Racionalidade burocrática e políticas públicas: crítica ao sistema normativo da assessoria técnica, social e ambiental aos assentamentos da reforma agrária no RS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dalbianco, Vinicius Piccin
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/3833
Resumo: Considering that the implementation of the Rural Extension (RE) services was outsourced by the State in an institutional pluralism environment and that this process was accompanied by an instrumental rationalization of public policies, characterized by increasing regulation and bureaucratic rules, this study aimed to analyze the Regulatory System (ReS) in the configuration of the Technical, Social and Environmental Assistance Program (TSEA) to the settlements of Land Reform in Rio Grande do Sul (RS). We used mixed quantitative and qualitative methods as approach and analytical methods concerning the objectives. We conducted document analysis, observation and individual interviews for the production of narratives concerning the configuration of TSEA services. The analysis was performed from the theoretical perspective and emerging analytical categories, and the data were interpreted and systematized as a whole. The document review sought to characterize the conceptual basis and the guidelines of TSEA and unravel the references that characterized the establishment of ReS that guided the operationalization of the Program in order to enable an understanding of the factors influencing the planning and execution of RE services. TSEA is inserted in the context of reform of the State s role, which is mediated by the neoliberal assumptions and characterized by outsourcing services for institutional pluralism and the expansion of bureaucratic rules on State s actions. We identified that the ReS set in TSEA aimed the clear determination of legal procedures at the expense of development processes, assuring legal and bureaucratic security of contracts and the social legitimacy of the actions developed. Allied to the problems of assessment criteria that could not measure the goals aimed by TSEA, an environment was created which prevailed the meeting of the means in procedures and correspondence with the organizational and operational reality of the institutions involved. In this sense, well-assessed technical teams were those who managed to avoid penalties for meeting regulatory criteria even if their actions had no practical meaning settlers lives. We observed that the ReS of TSEA evolved as inference to the correction of practices and distortions that have been diagnosed during the development of the Program. Methodological and structural innovations have arisen from new regulatory measures, which sought to solve previous operational dysfunctions and prevent new functional deviations. Regulatory System also contributed to the promotion of accommodation of actors from TSEA Program, when it is important to guarantee compliance with the rules, promoting uniform routines. The analysis of the functioning of the TSEA Program also highlighted the commitment of social participation. RS hindered the development of the democratic exercise of social participation. We understand that the combination of executive and participatory decentralization could be the condition to break with the bureaucratic regulation of public policies. We understand that a new configuration of TSEA management model will enable increase the positive results, especially by the conjunction between social demand and actions performed. Thus, there is a challenge that is a new round of discussion and action in the Program, in which the central role is in the management model and adjustments in power relations and the role of the State concerning the reality of settlers.
id UFSM_a93f4db1f2bcf84d0631f510277883cc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/3833
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Racionalidade burocrática e políticas públicas: crítica ao sistema normativo da assessoria técnica, social e ambiental aos assentamentos da reforma agrária no RSBureaucratic rationality and public policies: criticism to the normative system of technical, social and environmental assistance to land reform setlements in RSBurocraciaSistema normativoAssentamentosExtensão ruralATES (Assistência Técnica, Social e Ambiental)BureaucracyRegulatory systemSettlementsRural extensionTSEACNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIAConsidering that the implementation of the Rural Extension (RE) services was outsourced by the State in an institutional pluralism environment and that this process was accompanied by an instrumental rationalization of public policies, characterized by increasing regulation and bureaucratic rules, this study aimed to analyze the Regulatory System (ReS) in the configuration of the Technical, Social and Environmental Assistance Program (TSEA) to the settlements of Land Reform in Rio Grande do Sul (RS). We used mixed quantitative and qualitative methods as approach and analytical methods concerning the objectives. We conducted document analysis, observation