Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bertinatto,Rovian
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Schlosser,José Fernando, Bertollo,Gilvan Moisés, Herzog,Daniela, Casali,Leonardo, Borsatto,Halan Gabriel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000100351
Resumo: ABSTRACT: Over the past few years, changes have been observed in the behavior of typical performance curves, after higher technology has been incorporated into the agricultural tractor engines, either to satisfy the ceiling of the new pollutant gas emission limits or to achieve better efficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the typical performance behavior of an agricultural tractor engine, possessing electronic injection management, turbocharger, aftercooler and EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) treatment system. An analysis was done of the information the manufacturers provided, in terms of nominal power, maximum power and maximum power with Booster, maximum torque and maximum torque with Booster. From the results, the percentage difference between the nominal power and maximum power were found to hover anywhere from 1.49 to 11.97%, for the same manufacturer, 0% in another manufacturer and 9% in a third manufacturer, for all the models. Similar results were noted for the data reported on the maximum torque and maximum torque with Booster, giving 0.62% as the minimum value, 7.44% as the average value and 12.65% as the maximum value for the entire series.
id UFSM-2_693eb95edd0d12143dadb822f9902594
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782022000100351
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbochargerdynamometric testtorquepowerconstant rangeABSTRACT: Over the past few years, changes have been observed in the behavior of typical performance curves, after higher technology has been incorporated into the agricultural tractor engines, either to satisfy the ceiling of the new pollutant gas emission limits or to achieve better efficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the typical performance behavior of an agricultural tractor engine, possessing electronic injection management, turbocharger, aftercooler and EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) treatment system. An analysis was done of the information the manufacturers provided, in terms of nominal power, maximum power and maximum power with Booster, maximum torque and maximum torque with Booster. From the results, the percentage difference between the nominal power and maximum power were found to hover anywhere from 1.49 to 11.97%, for the same manufacturer, 0% in another manufacturer and 9% in a third manufacturer, for all the models. Similar results were noted for the data reported on the maximum torque and maximum torque with Booster, giving 0.62% as the minimum value, 7.44% as the average value and 12.65% as the maximum value for the entire series.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000100351Ciência Rural v.52 n.1 2022reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20200966info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBertinatto,RovianSchlosser,José FernandoBertollo,Gilvan MoisésHerzog,DanielaCasali,LeonardoBorsatto,Halan Gabrieleng2021-07-23T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger
title Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger
spellingShingle Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger
Bertinatto,Rovian
dynamometric test
torque
power
constant range
title_short Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger
title_full Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger
title_fullStr Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger
title_full_unstemmed Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger
title_sort Typical performance behavior of a Diesel cycle agricultural tractor engine with electronic injection management and turbocharger
author Bertinatto,Rovian
author_facet Bertinatto,Rovian
Schlosser,José Fernando
Bertollo,Gilvan Moisés
Herzog,Daniela
Casali,Leonardo
Borsatto,Halan Gabriel
author_role author
author2 Schlosser,José Fernando
Bertollo,Gilvan Moisés
Herzog,Daniela
Casali,Leonardo
Borsatto,Halan Gabriel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bertinatto,Rovian
Schlosser,José Fernando
Bertollo,Gilvan Moisés
Herzog,Daniela
Casali,Leonardo
Borsatto,Halan Gabriel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv dynamometric test
torque
power
constant range
topic dynamometric test
torque
power
constant range
description ABSTRACT: Over the past few years, changes have been observed in the behavior of typical performance curves, after higher technology has been incorporated into the agricultural tractor engines, either to satisfy the ceiling of the new pollutant gas emission limits or to achieve better efficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the typical performance behavior of an agricultural tractor engine, possessing electronic injection management, turbocharger, aftercooler and EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) treatment system. An analysis was done of the information the manufacturers provided, in terms of nominal power, maximum power and maximum power with Booster, maximum torque and maximum torque with Booster. From the results, the percentage difference between the nominal power and maximum power were found to hover anywhere from 1.49 to 11.97%, for the same manufacturer, 0% in another manufacturer and 9% in a third manufacturer, for all the models. Similar results were noted for the data reported on the maximum torque and maximum torque with Booster, giving 0.62% as the minimum value, 7.44% as the average value and 12.65% as the maximum value for the entire series.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000100351
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000100351
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20200966
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.52 n.1 2022
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140556501483520