A análise da mentira em Agostinho
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27274 |
Resumo: | Lying is a perennial theme of moral philosophy. Due to its frequent practice in the routine of people and institutions, and to its great impact, a philosophical reflection about lying acquires great importance. However, its exact function in the interpersonal and institutional relations, its characterization and legitimacy present themselves as a philosophical challenge, as non trivial philosophical issues. Since the origin of philosophy there were disagreeing opinions about the question of knowing if the act of lying is always acceptable, because, if being veracious does not require explanation, being mendacious does. If, on one hand, Augustine and Kant reject each and every type of lie, considering them as an immoral practice, Plato and Benjamin Constant accepted certain types of lie, since these lies are justified by the context. It means that, even those who show themselves as disposed to accept defined exceptions to the practice of being veracious looked for offering good reasons for the aforesaid exceptions. In the interior of Christian tradition, Augustine rejected each and every kind of lie, not accepting any justification for its practice. Was one of the first thinkers to get closer of a definition and to systematize the lie theme. He developed the lie theme in two treaties, one of them titled “On Lying” (De Mendacio, 395 D.C.), and the other “Against Lying” (Contra Mendacium, 420 D.C.). From such treaties it is proposed an analysis of the Augustinian characterization of lie. Augustine adopts as a starting point, the doubt and by the aid of a dialectic and rhetorical route conducts us to a wide ranging proposal about the theme. His work was composed with the hope of finding necessary and enough characteristics of an objective notion of lie, for beyond each and every probable denial. The Augustine analysis about lie will be enlightened, and, from this, practical cases will be explored in their different levels of complexity. Other thinkers who also use the theme and other issues related to the definition are examined, as the case of the double heart doctrine, as well as correlative themes as the moral luck, the case of silence eloquence, and the application of the fallacy of the slippery slope and the crash of faith in the lie theme. |
id |
UFSM_1d71f99c51107c20499527493f9f65e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/27274 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A análise da mentira em AgostinhoThe analysis of lying in AugustineMendacidadeVeracidadeAgostinhoDefiniçãoAto de falaMendacityVeracityAugustineDefinitionSpeech actCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIALying is a perennial theme of moral philosophy. Due to its frequent practice in the routine of people and institutions, and to its great impact, a philosophical reflection about lying acquires great importance. However, its exact function in the interpersonal and institutional relations, its characterization and legitimacy present themselves as a philosophical challenge, as non trivial philosophical issues. Since the origin of philosophy there were disagreeing opinions about the question of knowing if the act of lying is always acceptable, because, if being veracious does not require explanation, being mendacious does. If, on one hand, Augustine and Kant reject each and every type of lie, considering them as an immoral practice, Plato and Benjamin Constant accepted certain types of lie, since these lies are justified by the context. It means that, even those who show themselves as disposed to accept defined exceptions to the practice of being veracious looked for offering good reasons for the aforesaid exceptions. In the interior of Christian tradition, Augustine rejected each and every kind of lie, not accepting any justification for its practice. Was one of the first thinkers to get closer of a definition and to systematize the lie theme. He developed the lie theme in two treaties, one of them titled “On Lying” (De Mendacio, 395 D.C.), and the other “Against Lying” (Contra Mendacium, 420 D.C.). From such treaties it is proposed an analysis of the Augustinian characterization of lie. Augustine adopts as a starting point, the doubt and by the aid of a dialectic and rhetorical route conducts us to a wide ranging proposal about the theme. His work was composed with the hope of finding necessary and enough characteristics of an objective notion of lie, for beyond each and every probable denial. The Augustine analysis about lie will be enlightened, and, from this, practical cases will be explored in their different levels of complexity. Other thinkers who also use the theme and other issues related to the definition are examined, as the case of the double heart doctrine, as well as correlative themes as the moral luck, the case of silence eloquence, and the application of the fallacy of the slippery slope and the crash of faith in the lie theme.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESA mentira é um tema perene de filosofia moral. Devido à sua prática frequente no cotidiano das pessoas e instituições, e o seu grande impacto, uma reflexão filosófica sobre a mentira adquire grande importância. Entretanto, sua exata função nas relações interpessoais e institucionais, sua caracterização e sua legitimidade apresentam-se como um desafio filosófico, como questões filosóficas não triviais. Desde os primórdios da filosofia houve opiniões discordantes sobre a questão de saber se mentir é sempre admissível, pois, se ser veraz não requer explicação, ser mendaz o exige. Se, por um lado, Agostinho e Kant rejeitam todo e qualquer tipo de mentira, considerando-as como uma prática imoral, Platão e Benjamin Constant aceitaram certos tipos de mentira, desde que justificadas pelo contexto. Isto significa dizer que, mesmo aqueles que se mostraram dispostos a aceitar determinadas exceções