Polymerase Chain Reaction and blood culture for diagnosis of canine sepsis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018000600452 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: Sepsis is characterized by the presence of organ dysfunction secondary to the dysregulated systemic inflammatory response associated with an infection, and has high mortality rates. Traditional diagnostic techniques based on non-microbiological isolation are time-consuming and may delay treatment. Thus, this study aimed to compare bacterial and fungal broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in dogs. Blood samples from 88 dogs with suspected sepsis were analyzed by blood culture, and PCR to detect bacterial and fungal DNA. On blood culture, 20 (22.7%) samples tested positive for bacterial isolates; however, none tested positive for fungi. Through PCR analysis, bacterial DNA was detected in 46 (52.3%) animals, whereas fungal DNA was present in one (1.1%) sample. Our results showed that PCR-based testing has important diagnostic value for canine blood infections because it has a shorter turnaround time and higher sensitivity than traditional blood culture. |
id |
UFSM-2_5116134b45d482ea7f268a778972e038 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782018000600452 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Polymerase Chain Reaction and blood culture for diagnosis of canine sepsisblood culturePCRbacteremiafungemiaABSTRACT: Sepsis is characterized by the presence of organ dysfunction secondary to the dysregulated systemic inflammatory response associated with an infection, and has high mortality rates. Traditional diagnostic techniques based on non-microbiological isolation are time-consuming and may delay treatment. Thus, this study aimed to compare bacterial and fungal broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in dogs. Blood samples from 88 dogs with suspected sepsis were analyzed by blood culture, and PCR to detect bacterial and fungal DNA. On blood culture, 20 (22.7%) samples tested positive for bacterial isolates; however, none tested positive for fungi. Through PCR analysis, bacterial DNA was detected in 46 (52.3%) animals, whereas fungal DNA was present in one (1.1%) sample. Our results showed that PCR-based testing has important diagnostic value for canine blood infections because it has a shorter turnaround time and higher sensitivity than traditional blood culture.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018000600452Ciência Rural v.48 n.6 2018reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20170871info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilveira,Marcelo Marques daCândido,Stéfhano LuisSantos,Karin Rinaldi dosMaia,Maerle OliveiraSouza,Roberto Lopes deSousa,Valéria Régia FrancoAlmeida,Arleana do Bom Parto Ferreira deDutra,ValeriaNakazato,Lucianoeng2018-05-21T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Polymerase Chain Reaction and blood culture for diagnosis of canine sepsis |
title |
Polymerase Chain Reaction and blood culture for diagnosis of canine sepsis |
spellingShingle |
Polymerase Chain Reaction and blood culture for diagnosis of canine sepsis Silveira,Marcelo Marques da blood culture PCR bacteremia fungemia |
title_short |
Polymerase Chain Reaction and blood culture for diagnosis of canine sepsis |
title_full |
Polymerase Chain Reaction and blood culture for diagnosis of canine sepsis |
title_fullStr |
Polymerase Chain Reaction and blood culture for diagnosis of canine sepsis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Polymerase Chain Reaction and blood culture for diagnosis of canine sepsis |
title_sort |
Polymerase Chain Reaction and blood culture for diagnosis of canine sepsis |
author |
Silveira,Marcelo Marques da |
author_facet |
Silveira,Marcelo Marques da Cândido,Stéfhano Luis Santos,Karin Rinaldi dos Maia,Maerle Oliveira Souza,Roberto Lopes de Sousa,Valéria Régia Franco Almeida,Arleana do Bom Parto Ferreira de Dutra,Valeria Nakazato,Luciano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cândido,Stéfhano Luis Santos,Karin Rinaldi dos Maia,Maerle Oliveira Souza,Roberto Lopes de Sousa,Valéria Régia Franco Almeida,Arleana do Bom Parto Ferreira de Dutra,Valeria Nakazato,Luciano |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silveira,Marcelo Marques da Cândido,Stéfhano Luis Santos,Karin Rinaldi dos Maia,Maerle Oliveira Souza,Roberto Lopes de Sousa,Valéria Régia Franco Almeida,Arleana do Bom Parto Ferreira de Dutra,Valeria Nakazato,Luciano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
blood culture PCR bacteremia fungemia |
topic |
blood culture PCR bacteremia fungemia |
description |
ABSTRACT: Sepsis is characterized by the presence of organ dysfunction secondary to the dysregulated systemic inflammatory response associated with an infection, and has high mortality rates. Traditional diagnostic techniques based on non-microbiological isolation are time-consuming and may delay treatment. Thus, this study aimed to compare bacterial and fungal broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in dogs. Blood samples from 88 dogs with suspected sepsis were analyzed by blood culture, and PCR to detect bacterial and fungal DNA. On blood culture, 20 (22.7%) samples tested positive for bacterial isolates; however, none tested positive for fungi. Through PCR analysis, bacterial DNA was detected in 46 (52.3%) animals, whereas fungal DNA was present in one (1.1%) sample. Our results showed that PCR-based testing has important diagnostic value for canine blood infections because it has a shorter turnaround time and higher sensitivity than traditional blood culture. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018000600452 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018000600452 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20170871 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.48 n.6 2018 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140552558837760 |