Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Groppo, Juliano Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Salemi, Luiz Felippe, Moraes, Jorge Marcos, Trevisan, Rodrigo, Seghesi, Gustavo Bicci, Martinelli, Luiz Antônio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência Florestal (Online)
DOI: 10.5902/1980509816862
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/16862
Resumo: The Atlantic rainforest is one of the most endangered ecosystems of our planet, this area presents only 8% of its original distribution, needs special attention to improve its conservation goals. This study aimed to compare the water retention capacity of the canopy in two watersheds an entirely covered by Atlantic Forest (Rain Forest), located in “Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar” and other covered with Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis in an adjacent area. Monitoring was carried out in the years of 2008 and 2009 through rain gauges and the water retention of the forest canopy was evaluated from linear regressions between precipitation (PR) and internal elevation (TR). The results showed that, with the exception of interception in the “dry” season that presented the lowest coeffcients of determination (R2), being 77% in the eucalypt and 82% in the Atlantic Forest, the variables presented a good ft with the incident precipitation, with higher coeffcients of 90%. The Atlantic Forest showed higher retention capacity of water in relation to Eucalyptus, where rainfall lower than 5 mm in the Atlantic Forest and 0.78mm in eucalypt are fully intercepted by the forest canopy and the wet period presented the greatest water retention capacity, probably due to the greater vegetation regeneration at this time, since in the dry period the leaves fall can decrease the retention.
id UFSM-6_5fcf5534a89a46a171642df955514481
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16862
network_acronym_str UFSM-6
network_name_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
spelling Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalyptCapacidade de retenção de água do dossel vegetativo: comparação entre Mata Atlântica e plantação florestal de eucaliptoLand useInterceptionImpactUso do soloInterceptaçãoImpactoThe Atlantic rainforest is one of the most endangered ecosystems of our planet, this area presents only 8% of its original distribution, needs special attention to improve its conservation goals. This study aimed to compare the water retention capacity of the canopy in two watersheds an entirely covered by Atlantic Forest (Rain Forest), located in “Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar” and other covered with Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis in an adjacent area. Monitoring was carried out in the years of 2008 and 2009 through rain gauges and the water retention of the forest canopy was evaluated from linear regressions between precipitation (PR) and internal elevation (TR). The results showed that, with the exception of interception in the “dry” season that presented the lowest coeffcients of determination (R2), being 77% in the eucalypt and 82% in the Atlantic Forest, the variables presented a good ft with the incident precipitation, with higher coeffcients of 90%. The Atlantic Forest showed higher retention capacity of water in relation to Eucalyptus, where rainfall lower than 5 mm in the Atlantic Forest and 0.78mm in eucalypt are fully intercepted by the forest canopy and the wet period presented the greatest water retention capacity, probably due to the greater vegetation regeneration at this time, since in the dry period the leaves fall can decrease the retention.A Mata Atlântica, um dos ecossistemas mais ameaçados do planeta, reduzida atualmente a menos de 8% de sua cobertura original, necessita de atenção especial para sua melhor conservação. O objetivo do estudo foi comparar a capacidade de retenção de água do dossel vegetativo em uma microbacia coberta por Floresta Ombrófila Densa (Mata Atlântica), situada no Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar e outra com cobertura de Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis em área próxima ao Parque. O monitoramento foi realizado nos anos de 2008 e 2009 através de pluviômetros e a retenção de água do dossel florestal foi avaliada a partir de regressões lineares entre a precipitação (PR) e a precipitação interna (TR). Os resultados mostraram que com exceção da interceptação na época “seca” que apresentou os menores coeficientes de determinação (R2), sendo de 77% no eucalipto e 82% na Mata Atlântica, as variáveis apresentaram bom ajuste com a precipitação incidente com coeficientes maiores de 90%. A microbacia de Mata Atlântica obteve maior capacidade de retenção de água das copas em relação ao eucalipto, em todo o período de estudo foi observado que precipitações inferiores a 5 mm na Mata Atlântica e 0,78 mm no Eucalipto são totalmente interceptadas pelo dossel florestal e o período úmido apresentou a maior capacidade de retenção de água, provavelmente pela maior regeneração vegetal nesta época, já que no período seco a queda das folhas pode diminuir a retenção.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2019-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1686210.5902/1980509816862Ciência Florestal; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2019); 96-104Ciência Florestal; v. 29 n. 1 (2019); 96-1041980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/16862/pdfCopyright (c) 2019 Ciência Florestalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGroppo, Juliano DanielSalemi, Luiz FelippeMoraes, Jorge MarcosTrevisan, RodrigoSeghesi, Gustavo BicciMartinelli, Luiz Antônio2020-06-05T19:47:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16862Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2020-06-05T19:47:20Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
Capacidade de retenção de água do dossel vegetativo: comparação entre Mata Atlântica e plantação florestal de eucalipto
title Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
spellingShingle Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
Groppo, Juliano Daniel
Land use
Interception
Impact
Uso do solo
Interceptação
Impacto
Groppo, Juliano Daniel
Land use
Interception
Impact
Uso do solo
Interceptação
Impacto
title_short Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
title_full Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
title_fullStr Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
title_full_unstemmed Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
title_sort Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
author Groppo, Juliano Daniel
author_facet Groppo, Juliano Daniel
Groppo, Juliano Daniel
Salemi, Luiz Felippe
Moraes, Jorge Marcos
Trevisan, Rodrigo
Seghesi, Gustavo Bicci
Martinelli, Luiz Antônio
Salemi, Luiz Felippe
Moraes, Jorge Marcos
Trevisan, Rodrigo
Seghesi, Gustavo Bicci
Martinelli, Luiz Antônio
author_role author
author2 Salemi, Luiz Felippe
Moraes, Jorge Marcos
Trevisan, Rodrigo
Seghesi, Gustavo Bicci
Martinelli, Luiz Antônio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Groppo, Juliano Daniel
Salemi, Luiz Felippe
Moraes, Jorge Marcos
Trevisan, Rodrigo
Seghesi, Gustavo Bicci
Martinelli, Luiz Antônio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Land use
Interception
Impact
Uso do solo
Interceptação
Impacto
topic Land use
Interception
Impact
Uso do solo
Interceptação
Impacto
description The Atlantic rainforest is one of the most endangered ecosystems of our planet, this area presents only 8% of its original distribution, needs special attention to improve its conservation goals. This study aimed to compare the water retention capacity of the canopy in two watersheds an entirely covered by Atlantic Forest (Rain Forest), located in “Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar” and other covered with Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis in an adjacent area. Monitoring was carried out in the years of 2008 and 2009 through rain gauges and the water retention of the forest canopy was evaluated from linear regressions between precipitation (PR) and internal elevation (TR). The results showed that, with the exception of interception in the “dry” season that presented the lowest coeffcients of determination (R2), being 77% in the eucalypt and 82% in the Atlantic Forest, the variables presented a good ft with the incident precipitation, with higher coeffcients of 90%. The Atlantic Forest showed higher retention capacity of water in relation to Eucalyptus, where rainfall lower than 5 mm in the Atlantic Forest and 0.78mm in eucalypt are fully intercepted by the forest canopy and the wet period presented the greatest water retention capacity, probably due to the greater vegetation regeneration at this time, since in the dry period the leaves fall can decrease the retention.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/16862
10.5902/1980509816862
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/16862
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1980509816862
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/16862/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Ciência Florestal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Ciência Florestal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2019); 96-104
Ciência Florestal; v. 29 n. 1 (2019); 96-104
1980-5098
0103-9954
reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
collection Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br
_version_ 1822352031519604736
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5902/1980509816862