O Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/88: o processo de delimitação de suas competências

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maieron, Alexandra Johann
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
dARK ID: ark:/26339/001300000qxzw
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/22748
Resumo: The object of the present work is the Constituent Process, as well its political transformation in which is identified the involved actors and its stance. Seeks, moreover, critical reflections to the following questions: How was defined the competences of the Federal Court of Justice (Supremo Tribunal Federal - STF) in the constituent process of 1987/88 – that resulted of federal Constitution’s diction of the art. 102, now in force? Which actors participated? And, especially, which participation of the STF’s officers of the time – as well as its Judicial Power’s members in those deliberations? In this sense, these questions are discussed in the narrative. Namely, in the first and the second chapters, beyond the conceptual elements, the historical aspects of STF and the Competences attributed to it on the Constitutions of Brazil Republic are widely argued. As well as, in the third chapter, is evidenced descriptive highlighting in how the Federal Court of Justice and its representatives of the Civil Society, especially jurists, lawyers and magistrates, developed the debates in the court of the National Constituent Assembly of 1987/88. Therefore, wants to pursuit the understanding of the participants’ different opinions, they being the politicians of Federal Parliament, deputies, senators, jurists, doctrinators, professors, Judicial Power and Public Prosecution members, just as all the people involved in the definition of the Federal Court of Justice’s competences in the Federal Constitution of 1988. The research is organized in a documental analysis, using the deductive method to comprehend, in an analytical and descriptive way, the registered discussions in the Proceedings of the National Constituent Assembly. Thus, in the referred Constituent Process, is realized the predominance of the social movement of the participation, noted during the public audiences. However, regarding the STF’s competences prevailed the institutionalism and party political movements. Consequently, in the fourth chapter, the research reaches the redefinition of STF’s role in the social conformation of the Democratic state. Thereby, is understandable that the STF kept its juridical nature as constituent of PJ, but also assembled political competences as guardian of CF of 1988, what it transformed in one institution of hybrid powers, while the maximum entity of PJ, although, with political competences and powers when it comes of the constitutional control amplified by it. Briefly, the relevant legal competence of the STF is delimited, by means of a temporality and different views.
id UFSM_00fdc512c97fe473f8edf2915bccf530
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/22748
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling O Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/88: o processo de delimitação de suas competênciasO Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/88: o processo de delimitação de suas competênciasSupremo Tribunal FederalAssembleia Nacional ConstituinteAtores envolvidosCompetênciasFederal Court of JusticeNational Constituent AssemblyInvolved actorsCompetencesCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIAThe object of the present work is the Constituent Process, as well its political transformation in which is identified the involved actors and its stance. Seeks, moreover, critical reflections to the following questions: How was defined the competences of the Federal Court of Justice (Supremo Tribunal Federal - STF) in the constituent process of 1987/88 – that resulted of federal Constitution’s diction of the art. 102, now in force? Which actors participated? And, especially, which participation of the STF’s officers of the time – as well as its Judicial Power’s members in those deliberations? In this sense, these questions are discussed in the narrative. Namely, in the first and the second chapters, beyond the conceptual elements, the historical aspects of STF and the Competences attributed to it on the Constitutions of Brazil Republic are widely argued. As well as, in the third chapter, is evidenced descriptive highlighting in how the Federal Court of Justice and its representatives of the Civil Society, especially jurists, lawyers and magistrates, developed the debates in the court of the National Constituent Assembly of 1987/88. Therefore, wants to pursuit the understanding of the participants’ different opinions, they being the politicians of Federal Parliament, deputies, senators, jurists, doctrinators, professors, Judicial Power and Public Prosecution members, just as all the people involved in the definition of the Federal Court of Justice’s competences in the Federal Constitution of 1988. The research is organized in a documental analysis, using the deductive method to comprehend, in an analytical and descriptive way, the registered discussions in the Proceedings of the National Constituent Assembly. Thus, in the referred Constituent Process, is realized the predominance of the social movement of the participation, noted during the public audiences. However, regarding the STF’s competences prevailed the institutionalism and party political movements. Consequently, in the fourth chapter, the research reaches the redefinition of STF’s role in the social conformation of the Democratic state. Thereby, is understandable that the STF kept its juridical nature as constituent of PJ, but also assembled political competences as guardian of CF of 1988, what it transformed in one institution of hybrid powers, while the maximum entity of PJ, although, with political competences and powers when it comes of the constitutional control amplified by it. Briefly, the relevant legal competence of the STF is delimited, by means of a temporality and different views.O presente trabalho tem como objeto o Processo Constituinte, bem como a transformação política em que se identificam os atores envolvidos e seus posicionamentos. Busca, ademais, reflexões críticas às seguintes interrogações: Como se definiram as competências do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) no processo constituinte de 1987/88 – e que resultaram na dicção do art. 102 da Constituição Federal ora em vigência? Quais atores participaram? E, em especial, qual a participação dos ministros do STF da época – bem como de membros do Poder Judiciário naquelas deliberações? Nesse sentido, estas questões são discutidas na narrativa. A saber, no primeiro e segundo capítulo, além de elementos conceituais, os aspectos históricos do STF e as Competências a ele atribuídas nas Constituições do Brasil República são amplamente argumentadas. Assim como, no terceiro capítulo, evidencia-se realce de caráter descritivo em como o Supremo Tribunal Federal e representantes da sociedade civil, em especial juristas, advogados e magistrados, desenvolveram os debates na corte da Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/1988. Para tanto, busca-se entender as diferentes opiniões dos participantes, sendo eles os políticos do Parlamento