Artroplastia unicompartimental do joelho: perspectivas e tendências atuais no Brasil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arliani, Gustavo Gonçalves [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Yazigi Júnior, João Alberto [UNIFESP], Angelini, Felipe Bertelli [UNIFESP], Ferlin, Fernando [UNIFESP], Hernandes, Andrea Canizares [UNIFESP], Astur, Diego Da Costa [UNIFESP], Cohen, Moises [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-36162012000600009
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6807
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the approaches and procedures used by Brazilian orthopedic surgeons for treating osteoarthrosis by means of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy of the knee. METHODS: A questionnaire with 14 closed questions was developed and applied to Brazilian knee surgeons during the three days of the 43rd Brazilian Congress of Orthopedics and Traumatology. RESULTS: A total of 113 surgeons filled out the questionnaire completely and became part of the sample analyzed. In this study, the majority of the surgeons performed fewer than five unicompartmental knee arthroplasty procedures/year (61.1%) and between 5 and 15 high tibial osteotomy procedures/year (37.2%). Use of computerized navigation systems during surgery remains uncommon in our environment, since only 0.9% of the specialists were using it. 65.5% of the surgeons reported that they had chosen to use total knee arthroplasty rather than partial arthroplasty due to lack of familiarity with the surgical technique. When asked about the possibility that the number of unicompartmental prostheses used in Brazil would grow as surgeons in this country become increasingly familiar with the technique, 80.5% of the respondents believed in this hypothesis. In this sample, we found that the greater the surgeon's experience was, the greater the numbers of unicompartmental prostheses and tibial osteotomies performed annually were (r = 0.550 and r = 0.465, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear evolutional trend towards treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis using partial knee arthroplasty in Brazil. However, further prospective controlled studies are needed in order to evaluate the clinical and scientific benefits of these trends.
id UFSP_4caf6f6a2f5534136f2802b41ab3ef74
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6807
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Artroplastia unicompartimental do joelho: perspectivas e tendências atuais no BrasilUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty: current perspectives and trends in BrazilArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteotomyOsteoarthritisKnee JointArtroplastia do JoelhoOsteotomiaOsteoartriteArticulação do JoelhoOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the approaches and procedures used by Brazilian orthopedic surgeons for treating osteoarthrosis by means of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy of the knee. METHODS: A questionnaire with 14 closed questions was developed and applied to Brazilian knee surgeons during the three days of the 43rd Brazilian Congress of Orthopedics and Traumatology. RESULTS: A total of 113 surgeons filled out the questionnaire completely and became part of the sample analyzed. In this study, the majority of the surgeons performed fewer than five unicompartmental knee arthroplasty procedures/year (61.1%) and between 5 and 15 high tibial osteotomy procedures/year (37.2%). Use of computerized navigation systems during surgery remains uncommon in our environment, since only 0.9% of the specialists were using it. 65.5% of the surgeons reported that they had chosen to use total knee arthroplasty rather than partial arthroplasty due to lack of familiarity with the surgical technique. When asked about the possibility that the number of unicompartmental prostheses used in Brazil would grow as surgeons in this country become increasingly familiar with the technique, 80.5% of the respondents believed in this hypothesis. In this sample, we found that the greater the surgeon's experience was, the greater the numbers of unicompartmental prostheses and tibial osteotomies performed annually were (r = 0.550 and r = 0.465, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear evolutional trend towards treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis using partial knee arthroplasty in Brazil. However, further prospective controlled studies are needed in order to evaluate the clinical and scientific benefits of these trends.OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar as condutas e procedimentos realizados pelos cirurgiões de joelho do Brasil no tratamento da osteoartrose com artroplastia unicompartimental e osteotomia tibial alta do joelho. MÉTODOS: Um questionário de 14 questões fechadas foi elaborado e aplicado a cirurgiões brasileiros de joelho durante os três dias do 43º Congresso Brasileiro de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. RESULTADOS: Um total de 113 cirurgiões de joelho preencheram completamente o questionário e fizeram parte da amostra analisada. Neste estudo, a maioria dos cirurgiões realizava menos de cinco artroplastias unicompartimentais do joelho/ano (61,1%) e entre cinco e 15 osteotomias tibiais altas/ano (37,2%). A utilização de navegação computadorizada no intraoperatório é ainda infrequente em nosso meio, sendo realizada por apenas 0,9% dos especialistas. A opção pelo uso da artroplastia total do joelho em detrimento da parcial devido à falta de familiaridade com a técnica cirúrgica foi relatada por 65,5% dos cirurgiões. Quando arguidos sobre a possibilidade de crescimento no número de próteses unicompartimentais no Brasil com o aumento da familiaridade com a técnica pelos cirurgiões do País, 80,5% dos entrevistados responderam que acreditam nesta hipótese. Nesta amostra, constatamos que quanto maior a experiência do cirurgião maior o número de próteses unicompartimentais e osteotomias tibiais realizadas anualmente (r = 0,550 e r = 0,465, respectivamente, e p < 0,05). CONCLUSÕES: Existem claras tendências em evolução no tratamento da osteoartrose unicompartimental com artroplastia parcial do joelho no Brasil. No entanto, mais estudos prospectivos controlados são necessários para avaliar o benefício clínico e científico destas tendências.