and individual interviews for the production of narratives concerning the configuration of TSEA services. The analysis was performed from the theoretical perspective and emerging analytical categories, and the data were interpreted and systematized as a whole. The document review sought to characterize the conceptual basis and the guidelines of TSEA and unravel the references that characterized the establishment of ReS that guided the operationalization of the Program in order to enable an understanding of the factors influencing the planning and execution of RE services. TSEA is inserted in the context of reform of the State s role, which is mediated by the neoliberal assumptions and characterized by outsourcing services for institutional pluralism and the expansion of bureaucratic rules on State s actions. We identified that the ReS set in TSEA aimed the clear determination of legal procedures at the expense of development processes, assuring legal and bureaucratic security of contracts and the social legitimacy of the actions developed. Allied to the problems of assessment criteria that could not measure the goals aimed by TSEA, an environment was created which prevailed the meeting of the means in procedures and correspondence with the organizational and operational reality of the institutions involved. In this sense, well-assessed technical teams were those who managed to avoid penalties for meeting regulatory criteria even if their actions had no practical meaning settlers lives. We observed that the ReS of TSEA evolved as inference to the correction of practices and distortions that have been diagnosed during the development of the Program. Methodological and structural innovations have arisen from new regulatory measures, which sought to solve previous operational dysfunctions and prevent new functional deviations. Regulatory System also contributed to the promotion of accommodation of actors from TSEA Program, when it is important to guarantee compliance with the rules, promoting uniform routines. The analysis of the functioning of the TSEA Program also highlighted the commitment of social participation. RS hindered the development of the democratic exercise of social participation. We understand that the combination of executive and participatory decentralization could be the condition to break with the bureaucratic regulation of public policies. We understand that a new configuration of TSEA management model will enable increase the positive results, especially by the conjunction between social demand and actions performed. Thus, there is a challenge that is a new round of discussion and action in the Program, in which the central role is in the management model and adjustments in power relations and the role of the State concerning the reality of settlers.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorConsiderando-se que a execução dos serviços de Extensão Rural (ER) foi terceirizada pelo Estado num ambiente de pluralidade institucional e que esse processo foi acompanhado por uma racionalização instrumental das políticas públicas, caracterizada pela crescente normatização e regramento burocrático, esta pesquisa objetivou analisar o Sistema Normativo (SN) na configuração do Programa de Assessoria Técnica, Social e Ambiental (ATES) aos assentamentos de Reforma Agrária no RS. Foram utilizados métodos mistos de abordagem quanti-qualitativa quanto à forma de abordagem e analítica quanto ao objetivo. Realizou-se análise documental, observação e entrevistas individuais para produção de narrativas referentes à configuração dos serviços de ATES. Foi realizada análise a partir da perspectiva teórica e das categorias analíticas emergentes, sendo os dados interpretados, sistematizados em seu conjunto. A revisão documental buscou caracterizar as bases conceituais e as diretrizes da ATES, bem como desvendar as referências que caracterizaram a constituição do SN que regimentou a operacionalização do Programa de modo a possibilitar a compreensão dos fatores que influenciam o planejamento e a execução dos serviços de ER. A ATES está inserida no contexto da reforma do papel do Estado, que é mediado pelos pressupostos neoliberais e caracterizado pela terceirização de serviços, pelo pluralismo institucional e pela ampliação do regramento burocrático sobre as ações do Estado. Foi identificado que o SN configurado na ATES teve como princípio a determinação clara de procedimentos legais em detrimento de processos de desenvolvimento, promovendo a garantia da segurança jurídica e burocrática dos contratos e a legitimidade social das ações desenvolvidas. Aliado aos problemas dos critérios de avaliação que não conseguiram medir os fins objetivados pela ATES, foi criado um ambiente onde prevaleceu o cumprimento dos meios nos procedimentos e na sua correspondência com a realidade organizativa e operativa das instituições envolvidas. Nesse sentido, equipes técnicas bem avaliadas foram aquelas que conseguiram evitar penalidades por atenderem os critérios normativos mesmo que sua ação não tivesse sentido prático para a vida das famílias