When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7847 |
Resumo: | Objective: To evaluate the necessity of the non contrast-enhanced phase in abdominal computed tomography scans. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study was developed, evaluating 244 consecutive abdominal computed tomography scans both with and without contrast injection. Initially, the contrast-enhanced images were analyzed (first analysis). Subsequently, the observers had access to the non-contrast-enhanced images for a second analysis. The primary and secondary diagnoses were established as a function of the clinical indications for each study (such as tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation for abdominal collection and hepatocellular carcinoma, among others). Finally, the changes in the diagnoses resulting from the addition of the non-contrast-enhanced phase were evaluated. Results: Only one (0.4%; p > 0.999; non-statistically significant) out of the 244 reviewed cases had the diagnosis changed after the reading of non-contrast-enhanced images. As the secondary diagnoses are considered, 35 (14%) cases presented changes after the second analysis, as follows: nephrolithiasis (10%), steatosis (3%), adrenal nodule (0.7%) and cholelithiasis (0.3%). Conclusion: For the clinical indications of tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation of abdominal collections and hepatocellular carcinoma, the non-contrast-enhanced phase can be excluded from abdominal computed tomography studies with no significant impact on the diagnosis. |
id |
UFSP_79f67abb40e423bef60a39f349474060 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/7847 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 casesQuando a fase sem contraste intravenoso é desnecessária nos exames de tomografia computadorizada do abdome? Análise retrospectiva de 244 casosComputed tomographyIonizing radiationAbdomenContrast mediaTomografia computadorizadaRadiacao ionizanteAbdomeMeio de contrasteObjective: To evaluate the necessity of the non contrast-enhanced phase in abdominal computed tomography scans. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study was developed, evaluating 244 consecutive abdominal computed tomography scans both with and without contrast injection. Initially, the contrast-enhanced images were analyzed (first analysis). Subsequently, the observers had access to the non-contrast-enhanced images for a second analysis. The primary and secondary diagnoses were established as a function of the clinical indications for each study (such as tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation for abdominal collection and hepatocellular carcinoma, among others). Finally, the changes in the diagnoses resulting from the addition of the non-contrast-enhanced phase were evaluated. Results: Only one (0.4%; p > 0.999; non-statistically significant) out of the 244 reviewed cases had the diagnosis changed after the reading of non-contrast-enhanced images. As the secondary diagnoses are considered, 35 (14%) cases presented changes after the second analysis, as follows: nephrolithiasis (10%), steatosis (3%), adrenal nodule (0.7%) and cholelithiasis (0.3%). Conclusion: For the clinical indications of tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation of abdominal collections and hepatocellular carcinoma, the non-contrast-enhanced phase can be excluded from abdominal computed tomography studies with no significant impact on the diagnosis.Objetivo: Avaliar a necessidade da fase sem contraste nos exames de tomografia computadorizada de abdome. Materiais e Métodos: Foi realizado estudo retrospectivo, transversal e observacional, no qual foram avaliados 244 exames consecutivos de tomografia computadorizada de abdome realizados sem e com a injeção do meio de contraste. Procurou-se estabelecer, mediante análise das fases com o uso do meio de contraste (primeira análise), e posteriormente com o acréscimo da avaliação da fase sem meio de contraste (segunda análise), o diagnóstico principal e os secundários em função da indicação clínica do exame (estadiamento tumoral, abdome agudo, pesquisa de coleção abdominal e hepatocarcinoma, entre outros). Foram medidas as mudanças nos diagnósticos principais e secundários, decorrentes do acréscimo da fase sem meio de contraste. Resultados: Dos 244 casos avaliados, apenas um (0,4%; p > 0,999; não significante) teve o seu diagnóstico modificado após a leitura da fase sem meio de contraste. Com relação aos diagnósticos secundários, 35 exames (14%) foram modificados após a segunda análise, sendo: nefrolitíase (10%), esteatose (3%), nódulo de adrenal (0,7%) e colelitíase (0,3%). Conclusão: Para as indicações clínicas de estadiamento tumoral, abdome agudo, pesquisa de coleção abdominal e carcinoma hepatocelular, a supressão da fase sem meio de contraste não apresentou impacto diagnóstico expressivo.