The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2907 |
Resumo: | The ostensive definition, based on ostensiveness, aims to indicate that human language is based only on gesture and indication. In this sense, such linguistic theory largely excludes the considerable eminence of symbology and internalization inscribed in the dynamics and interiority inherent to human language. Thus, the ostensible definition, with the intention of being a paradigmatic thesis about human language, would not explain or synthesize in itself all the richness present in human language. Before that, or this article intends to reflect on the ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine. Both, temporarily distant, do not endorse the ostensible definition as the basis of their theses about human language. Also, first, a concept about the ostensive definition will be presented. Deepen Wittgenstein's critique of such a linguistic concept and, finally, consider that Augustine did not have an ostensible definition as the basis of his conception of language. |
id |
UFRB-4_cff00c67ed4971414982f09a2386598a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2907 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and AugustineA ambiguidade da definição ostensiva e a convergência entre Wittgenstein e AgostinhoDefinição ostensiva; Linguagem humana; Wittgenstein; Agostinho.Ostensible definition; Human language; Wittgenstein; Augustine.The ostensive definition, based on ostensiveness, aims to indicate that human language is based only on gesture and indication. In this sense, such linguistic theory largely excludes the considerable eminence of symbology and internalization inscribed in the dynamics and interiority inherent to human language. Thus, the ostensible definition, with the intention of being a paradigmatic thesis about human language, would not explain or synthesize in itself all the richness present in human language. Before that, or this article intends to reflect on the ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine. Both, temporarily distant, do not endorse the ostensible definition as the basis of their theses about human language. Also, first, a concept about the ostensive definition will be presented. Deepen Wittgenstein's critique of such a linguistic concept and, finally, consider that Augustine did not have an ostensible definition as the basis of his conception of language.A definição ostensiva, ao basear-se na ostensividade, visa indicar que a linguagem humana se norteia, tão somente, na gesticulação e indicação. Nesse sentido, semelhante teoria linguística exclui, em grande parte, a considerável eminência da simbologia e internalização inscritos na dinamicidade e interioridade inerentes à linguagem humana. Desse modo, a definição ostensiva, com a pretensão de ser a tese paradigmática sobre a linguagem humana, não a explicitaria, tampouco sintetizaria em si toda a riqueza presente na linguagem humana. Perante isso, o presente artigo visa refletir acerca da ambiguidade da definição ostensiva e a convergência entre Wittgenstein e Agostinho. Ambos, embora distante temporalmente, não endossam a definição ostensiva como base de suas teses sobre a linguagem humana. Assim, em primeiro lugar, será apresentada uma conceituação sobre a definição ostensiva. Para depois, investigar sobre a crítica de Wittgenstein sobre tal conceito linguístico e, por fim, ponderar que, também, Agostinho não tem a definição ostensiva como base de sua concepção sobre a linguagem.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2022-06-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/290710.31977/grirfi.v22i2.2907Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 2 (2022); 156-1672178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2907/1725Copyright (c) 2022 Clodoaldo da Luzhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Luz, Clodoaldo2022-06-19T21:38:45Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2907Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2022-06-19T21:38:45Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine A ambiguidade da definição ostensiva e a convergência entre Wittgenstein e Agostinho |
title |
The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine |
spellingShingle |
The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine da Luz, Clodoaldo Definição ostensiva; Linguagem humana; Wittgenstein; Agostinho. Ostensible definition; Human language; Wittgenstein; Augustine. |
title_short |
The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine |
title_full |
The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine |
title_fullStr |
The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine |
title_full_unstemmed |
The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine |
title_sort |
The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine |
author |
da Luz, Clodoaldo |
author_facet |
da Luz, Clodoaldo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Luz, Clodoaldo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Definição ostensiva; Linguagem humana; Wittgenstein; Agostinho. Ostensible definition; Human language; Wittgenstein; Augustine. |
topic |
Definição ostensiva; Linguagem humana; Wittgenstein; Agostinho. Ostensible definition; Human language; Wittgenstein; Augustine. |
description |
The ostensive definition, based on ostensiveness, aims to indicate that human language is based only on gesture and indication. In this sense, such linguistic theory largely excludes the considerable eminence of symbology and internalization inscribed in the dynamics and interiority inherent to human language. Thus, the ostensible definition, with the intention of being a paradigmatic thesis about human language, would not explain or synthesize in itself all the richness present in human language. Before that, or this article intends to reflect on the ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine. Both, temporarily distant, do not endorse the ostensible definition as the basis of their theses about human language. Also, first, a concept about the ostensive definition will be presented. Deepen Wittgenstein's critique of such a linguistic concept and, finally, consider that Augustine did not have an ostensible definition as the basis of his conception of language. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2907 10.31977/grirfi.v22i2.2907 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2907 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v22i2.2907 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2907/1725 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Clodoaldo da Luz http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Clodoaldo da Luz http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 2 (2022); 156-167 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732700715974656 |