Feed selectivity of laying hens undergoing different beak trimming in two rearing systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baggio,Rafael Alan
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Lunardi,Samuel Jacinto, Testa,Manuela, Chiossi,Diego Mateus, Petroli,Tiago Goulart, Boiago,Marcel Manente, Paiano,Diovani, Zotti,Maria Luisa Appendino Nunes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018001000651
Resumo: ABSTRACT: The present research was conducted to evaluate whether different beak trimming methods and rearing systems affected the feed selectivity of laying hens. A total of 178 Hy-line Brown laying hens in the growing phase and 120 hens in the production phase were divided in a factorial arrangement (2 x 3), with two rearing systems (floor and cages) and three beak trimming methods: without beak trimming (control), hot-blade beak trimming, and infrared beak trimming, with four replicates. Laying hens were feed with isonutritive diets. Samples were collected from feed orts and feed provided, with a subsequent analysis of dry matter, crude energy, crude protein, mineral matter, geometric mean diameter and geometric standard deviation. The results were subjected to the error normality test, analysis of variance and the Fisher-Snedecor (P<0.05) and Duncan tests (P<0.05). The beak trimming methods evaluated were not sufficient to prevent feed selection in laying hens. However, in the growing phase, hot-blade beak trimming reduced feed selection capacity of laying hens more than did infrared beak trimming. The cage system favored feed selection, both in the growing and production phases.
id UFSM-2_17c983686135af564ec686af1146ad15
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782018001000651
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Feed selectivity of laying hens undergoing different beak trimming in two rearing systemsanimal welfarecage-freefeed selectionABSTRACT: The present research was conducted to evaluate whether different beak trimming methods and rearing systems affected the feed selectivity of laying hens. A total of 178 Hy-line Brown laying hens in the growing phase and 120 hens in the production phase were divided in a factorial arrangement (2 x 3), with two rearing systems (floor and cages) and three beak trimming methods: without beak trimming (control), hot-blade beak trimming, and infrared beak trimming, with four replicates. Laying hens were feed with isonutritive diets. Samples were collected from feed orts and feed provided, with a subsequent analysis of dry matter, crude energy, crude protein, mineral matter, geometric mean diameter and geometric standard deviation. The results were subjected to the error normality test, analysis of variance and the Fisher-Snedecor (P<0.05) and Duncan tests (P<0.05). The beak trimming methods evaluated were not sufficient to prevent feed selection in laying hens. However, in the growing phase, hot-blade beak trimming reduced feed selection capacity of laying hens more than did infrared beak trimming. The cage system favored feed selection, both in the growing and production phases.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018001000651Ciência Rural v.48 n.10 2018reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20170686info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaggio,Rafael AlanLunardi,Samuel JacintoTesta,ManuelaChiossi,Diego MateusPetroli,Tiago GoulartBoiago,Marcel ManentePaiano,DiovaniZotti,Maria Luisa Appendino Nuneseng2018-10-09T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Feed selectivity of laying hens undergoing different beak trimming in two rearing systems
title Feed selectivity of laying hens undergoing different beak trimming in two rearing systems
spellingShingle Feed selectivity of laying hens undergoing different beak trimming in two rearing systems
Baggio,Rafael Alan
animal welfare
cage-free
feed selection
title_short Feed selectivity of laying hens undergoing different beak trimming in two rearing systems
title_full Feed selectivity of laying hens undergoing different beak trimming in two rearing systems
title_fullStr Feed selectivity of laying hens undergoing different beak trimming in two rearing systems
title_full_unstemmed Feed selectivity of laying hens undergoing different beak trimming in two rearing systems
title_sort Feed selectivity of laying hens undergoing different beak trimming in two rearing systems
author Baggio,Rafael Alan
author_facet Baggio,Rafael Alan
Lunardi,Samuel Jacinto
Testa,Manuela
Chiossi,Diego Mateus
Petroli,Tiago Goulart
Boiago,Marcel Manente
Paiano,Diovani
Zotti,Maria Luisa Appendino Nunes
author_role author
author2 Lunardi,Samuel Jacinto
Testa,Manuela
Chiossi,Diego Mateus
Petroli,Tiago Goulart
Boiago,Marcel Manente
Paiano,Diovani
Zotti,Maria Luisa Appendino Nunes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baggio,Rafael Alan
Lunardi,Samuel Jacinto
Testa,Manuela
Chiossi,Diego Mateus
Petroli,Tiago Goulart
Boiago,Marcel Manente
Paiano,Diovani
Zotti,Maria Luisa Appendino Nunes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv animal welfare
cage-free
feed selection
topic animal welfare
cage-free
feed selection
description ABSTRACT: The present research was conducted to evaluate whether different beak trimming methods and rearing systems affected the feed selectivity of laying hens. A total of 178 Hy-line Brown laying hens in the growing phase and 120 hens in the production phase were divided in a factorial arrangement (2 x 3), with two rearing systems (floor and cages) and three beak trimming methods: without beak trimming (control), hot-blade beak trimming, and infrared beak trimming, with four replicates. Laying hens were feed with isonutritive diets. Samples were collected from feed orts and feed provided, with a subsequent analysis of dry matter, crude energy, crude protein, mineral matter, geometric mean diameter and geometric standard deviation. The results were subjected to the error normality test, analysis of variance and the Fisher-Snedecor (P<0.05) and Duncan tests (P<0.05). The beak trimming methods evaluated were not sufficient to prevent feed selection in laying hens. However, in the growing phase, hot-blade beak trimming reduced feed selection capacity of laying hens more than did infrared beak trimming. The cage system favored feed selection, both in the growing and production phases.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018001000651
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018001000651
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20170686
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.48 n.10 2018
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140553000288256