Por Que Ensinar Desenho No Curso Primário? Um Estudo Sobre As Suas Finalidades (1829- 1950)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=5218899 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/50843 |
Resumo: | This thesis has as a main objective to analyze, in a historical perspective, which changes the purposes of teaching Drawing in primary school from 1829 to 1950 have gone through. It was adopted the chronological landmark, regarding the year of the first manual found for the teaching of Drawing and the year of publication of São Paulo’s programs in 1949 and 1950, where the subject of Drawing was present. The sources that have been studied are official teaching documents: laws, decrees, decisions, programs, reports, manuals and pedagogical magazines. Analyzing the changes of Drawing purposes implied in searching to understand the reason to make Drawing as a subject of the primary school. Thus, this investigation was based mainly on the studies of Chervel (1990), in order to comprehend the school purposes; the studies of Trouvé (2008, 2010), on the conception of the elementary/rudimentary pair and in the theoretical and methodological assumptions from Chartier’s (1990) cultural history. The sources analyses have permitted to identify different purposes attributed to the teaching of Drawing, which have changed throughout time. Amongst stays and ruptures, the Drawing teaching in primary school has been a fruit of a complex process, notably marked by the appropriation of discourses. It was observed that, in the first analyzed period (first and second halves of the 19th century), the teaching of Drawing had as the main objective to develop the manual and visual skills, in order to educate the eyes and to make the hand steady, so that the students would be able to construct the geometric figures and further works. Hence, in the form of elements, it served as a way of access to more elaborated knowledges. The learning of these abstract and theoretical concepts was linked to a special kind of advanced knowledge, entitled Euclidian geometry. Considered as rudiments (the first half of the 20th century), when it gained autonomy in relation to geometry, the Drawing teaching started to be seen as a way of preparing children for future professions, developing their intellectual faculties, promoting the observation, educating the judgement and developing the esthetic sense. |
id |
UFSP_78aa29063a6b950d9abd1f1b4979c24c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/50843 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Por Que Ensinar Desenho No Curso Primário? Um Estudo Sobre As Suas Finalidades (1829- 1950)Primary SchoolDrawingPurposesElementaryRudimentaryCurso PrimárioDesenhoFinalidadesElementarRudimentarThis thesis has as a main objective to analyze, in a historical perspective, which changes the purposes of teaching Drawing in primary school from 1829 to 1950 have gone through. It was adopted the chronological landmark, regarding the year of the first manual found for the teaching of Drawing and the year of publication of São Paulo’s programs in 1949 and 1950, where the subject of Drawing was present. The sources that have been studied are official teaching documents: laws, decrees, decisions, programs, reports, manuals and pedagogical magazines. Analyzing the changes of Drawing purposes implied in searching to understand the reason to make Drawing as a subject of the primary school. Thus, this investigation was based mainly on the studies of Chervel (1990), in order to comprehend the school purposes; the studies of Trouvé (2008, 2010), on the conception of the elementary/rudimentary pair and in the theoretical and methodological assumptions from Chartier’s (1990) cultural history. The sources analyses have permitted to identify different purposes attributed to the teaching of Drawing, which have changed throughout time. Amongst stays and ruptures, the Drawing teaching in primary school has been a fruit of a complex process, notably marked by the appropriation of discourses. It was observed that, in the first analyzed period (first and second halves of the 19th century), the teaching of Drawing had as the main objective to develop the manual and visual skills, in order to educate the eyes and to make the hand steady, so that the students would be able to construct the geometric figures and further works. Hence, in the form of elements, it served as a way of access to more elaborated knowledges. The learning of these abstract and theoretical concepts was linked to a special kind of advanced knowledge, entitled Euclidian geometry. Considered as rudiments (the first half of the 20th century), when it gained autonomy in relation to geometry, the Drawing teaching started to be seen as a way of preparing children for future professions, developing their intellectual faculties, promoting the observation, educating the judgement and developing the esthetic sense.Este estudo buscou investigar em perspectiva histórica que transformações sofreram as finalidades do ensino do Desenho no curso primário, no período de 1829-1950. Adotou-se tal marco cronológico considerando-se, respectivamente, o ano do primeiro manual encontrado para o ensino do Desenho e o ano da publicação dos programas paulistas de 1949/50, nos quais esteve presente a matéria de Desenho. As fontes examinadas foram documentos oficiais de ensino: leis, decretos, decisões, programas, relatórios, parecer e manuais escolares e revistas pedagógicas. Analisar as transformações das finalidades do Desenho implicou buscar entender o porquê do Desenho como uma das matérias do curso primário. Neste sentido, esta investigação pautou-se nos estudos de Chervel (1990) para o entendimento de finalidades escolares; nos estudos de Trouvé (2008, 2010) acerca da concepção do par elementar/rudimentar e nos pressupostos teórico-metodológicos advindos da história cultural de Chartier (1990). O exame das fontes permitiu identificar que ao ensino do Desenho foram atribuídas diferentes finalidades que se transformaram ao longo do tempo. Entre