Avaliação da crítica de Bonjour à epistemologia naturalizada de quine
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9074 |
Resumo: | The project of naturalization of the epistemology proposed by Willard V. O. Quine it supplies a new way to do epistemology. Starting from that proposal, everything that is had to build knowledge on the world they are the sensitive evidences and the results obtained in the several scientific investigations, among them, the own empiric philosophical investigations. The naturalized epistemology doesn't intend to proceed of a privileged point of view in relation to the other sciences. For Quine that point of view is not possible, always originates from a world theory for since then, to reconstruct her revising and rejecting some beliefs. Starting from those conclusions of the quinean proposal it is noticed explicit rejection of the knowledge and justification a priori second which what would guarantee the beliefs ultimately on the world it would be a rational intuition given independently of the experience. Front to that, Laurence BonJour criticizes the project of naturalization of the epistemology proposed by Quine, because this proposal when not accepting a logic a priori would not be any reason to sustain, it would destroy yourself. This work tries to evaluate the critics of BonJour to the project of naturalization of the epistemology proposed by Quine. Intends to come a possible answer in the quinean project that there is not a logic a priori, but a naturalized reason developed starting from the experience that connects the sentences of the web. |
id |
UFSM-20_4dcf5190e82c64b3c50170601d378a28 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/9074 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-20 |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
3913 |
spelling |
2009-10-302009-10-302009-08-31OLIVEIRA, Cínthia Roso. VALUATION OF THE CRITIC OF BONJOUR TO NATURALIZED EPISTEMOLOGY OF QUINE. 2009. 141 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2009.http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9074The project of naturalization of the epistemology proposed by Willard V. O. Quine it supplies a new way to do epistemology. Starting from that proposal, everything that is had to build knowledge on the world they are the sensitive evidences and the results obtained in the several scientific investigations, among them, the own empiric philosophical investigations. The naturalized epistemology doesn't intend to proceed of a privileged point of view in relation to the other sciences. For Quine that point of view is not possible, always originates from a world theory for since then, to reconstruct her revising and rejecting some beliefs. Starting from those conclusions of the quinean proposal it is noticed explicit rejection of the knowledge and justification a priori second which what would guarantee the beliefs ultimately on the world it would be a rational intuition given independently of the experience. Front to that, Laurence BonJour criticizes the project of naturalization of the epistemology proposed by Quine, because this proposal when not accepting a logic a priori would not be any reason to sustain, it would destroy yourself. This work tries to evaluate the critics of BonJour to the project of naturalization of the epistemology proposed by Quine. Intends to come a possible answer in the quinean project that there is not a logic a priori, but a naturalized reason developed starting from the experience that connects the sentences of the web.O projeto de naturalização da epistemologia proposto por Willard V. O. Quine fornece uma nova maneira de fazer epistemologia. A partir dessa proposta, tudo o que se tem para construir conhecimentos sobre o mundo são as evidências sensíveis e os resultados obtidos nas diversas investigações científicas, entre elas, as próprias investigações filosóficas empíricas. A epistemologia naturalizada não pretende proceder de um ponto de vista privilegiado em relação às outras ciências. Para Quine esse ponto de vista não é possível, sempre se parte de uma teoria de mundo para a partir daí, reconstruí-la revisando e rejeitando algumas crenças. A partir dessas conclusões da proposta quineana percebe-se uma clara rejeição do conhecimento e justificação a priori segundo o qual o que garantiria as crenças sobre o mundo em última instância seria uma intuição racional dada independentemente da experiência. Frente a isso, Laurence BonJour critica o projeto de naturalização da epistemologia proposto por Quine, pois esta proposta ao não aceitar uma lógica a priori não teria nenhuma razão para se sustentar, seria auto-destrutiva. Este trabalho procura avaliar as críticas de BonJour ao projeto de naturalização da epistemologia proposto por Quine. Pretende-se apresentar uma possível resposta no projeto quineano de que não há uma lógica a priori, mas uma razão naturalizada desenvolvida a partir da experiência que conecta as sentenças da teia.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUFSMBRFilosofiaEpistemologiaQuineBonJourEpistemologyQuineBonJourCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAAvaliação da crítica de Bonjour à epistemologia naturalizada de quineValuation of the critic of Bonjour to naturalized epistemology of quineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisGallina, Albertinho Luizhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0750109262601371Stein, Sofia Inês Albornozhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2045729600668270Sartori, Carlos Augustohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6830220445412069http://lattes.cnpq.br/0966655069253972Oliveira, Cínthia Roso7001000000044005003003003006dd1762b-d15e-4dab-bf93-1ae6494c41bf6ab077d9-f35a-4573-989f-9c73dc1e1f79e1b8be6f-530c-4bd8-8e7a-fcd1e59f8d32420dd786-5b10-4117-a3b4-a2cabe1b2830info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALOLIVEIRA, CINTIA ROSO.pdfapplication/pdf532866http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/9074/1/OLIVEIRA%2c%20CINTIA%20ROSO.pdf6cf956e49521b55babd2d329a3c9faf9MD51TEXTOLIVEIRA, CINTIA ROSO.pdf.txtOLIVEIRA, CINTIA ROSO.