Conservação de cereais de inverno com o uso de aditivos microbianos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Becker, Eduardo Garcia
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
dARK ID: ark:/26339/001300000sk3m
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16512
Resumo: In order to evaluate the productivity, nutritional composition and fermentative parameters in winter, oat and wheat cereal silages, in different conservation forms, associated or not with homo and heterofermentative inoculants, an experiment was conducted in the central region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The work was conducted during two years, in the harvests of 2015 and 2016 where sowing and cutting were carried out during the months of June to October, respectively. The cutt were performed in flowering stage and pasty to farinaceous grain to make the pre-dried silage and silage, respectively. In the harvest of 2015, treatments with one genotype of oats (cv. Guapa) and two of wheat (cv. BRS Umbu and cv. TBIO Energia I) were used, where each genotype was submitted to a control group in the form of silage without addition of the inoculant (SSI) and two groups with different levels of addition of a bacterial inoculant (S1X and S2X) TotalSilo®. In the 2016 crop, two wheat cultivars (TBIO Energy I and II) and a mixture of both cultivars submitted to three forms of conservation, silage without inoculant, silage with inoculant and pre-dried silage were used. In both experiments, after sixty days of storage, the silos were opened and homogeneous samples were taken for analysis of pH, N-NH3 and buffering power. Evaluations of the bromatological composition and productivity of the cereals studied were carried out. PH reduction was observed with the use of the bacterial inoculant in oat and wheat cultivars. The levels of NDFcp and ADFcp were lower with the bacterial inoculant, and higher for TDN and NFC. Therefore, it obtained a higher estimate of dry matter consumption. When we evaluated the conservation forms, the silage presented greater nutritive value, independent of the use of the inoculant in relation to the pre-dried silage. The TBIO I wheat presented a better chemical composition considering the reduction in the levels of NDFcp and ADFcp, and increases in CP, TDN, NFC and in the estimation of the relative value of the food. Productivity was higher for oats in relation to wheat cultivars, however there was a higher production of CP and TDN per hectare for wheat genotype TBIO I in relation to oats and UMBU wheat. The addition of the bacterial inoculant improved the fermentation process, and the wheat genotype TBIO I presented better chemical composition in relation to the other winter cereals studied. The conservation of cereals as silage presented a better fermentation pattern and higher chemical composition in relation to pre-dried silage.
id UFSM_7a1e6ae340336c84670a780f5a632144
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/16512
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Conservação de cereais de inverno com o uso de aditivos microbianosConservation of winter cereals with the use of microbial additivesAveiaComposição químicaFermentaçãoInoculante bacterianoSilagem pré-secadaSilagemTrigoBacterial inoculantChemical compositionFermentationOatsPre-driedSilageWheatCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIAIn order to evaluate the productivity, nutritional composition and fermentative parameters in winter, oat and wheat cereal silages, in different conservation forms, associated or not with homo and heterofermentative inoculants, an experiment was conducted in the central region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The work was conducted during two years, in the harvests of 2015 and 2016 where sowing and cutting were carried out during the months of June to October, respectively. The cutt were performed in flowering stage and pasty to farinaceous grain to make the pre-dried silage and silage, respectively. In the harvest of 2015, treatments with one genotype of oats (cv. Guapa) and two of wheat (cv. BRS Umbu and cv. TBIO Energia I) were used, where each genotype was submitted to a control group in the form of silage without addition of the inoculant (SSI) and two groups with different levels of addition of a bacterial inoculant (S1X and S2X) TotalSilo®. In the 2016 crop, two wheat cultivars (TBIO Energy I and II) and a mixture of both cultivars submitted to three forms of conservation, silage without inoculant, silage with inoculant and pre-dried silage were used. In both experiments, after sixty days of storage, the silos were opened and homogeneous samples were taken for analysis of pH, N-NH3 and buffering power. Evaluations of the bromatological composition and productivity of the cereals studied were carried out. PH reduction was observed with the use of the bacterial inoculant in oat and wheat cultivars. The levels of NDFcp and ADFcp were lower with the bacterial