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia Centro de Traumatologia do EsporteUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Departamento de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaUNIFESP, Depto. de Ortopedia e Traumatologia Centro de Traumatologia do EsporteUNIFESP, Depto. de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaSciELOSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Arliani, Gustavo Gonçalves [UNIFESP]Yazigi Júnior, João Alberto [UNIFESP]Angelini, Felipe Bertelli [UNIFESP]Ferlin, Fernando [UNIFESP]Hernandes, Andrea Canizares [UNIFESP]Astur, Diego Da Costa [UNIFESP]Cohen, Moises [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:43:27Z2015-06-14T13:43:27Z2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion724-729application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-36162012000600009Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, v. 47, n. 6, p. 724-729, 2012.10.1590/S0102-36162012000600009S0102-36162012000600009.pdf0102-3616S0102-36162012000600009http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6807porRevista Brasileira de Ortopediainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-28T23:48:18Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6807Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-28T23:48:18Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Artroplastia unicompartimental do joelho: perspectivas e tendências atuais no Brasil
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: current perspectives and trends in Brazil
title Artroplastia unicompartimental do joelho: perspectivas e tendências atuais no Brasil
spellingShingle Artroplastia unicompartimental do joelho: perspectivas e tendências atuais no Brasil
Arliani, Gustavo Gonçalves [UNIFESP]
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Osteotomy
Osteoarthritis
Knee Joint
Artroplastia do Joelho
Osteotomia
Osteoartrite
Articulação do Joelho
title_short Artroplastia unicompartimental do joelho: perspectivas e tendências atuais no Brasil
title_full Artroplastia unicompartimental do joelho: perspectivas e tendências atuais no Brasil
title_fullStr Artroplastia unicompartimental do joelho: perspectivas e tendências atuais no Brasil
title_full_unstemmed Artroplastia unicompartimental do joelho: perspectivas e tendências atuais no Brasil
title_sort Artroplastia unicompartimental do joelho: perspectivas e tendências atuais no Brasil
author Arliani, Gustavo Gonçalves [UNIFESP]
author_facet Arliani, Gustavo Gonçalves [UNIFESP]
Yazigi Júnior, João Alberto [UNIFESP]
Angelini, Felipe Bertelli [UNIFESP]
Ferlin, Fernando [UNIFESP]
Hernandes, Andrea Canizares [UNIFESP]
Astur, Diego Da Costa [UNIFESP]
Cohen, Moises [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Yazigi Júnior, João Alberto [UNIFESP]
Angelini, Felipe Bertelli [UNIFESP]
Ferlin, Fernando [UNIFESP]
Hernandes, Andrea Canizares [UNIFESP]
Astur, Diego Da Costa [UNIFESP]
Cohen, Moises [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arliani, Gustavo Gonçalves [UNIFESP]
Yazigi Júnior, João Alberto [UNIFESP]
Angelini, Felipe Bertelli [UNIFESP]
Ferlin, Fernando [UNIFESP]
Hernandes, Andrea Canizares [UNIFESP]
Astur, Diego Da Costa [UNIFESP]
Cohen, Moises [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Osteotomy
Osteoarthritis
Knee Joint
Artroplastia do Joelho
Osteotomia
Osteoartrite
Articulação do Joelho
topic Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Osteotomy
Osteoarthritis
Knee Joint
Artroplastia do Joelho
Osteotomia
Osteoartrite
Articulação do Joelho
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the approaches and procedures used by Brazilian orthopedic surgeons for treating osteoarthrosis by means of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy of the knee. METHODS: A questionnaire with 14 closed questions was developed and applied to Brazilian knee surgeons during the three days of the 43rd Brazilian Congress of Orthopedics and Traumatology. RESULTS: A total of 113 surgeons filled out the questionnaire completely and became part of the sample analyzed. In this study, the majority of the surgeons performed fewer than five unicompartmental knee arthroplasty procedures/year (61.1%) and between 5 and 15 high tibial osteotomy procedures/year (37.2%). Use of computerized navigation systems during surgery remains uncommon in our environment, since only 0.9% of the specialists were using it. 65.5% of the surgeons reported that they had chosen to use total knee arthroplasty rather than partial arthroplasty due to lack of familiarity with the surgical technique. When asked about the possibility that the number of unicompartmental prostheses used in Brazil would grow as surgeons in this country become increasingly familiar with the technique, 80.5% of the respondents believed in this hypothesis. In this sample, we found that the greater the surgeon's experience was, the greater the numbers of unicompartmental prostheses and tibial osteotomies performed annually were (r = 0.550 and r = 0.465, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear evolutional trend towards treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis using partial knee arthroplasty in Brazil. However, further prospective controlled studies are needed in order to evaluate the clinical and scientific benefits of these trends.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01
2015-06-14T13:43:27Z
2015-06-14T13:43:27Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-36162012000600009
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, v. 47, n. 6, p. 724-729, 2012.
10.1590/S0102-36162012000600009
S0102-36162012000600009.pdf
0102-3616
S0102-36162012000600009
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6807
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-36162012000600009
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6807
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, v. 47, n. 6, p. 724-729, 2012.
10.1590/S0102-36162012000600009
S0102-36162012000600009.pdf
0102-3616
S0102-36162012000600009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 724-729
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268283065466880