O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade”

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guimarães, Rômulo Eisinger
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
dARK ID: ark:/26339/0013000000cfm
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/28368
Resumo: With his Critique of Judgment, Kant aimed to establish a connection between the two facultiesof- mind addressed in the first two Critiques – i.e., the Understanding, concerning the sensibly knowable, and Reason, concerning the domain of the intelligible, of freedom – completing, thus, the so-called critical system of Reason. However, to establish this bridge over the “incalculable gulf fixed between the domain of the concept of nature […] and the domain of the concept of freedom, as the supersensible” [KU, AA 05: 175] is not as easy as, at first glance, it may seem: it is because each of these faculties has its own foundation that it is not legitimate for us to establish a direct link between the sensitive and the intelligible. Thus, even when Kant postulates “beauty as a symbol of morality” [KU, AA 05: 351], and when he puts the development of moral ideas as propaedeutic for the grounding of taste [cf. KU, AA 05: 356] one cannot – unlike many interpreters and commentators – link Ethics and Aesthetics if not at a transcendental level. However, it is problematic that, if, on the one hand, this is precisely one of the tasks proposed by the third Critique – i.e., to close the architecture of the criticaltranscendental system of Reason through a new transcendental a priori legislative faculty (the Judgment), which is placed alongside the other autonomous faculties of knowledge that contain a priori principles -; on the other hand, it is precisely this a priori groundwork of judgment-oftaste - a subject so important to Kant's argumentation and what makes it possible to establish, at last, the intended bridge between sensible and supersensible, i.e., between nature and freedom (and this without breaking with transcendental argumentation) - which seems overlooked by those few who were willing to investigate the Kantian problem of “sensification” of ideas. In the study proposed here, I intend to show how the groundwork of the apriority of judgmentsof- taste may be essential in order to think, legitimately, the Beautiful in a Moral perspective
id UFSM_82251bdb284ec5fe89eec5a8a2eb5a8e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/28368
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade”The problem of the “sensification” of ideas and the kantian doctrine of “beauty as a symbol of moralityKantCrítica do JuízoFaculdade transcendental a priori do juízoÉticaEstéticaDAADCritique of JudgmentA priori transcendental faculty of judgmentEthicAestheticsCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAWith his Critique of Judgment, Kant aimed to establish a connection between the two facultiesof- mind addressed in the first two Critiques – i.e., the Understanding, concerning the sensibly knowable, and Reason, concerning the domain of the intelligible, of freedom – completing, thus, the so-called critical system of Reason. However, to establish this bridge over the “incalculable gulf fixed between the domain of the concept of nature […] and the domain of the concept of freedom, as the supersensible” [KU, AA 05: 175] is not as easy as, at first glance, it may seem: it is because each of these faculties has its own foundation that it is not legitimate for us to establish a direct link between the sensitive and the intelligible. Thus, even when Kant postulates “beauty as a symbol of morality” [KU, AA 05: 351], and when he puts the development of moral ideas as propaedeutic for the grounding of taste [cf. KU, AA 05: 356] one cannot – unlike many interpreters and commentators – link Ethics and Aesthetics if not at a transcendental level. However, it is problematic that, if, on the one hand, this is precisely one of the tasks proposed by the third Critique – i.e., to close the architecture of the criticaltranscendental system of Reason through a new transcendental a priori legislative faculty (the Judgment), which is placed alongside the other autonomous faculties of knowledge that contain a priori principles -; on the other hand, it is precisely this a priori groundwork of judgment-oftaste - a subject so important to Kant's argumentation and what makes it possible to establish, at last, the intended bridge between sensible and supersensible, i.e., between nature and freedom (and this without breaking with transcendental argumentation) - which seems overlooked by those few who were willing to investigate the Kantian problem of “sensification” of ideas. In the study proposed here, I intend to show how the groundwork of the apriority of judgmentsof- taste may be essential in order to think, legitimately, the Beautiful in a Moral perspectiveCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESCom sua Crítica do Juízo pretendeu Kant estabelecer uma ligação entre as duas faculdades-doânimo abordadas nas duas primeiras Críticas – i.e., o Entendimento, relativo ao sensivelmente cognoscível, e a Razão, respeitante ao domínio do inteligível, da liberdade – completando, desse modo, o assim chamado sistema crítico da Razão. Mas estabelecer esta ponte sobre o “abismo intransponível entre o domínio do conceito da natureza [...] e o do conceito de liberdade” [KU, AA 05: 175] não se mostra tão fácil como, à primeira vista, pode parecer: é porque cada uma destas faculdades possui uma fundamentação própria que não nos é legítimo estabelecer uma ligação direta entre o sensível e o inteligível. Assim, mesmo quando Kant postula a “beleza como símbolo da moralidade” [KU, AA 05: 35], e quando coloca o desenvolvimento de ideias morais como propedêutica para a fundação do gosto [cf. KU, AA 05: 356] não se pode – à diferença de muitos interpretes e comentadores – vincular Ética e Estética senão em um nível transcendental. Contudo, problemático é o fato de que se, por um