inoculant, and higher for TDN and NFC. Therefore, it obtained a higher estimate of dry matter consumption. When we evaluated the conservation forms, the silage presented greater nutritive value, independent of the use of the inoculant in relation to the pre-dried silage. The TBIO I wheat presented a better chemical composition considering the reduction in the levels of NDFcp and ADFcp, and increases in CP, TDN, NFC and in the estimation of the relative value of the food. Productivity was higher for oats in relation to wheat cultivars, however there was a higher production of CP and TDN per hectare for wheat genotype TBIO I in relation to oats and UMBU wheat. The addition of the bacterial inoculant improved the fermentation process, and the wheat genotype TBIO I presented better chemical composition in relation to the other winter cereals studied. The conservation of cereals as silage presented a better fermentation pattern and higher chemical composition in relation to pre-dried silage.Com o objetivo de avaliar a produtividade, composição nutricional e os parâmetros fermentativos em silagens de cereais de inverno, aveia e trigo, em diferentes formas de conservação, associado, ou não, à inoculantes homo e heterofermentativos, foi conduzido um experimento na região central do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. O trabalho foi conduzido durante dois anos, nas safras de 2015 e 2016 onde foi realizada a semeadura e corte durante os meses de junho a outubro, respectivamente. Os cortes foram realizados em estádio de florescimento e grão pastoso a farináceo para confecção da silagem pré-secada e silagem, respectivamente. Na safra de 2015 foram utilizados os tratamentos com um genótipo de aveia (cv. Guapa) e dois de trigo (cv. BRS Umbu e cv. TBIO Energia I), onde cada genótipo foi submetido a um grupo controle na forma de silagem sem adição do inoculante (SSI) e dois grupos com diferentes níveis de adição de um inoculante bacteriano (S1X e S2X) TotalSilo®. Na safra de 2016 foram utilizados dois genótipos de trigo (TBIO Energia I e II) e uma mistura dos dois genótipos submetidos a três formas de conservação, silagem sem inoculante, silagem com inoculante e silagem pré-secada. Em ambos os experimentos, após sessenta dias de conservação foi realizada a abertura dos silos e retiradas amostras homogêneas para análise de pH, N-NH3 e poder tampão. Foram realizadas avaliações da composição bromatológica e de produtividade dos cereais estudados. Foi observada redução de pH com o uso do inoculante bacteriano nos genótipos de aveia e trigo. Os teores de FDNcp e FDAcp foram menores com a utilização do inoculante bacteriano, e maiores para NDT e CNF. Diante disso, obteve uma maior estimativa de consumo de matéria seca. Quando avaliamos as formas de conservação, a silagem apresentou maior valor nutritivo, independente do uso do inoculante em relação à silagem pré-secada. O trigo TBIO I apresentou melhor composição química considerando a redução nos teores de FDNcp e FDAcp, e incrementos em PB, NDT, CNF e na estimativa do valor relativo do alimento. A produtividade foi maior para a aveia em relação aos genótipos de trigo, no entanto houve uma maior produção de PB e NDT por hectare para o genótipo de trigo TBIO I em relação a aveia e o trigo UMBU. A adição do inoculante bacteriano melhorou o processo fermentativo, e o genótipo de trigo TBIO I apresentou melhor composição química em relação aos demais cerais de inverno estudados. A conservação dos cereais como silagem apresentou melhor padrão de fermentação e composição química superior em relação à silagem pré-secada.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilZootecniaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em ZootecniaCentro de Ciências RuraisViégas, Juliohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6750187644177333Silveira, Alisson Minozzo dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1854180562747190Vargas, Diego Prado dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3544899518150808Meinerz, Gilmar Robertohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9192042379813082Santos, Joabel Tonellotto doshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4354538229705803Becker, Eduardo Garcia2019-05-09T22:17:34Z2019-05-09T22:17:34Z2019-04-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16512ark:/26339/001300000sk3mporAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2019-05-10T06:02:47Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/16512Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2019-05-10T06:02:47Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Conservação de cereais de inverno com o uso de aditivos microbianos
Conservation of winter cereals with the use of microbial additives
title Conservação de cereais de inverno com o uso de aditivos microbianos
spellingShingle Conservação de cereais de inverno com o uso de aditivos microbianos
Becker, Eduardo Garcia
Aveia
Composição química
Fermentação