assentadas. Observou-se que o SN da ATES evoluiu como inferência para a correção das práticas e distorções que foram sendo diagnosticadas no decorrer do desenvolvimento do Programa. As inovações metodológicas e estruturais foram procedidas de novas medidas de regulação, que buscaram solucionar as disfunções operativas anteriores e prevenir novos desvios funcionais. O Sistema Normativo também contribuiu para a promoção da acomodação dos atores do Programa de ATES, sendo importante a garantia de cumprimento das regras, impulsionando rotinas uniformes. A análise do funcionamento do Programa de ATES também evidenciou o comprometimento da participação social. O SN dificultou o desenvolvimento do exercício democrático da participação social. Compreende-se que a combinação entre a descentralização executiva e participativa poderia ser a condição para o rompimento com a normatização burocrática das políticas públicas. Compreende-se que uma nova configuração do modelo de gestão da ATES possibilitará ampliar os resultados positivos, principalmente pela conjunção entre demanda social e ações realizadas. Desafia-se, com isso, um novo ciclo de discussão e ação no Programa, no qual a centralidade esteja no modelo de gestão e nos ajustes nas relações de poder e no papel do Estado frente à realidade das famílias assentadas.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBRAgronomiaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Extensão RuralNeumann, Pedro Selvinohttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4777288A1Souza, Renato Santos dehttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4797085Z8Fialho, Marco Antônio Verardihttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4769329J4Seminotti, Jonas Joséhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0843192605086286Norder, Luiz Antonio Cabellohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0080353709980071Dalbianco, Vinicius Piccin2017-01-122017-01-122016-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfapplication/pdfDALBIANCO, Vinicius Piccin. BUREAUCRATIC RATIONALITY AND PUBLIC POLICIES: CRITICISM TO THE NORMATIVE SYSTEM OF TECHNICAL, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE TO LAND REFORM SETLEMENTS IN RS. 2016. 286 f. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2016.http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/3833porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2017-08-10T12:50:32Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/3833Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2017-08-10T12:50:32Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Racionalidade burocrática e políticas públicas: crítica ao sistema normativo da assessoria técnica, social e ambiental aos assentamentos da reforma agrária no RS
Bureaucratic rationality and public policies: criticism to the normative system of technical, social and environmental assistance to land reform setlements in RS
title Racionalidade burocrática e políticas públicas: crítica ao sistema normativo da assessoria técnica, social e ambiental aos assentamentos da reforma agrária no RS
spellingShingle Racionalidade burocrática e políticas públicas: crítica ao sistema normativo da assessoria técnica, social e ambiental aos assentamentos da reforma agrária no RS
Dalbianco, Vinicius Piccin
Burocracia
Sistema normativo
Assentamentos
Extensão rural
ATES (Assistência Técnica, Social e Ambiental)
Bureaucracy
Regulatory system
Settlements
Rural extension
TSEA
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
title_short Racionalidade burocrática e políticas públicas: crítica ao sistema normativo da assessoria técnica, social e ambiental aos assentamentos da reforma agrária no RS
title_full Racionalidade burocrática e políticas públicas: crítica ao sistema normativo da assessoria técnica, social e ambiental aos assentamentos da reforma agrária no RS
title_fullStr Racionalidade burocrática e políticas públicas: crítica ao sistema normativo da assessoria técnica, social e ambiental aos assentamentos da reforma agrária no RS
title_full_unstemmed Racionalidade burocrática e políticas públicas: crítica ao sistema normativo da assessoria técnica, social e ambiental aos assentamentos da reforma agrária no RS
title_sort Racionalidade burocrática e políticas públicas: crítica ao sistema normativo da assessoria técnica, social e ambiental aos assentamentos da reforma agrária no RS
author Dalbianco, Vinicius Piccin
author_facet Dalbianco, Vinicius Piccin
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Neumann, Pedro Selvino
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4777288A1
Souza, Renato Santos de
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4797085Z8
Fialho, Marco Antônio Verardi
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4769329J4
Seminotti, Jonas José
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0843192605086286
Norder, Luiz Antonio Cabello
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0080353709980071
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dalbianco, Vinicius Piccin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Burocracia