lado, esta é justamente uma das tarefas a que se propõe a terceira Crítica – i.e., fechar a arquitetura do sistema críticotranscendental da Razão através de uma nova faculdade transcendental a priori legislante (o Juízo), colocada ao lado das demais faculdades-de-conhecimento autônomas que contém princípios a priori –; por outro lado, é precisamente esta fundamentação a priori do juízo-degosto – tema tão caro à argumentação kantiana e o que possibilita estabelecer, enfim, a pretendida ponte entre sensível e suprassensível, i.e., entre natureza e liberdade (e isso sem romper com a argumentação transcendental) – o que parece negligenciado por aqueles poucos que se propuseram a investigar o problema kantiano da “sensificação” das ideias. Na investigação aqui proposta pretendo mostrar como a fundamentação da aprioridade dos juízosde- gosto pode ser essencial para pensar, legitimamente, o belo numa perspectiva moralUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilFilosofiaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasHamm, Christian Viktorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5301026925485532Cecchinato, GiorgiaSilva, Mitieli Seixas daDejeanne, Solange de MoraesEuler, Werner LudwigGuimarães, Rômulo Eisinger2023-03-24T11:43:43Z2023-03-24T11:43:43Z2020-09-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/28368ark:/26339/0013000000cfmporAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2023-03-24T11:43:43Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/28368Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2023-03-24T11:43:43Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade”
The problem of the “sensification” of ideas and the kantian doctrine of “beauty as a symbol of morality
title O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade”
spellingShingle O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade”
Guimarães, Rômulo Eisinger
Kant
Crítica do Juízo
Faculdade transcendental a priori do juízo
Ética
Estética
DAAD
Critique of Judgment
A priori transcendental faculty of judgment
Ethic
Aesthetics
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
title_short O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade”
title_full O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade”
title_fullStr O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade”
title_full_unstemmed O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade”
title_sort O problema da “sensificação” das ideias e a doutrina kantiana da “beleza como símbolo da moralidade”
author Guimarães, Rômulo Eisinger
author_facet Guimarães, Rômulo Eisinger
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Hamm, Christian Viktor
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5301026925485532
Cecchinato, Giorgia
Silva, Mitieli Seixas da
Dejeanne, Solange de Moraes
Euler, Werner Ludwig
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guimarães, Rômulo Eisinger
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Kant
Crítica do Juízo
Faculdade transcendental a priori do juízo
Ética
Estética
DAAD
Critique of Judgment
A priori transcendental faculty of judgment
Ethic
Aesthetics
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
topic Kant
Crítica do Juízo
Faculdade transcendental a priori do juízo
Ética
Estética
DAAD
Critique of Judgment
A priori transcendental faculty of judgment
Ethic
Aesthetics
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
description With his Critique of Judgment, Kant aimed to establish a connection between the two facultiesof- mind addressed in the first two Critiques – i.e., the Understanding, concerning the sensibly knowable, and Reason, concerning the domain of the intelligible, of freedom – completing, thus, the so-called critical system of Reason. However, to establish this bridge over the “incalculable gulf fixed between the domain of the concept of nature […] and the domain of the concept of freedom, as the supersensible” [KU, AA 05: 175] is not as easy as, at first glance, it may seem: it is because each of these faculties has its own foundation that it is not legitimate for us to establish a direct link between the sensitive and the intelligible. Thus, even when Kant postulates “beauty as a symbol of morality” [KU, AA 05: 351], and when he puts the development of moral ideas as propaedeutic for the grounding of taste [cf. KU, AA 05: 356] one cannot – unlike many interpreters and commentators – link Ethics and Aesthetics if not at a transcendental level. However, it is problematic that, if, on the one hand, this is precisely one of the tasks proposed by the third Critique – i.e., to close the architecture of the criticaltranscendental system of Reason through a new transcendental a priori legislative faculty (the Judgment), which is placed alongside the other autonomous faculties of knowledge that contain a priori principles -; on the other hand, it is precisely this a priori groundwork of judgment-oftaste - a subject so important to Kant's argumentation and what makes it possible to establish, at last, the intended bridge between sensible and supersensible, i.e., between nature and freedom (and this without breaking with transcendental argumentation) - which seems overlooked by those few who were willing to investigate the Kantian problem of “sensification” of ideas. In the study proposed here, I intend to show how the groundwork of the apriority of judgmentsof- taste may be essential in order to think, legitimately, the Beautiful in a Moral perspective
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-14
2023-03-24T11:43:43Z
2023-03-24T11:43:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/28368
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/0013000000cfm
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/28368
identifier_str_mv ark:/26339/0013000000cfm
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Filosofia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Filosofia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1815172256522829824