Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19465 |
Resumo: | The present research aims to analyze the politics of presidential impeachment in Brazil between 1992 and 2016, specifically the cases of Fernando Collor de Mello (PRN) and Dilma Vana Rousseff (PT). The study focused on three conceptual categories - policy of impeachment, executive/legislative relationship, and legislative shield - to understand the different outcomes of processes that culminate in removing or keeping presidents in office. The analysis was delimited in the support of Congress to answer the research problem: "How does the legislative shield influence the policy of presidential impeachment?". A President's Legislative Shield is made up of parliamentarians willing to protect him in the event of an impeachment process. According to Perez-Liñan (2009), the legislative shield is the size of the president's party coalition and its internal cohesion. Thus, to answer the question, a comparison is presented by means of three factors and their characteristics: Denunciation Factor (Number of Complaints, Parliamentary/Non-parliamentary), Legislative Composition Factor (President of chamber, Party of president) and Coalition Party Factor (Governance Coalition, Coalition of Opposition). First, the comparison of two blocks: those that remained in the presidency even with protocol processes - FHC (PSDB) and Lula (PT) - and those who were deposed - Collor (PRN) and Rousseff (PT). After identifying that the legislative shield is primordial to stop the process, it is made the comparison between the two cases effected in the country to thus identify the similarities and particularities between Collor and Rousseff. Operating this research design, comparing and observing how the impeachment policy delimited in the legislative shield occurred in each scenario, made it possible to test and verify the research hypothesis raised, which presents that the legislative shield as an institutional instrument determines the archiving or follow-up of the presidential impeachment process. The analysis pointed out that although Fernando Collor de Mello and Dilma Vana Rousseff also suffered impeachment, the policy of impediment in each case is distinguished by its characteristics as allies and opponents, but the suggestion that remains is the importance of the legislative shield, which is formed by a strong party coalition and a legislative composition favorable to the president. |
id |
UFSM-20_3684ff844b4dd678f59e5d0680b5b6f3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/19465 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-20 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM |
repository_id_str |
3913 |
spelling |
2020-02-03T15:31:09Z2020-02-03T15:31:09Z2019-02-28http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19465The present research aims to analyze the politics of presidential impeachment in Brazil between 1992 and 2016, specifically the cases of Fernando Collor de Mello (PRN) and Dilma Vana Rousseff (PT). The study focused on three conceptual categories - policy of impeachment, executive/legislative relationship, and legislative shield - to understand the different outcomes of processes that culminate in removing or keeping presidents in office. The analysis was delimited in the support of Congress to answer the research problem: "How does the legislative shield influence the policy of presidential impeachment?". A President's Legislative Shield is made up of parliamentarians willing to protect him in the event of an impeachment process. According to Perez-Liñan (2009), the legislative shield is the size of the president's party coalition and its internal cohesion. Thus, to answer the question, a comparison is presented by means of three factors and their characteristics: Denunciation Factor (Number of Complaints, Parliamentary/Non-parliamentary), Legislative Composition Factor (President of chamber, Party of president) and Coalition Party Factor (Governance Coalition, Coalition of Opposition). First, the comparison of two blocks: those that remained in the presidency even with protocol processes - FHC (PSDB) and Lula (PT) - and those who were deposed - Collor (PRN) and Rousseff (PT). After identifying that the legislative shield is primordial to stop the process, it is made the comparison between the two cases effected in the country to thus identify the similarities and particularities between Collor and Rousseff. Operating this research design, comparing and observing how the impeachment policy delimited in the legislative shield occurred in each scenario, made it possible to test and verify the research hypothesis raised, which presents that the legislative shield as an institutional instrument determines the archiving or follow-up of the presidential impeachment process. The analysis pointed out that although Fernando Collor de Mello and Dilma Vana Rousseff also suffered impeachment, the policy of impediment in each case is distinguished by its characteristics as allies and opponents, but the suggestion that remains is the importance of the legislative shield, which is formed by a strong party coalition and a legislative composition favorable to the president.A presente pesquisa tem como objetivo analisar a política do impeachment presidencial no Brasil entre 1992 e 2016, especificamente, os casos de Fernando Collor de Mello (PRN) e Dilma Vana Rousseff (PT). O estudo orientou-se em três categorias conceituais - política do impeachment, relação executivo/legislativo e escudo legislativo - para compreender os diferentes desfechos de processos que culminam em afastar ou manter presidentes em seus cargos. A análise se delimitou no apoio do Congresso para responder o problema de pesquisa: “Como o escudo legislativo influencia a política do impeachment presidencial?”