Assessment of Length of Maternal Cervix between 18 and 24 weeks of Gestation in a Low-Risk Brazilian Population

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Amorim Andrade, Soraya Gomes [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: de Andrade, Fernando Moreira [UNIFESP], Araujo Junior, Edward [UNIFESP], Pires, Claudio Rodrigues, Mattar, Rosiane [UNIFESP], Moron, Antonio Fernandes [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1608617
Resumo: Purpose To determine cervical biometry in pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation and the ideal mode of measurement of cervical length in cases of curved and straight cervical morphology. Methods The uterine cervices of 752 low-risk pregnant women were assessed using transvaginal ultrasound in a prospective cross-sectional study. In women with straight uterine cervices, cervical biometry was performed in a continuous manner. In women with curved uterine cervices, the biometry was performed using both the continuous and segmented techniques (in segments joining the cervical os). Polynomial regression models were created to assess the correlation between the cervical length and gestational age. The paired Student t-test was used to comparemeasuring techniques. Results The cervical biometry results did not vary significantly with the gestational age and were best represented by linear regression (R-2 = 0.0075 with the continuous technique, and R-2 = 0.0017 with the segmented technique). Up to the 21st week of gestation, there was a predominance of curved uterine cervix morphology (58.9%), whereas the straight morphology predominated after this gestational age (54.2%). There was a significant difference between the continuous and the segmented measuring methods in all the assessed gestational ages (p < 0.001). Conclusion Cervical biometry in pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks was represented by a linear regression, independently of the measuring mode. The ideal measuring technique was the transvaginal ultrasound performed at a gestational age >= 21 weeks.
id UFSP_641b5b54009e094650efa2afc4995d1e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/58082
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling de Amorim Andrade, Soraya Gomes [UNIFESP]de Andrade, Fernando Moreira [UNIFESP]Araujo Junior, Edward [UNIFESP]Pires, Claudio RodriguesMattar, Rosiane [UNIFESP]Moron, Antonio Fernandes [UNIFESP]2020-09-01T13:21:05Z2020-09-01T13:21:05Z2017Revista Brasileira De Ginecologia E Obstetricia. Rio De Janeiro Rj, v. 39, n. 12, p. 647-652, 2017.0100-7203https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58082http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1608617WOS000418072500002.pdf10.1055/s-0037-1608617WOS:000418072500002Purpose To determine cervical biometry in pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation and the ideal mode of measurement of cervical length in cases of curved and straight cervical morphology. Methods The uterine cervices of 752 low-risk pregnant women were assessed using transvaginal ultrasound in a prospective cross-sectional study. In women with straight uterine cervices, cervical biometry was performed in a continuous manner. In women with curved uterine cervices, the biometry was performed using both the continuous and segmented techniques (in segments joining the cervical os). Polynomial regression models were created to assess the correlation between the cervical length and gestational age. The paired Student t-test was used to comparemeasuring techniques. Results The cervical biometry results did not vary significantly with the gestational age and were best represented by linear regression (R-2 = 0.0075 with the continuous technique, and R-2 = 0.0017 with the segmented technique). Up to the 21st week of gestation, there was a predominance of curved uterine cervix morphology (58.9%), whereas the straight morphology predominated after this gestational age (54.2%). There was a significant difference between the continuous and the segmented measuring methods in all the assessed gestational ages (p < 0.001). Conclusion Cervical biometry in pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks was represented by a linear regression, independently of the measuring mode. The ideal measuring technique was the transvaginal ultrasound performed at a gestational age >= 21 weeks.Univ Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, EPM, Dept Obstet, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilCtr Referencia Ensino Diagnost Imagem CETRUS, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, EPM, Dept Obstet, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of Science647-652engFederacao Brasileira Soc Ginecologia & Obstetricia-FebrasgoRevista Brasileira De Ginecologia E Obstetriciagestationuterine cervixbiometrymorphologytransvaginal ultrasoundAssessment of Length of Maternal Cervix between 18 and 24 weeks of Gestation in a Low-Risk Brazilian Populationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleRio De Janeiro Rj3912info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPORIGINALWOS000418072500002.pdfapplication/pdf239111${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/58082/1/WOS000418072500002.pdfc245fda0e51e5900a3ed32b7e36d6753MD51open accessTEXTWOS000418072500002.pdf.txtWOS000418072500002.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain24847${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/58082/2/WOS000418072500002.pdf.txtf71c058c4b39e779be76b967c73b84a1MD52open accessTHUMBNAILWOS000418072500002.pdf.jpgWOS000418072500002.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6496${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/58082/4/WOS000418072500002.pdf.jpg992ab53031dc868ce4560ea530bbd184MD54open access11600/580822022-07-31 19:03:23.844open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/58082Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652022-07-31T22:03:23Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Assessment of Length of Maternal Cervix between 18 and 24 weeks of Gestation in a Low-Risk Brazilian Population
