THE COOPERATIVE PROCESS AS A PRADAIGM FOR THE REDIMENSIONING OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITY AND THE OVERCOMING OF HARMFUL PRACTICES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW MODEL DECISION BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Rosalina Moitta Pinto da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/36598
Resumo: The paper analyzes the structural changes in the study and design of civil procedural science, in order to highlight the deviations that have occurred in our country that led to the increase of judicial protagonism and the need to build a new process paradigm to combat harmful practices judicial activism. Using as a methodological option bibliographical research and the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice, we start with the study of neoconstitutionalism, as a theoretical framework decisive for structural changes in procedural science, which, in our country, ended up generating a judicial role. The following is an analysis of the search for a new procedural model capable of overcoming judicial activism. It is concluded, with support in the most recent judgments of the Superior Court of Justice, that the cooperative process model, provoking a paradigm shift and resizing in the role of the judge, has proven to be effective in combating the harmful practices of activism practiced by some judges.
id UFSM-17_796fed237f5ae10ed4bb68ad74826798
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36598
network_acronym_str UFSM-17
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling THE COOPERATIVE PROCESS AS A PRADAIGM FOR THE REDIMENSIONING OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITY AND THE OVERCOMING OF HARMFUL PRACTICES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW MODEL DECISION BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICEEL PROCESO COOPERATIVO COMO PARADIGMA PARA REDIMENSIONAR LA ACTIVIDAD DEL JUEZ Y SUPERAR LAS PRÁCTICAS PERJUDICIALES DEL ACTIVISMO JUDICIAL: APLICACIÓN DEL NUEVO ARQUETIPO DE DECISIÓN POR LA CORTE SUPERIOR DE JUSTICIAO PROCESSO COOPERATIVO COMO PARADIGMA PARA O REDIMENSIONAMENTO DA ATIVIDADE DO JULGADOR E SUPERAÇÃO DO ATIVISMO JUDICIAL: APLICAÇÃO DO NOVO ARQUÉTIPO DECISÓRIO PELO SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇAAtivismo judicialneoconstitucionalismoneoprocessualismoprocesso cooperativoThe paper analyzes the structural changes in the study and design of civil procedural science, in order to highlight the deviations that have occurred in our country that led to the increase of judicial protagonism and the need to build a new process paradigm to combat harmful practices judicial activism. Using as a methodological option bibliographical research and the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice, we start with the study of neoconstitutionalism, as a theoretical framework decisive for structural changes in procedural science, which, in our country, ended up generating a judicial role. The following is an analysis of the search for a new procedural model capable of overcoming judicial activism. It is concluded, with support in the most recent judgments of the Superior Court of Justice, that the cooperative process model, provoking a paradigm shift and resizing in the role of the judge, has proven to be effective in combating the harmful practices of activism practiced by some judges.El trabajo analiza los cambios estructurales en el estudio y dimensionamiento de la ciencia procesal civil, con el fin de resaltar los desvíos ocurridos en nuestro país que llevaron al aumento del protagonismo judicial y la necesidad de construir un nuevo paradigma de proceso para superar las prácticas nocivas del activismo judicial. Utilizando la investigación bibliográfica y la jurisprudencia de la Corte Superior de Justicia como opción metodológica, partimos del estudio del neoconstitucionalismo como marco teórico decisivo para los cambios estructurales de la ciencia procesal, que, en nuestro país, terminaron generando un rol judicial. A continuación, se analiza la búsqueda de un nuevo modelo procesal capaz de superar el activismo judicial. Se concluye, sustentado en las más recientes sentencias de la Corte Superior de Justicia, que el modelo de proceso cooperativo, provocando un cambio de paradigma y un redimensionamiento del rol del juez, ha demostrado ser efectivo en el combate a las prácticas nocivas del activismo practicado por algunos jueces.O trabalho analisa as mudanças estruturais no estudo e no dimensionamento da ciência processual civil, para salientar os desvios ocorridos em nosso país que levaram ao incremento do protagonismo judicial e à necessidade de construção de um novo paradigma de processo para superar as práticas nocivas do ativismo judicial. Utilizando-se como opção metodológica a pesquisa bibliográfica e a jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, parte-se do estudo do neoconstitucionalismo como marco teórico decisivo para as mudanças estruturais da ciência processual, o qual, em nosso país, acabou gerando um protagonismo judicial. A seguir, analisa-se a busca de um novo modelo processual capaz de superar o ativismo judicial. Conclui-se, com suporte nos julgamentos mais recentes do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, que o modelo cooperativo de processo, provocando uma mudança de paradigma e um redimensionamento no papel do juiz, tem-se mostrado eficaz para a combater as práticas nocivas do ativismo praticado por alguns juízes.