Avaliação transversal dos métodos terapêuticos do pé torto congênito equinovaro idiopático: controvérsias sobre a tenotomia do tendão calcâneo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chaim, Renan Moukbel [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Silva, Fabio Assunção e [UNIFESP], Angelini, Felipe Bertelli [UNIFESP], Dobashi, Eiffel Tsuyoshi [UNIFESP], Andrade Júnior, Luiz Carlos de [UNIFESP], Blumetti, Francesco Camara [UNIFESP], Pinto, Jose Antonio [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-36162010000700006
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6030
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: There has been a lot of discussion regarding the treatment of congenital clubfoot (talipes equinovarus,) and Posenti's methodology currently seems to be the most rational, offering high rates of satisfactory results when compared to Kite's approach that prevailed in orthopedics until the end of the 90s. With the recent change of concepts, this study purports to analyze the profile of orthopedists treating this infirmity in Brazil, through a questionnaire used at the 39th Brazilian Congress of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, since such data is unknown in the Brazilian literature. METHODS: An investigative questionnaire was prepared to ascertain the treatment method used, the characteristics of the population studied, the results acquired with treatment and, particularly, how they approached the Achilles tendon. RESULTS: Of the 5,329 registered orthopedists, we acquired 539 spontaneous participations. Of these, only 88 (16.30%) orthopedists perform the treatment for congenital clubfoot; 78 (88.60%) use the Ponseti method and 9 (10.20%) use Kite's; for 47.70%, conservative treatment is performed between 4 and 6 months and for 35.30%, between 1 and 3 months; 58 (66.00%) interviewees perform the Achilles tendon tenotomy in 80% to 100% of their patients and 59 (67.05%) perform it at a surgical center due to safety conditions, sterilized environment, anesthesia, ease of access, and patient monitoring; 32 (36.36%) orthopedists present 80% of good results or more, 54 (61.36%) present 50% to 80% good results and 46 (52.27%) present a 10% relapse rate. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Ponseti Method defines that the Achilles tendon tenotomy should be performed in an outpatient setting, most of the orthopedists (59 - 67.05%) perform it in the operating room.
id UFSP_230657efdc25f9dbcf1aff2c7d4fd932
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6030
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Avaliação transversal dos métodos terapêuticos do pé torto congênito equinovaro idiopático: controvérsias sobre a tenotomia do tendão calcâneoCross-evaluation of the therapeutical methods for idiopathic congenital clubfoot (talipes equinovarus): controversies regarding the tendocalcaneous tenotomyClubfootQuestionnairesAchilles TendonMethodsPé TortoQuestionáriosTendão do CalcâneoMétodoOBJECTIVE: There has been a lot of discussion regarding the treatment of congenital clubfoot (talipes equinovarus,) and Posenti's methodology currently seems to be the most rational, offering high rates of satisfactory results when compared to Kite's approach that prevailed in orthopedics until the end of the 90s. With the recent change of concepts, this study purports to analyze the profile of orthopedists treating this infirmity in Brazil, through a questionnaire used at the 39th Brazilian Congress of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, since such data is unknown in the Brazilian literature. METHODS: An investigative questionnaire was prepared to ascertain the treatment method used, the characteristics of the population studied, the results acquired with treatment and, particularly, how they approached the Achilles tendon. RESULTS: Of the 5,329 registered orthopedists, we acquired 539 spontaneous participations. Of these, only 88 (16.30%) orthopedists perform the treatment for congenital clubfoot; 78 (88.60%) use the Ponseti method and 9 (10.20%) use Kite's; for 47.70%, conservative treatment is performed between 4 and 6 months and for 35.30%, between 1 and 3 months; 58 (66.00%) interviewees perform the Achilles tendon tenotomy in 80% to 100% of their patients and 59 (67.05%) perform it at a surgical center due to safety conditions, sterilized environment, anesthesia, ease of access, and patient monitoring; 32 (36.36%) orthopedists present 80% of good results or more, 54 (61.36%) present 50% to 80% good results and 46 (52.27%) present a 10% relapse rate. