O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade”
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
dARK ID: | ark:/26339/0013000000cfm |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/28368 |
Resumo: | With his Critique of Judgment, Kant aimed to establish a connection between the two facultiesof- mind addressed in the first two Critiques – i.e., the Understanding, concerning the sensibly knowable, and Reason, concerning the domain of the intelligible, of freedom – completing, thus, the so-called critical system of Reason. However, to establish this bridge over the “incalculable gulf fixed between the domain of the concept of nature […] and the domain of the concept of freedom, as the supersensible” [KU, AA 05: 175] is not as easy as, at first glance, it may seem: it is because each of these faculties has its own foundation that it is not legitimate for us to establish a direct link between the sensitive and the intelligible. Thus, even when Kant postulates “beauty as a symbol of morality” [KU, AA 05: 351], and when he puts the development of moral ideas as propaedeutic for the grounding of taste [cf. KU, AA 05: 356] one cannot – unlike many interpreters and commentators – link Ethics and Aesthetics if not at a transcendental level. However, it is problematic that, if, on the one hand, this is precisely one of the tasks proposed by the third Critique – i.e., to close the architecture of the criticaltranscendental system of Reason through a new transcendental a priori legislative faculty (the Judgment), which is placed alongside the other autonomous faculties of knowledge that contain a priori principles -; on the other hand, it is precisely this a priori groundwork of judgment-oftaste - a subject so important to Kant's argumentation and what makes it possible to establish, at last, the intended bridge between sensible and supersensible, i.e., between nature and freedom (and this without breaking with transcendental argumentation) - which seems overlooked by those few who were willing to investigate the Kantian problem of “sensification” of ideas. In the study proposed here, I intend to show how the groundwork of the apriority of judgmentsof- taste may be essential in order to think, legitimately, the Beautiful in a Moral perspective |
id |
UFSM_82251bdb284ec5fe89eec5a8a2eb5a8e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/28368 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade”The problem of the “sensification” of ideas and the kantian doctrine of “beauty as a symbol of moralityKantCrítica do JuízoFaculdade transcendental a priori do juízoÉticaEstéticaDAADCritique of JudgmentA priori transcendental faculty of judgmentEthicAestheticsCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAWith his Critique of Judgment, Kant aimed to establish a connection between the two facultiesof- mind addressed in the first two Critiques – i.e., the Understanding, concerning the sensibly knowable, and Reason, concerning the domain of the intelligible, of freedom – completing, thus, the so-called critical system of Reason. However, to establish this bridge over the “incalculable gulf fixed between the domain of the concept of nature […] and the domain of the concept of freedom, as the supersensible” [KU, AA 05: 175] is not as easy as, at first glance, it may seem: it is because each of these faculties has its own foundation that it is not legitimate for us to establish a direct link between the sensitive and the intelligible. Thus, even when Kant postulates “beauty as a symbol of morality” [KU, AA 05: 351], and when he puts the development of moral ideas as propaedeutic for the grounding of taste [cf. KU, AA 05: 356] one cannot – unlike many interpreters and commentators – link Ethics and Aesthetics if not at a transcendental level. However, it is problematic that, if, on the one hand, this is precisely one of the tasks proposed by the third Critique – i.e., to close the architecture of the criticaltranscendental system of Reason through a new transcendental a priori legislative faculty (the Judgment), which is placed alongside the other autonomous faculties of knowledge that contain a priori principles -; on the other hand, it is precisely this a priori groundwork of judgment-oftaste - a subject so important to Kant's argumentation and what makes it possible to establish, at last, the intended bridge between sensible and supersensible, i.e., between nature and freedom (and this without breaking with transcendental argumentation) - which seems overlooked by those few who were willing to investigate the Kantian problem of “sensification” of ideas. In the study proposed here, I intend to show how the groundwork of the apriority of judgmentsof- taste may be essential in order to think, legitimately, the Beautiful in a Moral perspectiveCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESCom sua Crítica do Juízo pretendeu Kant estabelecer uma ligação entre as duas faculdades-doânimo abordadas nas duas primeiras Críticas – i.e., o Entendimento, relativo ao sensivelmente cognoscível, e a Razão, respeitante ao domínio do inteligível, da liberdade – completando, desse modo, o assim chamado sistema crítico da Razão. Mas estabelecer esta ponte sobre o “abismo intransponível entre o domínio do conceito da natureza [...] e o do conceito de liberdade” [KU, AA 05: 175] não se mostra tão fácil como, à primeira vista, pode parecer: é porque cada uma destas faculdades possui uma fundamentação própria que não nos é legítimo estabelecer uma ligação direta entre o sensível e o inteligível. Assim, mesmo quando Kant postula a “beleza como símbolo da moralidade” [KU, AA 05: 35], e quando coloca o desenvolvimento de ideias morais como propedêutica para a fundação do gosto [cf. KU, AA 05: 356] não se pode – à diferença de muitos interpretes e comentadores – vincular Ética e Estética senão em um nível transcendental. Contudo, problemático é o fato de que