permanências e rupturas, o ensino do Desenho no curso primário constituiu-se como fruto de um processo notadamente marcado pela apropriação de discursos. Constatou-se, no primeiro período analisado (primeira e segunda metades do século XIX), que o ensino do Desenho teve como finalidade principal desenvolver habilidades manual e visual, de modo a educar a vista e tornar a mão firme para a construção de figuras geométricas e para trabalhos posteriores. Assim, sob a forma de elementos, servia de acesso a saberes mais elaborados, cuja aprendizagem de conceitos abstratos e teóricos estava atrelada a um tipo especial de saber avançado, denominado geometria euclidiana. Encarado como rubrica de rudimentos (toda a primeira metade do século XX), ao ganhar autonomia em relação à geometria, o ensino do Desenho passou a ser visto como um meio de habilitar as crianças para profissões futuras, desenvolver as suas faculdades intelectivas e motoras, promover a observação, educar o julgamento e desenvolver o sentido estético.Dados abertos - Sucupira - Teses e dissertações (2017)Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Valente, Wagner Rodrigues [UNIFESP]Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Guimaraes, Marcos Denilson [UNIFESP]2019-06-19T14:58:28Z2019-06-19T14:58:28Z2017-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion50p.https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=52188992017-0995.pdfhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/50843porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2021-07-23T21:13:50Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/50843Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652021-07-23T21:13:50Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Por Que Ensinar Desenho No Curso Primário? Um Estudo Sobre As Suas Finalidades (1829- 1950) |
title |
Por Que Ensinar Desenho No Curso Primário? Um Estudo Sobre As Suas Finalidades (1829- 1950) |
spellingShingle |
Por Que Ensinar Desenho No Curso Primário? Um Estudo Sobre As Suas Finalidades (1829- 1950) Guimaraes, Marcos Denilson [UNIFESP] Primary School Drawing Purposes Elementary Rudimentary Curso Primário Desenho Finalidades Elementar Rudimentar |
title_short |
Por Que Ensinar Desenho No Curso Primário? Um Estudo Sobre As Suas Finalidades (1829- 1950) |
title_full |
Por Que Ensinar Desenho No Curso Primário? Um Estudo Sobre As Suas Finalidades (1829- 1950) |
title_fullStr |
Por Que Ensinar Desenho No Curso Primário? Um Estudo Sobre As Suas Finalidades (1829- 1950) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Por Que Ensinar Desenho No Curso Primário? Um Estudo Sobre As Suas Finalidades (1829- 1950) |
title_sort |
Por Que Ensinar Desenho No Curso Primário? Um Estudo Sobre As Suas Finalidades (1829- 1950) |
author |
Guimaraes, Marcos Denilson [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Guimaraes, Marcos Denilson [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Valente, Wagner Rodrigues [UNIFESP] Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guimaraes, Marcos Denilson [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Primary School Drawing Purposes Elementary Rudimentary Curso Primário Desenho Finalidades Elementar Rudimentar |
topic |
Primary School Drawing Purposes Elementary Rudimentary Curso Primário Desenho Finalidades Elementar Rudimentar |
description |
This thesis has as a main objective to analyze, in a historical perspective, which changes the purposes of teaching Drawing in primary school from 1829 to 1950 have gone through. It was adopted the chronological landmark, regarding the year of the first manual found for the teaching of Drawing and the year of publication of São Paulo’s programs in 1949 and 1950, where the subject of Drawing was present. The sources that have been studied are official teaching documents: laws, decrees, decisions, programs, reports, manuals and pedagogical magazines. Analyzing the changes of Drawing purposes implied in searching to understand the reason to make Drawing as a subject of the primary school. Thus, this investigation was based mainly on the studies of Chervel (1990), in order to comprehend the school purposes; the studies of Trouvé (2008, 2010), on the conception of the elementary/rudimentary pair and in the theoretical and methodological assumptions from Chartier’s (1990) cultural history. The sources analyses have permitted to identify different purposes attributed to the teaching of Drawing, which have changed throughout time. Amongst stays and ruptures, the Drawing teaching in primary school has been a fruit of a complex process, notably marked by the appropriation of discourses. It was observed that, in the first analyzed period (first and second halves of the 19th century), the teaching of Drawing had as the main objective to develop the manual and visual skills, in order to educate the eyes and to make the hand steady, so that the students would be able to construct the geometric figures and further works. Hence, in the form of elements, it served as a way of access to more elaborated knowledges. The learning of these abstract and theoretical concepts was linked to a special kind of advanced knowledge, entitled Euclidian geometry. Considered as rudiments (the first half of the 20th century), when it gained autonomy in relation to geometry, the Drawing teaching started to be seen as a way of preparing children for future professions, developing their intellectual faculties, promoting the observation, educating the judgement and developing the esthetic sense. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-25 2019-06-19T14:58:28Z 2019-06-19T14:58:28Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=5218899 2017-0995.pdf http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/50843 |
url |
https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=5218899 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/50843 |
identifier_str_mv |
2017-0995.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
50p. |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268459416027136 |