Alternative light colors in suckling piglet creep area: preference and validation tests in swine maternity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paggi,Ana Caroline
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Diesel,Taciana Aparecida, Oliveira,Paulo Armando Victoria de, Coldebella,Arlei, Paiano,Diovani, Marcanzoni,Victoria Carolina Bonassi, Zotti,Maria Luisa Appendino Nunes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782020001100651
Resumo: ABSTRACT: We performed a two-stage experiment: a preference and a validation test in swine litters, to determine whether suckling piglets preferred alternative light colors in their creep area over white light; we also determined whether the preferred color affected piglet behavior. In the first stage, five trials of two consecutive days were performed, each at 21-day intervals. In each trial, 40 piglets, from three to five days old, from four F1 sows (Large White x Landrace), were distributed in four treatments, in a paired scheme, receiving the following treatments: Treatment GR: white light vs. green light ; Treatment BL: white light vs. blue light; Treatment YE: yellow light vs. white light; Treatment RD: white light vs. red light. For the validation test, three consecutive lots of eight F1 sows (Large White x Landrace) and their corresponding maternity were used, remaining from birth under the influence of treatments T_Gr and T_Wh, totaling three replicates. T_Gr corresponded to four creep areaswith green LED light and T_Wh to four nurseries with white LED light. The piglets showed a significant preference only for white over blue. Among the alternative colors, piglets significantly preferred green. In the validation stage, there was no significant effect of colors on the mean percentage of permanence of the piglets inside the creep areas over all evaluated periods. Piglets between two and five days of age prefer green lighting;however,in the creep area, the light color used did not influence piglet behavior.
id UFSM-2_7df24bd2a535b2d05598c6664f298bed
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782020001100651
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Alternative light colors in suckling piglet creep area: preference and validation tests in swine maternitymaternitycolorambienceLEDABSTRACT: We performed a two-stage experiment: a preference and a validation test in swine litters, to determine whether suckling piglets preferred alternative light colors in their creep area over white light; we also determined whether the preferred color affected piglet behavior. In the first stage, five trials of two consecutive days were performed, each at 21-day intervals. In each trial, 40 piglets, from three to five days old, from four F1 sows (Large White x Landrace), were distributed in four treatments, in a paired scheme, receiving the following treatments: Treatment GR: white light vs. green light ; Treatment BL: white light vs. blue light; Treatment YE: yellow light vs. white light; Treatment RD: white light vs. red light. For the validation test, three consecutive lots of eight F1 sows (Large White x Landrace) and their corresponding maternity were used, remaining from birth under the influence of treatments T_Gr and T_Wh, totaling three replicates. T_Gr corresponded to four creep areaswith green LED light and T_Wh to four nurseries with white LED light. The piglets showed a significant preference only for white over blue. Among the alternative colors, piglets significantly preferred green. In the validation stage, there was no significant effect of colors on the mean percentage of permanence of the piglets inside the creep areas over all evaluated periods. Piglets between two and five days of age prefer green lighting;however,in the creep area, the light color used did not influence piglet behavior.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782020001100651Ciência Rural v.50 n.11 2020reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20190328info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaggi,Ana CarolineDiesel,Taciana AparecidaOliveira,Paulo Armando Victoria deColdebella,ArleiPaiano,DiovaniMarcanzoni,Victoria Carolina BonassiZotti,Maria Luisa Appendino Nuneseng2020-09-09T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Alternative light colors in suckling piglet creep area: preference and validation tests in swine maternity
title Alternative light colors in suckling piglet creep area: preference and validation tests in swine maternity
spellingShingle Alternative light colors in suckling piglet creep area: preference and validation tests in swine maternity
Paggi,Ana Caroline
maternity
color
ambience
LED
title_short Alternative light colors in suckling piglet creep area: preference and validation tests in swine maternity
title_full Alternative light colors in suckling piglet creep area: preference and validation tests in swine maternity
title_fullStr Alternative light colors in suckling piglet creep area: preference and validation tests in swine maternity
title_full_unstemmed Alternative light colors in suckling piglet creep area: preference and validation tests in swine maternity
title_sort Alternative light colors in suckling piglet creep area: preference and validation tests in swine maternity
author Paggi,Ana Caroline
author_facet Paggi,Ana Caroline
Diesel,Taciana Aparecida
Oliveira,Paulo Armando Victoria de
Coldebella,Arlei
Paiano,Diovani
Marcanzoni,Victoria Carolina Bonassi
Zotti,Maria Luisa Appendino Nunes
author_role author
author2 Diesel,Taciana Aparecida
Oliveira,Paulo Armando Victoria de
Coldebella,Arlei
Paiano,Diovani
Marcanzoni,Victoria Carolina Bonassi
Zotti,Maria Luisa Appendino Nunes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paggi,Ana Caroline
Diesel,Taciana Aparecida
Oliveira,Paulo Armando Victoria de
Coldebella,Arlei
Paiano,Diovani
Marcanzoni,Victoria Carolina Bonassi
Zotti,Maria Luisa Appendino Nunes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv maternity
color
ambience
LED
topic maternity
color
ambience
LED
description ABSTRACT: We performed a two-stage experiment: a preference and a validation test in swine litters, to determine whether suckling piglets preferred alternative light colors in their creep area over white light; we also determined whether the preferred color affected piglet behavior. In the first stage, five trials of two consecutive days were performed, each at 21-day intervals. In each trial, 40 piglets, from three to five days old, from four F1 sows (Large White x Landrace), were distributed in four treatments, in a paired scheme, receiving the following treatments: Treatment GR: white light vs. green light ; Treatment BL: white light vs. blue light; Treatment YE: yellow light vs. white light; Treatment RD: white light vs. red light. For the validation test, three consecutive lots of eight F1 sows (Large White x Landrace) and their corresponding maternity were used, remaining from birth under the influence of treatments T_Gr and T_Wh, totaling three replicates. T_Gr corresponded to four creep areaswith green LED light and T_Wh to four nurseries with white LED light. The piglets showed a significant preference only for white over blue. Among the alternative colors, piglets significantly preferred green. In the validation stage, there was no significant effect of colors on the mean percentage of permanence of the piglets inside the creep areas over all evaluated periods. Piglets between two and five days of age prefer green lighting;however,in the creep area, the light color used did not influence piglet behavior.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782020001100651
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782020001100651
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20190328
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.50 n.11 2020
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140555204395008