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Ponseti Method defines that the Achilles tendon tenotomy should be performed in an outpatient setting, most of the orthopedists (59 - 67.05%) perform it in the operating room.OBJETIVO: Há muita discussão em relação ao tratamento do pé torto congênito equino-cavo-varo e atualmente a sistemática proposta por Ponseti parece ser a mais racional oferecendo altas taxas de resultados satisfatórios em detrimento à metodologia de Kite que predominou no meio ortopédico até o final da década de 90. Com a recente mudança de conceitos, este trabalho tem o intuito de analisar, por meio de questionário aplicado no 39° Congresso Brasileiro de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, o perfil dos ortopedistas no Brasil frente a esta afecção, fato este desconhecido considerando a literatura nacional. MÉTODO: Um questionário para investigação foi elaborado para verificar o método de tratamento utilizado, as características da população estudada, os resultados obtidos com o tratamento e particularmente como abordam cirurgicamente o tendão calcâneo. RESULTADOS: Do total de 5.329 ortopedistas inscritos, obtivemos 539 participações espontâneas; destes, somente 88 (16,30%) indivíduos executam o tratamento para o pé torto congênito; 78 (88,60%) aplicam o método de Ponseti; e nove (10,20%) o de Kite. Para 47,70%, o tratamento conservador é realizado entre quatro e seis meses e para 35,20% entre um e três meses; 58 (66,00%) entrevistados efetuam a tenotomia do tendão calcâneo em 80% a 100% de seus pacientes e 59 (67,05%) a realizam no centro cirúrgico devido às condições de segurança, assepsia, anestesia, facilidade de acesso e monitorização do paciente; 32 (36,36%) ortopedistas apresentam 80% ou mais de bons resultados, 54 (61,36%) apresentam 50% a 80% de bons resultados e 46 (52,27%) apresentam taxa de recidiva de 10%. CONCLUSÃO: Embora o método de Ponseti defina que a tenotomia do tendão calcâneo seja realizada ambulatorialmente com anestesia local, a maioria 59 (67,05%) dos ortopedistas a realiza no centro cirúrgico.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Departamento de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia Ortopedia PediátricaUNIFESP, Depto. de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaUNIFESP, Depto. de Ortopedia e Traumatologia Ortopedia PediátricaSciELOSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Chaim, Renan Moukbel [UNIFESP]Silva, Fabio Assunção e [UNIFESP]Angelini, Felipe Bertelli [UNIFESP]Dobashi, Eiffel Tsuyoshi [UNIFESP]Andrade Júnior, Luiz Carlos de [UNIFESP]Blumetti, Francesco Camara [UNIFESP]Pinto, Jose Antonio [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:41:58Z2015-06-14T13:41:58Z2010-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion31-36application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-36162010000700006Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, v. 45, p. 31-36, 2010.10.1590/S0102-36162010000700006S0102-36162010000700006.pdf0102-3616S0102-36162010000700006http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6030porRevista Brasileira de Ortopediainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-27T14:06:44Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6030Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-27T14:06:44Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação transversal dos métodos terapêuticos do pé torto congênito equinovaro idiopático: controvérsias sobre a tenotomia do tendão calcâneo
Cross-evaluation of the therapeutical methods for idiopathic congenital clubfoot (talipes equinovarus): controversies regarding the tendocalcaneous tenotomy
title Avaliação transversal dos métodos terapêuticos do pé torto congênito equinovaro idiopático: controvérsias sobre a tenotomia do tendão calcâneo
spellingShingle Avaliação transversal dos métodos terapêuticos do pé torto congênito equinovaro idiopático: controvérsias sobre a tenotomia do tendão calcâneo
Chaim, Renan Moukbel [UNIFESP]
Clubfoot
Questionnaires
Achilles Tendon
Methods
Pé Torto
Questionários
Tendão do Calcâneo
Método
title_short Avaliação transversal dos métodos terapêuticos do pé torto congênito equinovaro idiopático: controvérsias sobre a tenotomia do tendão calcâneo
