Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos em alvenaria convencional e painéis monolíticos de poliestireno expandido (EPS) para habitações unifamiliares
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
dARK ID: | ark:/26339/0013000008bn5 |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/29958 |
Resumo: | Considering the viability of the constructive system in monolithic panels in expanded polystyrene as an alternative to conventional masonry, the present study deals with the comparison of constructive systems for single-family houses, in order to carry out comparisons of constructive scopes, performance and financial. Therefore, it was necessary to emphasize constructive aspects of the two systems, as well as studies carried out in order to clarify aspects of performance and financial costs. A basic and exploratory research with a quali-quantitative approach was then carried out, in order to gather information for carrying out the comparisons. In view of this, it was resisted that the constructive aspects of the expanded polystyrene (EPS) panel system increase its productivity by requiring less labor demand, an example of this is in the execution of the walls with which the EPS system is about 186 % faster. It was also possible to observe an excellent thermal performance of the EPS panels, as a 15 cm wall in EPS is equivalent to a 98 cm wall in masonry for this item. Finally, a saving of 29.13% was achieved when using the monolithic system in relation to conventional masonry, where it was possible to conclude that the system in monolithic panels of expanded polystyrene is an economically and constructively viable alternative when compared to conventional masonry. |
id |
UFSM_f3f29030a33e466d78878174769f1dff |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/29958 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos em alvenaria convencional e painéis monolíticos de poliestireno expandido (EPS) para habitações unifamiliarespoliestireno expandidoEPSsistemas construtivosCNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVILConsidering the viability of the constructive system in monolithic panels in expanded polystyrene as an alternative to conventional masonry, the present study deals with the comparison of constructive systems for single-family houses, in order to carry out comparisons of constructive scopes, performance and financial. Therefore, it was necessary to emphasize constructive aspects of the two systems, as well as studies carried out in order to clarify aspects of performance and financial costs. A basic and exploratory research with a quali-quantitative approach was then carried out, in order to gather information for carrying out the comparisons. In view of this, it was resisted that the constructive aspects of the expanded polystyrene (EPS) panel system increase its productivity by requiring less labor demand, an example of this is in the execution of the walls with which the EPS system is about 186 % faster. It was also possible to observe an excellent thermal performance of the EPS panels, as a 15 cm wall in EPS is equivalent to a 98 cm wall in masonry for this item. Finally, a saving of 29.13% was achieved when using the monolithic system in relation to conventional masonry, where it was possible to conclude that the system in monolithic panels of expanded polystyrene is an economically and constructively viable alternative when compared to conventional masonry.Tendo em vista a viabilidade do sistema construtivo em painéis monolíticos em poliestireno expandido em alternativa à alvenaria convencional, o presente estudo trata sobre a comparação dos sistemas construtivos para habitações unifamiliares, a fim de realizar comparações de âmbito construtivo, desempenho e financeiro. Para tanto, foi necessário ressaltar aspectos construtivos dos dois sistemas, assim como estudos realizados a fim de esclarecer aspectos de desempenho e custos financeiros. Realizou-se, então, uma pesquisa básica e exploratória com abordagem quali-quantitativa, a fim de levantar informações para a realização das comparações. Diante disso, verificou-se que os aspectos construtivos do sistema de painéis em poliestireno expandido (EPS) aumentam sua produtividade por necessitar menor demanda de mão de obra, um exemplo disso é na execução das paredes as quais o sistema em EPS é cerca de 186% mais rápido. Também foi possível observar um ótimo desempenho térmico dos painéis em EPS, pois uma de parede de 15 cm em EPS equivale a uma de 98 cm em alvenaria para este quesito. Por último, verificou-se uma economia de 29,13% ao utilizar o sistema monolítico em relação a alvenaria convencional, onde foi possível concluir que o sistema em painéis monolíticos de poliestireno expandido é uma alternativa viável economicamente e construtivamente quando comparado com a alvenaria convencional.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilUFSMCentro de TecnologiaVaghetti, Marcos Alberto OssFlores, Matheus Bacelar2023-08-17T17:12:29Z2023-08-17T17:12:29Z2023-07-192023Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso de Graduaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/29958ark:/26339/0013000008bn5porAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2023-08-17T17:12:29Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/29958Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2023-08-17T17:12:29Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos em alvenaria convencional e painéis monolíticos de poliestireno expandido (EPS) para habitações unifamiliares |
title |
Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos em alvenaria convencional e painéis monolíticos de poliestireno expandido (EPS) para habitações unifamiliares |
spellingShingle |
Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos em alvenaria convencional e painéis monolíticos de poliestireno expandido (EPS) para habitações unifamiliares Flores, Matheus Bacelar poliestireno expandido EPS sistemas construtivos CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL |
title_short |
Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos em alvenaria convencional e painéis monolíticos de poliestireno expandido (EPS) para habitações unifamiliares |
title_full |
Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos em alvenaria convencional e painéis monolíticos de poliestireno expandido (EPS) para habitações unifamiliares |
title_fullStr |
Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos em alvenaria convencional e painéis monolíticos de poliestireno expandido (EPS) para habitações unifamiliares |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos em alvenaria convencional e painéis monolíticos de poliestireno expandido (EPS) para habitações unifamiliares |
title_sort |
Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos em alvenaria convencional e painéis monolíticos de poliestireno expandido (EPS) para habitações unifamiliares |
author |
Flores, Matheus Bacelar |
author_facet |
Flores, Matheus Bacelar |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Vaghetti, Marcos Alberto Oss |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Flores, Matheus Bacelar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
poliestireno expandido EPS sistemas construtivos CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL |
topic |
poliestireno expandido EPS sistemas construtivos CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL |
description |
Considering the viability of the constructive system in monolithic panels in expanded polystyrene as an alternative to conventional masonry, the present study deals with the comparison of constructive systems for single-family houses, in order to carry out comparisons of constructive scopes, performance and financial. Therefore, it was necessary to emphasize constructive aspects of the two systems, as well as studies carried out in order to clarify aspects of performance and financial costs. A basic and exploratory research with a quali-quantitative approach was then carried out, in order to gather information for carrying out the comparisons. In view of this, it was resisted that the constructive aspects of the expanded polystyrene (EPS) panel system increase its productivity by requiring less labor demand, an example of this is in the execution of the walls with which the EPS system is about 186 % faster. It was also possible to observe an excellent thermal performance of the EPS panels, as a 15 cm wall in EPS is equivalent to a 98 cm wall in masonry for this item. Finally, a saving of 29.13% was achieved when using the monolithic system in relation to conventional masonry, where it was possible to conclude that the system in monolithic panels of expanded polystyrene is an economically and constructively viable alternative when compared to conventional masonry. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-17T17:12:29Z 2023-08-17T17:12:29Z 2023-07-19 2023 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso de Graduação |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/29958 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/26339/0013000008bn5 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/29958 |
identifier_str_mv |
ark:/26339/0013000008bn5 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil UFSM Centro de Tecnologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil UFSM Centro de Tecnologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1815172303920562176 |