. O Escudo Legislativo de um presidente é composto pelos parlamentares dispostos a protegê-lo no caso do surgimento de um processo de impeachment. Conforme Perez-Liñan (2009), o escudo legislativo é o tamanho da coalizão partidária do presidente e a sua coesão interna. Deste modo, para responder a questão apresenta-se um comparativo por meio de três fatores e suas características: Fator Denúncia (Número de Denúncias, Parlamentar/Não parlamentar), Fator Composição Legislativa (Presidente da Câmara, Partido do presidente da Câmara) e Fator Coalizão Partidária (Coalizão Governativa, Coalizão de Oposição). Primeiramente, a comparação de dois blocos: os que se mantiveram na presidência mesmo com processos protocolados – FHC (PSDB) e Lula (PT) - e os que foram destituídos – Collor (PRN) e Rousseff (PT). Após identificado que o escudo legislativo é primordial para barrar o processo, faz-se a comparação entre os dois casos efetivados no país para assim identificar as similaridades e particularidades entre Collor e Rousseff. Ao operacionalizar este desenho de pesquisa, comparar e observar como se deu a política do impeachment delimitado no escudo legislativo em cada cenário, possibilitou testar e verificar a hipótese de pesquisa levantada, a qual apresenta que o escudo legislativo enquanto instrumento institucional determina o arquivamento ou seguimento do processo de impeachment presidencial. A análise apontou que embora Fernando Collor de Mello e Dilma Vana Rousseff igualmente terem sofrido o impeachment, a política do impedimento em cada caso se distingue por suas características de aliados e opositores, mas a sugestão que fica é da importância, ao final do escudo legislativo, o qual é formado por uma coalizão partidária forte e uma composição legislativa favorável ao presidente.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências SociaisUFSMBrasilSociologiaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessImpeachment presidencialFernando CollorDilma RousseffEscudo legislativoImpeachmentLegislative ShieldCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIAPolítica do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e RousseffPresidential Impeachment policy: a comparative analysis of the factors that impulse the Collor and Rousseff impedimentinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisCampos, Rosana Soareshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3832191347253241Cabrera, Carlos Artur Gallohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6099239530718796Grohmann, Luis Gustavo Mellohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6187581697631376http://lattes.cnpq.br/7851434600949028Maidana, Andreia Sena700200000009600b1b72c93-c80e-4129-9d4c-5bead784f9d9a99f0d9c-308c-4922-a3f9-22d6b43c8d66ead56481-b8ee-4bc0-8c44-f1fb759f8f2b8d97a51e-c44d-4bb6-a1c7-219703a65ed4reponame:Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALDIS_PPGCS_2019_MAIDANA_ANDREIA.pdfDIS_PPGCS_2019_MAIDANA_ANDREIA.pdfDissertação de Mestradoapplication/pdf1572166http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19465/1/DIS_PPGCS_2019_MAIDANA_ANDREIA.pdf877ff203993952ce3b2b221f6f20ec04MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19465/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19465/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTDIS_PPGCS_2019_MAIDANA_ANDREIA.pdf.txtDIS_PPGCS_2019_MAIDANA_ANDREIA.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain296755http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19465/4/DIS_PPGCS_2019_MAIDANA_ANDREIA.pdf.txt995ce6b68b19edf95cc5c880f548e675MD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGCS_2019_MAIDANA_ANDREIA.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGCS_2019_MAIDANA_ANDREIA.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4666http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19465/5/DIS_PPGCS_2019_MAIDANA_ANDREIA.pdf.jpg54dd894648632e9483e8f2a77e83e9c5MD551/194652022-07-18 10:41:42.998oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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ório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestouvidoria@ufsm.bropendoar:39132022-07-18T13:41:42Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Presidential Impeachment policy: a comparative analysis of the factors that impulse the Collor and Rousseff impediment |
title |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
spellingShingle |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff Maidana, Andreia Sena Impeachment presidencial Fernando Collor Dilma Rousseff Escudo legislativo Impeachment Legislative Shield CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
title_short |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
title_full |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