title_full Avaliação transversal dos métodos terapêuticos do pé torto congênito equinovaro idiopático: controvérsias sobre a tenotomia do tendão calcâneo
title_fullStr Avaliação transversal dos métodos terapêuticos do pé torto congênito equinovaro idiopático: controvérsias sobre a tenotomia do tendão calcâneo
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação transversal dos métodos terapêuticos do pé torto congênito equinovaro idiopático: controvérsias sobre a tenotomia do tendão calcâneo
title_sort Avaliação transversal dos métodos terapêuticos do pé torto congênito equinovaro idiopático: controvérsias sobre a tenotomia do tendão calcâneo
author Chaim, Renan Moukbel [UNIFESP]
author_facet Chaim, Renan Moukbel [UNIFESP]
Silva, Fabio Assunção e [UNIFESP]
Angelini, Felipe Bertelli [UNIFESP]
Dobashi, Eiffel Tsuyoshi [UNIFESP]
Andrade Júnior, Luiz Carlos de [UNIFESP]
Blumetti, Francesco Camara [UNIFESP]
Pinto, Jose Antonio [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Silva, Fabio Assunção e [UNIFESP]
Angelini, Felipe Bertelli [UNIFESP]
Dobashi, Eiffel Tsuyoshi [UNIFESP]
Andrade Júnior, Luiz Carlos de [UNIFESP]
Blumetti, Francesco Camara [UNIFESP]
Pinto, Jose Antonio [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chaim, Renan Moukbel [UNIFESP]
Silva, Fabio Assunção e [UNIFESP]
Angelini, Felipe Bertelli [UNIFESP]
Dobashi, Eiffel Tsuyoshi [UNIFESP]
Andrade Júnior, Luiz Carlos de [UNIFESP]
Blumetti, Francesco Camara [UNIFESP]
Pinto, Jose Antonio [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Clubfoot
Questionnaires
Achilles Tendon
Methods
Pé Torto
Questionários
Tendão do Calcâneo
Método
topic Clubfoot
Questionnaires
Achilles Tendon
Methods
Pé Torto
Questionários
Tendão do Calcâneo
Método
description OBJECTIVE: There has been a lot of discussion regarding the treatment of congenital clubfoot (talipes equinovarus,) and Posenti's methodology currently seems to be the most rational, offering high rates of satisfactory results when compared to Kite's approach that prevailed in orthopedics until the end of the 90s. With the recent change of concepts, this study purports to analyze the profile of orthopedists treating this infirmity in Brazil, through a questionnaire used at the 39th Brazilian Congress of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, since such data is unknown in the Brazilian literature. METHODS: An investigative questionnaire was prepared to ascertain the treatment method used, the characteristics of the population studied, the results acquired with treatment and, particularly, how they approached the Achilles tendon. RESULTS: Of the 5,329 registered orthopedists, we acquired 539 spontaneous participations. Of these, only 88 (16.30%) orthopedists perform the treatment for congenital clubfoot; 78 (88.60%) use the Ponseti method and 9 (10.20%) use Kite's; for 47.70%, conservative treatment is performed between 4 and 6 months and for 35.30%, between 1 and 3 months; 58 (66.00%) interviewees perform the Achilles tendon tenotomy in 80% to 100% of their patients and 59 (67.05%) perform it at a surgical center due to safety conditions, sterilized environment, anesthesia, ease of access, and patient monitoring; 32 (36.36%) orthopedists present 80% of good results or more, 54 (61.36%) present 50% to 80% good results and 46 (52.27%) present a 10% relapse rate. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Ponseti Method defines that the Achilles tendon tenotomy should be performed in an outpatient setting, most of the orthopedists (59 - 67.05%) perform it in the operating room.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-01
2015-06-14T13:41:58Z
2015-06-14T13:41:58Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-36162010000700006
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, v. 45, p. 31-36, 2010.
10.1590/S0102-36162010000700006
S0102-36162010000700006.pdf
0102-3616
S0102-36162010000700006
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6030
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-36162010000700006
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6030
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, v. 45, p. 31-36, 2010.
10.1590/S0102-36162010000700006
S0102-36162010000700006.pdf
0102-3616
S0102-36162010000700006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 31-36
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268277372747776