Management of degraded natural forests in the Amazon: case study on harvest criteria

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Siviero, Marco Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ruschel, Ademir Roberto, Yared, Jorge Alberto Gazel, Pereira, José Francisco, Aguiar, Osmar José Romeiro de, Brienza Junior, Sílvio, Pereira, Paulo Cezar Gomes, Vieira, Sabrina Benmuyal, Contini, Karina Piekarski Siviero, Sales, Agust
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência Florestal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/25856
Resumo: This paper deals with an innovative experience regarding tree harvesting criteria in degraded natural forest in the Amazon. The research was carried out in 535.6 ha of forest at Fazenda Shet, in Dom Eliseu/PA state, using the database of forest census for trees with DBH ≥ 25 cm. Criteria for tree harvesting considered, as a priority, the following elements: degree of health, shape of stem (2 and 3), maximum diameter to remain in the forest (DBH = 100 cm), smaller diameter trees (25 ≥ DBH ≤ 55 cm), species with higher tree density per unit area, diameter distribution according to the Liocourt coefficient, maintenance of intensively exploited species in the past and tree population ≤ 0.15 arv.ha-1. A total of 46,012 trees belonging to 106 species were inventoried and planned for harvest 23.19% (10,671 trees) at 12 years after the previous harvest. Based on harvest planning and following the criteria, the harvest forecast in relation to the total inventoried population resulted in: 2.16% trees by the criterion of health; 15.45% for the shape of stem; 0.26% by the maximum diameter; 93.93% for the smallest diameter; 57.50% for the tree density; and 5.04% for the maintenance of the species. Harvesting was performed on 98.79% of trees with compromised health; 22.20% with stem 2 and 3; 97.39% with maximum diameter; 95.02% with smaller diameter; and 90.30% with higher tree density. Were kept 98.14% of the species Astronium lecointei, Cordia goeldiana, Copaifera sp., Hymenaea courbaril, Hymenolobium petraeum, Handrohanthus serratifolius and Manilkara elata, intensively exploited in the past, and 98.70% of 53 other species with less abundance (≤ 0.15 arv.ha-1). The exploration planning following the proposed harvesting criteria allowed the extraction of trees in cycles of 10 to 12 years, being a shorter time than the one foreseen by the legislation. The maintenance of tree species diversity and forest conservation, provided for with these technical criteria, may be alternatives to ecologically and economically viable forest management.
id UFSM-6_508c2ffabb4cf9e7f13d139d74b37ab1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25856
network_acronym_str UFSM-6
network_name_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Management of degraded natural forests in the Amazon: case study on harvest criteriaManejo de florestas naturais degradadas na Amazônia: estudo de caso sobre critérios de colheitaForest harvestingHarvest diameterHarvesting by diameter distributionForest managementColheita florestalDiâmetro de colheitaColheita por distribuição de diâmetrosManejo florestalThis paper deals with an innovative experience regarding tree harvesting criteria in degraded natural forest in the Amazon. The research was carried out in 535.6 ha of forest at Fazenda Shet, in Dom Eliseu/PA state, using the database of forest census for trees with DBH ≥ 25 cm. Criteria for tree harvesting considered, as a priority, the following elements: degree of health, shape of stem (2 and 3), maximum diameter to remain in the forest (DBH = 100 cm), smaller diameter trees (25 ≥ DBH ≤ 55 cm), species with higher tree density per unit area, diameter distribution according to the Liocourt coefficient, maintenance of intensively exploited species in the past and tree population ≤ 0.15 arv.ha-1. A total of 46,012 trees belonging to 106 species were inventoried and planned for harvest 23.19% (10,671 trees) at 12 years after the previous harvest. Based on harvest planning and following the criteria, the harvest forecast in relation to the total inventoried population resulted in: 2.16% trees by the criterion of health; 15.45% for the shape of stem; 0.26% by the maximum diameter; 93.93% for the smallest diameter; 57.50% for the tree density; and 5.04% for the maintenance of the species. Harvesting was performed on 98.79% of trees with compromised health; 