Federal, deputados, senadores, juristas, doutrinadores, professores, membros do Poder Judiciário, Ministério Público, bem como todos os envolvidos na definição de competências do Supremo Tribunal Federal na Constituição Federal de 1988. A pesquisa organizou-se em uma análise documental, utilizando o método dedutivo para compreender, de forma analítica e descritiva, as discussões registradas nos Anais da Assembleia Nacional Constituinte. Desta forma, no referido Processo Constituinte, percebe-se a predominância do movimento social de participação, observado durante as audiências públicas. Contudo, no tocante às competências do STF, prevaleceu o institucionalismo e os movimentos políticos partidários. Por conseguinte, no quarto capítulo, a pesquisa chega à redefinição do papel do STF na conformação social do Estado Democrático de Direito. Assim, entende-se que o STF manteve seu caráter jurídico como integrante do PJ, mas também agregou competências políticas como guardião da CF de 1988, o que lhe transformou em uma instituição de poderes híbridos, enquanto órgão máximo do PJ, porém, com competências e poderes políticos no que se trata do controle constitucional que lhe foi ampliado. Assim sendo, a relevante competência legal do STF é delimitada, mediante uma temporalidade e olhares diversos.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilSociologiaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências SociaisCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasPerez, Reginaldo Teixeirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1378204180017338Maia, Eduardo Lopes CabralReck, Janriê RodriguesMaieron, Alexandra Johann2021-11-08T17:06:15Z2021-11-08T17:06:15Z2020-06-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/22748ark:/26339/001300000qxzwporAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2021-12-10T20:01:07Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/22748Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2021-12-10T20:01:07Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv O Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/88: o processo de delimitação de suas competências
O Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/88: o processo de delimitação de suas competências
title O Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/88: o processo de delimitação de suas competências
spellingShingle O Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/88: o processo de delimitação de suas competências
Maieron, Alexandra Johann
Supremo Tribunal Federal
Assembleia Nacional Constituinte
Atores envolvidos
Competências
Federal Court of Justice
National Constituent Assembly
Involved actors
Competences
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA
title_short O Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/88: o processo de delimitação de suas competências
title_full O Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/88: o processo de delimitação de suas competências
title_fullStr O Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/88: o processo de delimitação de suas competências
title_full_unstemmed O Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/88: o processo de delimitação de suas competências
title_sort O Supremo Tribunal Federal durante a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987/88: o processo de delimitação de suas competências
author Maieron, Alexandra Johann
author_facet Maieron, Alexandra Johann
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Perez, Reginaldo Teixeira
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1378204180017338
Maia, Eduardo Lopes Cabral
Reck, Janriê Rodrigues
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maieron, Alexandra Johann
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Supremo Tribunal Federal
Assembleia Nacional Constituinte
Atores envolvidos
Competências
Federal Court of Justice
National Constituent Assembly
Involved actors
Competences
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA
topic Supremo Tribunal Federal
Assembleia Nacional Constituinte
Atores envolvidos
Competências
Federal Court of Justice
National Constituent Assembly
Involved actors
Competences
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA
description The object of the present work is the Constituent Process, as well its political transformation in which is identified the involved actors and its stance. Seeks, moreover, critical reflections to the following questions: How was defined the competences of the Federal Court of Justice (Supremo Tribunal Federal - STF) in the constituent process of 1987/88 – that resulted of federal Constitution’s diction of the art. 102, now in force? Which actors participated? And, especially, which participation of the STF’s officers of the time – as well as its Judicial Power’s members in those deliberations? In this sense, these questions are discussed in the narrative. Namely, in the first and the second chapters, beyond the conceptual elements, the historical aspects of STF and the Competences attributed to it on the Constitutions of Brazil Republic are widely argued. As well as, in the third chapter, is evidenced descriptive highlighting in how the Federal Court of Justice and its representatives of the Civil Society, especially jurists, lawyers and magistrates, developed the debates in the court of the National Constituent Assembly of 1987/88. Therefore, wants to pursuit the understanding of the participants’ different opinions, they being the politicians of Federal Parliament, deputies, senators, jurists, doctrinators, professors, Judicial Power and Public Prosecution members, just as all the people involved in the definition of the Federal Court of Justice’s competences in the Federal Constitution of 1988. The research is organized in a documental analysis, using the deductive method to comprehend, in an analytical and descriptive way, the registered discussions in the Proceedings of the National Constituent Assembly. Thus, in the referred Constituent Process, is realized the predominance of the social movement of the participation, noted during the public audiences. However, regarding the STF’s competences prevailed the institutionalism and party political movements. Consequently, in the fourth chapter, the research reaches the redefinition of STF’s role in the social conformation of the Democratic state. Thereby, is understandable that the STF kept its juridical nature as constituent of PJ, but also assembled political competences as guardian of CF of 1988, what it transformed in one institution of hybrid powers, while the maximum entity of PJ, although, with political competences and powers when it comes of the constitutional control amplified by it. Briefly, the relevant legal competence of the STF is delimited, by means of a temporality and different views.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-18
2021-11-08T17:06:15Z
2021-11-08T17:06:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/22748
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000qxzw
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/22748
identifier_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000qxzw
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Sociologia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Sociologia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1815172381634723840