Inoculante bacteriano
Silagem pré-secada
Silagem
Trigo
Bacterial inoculant
Chemical composition
Fermentation
Oats
Pre-dried
Silage
Wheat
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
title_short Conservação de cereais de inverno com o uso de aditivos microbianos
title_full Conservação de cereais de inverno com o uso de aditivos microbianos
title_fullStr Conservação de cereais de inverno com o uso de aditivos microbianos
title_full_unstemmed Conservação de cereais de inverno com o uso de aditivos microbianos
title_sort Conservação de cereais de inverno com o uso de aditivos microbianos
author Becker, Eduardo Garcia
author_facet Becker, Eduardo Garcia
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Viégas, Julio
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6750187644177333
Silveira, Alisson Minozzo da
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1854180562747190
Vargas, Diego Prado de
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3544899518150808
Meinerz, Gilmar Roberto
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9192042379813082
Santos, Joabel Tonellotto dos
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4354538229705803
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Becker, Eduardo Garcia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aveia
Composição química
Fermentação
Inoculante bacteriano
Silagem pré-secada
Silagem
Trigo
Bacterial inoculant
Chemical composition
Fermentation
Oats
Pre-dried
Silage
Wheat
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
topic Aveia
Composição química
Fermentação
Inoculante bacteriano
Silagem pré-secada
Silagem
Trigo
Bacterial inoculant
Chemical composition
Fermentation
Oats
Pre-dried
Silage
Wheat
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
description In order to evaluate the productivity, nutritional composition and fermentative parameters in winter, oat and wheat cereal silages, in different conservation forms, associated or not with homo and heterofermentative inoculants, an experiment was conducted in the central region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The work was conducted during two years, in the harvests of 2015 and 2016 where sowing and cutting were carried out during the months of June to October, respectively. The cutt were performed in flowering stage and pasty to farinaceous grain to make the pre-dried silage and silage, respectively. In the harvest of 2015, treatments with one genotype of oats (cv. Guapa) and two of wheat (cv. BRS Umbu and cv. TBIO Energia I) were used, where each genotype was submitted to a control group in the form of silage without addition of the inoculant (SSI) and two groups with different levels of addition of a bacterial inoculant (S1X and S2X) TotalSilo®. In the 2016 crop, two wheat cultivars (TBIO Energy I and II) and a mixture of both cultivars submitted to three forms of conservation, silage without inoculant, silage with inoculant and pre-dried silage were used. In both experiments, after sixty days of storage, the silos were opened and homogeneous samples were taken for analysis of pH, N-NH3 and buffering power. Evaluations of the bromatological composition and productivity of the cereals studied were carried out. PH reduction was observed with the use of the bacterial inoculant in oat and wheat cultivars. The levels of NDFcp and ADFcp were lower with the bacterial inoculant, and higher for TDN and NFC. Therefore, it obtained a higher estimate of dry matter consumption. When we evaluated the conservation forms, the silage presented greater nutritive value, independent of the use of the inoculant in relation to the pre-dried silage. The TBIO I wheat presented a better chemical composition considering the reduction in the levels of NDFcp and ADFcp, and increases in CP, TDN, NFC and in the estimation of the relative value of the food. Productivity was higher for oats in relation to wheat cultivars, however there was a higher production of CP and TDN per hectare for wheat genotype TBIO I in relation to oats and UMBU wheat. The addition of the bacterial inoculant improved the fermentation process, and the wheat genotype TBIO I presented better chemical composition in relation to the other winter cereals studied. The conservation of cereals as silage presented a better fermentation pattern and higher chemical composition in relation to pre-dried silage.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-09T22:17:34Z
2019-05-09T22:17:34Z
2019-04-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16512
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000sk3m
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16512
identifier_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000sk3m
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Zootecnia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
Centro de Ciências Rurais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Zootecnia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1815172390967050240