22.20% with stem 2 and 3; 97.39% with maximum diameter; 95.02% with smaller diameter; and 90.30% with higher tree density. Were kept 98.14% of the species Astronium lecointei, Cordia goeldiana, Copaifera sp., Hymenaea courbaril, Hymenolobium petraeum, Handrohanthus serratifolius and Manilkara elata, intensively exploited in the past, and 98.70% of 53 other species with less abundance (≤ 0.15 arv.ha-1). The exploration planning following the proposed harvesting criteria allowed the extraction of trees in cycles of 10 to 12 years, being a shorter time than the one foreseen by the legislation. The maintenance of tree species diversity and forest conservation, provided for with these technical criteria, may be alternatives to ecologically and economically viable forest management.Este trabalho trata de uma experiência inovadora em relação a critérios para colheita de árvores em floresta natural degradada na Amazônia. A pesquisa foi desenvolvida em 535,6 ha de floresta na Fazenda Shet, em Dom Eliseu - PA, usando a base de dados do censo florestal referente a árvores com DAP ≥ 25 cm. Os critérios para colheita das árvores consideraram, prioritariamente, os seguintes elementos: grau de sanidade, qualidade do fuste (2 e 3), diâmetro máximo a permanecer na floresta (DAP < 100 cm), árvores de menor diâmetro (25 ≥ DAP ≤ 55 cm), espécies com maior densidade de árvores por unidade de área, distribuição diamétrica, segundo o coeficiente de Liocourt, manutenção das espécies intensamente exploradas no passado e com população de árvores ≤ 0,15 arv.ha-1. Foram inventariadas 46.012 árvores, pertencentes a 106 espécies, e planejadas para colheita 23,19% (10.671 árvores), aos 12 anos após a exploração anterior. Baseando-se no planejamento da colheita e seguindo os critérios, a previsão de colheita em relação à população total inventariada teve como resultado: 2,16% árvores pelo critério de sanidade; 15,45% pela forma de fuste; 0,26% pelo diâmetro máximo; 93,93% pelo menor diâmetro; 57,50% pela densidade arbórea; e 5,04% pela manutenção das espécies. A colheita foi realizada em 98,79% das árvores com sanidade comprometida; 22,20% com fuste 2 e 3; 97,39% com diâmetro máximo; 95,02% com menor diâmetro; e 90,30% com maior densidade arbórea. Foram mantidas 98,14% das espécies Astronium lecointei, Cordia goeldiana, Copaifera sp., Hymenaea courbaril, Hymenolobium petraeum, Handroanthus serratifolius e Manilkara elata, intensivamente exploradas no passado, e 98,70% de outras 53 espécies com menor abundância (≤ 0,15 arv.ha-1). O planejamento da exploração seguindo os critérios de colheita propostos possibilitou a extração de árvores em ciclos de 10 a 12 anos, sendo um tempo menor que o previsto pela legislação. A manutenção da diversidade de espécies arbóreas e a conservação da floresta em pé, previstas com esses critérios técnicos, podem ser alternativas para o manejo florestal ecológica e economicamente viável. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2020-04-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/2585610.5902/1980509825856Ciência Florestal; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2020); 43-59Ciência Florestal; v. 30 n. 1 (2020); 43-591980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/25856/23248Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Florestalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSiviero, Marco AntonioRuschel, Ademir RobertoYared, Jorge Alberto GazelPereira, José FranciscoAguiar, Osmar José Romeiro deBrienza Junior, SílvioPereira, Paulo Cezar GomesVieira, Sabrina BenmuyalContini, Karina Piekarski SivieroSales, Agust2020-09-02T20:44:36Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25856Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2020-09-02T20:44:36Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Management of degraded natural forests in the Amazon: case study on harvest criteria
Manejo de florestas naturais degradadas na Amazônia: estudo de caso sobre critérios de colheita
title Management of degraded natural forests in the Amazon: case study on harvest criteria
spellingShingle Management of degraded natural forests in the Amazon: case study on harvest criteria
Siviero, Marco Antonio
Forest harvesting
Harvest diameter
Harvesting by diameter distribution
Forest management
Colheita florestal
Diâmetro de colheita
Colheita por distribuição de diâmetros
Manejo florestal
title_short Management of degraded natural forests in the Amazon: case study on harvest criteria