title Assessment of Length of Maternal Cervix between 18 and 24 weeks of Gestation in a Low-Risk Brazilian Population
spellingShingle Assessment of Length of Maternal Cervix between 18 and 24 weeks of Gestation in a Low-Risk Brazilian Population
de Amorim Andrade, Soraya Gomes [UNIFESP]
gestation
uterine cervix
biometry
morphology
transvaginal ultrasound
title_short Assessment of Length of Maternal Cervix between 18 and 24 weeks of Gestation in a Low-Risk Brazilian Population
title_full Assessment of Length of Maternal Cervix between 18 and 24 weeks of Gestation in a Low-Risk Brazilian Population
title_fullStr Assessment of Length of Maternal Cervix between 18 and 24 weeks of Gestation in a Low-Risk Brazilian Population
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Length of Maternal Cervix between 18 and 24 weeks of Gestation in a Low-Risk Brazilian Population
title_sort Assessment of Length of Maternal Cervix between 18 and 24 weeks of Gestation in a Low-Risk Brazilian Population
author de Amorim Andrade, Soraya Gomes [UNIFESP]
author_facet de Amorim Andrade, Soraya Gomes [UNIFESP]
de Andrade, Fernando Moreira [UNIFESP]
Araujo Junior, Edward [UNIFESP]
Pires, Claudio Rodrigues
Mattar, Rosiane [UNIFESP]
Moron, Antonio Fernandes [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 de Andrade, Fernando Moreira [UNIFESP]
Araujo Junior, Edward [UNIFESP]
Pires, Claudio Rodrigues
Mattar, Rosiane [UNIFESP]
Moron, Antonio Fernandes [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Amorim Andrade, Soraya Gomes [UNIFESP]
de Andrade, Fernando Moreira [UNIFESP]
Araujo Junior, Edward [UNIFESP]
Pires, Claudio Rodrigues
Mattar, Rosiane [UNIFESP]
Moron, Antonio Fernandes [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv gestation
uterine cervix
biometry
morphology
transvaginal ultrasound
topic gestation
uterine cervix
biometry
morphology
transvaginal ultrasound
description Purpose To determine cervical biometry in pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation and the ideal mode of measurement of cervical length in cases of curved and straight cervical morphology. Methods The uterine cervices of 752 low-risk pregnant women were assessed using transvaginal ultrasound in a prospective cross-sectional study. In women with straight uterine cervices, cervical biometry was performed in a continuous manner. In women with curved uterine cervices, the biometry was performed using both the continuous and segmented techniques (in segments joining the cervical os). Polynomial regression models were created to assess the correlation between the cervical length and gestational age. The paired Student t-test was used to comparemeasuring techniques. Results The cervical biometry results did not vary significantly with the gestational age and were best represented by linear regression (R-2 = 0.0075 with the continuous technique, and R-2 = 0.0017 with the segmented technique). Up to the 21st week of gestation, there was a predominance of curved uterine cervix morphology (58.9%), whereas the straight morphology predominated after this gestational age (54.2%). There was a significant difference between the continuous and the segmented measuring methods in all the assessed gestational ages (p < 0.001). Conclusion Cervical biometry in pregnant women between 18 and 24 weeks was represented by a linear regression, independently of the measuring mode. The ideal measuring technique was the transvaginal ultrasound performed at a gestational age >= 21 weeks.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-09-01T13:21:05Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-09-01T13:21:05Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Ginecologia E Obstetricia. Rio De Janeiro Rj, v. 39, n. 12, p. 647-652, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1608617
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0100-7203
dc.identifier.file.none.fl_str_mv WOS000418072500002.pdf
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0037-1608617
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000418072500002
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Ginecologia E Obstetricia. Rio De Janeiro Rj, v. 39, n. 12, p. 647-652, 2017.
0100-7203
WOS000418072500002.pdf
10.1055/s-0037-1608617
WOS:000418072500002
url https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1608617
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Ginecologia E Obstetricia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 647-652
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Rio De Janeiro Rj
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federacao Brasileira Soc Ginecologia & Obstetricia-Febrasgo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federacao Brasileira Soc Ginecologia & Obstetricia-Febrasgo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/58082/1/WOS000418072500002.pdf
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/58082/2/WOS000418072500002.pdf.txt
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/58082/4/WOS000418072500002.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c245fda0e51e5900a3ed32b7e36d6753
f71c058c4b39e779be76b967c73b84a1
992ab53031dc868ce4560ea530bbd184
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802764139580358656