available in the electronic system of a clinical analysis laboratory located in Nova Prata, RS. Data included the year of sample collection, sample type, microorganisms isolated and their resistance mechanisms. Reports that contained information regarding the initiation of the patient's treatment with antimicrobials were excluded. Results: Overall, the prevalence of positive cases corresponding to isolated bacteria was 39.8% (150/377) over the entire study period. The lowest and highest rates were verified in the years 2018 and 2020, respectively, and in 2018, no sample analyzed was positive. In 2019, 44% (4/9) of the samples were positive, and the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) was the most prevalent, being isolated from 75% of the positive samples (3/4). In 2020, 43% (53/122) of the samples were positive, with the Escherichia coli producer of β-lactamases of extended-spectrum (ESBL) present in 32% (17/53), followed by Enterobacter cloacae ESBL and K. pneumoniae carbapenemase. In the year 2021, 40% (93/230) of the samples had a positive result, and the E. coli ESBL was the most prevalent, present in 57% (53/93) of positive samples. Finally, a higher prevalence of positive samples collected from the rectal and skin sites was found. Final considerations: The present study showed an increase in resistant bacteria in 2020 and 2021, which coincides with the covid-19 pandemic. Thus, it is essential to implement procedures that contribute to improving the control of resistant microorganisms in the municipality. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistasaude/article/view/71277 10.5902/2236583471277 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistasaude/article/view/71277 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/2236583471277 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistasaude/article/view/71277/51788 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Genara Cerato Todescatto, Alessandra Lago Salame, Thaís Dalzochio info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Genara Cerato Todescatto, Alessandra Lago Salame, Thaís Dalzochio |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Saúde (Santa Maria); Revista Saúde (Santa Maria). 2022, v. 48, n. 1 Saúde (Santa Maria); Revista Saúde (Santa Maria). 2022, v. 48, n. 1 2236-5834 0103-4499 reponame:Saúde (Santa Maria) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Saúde (Santa Maria) |
collection |
Saúde (Santa Maria) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Saúde (Santa Maria) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistasaude.ufsm@gmail.com || amanda.revsaude@gmail.com || beatriz.revsaude@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799944002756149248 |