Sistema normativo
Assentamentos
Extensão rural
ATES (Assistência Técnica, Social e Ambiental)
Bureaucracy
Regulatory system
Settlements
Rural extension
TSEA
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
topic Burocracia
Sistema normativo
Assentamentos
Extensão rural
ATES (Assistência Técnica, Social e Ambiental)
Bureaucracy
Regulatory system
Settlements
Rural extension
TSEA
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
description Considering that the implementation of the Rural Extension (RE) services was outsourced by the State in an institutional pluralism environment and that this process was accompanied by an instrumental rationalization of public policies, characterized by increasing regulation and bureaucratic rules, this study aimed to analyze the Regulatory System (ReS) in the configuration of the Technical, Social and Environmental Assistance Program (TSEA) to the settlements of Land Reform in Rio Grande do Sul (RS). We used mixed quantitative and qualitative methods as approach and analytical methods concerning the objectives. We conducted document analysis, observation and individual interviews for the production of narratives concerning the configuration of TSEA services. The analysis was performed from the theoretical perspective and emerging analytical categories, and the data were interpreted and systematized as a whole. The document review sought to characterize the conceptual basis and the guidelines of TSEA and unravel the references that characterized the establishment of ReS that guided the operationalization of the Program in order to enable an understanding of the factors influencing the planning and execution of RE services. TSEA is inserted in the context of reform of the State s role, which is mediated by the neoliberal assumptions and characterized by outsourcing services for institutional pluralism and the expansion of bureaucratic rules on State s actions. We identified that the ReS set in TSEA aimed the clear determination of legal procedures at the expense of development processes, assuring legal and bureaucratic security of contracts and the social legitimacy of the actions developed. Allied to the problems of assessment criteria that could not measure the goals aimed by TSEA, an environment was created which prevailed the meeting of the means in procedures and correspondence with the organizational and operational reality of the institutions involved. In this sense, well-assessed technical teams were those who managed to avoid penalties for meeting regulatory criteria even if their actions had no practical meaning settlers lives. We observed that the ReS of TSEA evolved as inference to the correction of practices and distortions that have been diagnosed during the development of the Program. Methodological and structural innovations have arisen from new regulatory measures, which sought to solve previous operational dysfunctions and prevent new functional deviations. Regulatory System also contributed to the promotion of accommodation of actors from TSEA Program, when it is important to guarantee compliance with the rules, promoting uniform routines. The analysis of the functioning of the TSEA Program also highlighted the commitment of social participation. RS hindered the development of the democratic exercise of social participation. We understand that the combination of executive and participatory decentralization could be the condition to break with the bureaucratic regulation of public policies. We understand that a new configuration of TSEA management model will enable increase the positive results, especially by the conjunction between social demand and actions performed. Thus, there is a challenge that is a new round of discussion and action in the Program, in which the central role is in the management model and adjustments in power relations and the role of the State concerning the reality of settlers.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-25
2017-01-12
2017-01-12
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv DALBIANCO, Vinicius Piccin. BUREAUCRATIC RATIONALITY AND PUBLIC POLICIES: CRITICISM TO THE NORMATIVE SYSTEM OF TECHNICAL, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE TO LAND REFORM SETLEMENTS IN RS. 2016. 286 f. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2016.
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/3833
identifier_str_mv DALBIANCO, Vinicius Piccin. BUREAUCRATIC RATIONALITY AND PUBLIC POLICIES: CRITICISM TO THE NORMATIVE SYSTEM OF TECHNICAL, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE TO LAND REFORM SETLEMENTS IN RS. 2016. 286 f. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2016.
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/3833
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
BR
Agronomia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Extensão Rural
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
BR
Agronomia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Extensão Rural
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1805922101673066496