Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Florestal (Online) |
DOI: | 10.5902/1980509816862 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/16862 |
Resumo: | The Atlantic rainforest is one of the most endangered ecosystems of our planet, this area presents only 8% of its original distribution, needs special attention to improve its conservation goals. This study aimed to compare the water retention capacity of the canopy in two watersheds an entirely covered by Atlantic Forest (Rain Forest), located in “Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar” and other covered with Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis in an adjacent area. Monitoring was carried out in the years of 2008 and 2009 through rain gauges and the water retention of the forest canopy was evaluated from linear regressions between precipitation (PR) and internal elevation (TR). The results showed that, with the exception of interception in the “dry” season that presented the lowest coeffcients of determination (R2), being 77% in the eucalypt and 82% in the Atlantic Forest, the variables presented a good ft with the incident precipitation, with higher coeffcients of 90%. The Atlantic Forest showed higher retention capacity of water in relation to Eucalyptus, where rainfall lower than 5 mm in the Atlantic Forest and 0.78mm in eucalypt are fully intercepted by the forest canopy and the wet period presented the greatest water retention capacity, probably due to the greater vegetation regeneration at this time, since in the dry period the leaves fall can decrease the retention. |
id |
UFSM-6_5fcf5534a89a46a171642df955514481 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16862 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-6 |
network_name_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
spelling |
Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalyptCapacidade de retenção de água do dossel vegetativo: comparação entre Mata Atlântica e plantação florestal de eucaliptoLand useInterceptionImpactUso do soloInterceptaçãoImpactoThe Atlantic rainforest is one of the most endangered ecosystems of our planet, this area presents only 8% of its original distribution, needs special attention to improve its conservation goals. This study aimed to compare the water retention capacity of the canopy in two watersheds an entirely covered by Atlantic Forest (Rain Forest), located in “Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar” and other covered with Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis in an adjacent area. Monitoring was carried out in the years of 2008 and 2009 through rain gauges and the water retention of the forest canopy was evaluated from linear regressions between precipitation (PR) and internal elevation (TR). The results showed that, with the exception of interception in the “dry” season that presented the lowest coeffcients of determination (R2), being 77% in the eucalypt and 82% in the Atlantic Forest, the variables presented a good ft with the incident precipitation, with higher coeffcients of 90%. The Atlantic Forest showed higher retention capacity of water in relation to Eucalyptus, where rainfall lower than 5 mm in the Atlantic Forest and 0.78mm in eucalypt are fully intercepted by the forest canopy and the wet period presented the greatest water retention capacity, probably due to the greater vegetation regeneration at this time, since in the dry period the leaves fall can decrease the retention.A Mata Atlântica, um dos ecossistemas mais ameaçados do planeta, reduzida atualmente a menos de 8% de sua cobertura original, necessita de atenção especial para sua melhor conservação. O objetivo do estudo foi comparar a capacidade de retenção de água do dossel vegetativo em uma microbacia coberta por Floresta Ombrófila Densa (Mata Atlântica), situada no Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar e outra com cobertura de Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis em área próxima ao Parque. O monitoramento foi realizado nos anos de 2008 e 2009 através de pluviômetros e a retenção de água do dossel florestal foi avaliada a partir de regressões lineares entre a precipitação (PR) e a precipitação interna (TR). Os resultados mostraram que com exceção da interceptação na época “seca” que apresentou os menores coeficientes de determinação (R2), sendo de 77% no eucalipto e 82% na Mata Atlântica, as variáveis apresentaram bom ajuste com a precipitação incidente com coeficientes maiores de 90%. A microbacia de Mata Atlântica obteve maior capacidade de retenção de água das copas em relação ao eucalipto, em todo o período de estudo foi observado que precipitações inferiores a 5 mm na Mata Atlântica e 0,78 mm no Eucalipto são totalmente interceptadas pelo dossel florestal e o período úmido apresentou a maior capacidade de retenção de água, provavelmente pela maior regeneração vegetal nesta época, já que no período seco a queda das folhas pode diminuir a retenção.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2019-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1686210.5902/1980509816862Ciência Florestal; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2019); 96-104Ciência Florestal; v. 29 n. 1 (2019); 96-1041980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/16862/pdfCopyright (c) 2019 Ciência Florestalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGroppo, Juliano DanielSalemi, Luiz FelippeMoraes, Jorge MarcosTrevisan, RodrigoSeghesi, Gustavo BicciMartinelli, Luiz Antônio2020-06-05T19:47:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16862Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2020-06-05T19:47:20Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt Capacidade de retenção de água do dossel vegetativo: comparação entre Mata Atlântica e plantação florestal de eucalipto |
title |
Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt |
spellingShingle |
Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt Groppo, Juliano Daniel Land use Interception Impact Uso do solo Interceptação Impacto Groppo, Juliano Daniel Land use Interception Impact Uso do solo Interceptação Impacto |
title_short |
Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt |
title_full |
Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt |
title_fullStr |
Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt |
title_full_unstemmed |
Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt |
title_sort |
Canopy water retention capacity: comparison between the Atlantic Rainforest and the forest plantation of eucalypt |
author |
Groppo, Juliano Daniel |
author_facet |
Groppo, Juliano Daniel Groppo, Juliano Daniel Salemi, Luiz Felippe Moraes, Jorge Marcos Trevisan, Rodrigo Seghesi, Gustavo Bicci Martinelli, Luiz Antônio Salemi, Luiz Felippe Moraes, Jorge Marcos Trevisan, Rodrigo Seghesi, Gustavo Bicci Martinelli, Luiz Antônio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Salemi, Luiz Felippe Moraes, Jorge Marcos Trevisan, Rodrigo Seghesi, Gustavo Bicci Martinelli, Luiz Antônio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Groppo, Juliano Daniel Salemi, Luiz Felippe Moraes, Jorge Marcos Trevisan, Rodrigo Seghesi, Gustavo Bicci Martinelli, Luiz Antônio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Land use Interception Impact Uso do solo Interceptação Impacto |
topic |
Land use Interception Impact Uso do solo Interceptação Impacto |
description |
The Atlantic rainforest is one of the most endangered ecosystems of our planet, this area presents only 8% of its original distribution, needs special attention to improve its conservation goals. This study aimed to compare the water retention capacity of the canopy in two watersheds an entirely covered by Atlantic Forest (Rain Forest), located in “Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar” and other covered with Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis in an adjacent area. Monitoring was carried out in the years of 2008 and 2009 through rain gauges and the water retention of the forest canopy was evaluated from linear regressions between precipitation (PR) and internal elevation (TR). The results showed that, with the exception of interception in the “dry” season that presented the lowest coeffcients of determination (R2), being 77% in the eucalypt and 82% in the Atlantic Forest, the variables presented a good ft with the incident precipitation, with higher coeffcients of 90%. The Atlantic Forest showed higher retention capacity of water in relation to Eucalyptus, where rainfall lower than 5 mm in the Atlantic Forest and 0.78mm in eucalypt are fully intercepted by the forest canopy and the wet period presented the greatest water retention capacity, probably due to the greater vegetation regeneration at this time, since in the dry period the leaves fall can decrease the retention. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/16862 10.5902/1980509816862 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/16862 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/1980509816862 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/16862/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Ciência Florestal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Ciência Florestal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2019); 96-104 Ciência Florestal; v. 29 n. 1 (2019); 96-104 1980-5098 0103-9954 reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
collection |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br |
_version_ |
1822352031519604736 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5902/1980509816862 |