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain355437http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/9074/2/OLIVEIRA%2c%20CINTIA%20ROSO.pdf.txtab5b8b2f11400b04b9edd4c54cc0bf3cMD52THUMBNAILOLIVEIRA, CINTIA ROSO.pdf.jpgOLIVEIRA, CINTIA ROSO.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4845http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/9074/3/OLIVEIRA%2c%20CINTIA%20ROSO.pdf.jpg419b3fdacbdcaf02c6778edc9c8aa951MD531/90742022-01-13 10:16:23.758oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/9074Repositório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132022-01-13T13:16:23Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação da crítica de Bonjour à epistemologia naturalizada de quine |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Valuation of the critic of Bonjour to naturalized epistemology of quine |
title |
Avaliação da crítica de Bonjour à epistemologia naturalizada de quine |
spellingShingle |
Avaliação da crítica de Bonjour à epistemologia naturalizada de quine Oliveira, Cínthia Roso Epistemologia Quine BonJour Epistemology Quine BonJour CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Avaliação da crítica de Bonjour à epistemologia naturalizada de quine |
title_full |
Avaliação da crítica de Bonjour à epistemologia naturalizada de quine |
title_fullStr |
Avaliação da crítica de Bonjour à epistemologia naturalizada de quine |
title_full_unstemmed |
Avaliação da crítica de Bonjour à epistemologia naturalizada de quine |
title_sort |
Avaliação da crítica de Bonjour à epistemologia naturalizada de quine |
author |
Oliveira, Cínthia Roso |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Cínthia Roso |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Gallina, Albertinho Luiz |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0750109262601371 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Stein, Sofia Inês Albornoz |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2045729600668270 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Sartori, Carlos Augusto |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6830220445412069 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0966655069253972 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Cínthia Roso |
contributor_str_mv |
Gallina, Albertinho Luiz Stein, Sofia Inês Albornoz Sartori, Carlos Augusto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Epistemologia Quine BonJour |
topic |
Epistemologia Quine BonJour Epistemology Quine BonJour CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Epistemology Quine BonJour |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The project of naturalization of the epistemology proposed by Willard V. O. Quine it supplies a new way to do epistemology. Starting from that proposal, everything that is had to build knowledge on the world they are the sensitive evidences and the results obtained in the several scientific investigations, among them, the own empiric philosophical investigations. The naturalized epistemology doesn't intend to proceed of a privileged point of view in relation to the other sciences. For Quine that point of view is not possible, always originates from a world theory for since then, to reconstruct her revising and rejecting some beliefs. Starting from those conclusions of the quinean proposal it is noticed explicit rejection of the knowledge and justification a priori second which what would guarantee the beliefs ultimately on the world it would be a rational intuition given independently of the experience. Front to that, Laurence BonJour criticizes the project of naturalization of the epistemology proposed by Quine, because this proposal when not accepting a logic a priori would not be any reason to sustain, it would destroy yourself. This work tries to evaluate the critics of BonJour to the project of naturalization of the epistemology proposed by Quine. Intends to come a possible answer in the quinean project that there is not a logic a priori, but a naturalized reason developed starting from the experience that connects the sentences of the web. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2009-10-30 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2009-10-30 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2009-08-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
OLIVEIRA, Cínthia Roso. VALUATION OF THE CRITIC OF BONJOUR TO NATURALIZED EPISTEMOLOGY OF QUINE. 2009. 141 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2009. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9074 |
identifier_str_mv |
OLIVEIRA, Cínthia Roso. VALUATION OF THE CRITIC OF BONJOUR TO NATURALIZED EPISTEMOLOGY OF QUINE. 2009. 141 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2009. |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9074 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
700100000004 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
400 500 300 300 300 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
6dd1762b-d15e-4dab-bf93-1ae6494c41bf 6ab077d9-f35a-4573-989f-9c73dc1e1f79 e1b8be6f-530c-4bd8-8e7a-fcd1e59f8d32 420dd786-5b10-4117-a3b4-a2cabe1b2830 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Filosofia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/9074/1/OLIVEIRA%2c%20CINTIA%20ROSO.pdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/9074/2/OLIVEIRA%2c%20CINTIA%20ROSO.pdf.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/9074/3/OLIVEIRA%2c%20CINTIA%20ROSO.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
6cf956e49521b55babd2d329a3c9faf9 ab5b8b2f11400b04b9edd4c54cc0bf3c 419b3fdacbdcaf02c6778edc9c8aa951 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801223859807977472 |