Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000100351 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: Over the past few years, changes have been observed in the behavior of typical performance curves, after higher technology has been incorporated into the agricultural tractor engines, either to satisfy the ceiling of the new pollutant gas emission limits or to achieve better efficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the typical performance behavior of an agricultural tractor engine, possessing electronic injection management, turbocharger, aftercooler and EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) treatment system. An analysis was done of the information the manufacturers provided, in terms of nominal power, maximum power and maximum power with Booster, maximum torque and maximum torque with Booster. From the results, the percentage difference between the nominal power and maximum power were found to hover anywhere from 1.49 to 11.97%, for the same manufacturer, 0% in another manufacturer and 9% in a third manufacturer, for all the models. Similar results were noted for the data reported on the maximum torque and maximum torque with Booster, giving 0.62% as the minimum value, 7.44% as the average value and 12.65% as the maximum value for the entire series. |
id |
UFSM-2_693eb95edd0d12143dadb822f9902594 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782022000100351 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbochargerdynamometric testtorquepowerconstant rangeABSTRACT: Over the past few years, changes have been observed in the behavior of typical performance curves, after higher technology has been incorporated into the agricultural tractor engines, either to satisfy the ceiling of the new pollutant gas emission limits or to achieve better efficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the typical performance behavior of an agricultural tractor engine, possessing electronic injection management, turbocharger, aftercooler and EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) treatment system. An analysis was done of the information the manufacturers provided, in terms of nominal power, maximum power and maximum power with Booster, maximum torque and maximum torque with Booster. From the results, the percentage difference between the nominal power and maximum power were found to hover anywhere from 1.49 to 11.97%, for the same manufacturer, 0% in another manufacturer and 9% in a third manufacturer, for all the models. Similar results were noted for the data reported on the maximum torque and maximum torque with Booster, giving 0.62% as the minimum value, 7.44% as the average value and 12.65% as the maximum value for the entire series.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000100351Ciência Rural v.52 n.1 2022reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20200966info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBertinatto,RovianSchlosser,José FernandoBertollo,Gilvan MoisésHerzog,DanielaCasali,LeonardoBorsatto,Halan Gabrieleng2021-07-23T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger |
title |
Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger |
spellingShingle |
Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger Bertinatto,Rovian dynamometric test torque power constant range |
title_short |
Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger |
title_full |
Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger |
title_fullStr |
Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger |
title_full_unstemmed |
Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger |
title_sort |
Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger |
author |
Bertinatto,Rovian |
author_facet |
Bertinatto,Rovian Schlosser,José Fernando Bertollo,Gilvan Moisés Herzog,Daniela Casali,Leonardo Borsatto,Halan Gabriel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schlosser,José Fernando Bertollo,Gilvan Moisés Herzog,Daniela Casali,Leonardo Borsatto,Halan Gabriel |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bertinatto,Rovian Schlosser,José Fernando Bertollo,Gilvan Moisés Herzog,Daniela Casali,Leonardo Borsatto,Halan Gabriel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
dynamometric test torque power constant range |
topic |
dynamometric test torque power constant range |
description |
ABSTRACT: Over the past few years, changes have been observed in the behavior of typical performance curves, after higher technology has been incorporated into the agricultural tractor engines, either to satisfy the ceiling of the new pollutant gas emission limits or to achieve better efficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the typical performance behavior of an agricultural tractor engine, possessing electronic injection management, turbocharger, aftercooler and EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) treatment system. An analysis was done of the information the manufacturers provided, in terms of nominal power, maximum power and maximum power with Booster, maximum torque and maximum torque with Booster. From the results, the percentage difference between the nominal power and maximum power were found to hover anywhere from 1.49 to 11.97%, for the same manufacturer, 0% in another manufacturer and 9% in a third manufacturer, for all the models. Similar results were noted for the data reported on the maximum torque and maximum torque with Booster, giving 0.62% as the minimum value, 7.44% as the average value and 12.65% as the maximum value for the entire series. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000100351 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000100351 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20200966 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.52 n.1 2022 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140556501483520 |