title_fullStr |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
title_full_unstemmed |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
title_sort |
Política do Impeachment Presidencial: uma análise comparativa dos fatores que impulsionaram o impedimento de Collor e Rousseff |
author |
Maidana, Andreia Sena |
author_facet |
Maidana, Andreia Sena |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Campos, Rosana Soares |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3832191347253241 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Cabrera, Carlos Artur Gallo |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6099239530718796 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Grohmann, Luis Gustavo Mello |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6187581697631376 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7851434600949028 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maidana, Andreia Sena |
contributor_str_mv |
Campos, Rosana Soares Cabrera, Carlos Artur Gallo Grohmann, Luis Gustavo Mello |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Impeachment presidencial Fernando Collor Dilma Rousseff Escudo legislativo |
topic |
Impeachment presidencial Fernando Collor Dilma Rousseff Escudo legislativo Impeachment Legislative Shield CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Impeachment Legislative Shield |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA |
description |
The present research aims to analyze the politics of presidential impeachment in Brazil between 1992 and 2016, specifically the cases of Fernando Collor de Mello (PRN) and Dilma Vana Rousseff (PT). The study focused on three conceptual categories - policy of impeachment, executive/legislative relationship, and legislative shield - to understand the different outcomes of processes that culminate in removing or keeping presidents in office. The analysis was delimited in the support of Congress to answer the research problem: "How does the legislative shield influence the policy of presidential impeachment?". A President's Legislative Shield is made up of parliamentarians willing to protect him in the event of an impeachment process. According to Perez-Liñan (2009), the legislative shield is the size of the president's party coalition and its internal cohesion. Thus, to answer the question, a comparison is presented by means of three factors and their characteristics: Denunciation Factor (Number of Complaints, Parliamentary/Non-parliamentary), Legislative Composition Factor (President of chamber, Party of president) and Coalition Party Factor (Governance Coalition, Coalition of Opposition). First, the comparison of two blocks: those that remained in the presidency even with protocol processes - FHC (PSDB) and Lula (PT) - and those who were deposed - Collor (PRN) and Rousseff (PT). After identifying that the legislative shield is primordial to stop the process, it is made the comparison between the two cases effected in the country to thus identify the similarities and particularities between Collor and Rousseff. Operating this research design, comparing and observing how the impeachment policy delimited in the legislative shield occurred in each scenario, made it possible to test and verify the research hypothesis raised, which presents that the legislative shield as an institutional instrument determines the archiving or follow-up of the presidential impeachment process. The analysis pointed out that although Fernando Collor de Mello and Dilma Vana Rousseff also suffered impeachment, the policy of impediment in each case is distinguished by its characteristics as allies and opponents, but the suggestion that remains is the importance of the legislative shield, which is formed by a strong party coalition and a legislative composition favorable to the president. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-28 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-03T15:31:09Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-03T15:31:09Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19465 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19465 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
700200000009 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
b1b72c93-c80e-4129-9d4c-5bead784f9d9 a99f0d9c-308c-4922-a3f9-22d6b43c8d66 ead56481-b8ee-4bc0-8c44-f1fb759f8f2b 8d97a51e-c44d-4bb6-a1c7-219703a65ed4 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Sociologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM |
collection |
Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19465/1/DIS_PPGCS_2019_MAIDANA_ANDREIA.pdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19465/2/license_rdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19465/3/license.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19465/4/DIS_PPGCS_2019_MAIDANA_ANDREIA.pdf.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19465/5/DIS_PPGCS_2019_MAIDANA_ANDREIA.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
877ff203993952ce3b2b221f6f20ec04 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df 995ce6b68b19edf95cc5c880f548e675 54dd894648632e9483e8f2a77e83e9c5 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ouvidoria@ufsm.br |
_version_ |
1808854698905567232 |