se, por um lado, esta é justamente uma das tarefas a que se propõe a terceira Crítica – i.e., fechar a arquitetura do sistema críticotranscendental da Razão através de uma nova faculdade transcendental a priori legislante (o Juízo), colocada ao lado das demais faculdades-de-conhecimento autônomas que contém princípios a priori –; por outro lado, é precisamente esta fundamentação a priori do juízo-degosto – tema tão caro à argumentação kantiana e o que possibilita estabelecer, enfim, a pretendida ponte entre sensível e suprassensível, i.e., entre natureza e liberdade (e isso sem romper com a argumentação transcendental) – o que parece negligenciado por aqueles poucos que se propuseram a investigar o problema kantiano da “sensificação” das ideias. Na investigação aqui proposta pretendo mostrar como a fundamentação da aprioridade dos juízosde- gosto pode ser essencial para pensar, legitimamente, o belo numa perspectiva moralUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilFilosofiaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasHamm, Christian Viktorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5301026925485532Cecchinato, GiorgiaSilva, Mitieli Seixas daDejeanne, Solange de MoraesEuler, Werner LudwigGuimarães, Rômulo Eisinger2023-03-24T11:43:43Z2023-03-24T11:43:43Z2020-09-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/28368ark:/26339/0013000000cfmporAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2023-03-24T11:43:43Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/28368Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2023-03-24T11:43:43Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade” The problem of the “sensification” of ideas and the kantian doctrine of “beauty as a symbol of morality |
title |
O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade” |
spellingShingle |
O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade” Guimarães, Rômulo Eisinger Kant Crítica do Juízo Faculdade transcendental a priori do juízo Ética Estética DAAD Critique of Judgment A priori transcendental faculty of judgment Ethic Aesthetics CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade” |
title_full |
O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade” |
title_fullStr |
O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade” |
title_full_unstemmed |
O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade” |
title_sort |
O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade” |
author |
Guimarães, Rômulo Eisinger |
author_facet |
Guimarães, Rômulo Eisinger |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Hamm, Christian Viktor http://lattes.cnpq.br/5301026925485532 Cecchinato, Giorgia Silva, Mitieli Seixas da Dejeanne, Solange de Moraes Euler, Werner Ludwig |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guimarães, Rômulo Eisinger |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Kant Crítica do Juízo Faculdade transcendental a priori do juízo Ética Estética DAAD Critique of Judgment A priori transcendental faculty of judgment Ethic Aesthetics CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
topic |
Kant Crítica do Juízo Faculdade transcendental a priori do juízo Ética Estética DAAD Critique of Judgment A priori transcendental faculty of judgment Ethic Aesthetics CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
With his Critique of Judgment, Kant aimed to establish a connection between the two facultiesof- mind addressed in the first two Critiques – i.e., the Understanding, concerning the sensibly knowable, and Reason, concerning the domain of the intelligible, of freedom – completing, thus, the so-called critical system of Reason. However, to establish this bridge over the “incalculable gulf fixed between the domain of the concept of nature […] and the domain of the concept of freedom, as the supersensible” [KU, AA 05: 175] is not as easy as, at first glance, it may seem: it is because each of these faculties has its own foundation that it is not legitimate for us to establish a direct link between the sensitive and the intelligible. Thus, even when Kant postulates “beauty as a symbol of morality” [KU, AA 05: 351], and when he puts the development of moral ideas as propaedeutic for the grounding of taste [cf. KU, AA 05: 356] one cannot – unlike many interpreters and commentators – link Ethics and Aesthetics if not at a transcendental level. However, it is problematic that, if, on the one hand, this is precisely one of the tasks proposed by the third Critique – i.e., to close the architecture of the criticaltranscendental system of Reason through a new transcendental a priori legislative faculty (the Judgment), which is placed alongside the other autonomous faculties of knowledge that contain a priori principles -; on the other hand, it is precisely this a priori groundwork of judgment-oftaste - a subject so important to Kant's argumentation and what makes it possible to establish, at last, the intended bridge between sensible and supersensible, i.e., between nature and freedom (and this without breaking with transcendental argumentation) - which seems overlooked by those few who were willing to investigate the Kantian problem of “sensification” of ideas. In the study proposed here, I intend to show how the groundwork of the apriority of judgmentsof- taste may be essential in order to think, legitimately, the Beautiful in a Moral perspective |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-14 2023-03-24T11:43:43Z 2023-03-24T11:43:43Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/28368 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/26339/0013000000cfm |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/28368 |
identifier_str_mv |
ark:/26339/0013000000cfm |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Filosofia UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Filosofia UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1815172256522829824 |