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de Medicina Department of Diagnostic ImagingEUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de Medicina Department of Diagnostic ImagingDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging Department of Diagnostic ImagingEscola Paulista de Medicina Escola Paulista de MedicinaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)UNIFESP, EPM, Department of Diagnostic ImagingEUNIFESP, EPM, Department of Diagnostic ImagingEscola Paulista de Medicina Escola Paulista de MedicinaUNIFESPSciELOColégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por ImagemUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Department of Diagnostic Imaging Department of Diagnostic ImagingCosta, Danilo Manuel CerqueiraSalvadori, Priscila SilveiraMonjardim, Rodrigo da FonsecaBretas, Elisa Almeida SathlerTorres, Lucas RiosCaldana, Rogerio PedreschiShigueoka, David Carlos [UNIFESP]Medeiros, Regina Bitelli [UNIFESP]D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:45:31Z2015-06-14T13:45:31Z2013-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion197-202application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004Radiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 46, n. 4, p. 197-202, 2013.10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004S0100-39842013000400197.pdf0100-3984S0100-39842013000400197http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7847engRadiologia Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-05T21:30:52Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/7847Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-05T21:30:52Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases Quando a fase sem contraste intravenoso é desnecessária nos exames de tomografia computadorizada do abdome? Análise retrospectiva de 244 casos |
title |
When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases |
spellingShingle |
When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases Costa, Danilo Manuel Cerqueira Computed tomography Ionizing radiation Abdomen Contrast media Tomografia computadorizada Radiacao ionizante Abdome Meio de contraste |
title_short |
When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases |
title_full |
When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases |
title_fullStr |
When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases |
title_full_unstemmed |
When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases |
title_sort |
When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases |
author |
Costa, Danilo Manuel Cerqueira |
author_facet |
Costa, Danilo Manuel Cerqueira Salvadori, Priscila Silveira Monjardim, Rodrigo da Fonseca Bretas, Elisa Almeida Sathler Torres, Lucas Rios Caldana, Rogerio Pedreschi Shigueoka, David Carlos [UNIFESP] Medeiros, Regina Bitelli [UNIFESP] D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Salvadori, Priscila Silveira Monjardim, Rodrigo da Fonseca Bretas, Elisa Almeida Sathler Torres, Lucas Rios Caldana, Rogerio Pedreschi Shigueoka, David Carlos [UNIFESP] Medeiros, Regina Bitelli [UNIFESP] D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Department of Diagnostic Imaging Department of Diagnostic Imaging |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Danilo Manuel Cerqueira Salvadori, Priscila Silveira Monjardim, Rodrigo da Fonseca Bretas, Elisa Almeida Sathler Torres, Lucas Rios Caldana, Rogerio Pedreschi Shigueoka, David Carlos [UNIFESP] Medeiros, Regina Bitelli [UNIFESP] D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Computed tomography Ionizing radiation Abdomen Contrast media Tomografia computadorizada Radiacao ionizante Abdome Meio de contraste |
topic |
Computed tomography Ionizing radiation Abdomen Contrast media Tomografia computadorizada Radiacao ionizante Abdome Meio de contraste |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the necessity of the non contrast-enhanced phase in abdominal computed tomography scans. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study was developed, evaluating 244 consecutive abdominal computed tomography scans both with and without contrast injection. Initially, the contrast-enhanced images were analyzed (first analysis). Subsequently, the observers had access to the non-contrast-enhanced images for a second analysis. The primary and secondary diagnoses were established as a function of the clinical indications for each study (such as tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation for abdominal collection and hepatocellular carcinoma, among others). Finally, the changes in the diagnoses resulting from the addition of the non-contrast-enhanced phase were evaluated. Results: Only one (0.4%; p > 0.999; non-statistically significant) out of the 244 reviewed cases had the diagnosis changed after the reading of non-contrast-enhanced images. As the secondary diagnoses are considered, 35 (14%) cases presented changes after the second analysis, as follows: nephrolithiasis (10%), steatosis (3%), adrenal nodule (0.7%) and cholelithiasis (0.3%). Conclusion: For the clinical indications of tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation of abdominal collections and hepatocellular carcinoma, the non-contrast-enhanced phase can be excluded from abdominal computed tomography studies with no significant impact on the diagnosis. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-07-01 2015-06-14T13:45:31Z 2015-06-14T13:45:31Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004 Radiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 46, n. 4, p. 197-202, 2013. 10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004 S0100-39842013000400197.pdf 0100-3984 S0100-39842013000400197 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7847 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7847 |
identifier_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 46, n. 4, p. 197-202, 2013. 10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004 S0100-39842013000400197.pdf 0100-3984 S0100-39842013000400197 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
197-202 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268349616488448 |