title_full Management of degraded natural forests in the Amazon: case study on harvest criteria
title_fullStr Management of degraded natural forests in the Amazon: case study on harvest criteria
title_full_unstemmed Management of degraded natural forests in the Amazon: case study on harvest criteria
title_sort Management of degraded natural forests in the Amazon: case study on harvest criteria
author Siviero, Marco Antonio
author_facet Siviero, Marco Antonio
Ruschel, Ademir Roberto
Yared, Jorge Alberto Gazel
Pereira, José Francisco
Aguiar, Osmar José Romeiro de
Brienza Junior, Sílvio
Pereira, Paulo Cezar Gomes
Vieira, Sabrina Benmuyal
Contini, Karina Piekarski Siviero
Sales, Agust
author_role author
author2 Ruschel, Ademir Roberto
Yared, Jorge Alberto Gazel
Pereira, José Francisco
Aguiar, Osmar José Romeiro de
Brienza Junior, Sílvio
Pereira, Paulo Cezar Gomes
Vieira, Sabrina Benmuyal
Contini, Karina Piekarski Siviero
Sales, Agust
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Siviero, Marco Antonio
Ruschel, Ademir Roberto
Yared, Jorge Alberto Gazel
Pereira, José Francisco
Aguiar, Osmar José Romeiro de
Brienza Junior, Sílvio
Pereira, Paulo Cezar Gomes
Vieira, Sabrina Benmuyal
Contini, Karina Piekarski Siviero
Sales, Agust
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Forest harvesting
Harvest diameter
Harvesting by diameter distribution
Forest management
Colheita florestal
Diâmetro de colheita
Colheita por distribuição de diâmetros
Manejo florestal
topic Forest harvesting
Harvest diameter
Harvesting by diameter distribution
Forest management
Colheita florestal
Diâmetro de colheita
Colheita por distribuição de diâmetros
Manejo florestal
description This paper deals with an innovative experience regarding tree harvesting criteria in degraded natural forest in the Amazon. The research was carried out in 535.6 ha of forest at Fazenda Shet, in Dom Eliseu/PA state, using the database of forest census for trees with DBH ≥ 25 cm. Criteria for tree harvesting considered, as a priority, the following elements: degree of health, shape of stem (2 and 3), maximum diameter to remain in the forest (DBH = 100 cm), smaller diameter trees (25 ≥ DBH ≤ 55 cm), species with higher tree density per unit area, diameter distribution according to the Liocourt coefficient, maintenance of intensively exploited species in the past and tree population ≤ 0.15 arv.ha-1. A total of 46,012 trees belonging to 106 species were inventoried and planned for harvest 23.19% (10,671 trees) at 12 years after the previous harvest. Based on harvest planning and following the criteria, the harvest forecast in relation to the total inventoried population resulted in: 2.16% trees by the criterion of health; 15.45% for the shape of stem; 0.26% by the maximum diameter; 93.93% for the smallest diameter; 57.50% for the tree density; and 5.04% for the maintenance of the species. Harvesting was performed on 98.79% of trees with compromised health; 22.20% with stem 2 and 3; 97.39% with maximum diameter; 95.02% with smaller diameter; and 90.30% with higher tree density. Were kept 98.14% of the species Astronium lecointei, Cordia goeldiana, Copaifera sp., Hymenaea courbaril, Hymenolobium petraeum, Handrohanthus serratifolius and Manilkara elata, intensively exploited in the past, and 98.70% of 53 other species with less abundance (≤ 0.15 arv.ha-1). The exploration planning following the proposed harvesting criteria allowed the extraction of trees in cycles of 10 to 12 years, being a shorter time than the one foreseen by the legislation. The maintenance of tree species diversity and forest conservation, provided for with these technical criteria, may be alternatives to ecologically and economically viable forest management.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/25856
10.5902/1980509825856
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/25856
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1980509825856
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/25856/23248
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Florestal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Florestal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2020); 43-59
Ciência Florestal; v. 30 n. 1 (2020); 43-59
1980-5098
0103-9954
reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
collection Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br
_version_ 1799944131785523200