Ambiguity as a rhetorical principle in Shakespeare - Much Adoabout Nothing (c. 1598) and Othello (c. 1604): case studies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Letras (Santa Maria. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/letras/article/view/56900 |
Resumo: | The ambiguity ascribed to Shakespeare was a recent subject of academic scrutiny. This article investigates the history of modern political thought scholarship for that phenomenon. According to this proposition, polyphony would derive from the use of the rhetorical technique known as in utramque partem, an approach of two opposite sides of the same topic, in order to stage delicate political questions. Using a pair of plays written in the context of intense discussions about war and peace in London as case studies, I seek to explore how Shakespeare represented the Anglo-Spanish conflict through antagonistic perspectives. |
id |
UFSM-19_fcd83baec11a5237c8dc70e56c1f3131 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/56900 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-19 |
network_name_str |
Letras (Santa Maria. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ambiguity as a rhetorical principle in Shakespeare - Much Adoabout Nothing (c. 1598) and Othello (c. 1604): case studiesA ambiguidade como princípio retórico em Shakespeare - Muito Barulho por Nada (c. 1598) e Otelo (c. 1604): estudos de casoShakespeareAmbiguityRhetoricSpainAmbiguidadeShakespeareEspanhaRetóricaThe ambiguity ascribed to Shakespeare was a recent subject of academic scrutiny. This article investigates the history of modern political thought scholarship for that phenomenon. According to this proposition, polyphony would derive from the use of the rhetorical technique known as in utramque partem, an approach of two opposite sides of the same topic, in order to stage delicate political questions. Using a pair of plays written in the context of intense discussions about war and peace in London as case studies, I seek to explore how Shakespeare represented the Anglo-Spanish conflict through antagonistic perspectives.A conhecida ambiguidade atribuída aos textos de Shakespeare tem sido tema de exames. Este artigo investiga determinada explicação para o fenômeno creditada a alguns estudiosos da História do Pensamento Político Moderno. Segundo propõem, a polifonia em certas obras decorreria do uso pelo dramaturgo da técnica retórica in utramque partem, abordagem de dois lados opostos de um mesmo tópico, na dramatização de questões políticas delicadas. Utilizaremos como estudos de caso duas peças escritas em contexto de intensas discussões sobre guerra e paz em Londres, buscando compreender como Shakespeare representou o assunto por meio de perspectivas antagônicas. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2022-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/letras/article/view/5690010.5902/2176148556900Letras; Edição Especial - 2/2020: Teatro Elisabetano e Jacobino: estudos textuais, teatrais e críticos; 93-1082176-14851519-3985reponame:Letras (Santa Maria. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/letras/article/view/56900/pdfCopyright (c) 2021 Letrashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardoso, Ricardo2022-11-08T18:41:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/56900Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/letrasPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/letras/oai||gil.negreiros@ufsm.br|| periodicoletras.ufsm@gmail.com2176-14851519-3985opendoar:2023-01-09T16:16:33.360432Letras (Santa Maria. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ambiguity as a rhetorical principle in Shakespeare - Much Adoabout Nothing (c. 1598) and Othello (c. 1604): case studies A ambiguidade como princípio retórico em Shakespeare - Muito Barulho por Nada (c. 1598) e Otelo (c. 1604): estudos de caso |
title |
Ambiguity as a rhetorical principle in Shakespeare - Much Adoabout Nothing (c. 1598) and Othello (c. 1604): case studies |
spellingShingle |
Ambiguity as a rhetorical principle in Shakespeare - Much Adoabout Nothing (c. 1598) and Othello (c. 1604): case studies Cardoso, Ricardo Shakespeare Ambiguity Rhetoric Spain Ambiguidade Shakespeare Espanha Retórica |
title_short |
Ambiguity as a rhetorical principle in Shakespeare - Much Adoabout Nothing (c. 1598) and Othello (c. 1604): case studies |
title_full |
Ambiguity as a rhetorical principle in Shakespeare - Much Adoabout Nothing (c. 1598) and Othello (c. 1604): case studies |
title_fullStr |
Ambiguity as a rhetorical principle in Shakespeare - Much Adoabout Nothing (c. 1598) and Othello (c. 1604): case studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ambiguity as a rhetorical principle in Shakespeare - Much Adoabout Nothing (c. 1598) and Othello (c. 1604): case studies |
title_sort |
Ambiguity as a rhetorical principle in Shakespeare - Much Adoabout Nothing (c. 1598) and Othello (c. 1604): case studies |
author |
Cardoso, Ricardo |
author_facet |
Cardoso, Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cardoso, Ricardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Shakespeare Ambiguity Rhetoric Spain Ambiguidade Shakespeare Espanha Retórica |
topic |
Shakespeare Ambiguity Rhetoric Spain Ambiguidade Shakespeare Espanha Retórica |
description |
The ambiguity ascribed to Shakespeare was a recent subject of academic scrutiny. This article investigates the history of modern political thought scholarship for that phenomenon. According to this proposition, polyphony would derive from the use of the rhetorical technique known as in utramque partem, an approach of two opposite sides of the same topic, in order to stage delicate political questions. Using a pair of plays written in the context of intense discussions about war and peace in London as case studies, I seek to explore how Shakespeare represented the Anglo-Spanish conflict through antagonistic perspectives. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/letras/article/view/56900 10.5902/2176148556900 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/letras/article/view/56900 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/2176148556900 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/letras/article/view/56900/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Letras http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Letras http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Letras; Edição Especial - 2/2020: Teatro Elisabetano e Jacobino: estudos textuais, teatrais e críticos; 93-108 2176-1485 1519-3985 reponame:Letras (Santa Maria. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Letras (Santa Maria. Online) |
collection |
Letras (Santa Maria. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Letras (Santa Maria. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||gil.negreiros@ufsm.br|| periodicoletras.ufsm@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1792205418320101376 |