Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kasmas, Soraia Hani [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Izar, Maria Cristina de Oliveira [UNIFESP], França, Carolina Nunes [UNIFESP], Ramos, Silvia Cristina [UNIFESP], Moreira, Flávio Tocci [UNIFESP], Helfenstein, Tatiana [UNIFESP], Moreno, Ronilson Agnaldo, Borges, Ney Carter do Carmo, Figueiredo Neto, Antonio Martins, Fonseca, Francisco Antonio Helfenstein [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7380
Resumo: Effective statin therapy is associated with a marked reduction of cardiovascular events. However, the explanation for full benefits obtained for LDL cholesterol targets by combined lipid-lowering therapy is controversial. Our study compared the effects of two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies on markers of cholesterol synthesis and absorption. A prospective, open label, randomized, parallel design study, with blinded endpoints, included 116 subjects. We compared the effects of a 12-week treatment with 40 mg rosuvastatin or the combination of 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe on markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol and β-sitosterol), synthesis (desmosterol), and their ratios to cholesterol. Both therapies similarly decreased total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B, and increased apolipoprotein A1 (P < 0.05 vs baseline for all). Simvastatin/ezetimibe increased plasma desmosterol (P = 0.012 vs baseline), and decreased campesterol and β-sitosterol (P < 0.0001 vs baseline for both), with higher desmosterol (P = 0.007) and lower campesterol and β-sitosterol compared to rosuvastatin, (P < 0.0001, for both). In addition, rosuvastatin increased the ratios of these markers to cholesterol (P < 0.002 vs baseline for all), whereas simvastatin/ezetimibe significantly decreased the campesterol/cholesterol ratio (P = 0.008 vs baseline) and tripled the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). The campesterol/cholesterol and β-sitosterol/cholesterol ratios were lower, whereas the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio was higher in patients receiving simvastatin/ezetimibe (P < 0.0001 vs rosuvastatin, for all). Pronounced differences in markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis were observed between two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies.
id UFSP_6e9de478e4e269d7e7f75f40218a8e29
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/7380
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapiesCampesterolβ-sitosterolDesmosterolStatinEzetimibeEffective statin therapy is associated with a marked reduction of cardiovascular events. However, the explanation for full benefits obtained for LDL cholesterol targets by combined lipid-lowering therapy is controversial. Our study compared the effects of two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies on markers of cholesterol synthesis and absorption. A prospective, open label, randomized, parallel design study, with blinded endpoints, included 116 subjects. We compared the effects of a 12-week treatment with 40 mg rosuvastatin or the combination of 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe on markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol and β-sitosterol), synthesis (desmosterol), and their ratios to cholesterol. Both therapies similarly decreased total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B, and increased apolipoprotein A1 (P < 0.05 vs baseline for all). Simvastatin/ezetimibe increased plasma desmosterol (P = 0.012 vs baseline), and decreased campesterol and β-sitosterol (P < 0.0001 vs baseline for both), with higher desmosterol (P = 0.007) and lower campesterol and β-sitosterol compared to rosuvastatin, (P < 0.0001, for both). In addition, rosuvastatin increased the ratios of these markers to cholesterol (P < 0.002 vs baseline for all), whereas simvastatin/ezetimibe significantly decreased the campesterol/cholesterol ratio (P = 0.008 vs baseline) and tripled the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). The campesterol/cholesterol and β-sitosterol/cholesterol ratios were lower, whereas the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio was higher in patients receiving simvastatin/ezetimibe (P < 0.0001 vs rosuvastatin, for all). Pronounced differences in markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis were observed between two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Departamento de Medicina Divisão de CardiologiaInstituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Fluidos ComplexosSynchropharUNIFESP, Depto. de Medicina Divisão de CardiologiaSciELOFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)FAPESP: 2008/55443-6FAPESP: 2008/52597-2CNPq: 2008/57685-7Associação Brasileira de Divulgação CientíficaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Fluidos ComplexosSynchropharKasmas, Soraia Hani [UNIFESP]Izar, Maria Cristina de Oliveira [UNIFESP]França, Carolina Nunes [UNIFESP]Ramos, Silvia Cristina [UNIFESP]Moreira, Flávio Tocci [UNIFESP]Helfenstein, Tatiana [UNIFESP]Moreno, Ronilson AgnaldoBorges, Ney Carter do CarmoFigueiredo Neto, Antonio MartinsFonseca, Francisco Antonio Helfenstein [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:45:02Z2015-06-14T13:45:02Z2012-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion1095-1101application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica, v. 45, n. 11, p. 1095-1101, 2012.10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118S0100-879X2012001100015.pdf0100-879XS0100-879X2012001100015http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7380WOS:000309470400015engBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-29T18:16:30Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/7380Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-29T18:16:30Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
title Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
spellingShingle Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
Kasmas, Soraia Hani [UNIFESP]
Campesterol
β-sitosterol
Desmosterol
Statin
Ezetimibe
title_short Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
title_full Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
title_fullStr Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
title_full_unstemmed Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
title_sort Differences in synthesis and absorption of cholesterol of two effective lipid-lowering therapies
author Kasmas, Soraia Hani [UNIFESP]
author_facet Kasmas, Soraia Hani [UNIFESP]
Izar, Maria Cristina de Oliveira [UNIFESP]
França, Carolina Nunes [UNIFESP]
Ramos, Silvia Cristina [UNIFESP]
Moreira, Flávio Tocci [UNIFESP]
Helfenstein, Tatiana [UNIFESP]
Moreno, Ronilson Agnaldo
Borges, Ney Carter do Carmo
Figueiredo Neto, Antonio Martins
Fonseca, Francisco Antonio Helfenstein [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Izar, Maria Cristina de Oliveira [UNIFESP]
França, Carolina Nunes [UNIFESP]
Ramos, Silvia Cristina [UNIFESP]
Moreira, Flávio Tocci [UNIFESP]
Helfenstein, Tatiana [UNIFESP]
Moreno, Ronilson Agnaldo
Borges, Ney Carter do Carmo
Figueiredo Neto, Antonio Martins
Fonseca, Francisco Antonio Helfenstein [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Fluidos Complexos
Synchrophar
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kasmas, Soraia Hani [UNIFESP]
Izar, Maria Cristina de Oliveira [UNIFESP]
França, Carolina Nunes [UNIFESP]
Ramos, Silvia Cristina [UNIFESP]
Moreira, Flávio Tocci [UNIFESP]
Helfenstein, Tatiana [UNIFESP]
Moreno, Ronilson Agnaldo
Borges, Ney Carter do Carmo
Figueiredo Neto, Antonio Martins
Fonseca, Francisco Antonio Helfenstein [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Campesterol
β-sitosterol
Desmosterol
Statin
Ezetimibe
topic Campesterol
β-sitosterol
Desmosterol
Statin
Ezetimibe
description Effective statin therapy is associated with a marked reduction of cardiovascular events. However, the explanation for full benefits obtained for LDL cholesterol targets by combined lipid-lowering therapy is controversial. Our study compared the effects of two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies on markers of cholesterol synthesis and absorption. A prospective, open label, randomized, parallel design study, with blinded endpoints, included 116 subjects. We compared the effects of a 12-week treatment with 40 mg rosuvastatin or the combination of 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe on markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol and β-sitosterol), synthesis (desmosterol), and their ratios to cholesterol. Both therapies similarly decreased total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B, and increased apolipoprotein A1 (P < 0.05 vs baseline for all). Simvastatin/ezetimibe increased plasma desmosterol (P = 0.012 vs baseline), and decreased campesterol and β-sitosterol (P < 0.0001 vs baseline for both), with higher desmosterol (P = 0.007) and lower campesterol and β-sitosterol compared to rosuvastatin, (P < 0.0001, for both). In addition, rosuvastatin increased the ratios of these markers to cholesterol (P < 0.002 vs baseline for all), whereas simvastatin/ezetimibe significantly decreased the campesterol/cholesterol ratio (P = 0.008 vs baseline) and tripled the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). The campesterol/cholesterol and β-sitosterol/cholesterol ratios were lower, whereas the desmosterol/cholesterol ratio was higher in patients receiving simvastatin/ezetimibe (P < 0.0001 vs rosuvastatin, for all). Pronounced differences in markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis were observed between two equally effective lipid-lowering strategies.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-11-01
2015-06-14T13:45:02Z
2015-06-14T13:45:02Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica, v. 45, n. 11, p. 1095-1101, 2012.
10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118
S0100-879X2012001100015.pdf
0100-879X
S0100-879X2012001100015
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7380
WOS:000309470400015
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7380
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica, v. 45, n. 11, p. 1095-1101, 2012.
10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500118
S0100-879X2012001100015.pdf
0100-879X
S0100-879X2012001100015
WOS:000309470400015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1095-1101
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268360711471104