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2021-05-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/3659810.5902/1981369436598Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM; v. 15 n. 3 (2020); e365981981-36941981-3694reponame:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/36598/pdfCopyright (c) 2020 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSMinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Rosalina Moitta Pinto da2022-10-03T19:00:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36598Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/revistadireito/PUBhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/revistadireito/oairevistadireito@ufsm.br||advrso@gmail.com1981-36941981-3694opendoar:2022-10-03T19:00:07Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE COOPERATIVE PROCESS AS A PRADAIGM FOR THE REDIMENSIONING OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITY AND THE OVERCOMING OF HARMFUL PRACTICES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW MODEL DECISION BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
EL PROCESO COOPERATIVO COMO PARADIGMA PARA REDIMENSIONAR LA ACTIVIDAD DEL JUEZ Y SUPERAR LAS PRÁCTICAS PERJUDICIALES DEL ACTIVISMO JUDICIAL: APLICACIÓN DEL NUEVO ARQUETIPO DE DECISIÓN POR LA CORTE SUPERIOR DE JUSTICIA
O PROCESSO COOPERATIVO COMO PARADIGMA PARA O REDIMENSIONAMENTO DA ATIVIDADE DO JULGADOR E SUPERAÇÃO DO ATIVISMO JUDICIAL: APLICAÇÃO DO NOVO ARQUÉTIPO DECISÓRIO PELO SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA
title THE COOPERATIVE PROCESS AS A PRADAIGM FOR THE REDIMENSIONING OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITY AND THE OVERCOMING OF HARMFUL PRACTICES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW MODEL DECISION BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
spellingShingle THE COOPERATIVE PROCESS AS A PRADAIGM FOR THE REDIMENSIONING OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITY AND THE OVERCOMING OF HARMFUL PRACTICES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW MODEL DECISION BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
Costa, Rosalina Moitta Pinto da
Ativismo judicial
neoconstitucionalismo
neoprocessualismo
processo cooperativo
title_short THE COOPERATIVE PROCESS AS A PRADAIGM FOR THE REDIMENSIONING OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITY AND THE OVERCOMING OF HARMFUL PRACTICES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW MODEL DECISION BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
title_full THE COOPERATIVE PROCESS AS A PRADAIGM FOR THE REDIMENSIONING OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITY AND THE OVERCOMING OF HARMFUL PRACTICES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW MODEL DECISION BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
title_fullStr THE COOPERATIVE PROCESS AS A PRADAIGM FOR THE REDIMENSIONING OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITY AND THE OVERCOMING OF HARMFUL PRACTICES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW MODEL DECISION BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
title_full_unstemmed THE COOPERATIVE PROCESS AS A PRADAIGM FOR THE REDIMENSIONING OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITY AND THE OVERCOMING OF HARMFUL PRACTICES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW MODEL DECISION BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
title_sort THE COOPERATIVE PROCESS AS A PRADAIGM FOR THE REDIMENSIONING OF THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITY AND THE OVERCOMING OF HARMFUL PRACTICES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW MODEL DECISION BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
author Costa, Rosalina Moitta Pinto da
author_facet Costa, Rosalina Moitta Pinto da
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Rosalina Moitta Pinto da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ativismo judicial
neoconstitucionalismo
neoprocessualismo
processo cooperativo
topic Ativismo judicial
neoconstitucionalismo
neoprocessualismo
processo cooperativo
description The paper analyzes the structural changes in the study and design of civil procedural science, in order to highlight the deviations that have occurred in our country that led to the increase of judicial protagonism and the need to build a new process paradigm to combat harmful practices judicial activism. Using as a methodological option bibliographical research and the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice, we start with the study of neoconstitutionalism, as a theoretical framework decisive for structural changes in procedural science, which, in our country, ended up generating a judicial role. The following is an analysis of the search for a new procedural model capable of overcoming judicial activism. It is concluded, with support in the most recent judgments of the Superior Court of Justice, that the cooperative process model, provoking a paradigm shift and resizing in the role of the judge, has proven to be effective in combating the harmful practices of activism practiced by some judges.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/36598
10.5902/1981369436598
url http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/36598
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1981369436598
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/36598/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM; v. 15 n. 3 (2020); e36598
1981-3694
1981-3694
reponame:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
collection Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadireito@ufsm.br||advrso@gmail.com
_version_ 1799944063911198720

Registros relacionados