à prática de ser veraz, procuraram oferecer boas razões para as referidas exceções. No interior da tradição cristã, Agostinho rejeitou todo e qualquer tipo de mentira, não aceitando nenhuma justificativa para a sua prática. Foi um dos primeiros pensadores a se aproximar de uma definição e sistematizar o tema da mentira. Ele desenvolveu o tema da mentira em dois tratados, um deles intitulado “Sobre a Mentira” (De Mendacio, 395 D.C.), e o outro “Contra a Mentira” (Contra Mendacium, 420 D.C.). A partir de tais tratados propõe-se uma análise da caracterização agostiniana da mentira. Agostinho adota como ponto de partida, a dúvida e mediante um percurso dialético e retórico nos conduz a uma proposta abrangente sobre o tema. Sua obra foi composta na esperança de encontrar características necessárias e suficientes de uma noção objetiva de mentira, para além de toda e qualquer provável refutação. Elucidar-se-á a análise de Agostinho sobre a mentira, e, a partir disso, explorar-seão casos práticos em seus diferentes graus de complexidade. Examinam-se outros pensadores que também se ocuparam do tema e demais questões relacionadas à definição, como é o caso da doutrina do duplo coração, bem como temas correlatos como a sorte moral, o caso da eloquência do silêncio, e a aplicação da falácia da ladeira escorregadia e da quebra de confiança ao tema da mentira.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilFilosofiaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasSautter, Frank Thomashttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760Rossatto, Noeli DutraCorá, Élsio JoséBlans, Lisiane Sabala2022-12-07T13:46:18Z2022-12-07T13:46:18Z2012-08-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27274porAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2022-12-07T13:46:18Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/27274Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2022-12-07T13:46:18Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A análise da mentira em Agostinho The analysis of lying in Augustine |
title |
A análise da mentira em Agostinho |
spellingShingle |
A análise da mentira em Agostinho Blans, Lisiane Sabala Mendacidade Veracidade Agostinho Definição Ato de fala Mendacity Veracity Augustine Definition Speech act CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
A análise da mentira em Agostinho |
title_full |
A análise da mentira em Agostinho |
title_fullStr |
A análise da mentira em Agostinho |
title_full_unstemmed |
A análise da mentira em Agostinho |
title_sort |
A análise da mentira em Agostinho |
author |
Blans, Lisiane Sabala |
author_facet |
Blans, Lisiane Sabala |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Sautter, Frank Thomas http://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760 Rossatto, Noeli Dutra Corá, Élsio José |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Blans, Lisiane Sabala |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mendacidade Veracidade Agostinho Definição Ato de fala Mendacity Veracity Augustine Definition Speech act CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
topic |
Mendacidade Veracidade Agostinho Definição Ato de fala Mendacity Veracity Augustine Definition Speech act CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
Lying is a perennial theme of moral philosophy. Due to its frequent practice in the routine of people and institutions, and to its great impact, a philosophical reflection about lying acquires great importance. However, its exact function in the interpersonal and institutional relations, its characterization and legitimacy present themselves as a philosophical challenge, as non trivial philosophical issues. Since the origin of philosophy there were disagreeing opinions about the question of knowing if the act of lying is always acceptable, because, if being veracious does not require explanation, being mendacious does. If, on one hand, Augustine and Kant reject each and every type of lie, considering them as an immoral practice, Plato and Benjamin Constant accepted certain types of lie, since these lies are justified by the context. It means that, even those who show themselves as disposed to accept defined exceptions to the practice of being veracious looked for offering good reasons for the aforesaid exceptions. In the interior of Christian tradition, Augustine rejected each and every kind of lie, not accepting any justification for its practice. Was one of the first thinkers to get closer of a definition and to systematize the lie theme. He developed the lie theme in two treaties, one of them titled “On Lying” (De Mendacio, 395 D.C.), and the other “Against Lying” (Contra Mendacium, 420 D.C.). From such treaties it is proposed an analysis of the Augustinian characterization of lie. Augustine adopts as a starting point, the doubt and by the aid of a dialectic and rhetorical route conducts us to a wide ranging proposal about the theme. His work was composed with the hope of finding necessary and enough characteristics of an objective notion of lie, for beyond each and every probable denial. The Augustine analysis about lie will be enlightened, and, from this, practical cases will be explored in their different levels of complexity. Other thinkers who also use the theme and other issues related to the definition are examined, as the case of the double heart doctrine, as well as correlative themes as the moral luck, the case of silence eloquence, and the application of the fallacy of the slippery slope and the crash of faith in the lie theme. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-08-28 2022-12-07T13:46:18Z 2022-12-07T13:46:18Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27274 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27274 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Filosofia UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Filosofia UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1805922040440422400 |