The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Luz, Clodoaldo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2907
Resumo: The ostensive definition, based on ostensiveness, aims to indicate that human language is based only on gesture and indication. In this sense, such linguistic theory largely excludes the considerable eminence of symbology and internalization inscribed in the dynamics and interiority inherent to human language. Thus, the ostensible definition, with the intention of being a paradigmatic thesis about human language, would not explain or synthesize in itself all the richness present in human language. Before that, or this article intends to reflect on the ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine. Both, temporarily distant, do not endorse the ostensible definition as the basis of their theses about human language. Also, first, a concept about the ostensive definition will be presented. Deepen Wittgenstein's critique of such a linguistic concept and, finally, consider that Augustine did not have an ostensible definition as the basis of his conception of language.
id UFRB-4_cff00c67ed4971414982f09a2386598a
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2907
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and AugustineA ambiguidade da definição ostensiva e a convergência entre Wittgenstein e AgostinhoDefinição ostensiva; Linguagem humana; Wittgenstein; Agostinho.Ostensible definition; Human language; Wittgenstein; Augustine.The ostensive definition, based on ostensiveness, aims to indicate that human language is based only on gesture and indication. In this sense, such linguistic theory largely excludes the considerable eminence of symbology and internalization inscribed in the dynamics and interiority inherent to human language. Thus, the ostensible definition, with the intention of being a paradigmatic thesis about human language, would not explain or synthesize in itself all the richness present in human language. Before that, or this article intends to reflect on the ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine. Both, temporarily distant, do not endorse the ostensible definition as the basis of their theses about human language. Also, first, a concept about the ostensive definition will be presented. Deepen Wittgenstein's critique of such a linguistic concept and, finally, consider that Augustine did not have an ostensible definition as the basis of his conception of language.A definição ostensiva, ao basear-se na ostensividade, visa indicar que a linguagem humana se norteia, tão somente, na gesticulação e indicação. Nesse sentido, semelhante teoria linguística exclui, em grande parte, a considerável eminência da simbologia e internalização inscritos na dinamicidade e interioridade inerentes à linguagem humana. Desse modo, a definição ostensiva, com a pretensão de ser a tese paradigmática sobre a linguagem humana, não a explicitaria, tampouco sintetizaria em si toda a riqueza presente na linguagem humana. Perante isso, o presente artigo visa refletir acerca da ambiguidade da definição ostensiva e a convergência entre Wittgenstein e Agostinho. Ambos, embora distante temporalmente, não endossam a definição ostensiva como base de suas teses sobre a linguagem humana. Assim, em primeiro lugar, será apresentada uma conceituação sobre a definição ostensiva. Para depois, investigar sobre a crítica de Wittgenstein sobre tal conceito linguístico e, por fim, ponderar que, também, Agostinho não tem a definição ostensiva como base de sua concepção sobre a linguagem.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2022-06-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/290710.31977/grirfi.v22i2.2907Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 2 (2022); 156-1672178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2907/1725Copyright (c) 2022 Clodoaldo da Luzhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Luz, Clodoaldo2022-06-19T21:38:45Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2907Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2022-06-19T21:38:45Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine
A ambiguidade da definição ostensiva e a convergência entre Wittgenstein e Agostinho
title The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine
spellingShingle The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine
da Luz, Clodoaldo
Definição ostensiva; Linguagem humana; Wittgenstein; Agostinho.
Ostensible definition; Human language; Wittgenstein; Augustine.
title_short The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine
title_full The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine
title_fullStr The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine
title_full_unstemmed The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine
title_sort The ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine
author da Luz, Clodoaldo
author_facet da Luz, Clodoaldo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Luz, Clodoaldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Definição ostensiva; Linguagem humana; Wittgenstein; Agostinho.
Ostensible definition; Human language; Wittgenstein; Augustine.
topic Definição ostensiva; Linguagem humana; Wittgenstein; Agostinho.
Ostensible definition; Human language; Wittgenstein; Augustine.
description The ostensive definition, based on ostensiveness, aims to indicate that human language is based only on gesture and indication. In this sense, such linguistic theory largely excludes the considerable eminence of symbology and internalization inscribed in the dynamics and interiority inherent to human language. Thus, the ostensible definition, with the intention of being a paradigmatic thesis about human language, would not explain or synthesize in itself all the richness present in human language. Before that, or this article intends to reflect on the ambiguity of the ostensive definition and the convergence between Wittgenstein and Augustine. Both, temporarily distant, do not endorse the ostensible definition as the basis of their theses about human language. Also, first, a concept about the ostensive definition will be presented. Deepen Wittgenstein's critique of such a linguistic concept and, finally, consider that Augustine did not have an ostensible definition as the basis of his conception of language.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2907
10.31977/grirfi.v22i2.2907
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2907
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v22i2.2907
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2907/1725
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Clodoaldo da Luz
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Clodoaldo da Luz
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 2 (2022); 156-167
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732700715974656