Potencial evocado auditivo de tronco encefálico com estímulos clique e iChirp em neonatos

• Autor(a) principal: Cargnelutti, Michelle
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/6598
• topic: Potenciais evocados auditivos; Potenciais evocados auditivos do tronco encefálico; Neonatos; Audição; Testes auditivos; Idade gestacional; Gênero; Auditory evoked potentials; Brainstem auditory evoked potentials; Newborns; Hearing; Hearing tests; Gestational age; Genre; CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FONOAUDIOLOGIA

The chirp stimulus was designed seeking to compensate the delay of the sound wave through the cochlea, enabling simultaneous stimulation of nerve fibers along the auditory pathway, providing better neural synchrony and consequently higher amplitude responses. This study aims to analyze and compare the results of brainstem auditory evoked potential in newborns born at term, using the click and iChirp stimuli at different intensities, analyzing latency and amplitude of the V wave, tested ear and genre. The study analyzed 30 newborns at terms, and the protocol for BAEP registry with click and iChirp stimulus was: rarified polarity, 2048 scans, presentation rate of 27.7 stimuli/s, bandpass filter from 100 to 3,000 Hz, 100k gain, 12 ms window for the click and 24 ms for iChirp. Intensities researched with the two stimuli were 60, 40 and 20 dB nHL. When results with the two stimuli used in the study were compared regarding the values for the latency of the V wave, increased values with iChirp were observed in the three levels of performance. In regards to the magnitude of this component, the three researched intensities also revealed that the iChirp stimulus was able to generate statistically significant larger amplitudes when compared to the click stimulus. Additionally, subtle differences were observed between the ears and between the genres for the latency values and V wave amplitude with the different stimuli used, although with little clinical relevance. In conclusion, the use of iChirp stimulus may be interesting in the field of audiological diagnosis in children, since it evokes responses with larger amplitudes in the three intensity levels studied, facilitating the identification of the V wave. It is worth noting that when the iChirp was used, the latency of the V wave was higher when compared to research with the click. The variables ear tested and gender exhibited slight differences that were not considered clinically relavant.