Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321 |
Resumo: | Object. Ideal surgical training models should be entirely reliable, atoxic, easy to handle, and, if possible, low cost. All available models have their advantages and disadvantages. the choice of one or another will depend on the type of surgery to be performed. the authors created an anatomical model called the S.I.M.O.N.T. (Sinus Model Oto-Rhino Neuro Trainer) Neurosurgical Endotrainer, which can provide reliable neuroendoscopic training. the aim in the present study was to assess both the quality of the model and the development of surgical skills by trainees.Methods. the S.I.M.O.N.T. is built of a synthetic thermoretractable, thermosensible rubber called Neoderma, which, combined with different polymers, produces more than 30 different formulas. Quality assessment of the model was based on qualitative and quantitative data obtained from training sessions with 9 experienced and 13 inexperienced neurosurgeons. the techniques used for evaluation were face validation, retest and interrater reliability, and construct validation.Results. the experts considered the S.I.M.O.N.T. capable of reproducing surgical situations as if they were real and presenting great similarity with the human brain. Surgical results of serial training showed that the model could be considered precise. Finally, development and improvement in surgical skills by the trainees were observed and considered relevant to further training. It was also observed that the probability of any single error was dramatically decreased after each training session, with a mean reduction of 41.65% (range 38.7%-45.6%).Conclusions. Neuroendoscopic training has some specific requirements. A unique set of instruments is required, as is a model that can resemble real-life situations. the S.I.M.O.N.T. is a new alternative model specially designed for this purpose. Validation techniques followed by precision assessments attested to the model's feasibility. (DOI: 10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321) |
id |
UFSP_1054003d0e21b59378ea30b6a5bef1ca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/33579 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz [UNIFESP]Coelho, GiselleCavalheiro, Sergio [UNIFESP]Lyra, MarcosZymberg, Samuel Tau [UNIFESP]Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Curitiba Neurol InstUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)2016-01-24T14:06:20Z2016-01-24T14:06:20Z2011-04-01Neurosurgical Focus. Rolling Meadows: Amer Assoc Neurological Surgeons, v. 30, n. 4, 6 p., 2011.1092-0684http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33579http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS1032110.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321WOS:000289077300018Object. Ideal surgical training models should be entirely reliable, atoxic, easy to handle, and, if possible, low cost. All available models have their advantages and disadvantages. the choice of one or another will depend on the type of surgery to be performed. the authors created an anatomical model called the S.I.M.O.N.T. (Sinus Model Oto-Rhino Neuro Trainer) Neurosurgical Endotrainer, which can provide reliable neuroendoscopic training. the aim in the present study was to assess both the quality of the model and the development of surgical skills by trainees.Methods. the S.I.M.O.N.T. is built of a synthetic thermoretractable, thermosensible rubber called Neoderma, which, combined with different polymers, produces more than 30 different formulas. Quality assessment of the model was based on qualitative and quantitative data obtained from training sessions with 9 experienced and 13 inexperienced neurosurgeons. the techniques used for evaluation were face validation, retest and interrater reliability, and construct validation.Results. the experts considered the S.I.M.O.N.T. capable of reproducing surgical situations as if they were real and presenting great similarity with the human brain. Surgical results of serial training showed that the model could be considered precise. Finally, development and improvement in surgical skills by the trainees were observed and considered relevant to further training. It was also observed that the probability of any single error was dramatically decreased after each training session, with a mean reduction of 41.65% (range 38.7%-45.6%).Conclusions. Neuroendoscopic training has some specific requirements. A unique set of instruments is required, as is a model that can resemble real-life situations. the S.I.M.O.N.T. is a new alternative model specially designed for this purpose. Validation techniques followed by precision assessments attested to the model's feasibility. (DOI: 10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321)Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Discipline Neurosurg, Escola Paulista Med, São Paulo, BrazilCuritiba Neurol Inst, Curitiba, Parana, BrazilUniv Fed Pernambuco, Dept Gynecol, Recife, PE, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Discipline Neurosurg, Escola Paulista Med, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Science6engAmer Assoc Neurological SurgeonsNeurosurgical Focusneuroendoscopysurgical trainingsimulationvalidationQuality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic traininginfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP11600/335792023-01-12 21:39:41.188metadata only accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/33579Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-01-13T00:39:41Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training |
title |
Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training |
spellingShingle |
Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz [UNIFESP] neuroendoscopy surgical training simulation validation |
title_short |
Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training |
title_full |
Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training |
title_fullStr |
Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training |
title_sort |
Quality assessment of a new surgical simulator for neuroendoscopic training |
author |
Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz [UNIFESP] Coelho, Giselle Cavalheiro, Sergio [UNIFESP] Lyra, Marcos Zymberg, Samuel Tau [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Coelho, Giselle Cavalheiro, Sergio [UNIFESP] Lyra, Marcos Zymberg, Samuel Tau [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Curitiba Neurol Inst Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guimaraes Filho, Francisco Vaz [UNIFESP] Coelho, Giselle Cavalheiro, Sergio [UNIFESP] Lyra, Marcos Zymberg, Samuel Tau [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
neuroendoscopy surgical training simulation validation |
topic |
neuroendoscopy surgical training simulation validation |
description |
Object. Ideal surgical training models should be entirely reliable, atoxic, easy to handle, and, if possible, low cost. All available models have their advantages and disadvantages. the choice of one or another will depend on the type of surgery to be performed. the authors created an anatomical model called the S.I.M.O.N.T. (Sinus Model Oto-Rhino Neuro Trainer) Neurosurgical Endotrainer, which can provide reliable neuroendoscopic training. the aim in the present study was to assess both the quality of the model and the development of surgical skills by trainees.Methods. the S.I.M.O.N.T. is built of a synthetic thermoretractable, thermosensible rubber called Neoderma, which, combined with different polymers, produces more than 30 different formulas. Quality assessment of the model was based on qualitative and quantitative data obtained from training sessions with 9 experienced and 13 inexperienced neurosurgeons. the techniques used for evaluation were face validation, retest and interrater reliability, and construct validation.Results. the experts considered the S.I.M.O.N.T. capable of reproducing surgical situations as if they were real and presenting great similarity with the human brain. Surgical results of serial training showed that the model could be considered precise. Finally, development and improvement in surgical skills by the trainees were observed and considered relevant to further training. It was also observed that the probability of any single error was dramatically decreased after each training session, with a mean reduction of 41.65% (range 38.7%-45.6%).Conclusions. Neuroendoscopic training has some specific requirements. A unique set of instruments is required, as is a model that can resemble real-life situations. the S.I.M.O.N.T. is a new alternative model specially designed for this purpose. Validation techniques followed by precision assessments attested to the model's feasibility. (DOI: 10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321) |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2011-04-01 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-24T14:06:20Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-24T14:06:20Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Neurosurgical Focus. Rolling Meadows: Amer Assoc Neurological Surgeons, v. 30, n. 4, 6 p., 2011. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1092-0684 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321 |
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv |
WOS:000289077300018 |
identifier_str_mv |
Neurosurgical Focus. Rolling Meadows: Amer Assoc Neurological Surgeons, v. 30, n. 4, 6 p., 2011. 1092-0684 10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321 WOS:000289077300018 |
url |
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10321 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Neurosurgical Focus |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
6 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Amer Assoc Neurological Surgeons |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Amer Assoc Neurological Surgeons |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1802764114667241472 |