Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Coelho, Giselle, Cavalheiro, Sergio [UNIFESP], Lyra, Marcos, Zymberg, Samuel Tau [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33579
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321
Resumo: Object. Ideal surgical training models should be entirely reliable, atoxic, easy to handle, and, if possible, low cost. All available models have their advantages and disadvantages. the choice of one or another will depend on the type of surgery to be performed. the authors created an anatomical model called the S.I.M.O.N.T. (Sinus Model Oto-Rhino Neuro Trainer) Neurosurgical Endotrainer, which can provide reliable neuroendoscopic training. the aim in the present study was to assess both the quality of the model and the development of surgical skills by trainees.Methods. the S.I.M.O.N.T. is built of a synthetic thermoretractable, thermosensible rubber called Neoderma, which, combined with different polymers, produces more than 30 different formulas. Quality assessment of the model was based on qualitative and quantitative data obtained from training sessions with 9 experienced and 13 inexperienced neurosurgeons. the techniques used for evaluation were face validation, retest and interrater reliability, and construct validation.Results. the experts considered the S.I.M.O.N.T. capable of reproducing surgical situations as if they were real and presenting great similarity with the human brain. Surgical results of serial training showed that the model could be considered precise. Finally, development and improvement in surgical skills by the trainees were observed and considered relevant to further training. It was also observed that the probability of any single error was dramatically decreased after each training session, with a mean reduction of 41.65% (range 38.7%-45.6%).Conclusions. Neuroendoscopic training has some specific requirements. A unique set of instruments is required, as is a model that can resemble real-life situations. the S.I.M.O.N.T. is a new alternative model specially designed for this purpose. Validation techniques followed by precision assessments attested to the model's feasibility. (DOI: 10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321)
id UFSP_1054003d0e21b59378ea30b6a5bef1ca
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/33579
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz [UNIFESP]Coelho, GiselleCavalheiro, Sergio [UNIFESP]Lyra, MarcosZymberg, Samuel Tau [UNIFESP]Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Curitiba Neurol InstUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)2016-01-24T14:06:20Z2016-01-24T14:06:20Z2011-04-01Neurosurgical Focus. Rolling Meadows: Amer Assoc Neurological Surgeons, v. 30, n. 4, 6 p., 2011.1092-0684http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33579http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS1032110.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321WOS:000289077300018Object. Ideal surgical training models should be entirely reliable, atoxic, easy to handle, and, if possible, low cost. All available models have their advantages and disadvantages. the choice of one or another will depend on the type of surgery to be performed. the authors created an anatomical model called the S.I.M.O.N.T. (Sinus Model Oto-Rhino Neuro Trainer) Neurosurgical Endotrainer, which can provide reliable neuroendoscopic training. the aim in the present study was to assess both the quality of the model and the development of surgical skills by trainees.Methods. the S.I.M.O.N.T. is built of a synthetic thermoretractable, thermosensible rubber called Neoderma, which, combined with different polymers, produces more than 30 different formulas. Quality assessment of the model was based on qualitative and quantitative data obtained from training sessions with 9 experienced and 13 inexperienced neurosurgeons. the techniques used for evaluation were face validation, retest and interrater reliability, and construct validation.Results. the experts considered the S.I.M.O.N.T. capable of reproducing surgical situations as if they were real and presenting great similarity with the human brain. Surgical results of serial training showed that the model could be considered precise. Finally, development and improvement in surgical skills by the trainees were observed and considered relevant to further training. It was also observed that the probability of any single error was dramatically decreased after each training session, with a mean reduction of 41.65% (range 38.7%-45.6%).Conclusions. Neuroendoscopic training has some specific requirements. A unique set of instruments is required, as is a model that can resemble real-life situations. the S.I.M.O.N.T. is a new alternative model specially designed for this purpose. Validation techniques followed by precision assessments attested to the model's feasibility. (DOI: 10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321)Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Discipline Neurosurg, Escola Paulista Med, São Paulo, BrazilCuritiba Neurol Inst, Curitiba, Parana, BrazilUniv Fed Pernambuco, Dept Gynecol, Recife, PE, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Discipline Neurosurg, Escola Paulista Med, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Science6engAmer Assoc Neurological SurgeonsNeurosurgical Focusneuroendoscopysurgical trainingsimulationvalidationQuality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic traininginfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP11600/335792023-01-12 21:39:41.188metadata only accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/33579Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-05-25T12:09:37.870441Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training
title Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training
spellingShingle Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training
Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz [UNIFESP]
neuroendoscopy
surgical training
simulation
validation
title_short Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training
title_full Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training
title_fullStr Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training
title_full_unstemmed Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training
title_sort Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training
author Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz [UNIFESP]
author_facet Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz [UNIFESP]
Coelho, Giselle
Cavalheiro, Sergio [UNIFESP]
Lyra, Marcos
Zymberg, Samuel Tau [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Coelho, Giselle
Cavalheiro, Sergio [UNIFESP]
Lyra, Marcos
Zymberg, Samuel Tau [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Curitiba Neurol Inst
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz [UNIFESP]
Coelho, Giselle
Cavalheiro, Sergio [UNIFESP]
Lyra, Marcos
Zymberg, Samuel Tau [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv neuroendoscopy
surgical training
simulation
validation
topic neuroendoscopy
surgical training
simulation
validation
description Object. Ideal surgical training models should be entirely reliable, atoxic, easy to handle, and, if possible, low cost. All available models have their advantages and disadvantages. the choice of one or another will depend on the type of surgery to be performed. the authors created an anatomical model called the S.I.M.O.N.T. (Sinus Model Oto-Rhino Neuro Trainer) Neurosurgical Endotrainer, which can provide reliable neuroendoscopic training. the aim in the present study was to assess both the quality of the model and the development of surgical skills by trainees.Methods. the S.I.M.O.N.T. is built of a synthetic thermoretractable, thermosensible rubber called Neoderma, which, combined with different polymers, produces more than 30 different formulas. Quality assessment of the model was based on qualitative and quantitative data obtained from training sessions with 9 experienced and 13 inexperienced neurosurgeons. the techniques used for evaluation were face validation, retest and interrater reliability, and construct validation.Results. the experts considered the S.I.M.O.N.T. capable of reproducing surgical situations as if they were real and presenting great similarity with the human brain. Surgical results of serial training showed that the model could be considered precise. Finally, development and improvement in surgical skills by the trainees were observed and considered relevant to further training. It was also observed that the probability of any single error was dramatically decreased after each training session, with a mean reduction of 41.65% (range 38.7%-45.6%).Conclusions. Neuroendoscopic training has some specific requirements. A unique set of instruments is required, as is a model that can resemble real-life situations. the S.I.M.O.N.T. is a new alternative model specially designed for this purpose. Validation techniques followed by precision assessments attested to the model's feasibility. (DOI: 10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321)
publishDate 2011
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2011-04-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T14:06:20Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T14:06:20Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Neurosurgical Focus. Rolling Meadows: Amer Assoc Neurological Surgeons, v. 30, n. 4, 6 p., 2011.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33579
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1092-0684
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000289077300018
identifier_str_mv Neurosurgical Focus. Rolling Meadows: Amer Assoc Neurological Surgeons, v. 30, n. 4, 6 p., 2011.
1092-0684
10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321
WOS:000289077300018
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33579
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Neurosurgical Focus
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 6
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Assoc Neurological Surgeons
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Assoc Neurological Surgeons
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1783460234693443584