When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Danilo Manuel Cerqueira
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Salvadori, Priscila Silveira, Monjardim, Rodrigo da Fonseca, Bretas, Elisa Almeida Sathler, Torres, Lucas Rios, Caldana, Rogerio Pedreschi, Shigueoka, David Carlos [UNIFESP], Medeiros, Regina Bitelli [UNIFESP], D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7847
Resumo: Objective: To evaluate the necessity of the non contrast-enhanced phase in abdominal computed tomography scans. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study was developed, evaluating 244 consecutive abdominal computed tomography scans both with and without contrast injection. Initially, the contrast-enhanced images were analyzed (first analysis). Subsequently, the observers had access to the non-contrast-enhanced images for a second analysis. The primary and secondary diagnoses were established as a function of the clinical indications for each study (such as tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation for abdominal collection and hepatocellular carcinoma, among others). Finally, the changes in the diagnoses resulting from the addition of the non-contrast-enhanced phase were evaluated. Results: Only one (0.4%; p > 0.999; non-statistically significant) out of the 244 reviewed cases had the diagnosis changed after the reading of non-contrast-enhanced images. As the secondary diagnoses are considered, 35 (14%) cases presented changes after the second analysis, as follows: nephrolithiasis (10%), steatosis (3%), adrenal nodule (0.7%) and cholelithiasis (0.3%). Conclusion: For the clinical indications of tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation of abdominal collections and hepatocellular carcinoma, the non-contrast-enhanced phase can be excluded from abdominal computed tomography studies with no significant impact on the diagnosis.
id UFSP_79f67abb40e423bef60a39f349474060
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/7847
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 casesQuando a fase sem contraste intravenoso é desnecessária nos exames de tomografia computadorizada do abdome? Análise retrospectiva de 244 casosComputed tomographyIonizing radiationAbdomenContrast mediaTomografia computadorizadaRadiacao ionizanteAbdomeMeio de contrasteObjective: To evaluate the necessity of the non contrast-enhanced phase in abdominal computed tomography scans. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study was developed, evaluating 244 consecutive abdominal computed tomography scans both with and without contrast injection. Initially, the contrast-enhanced images were analyzed (first analysis). Subsequently, the observers had access to the non-contrast-enhanced images for a second analysis. The primary and secondary diagnoses were established as a function of the clinical indications for each study (such as tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation for abdominal collection and hepatocellular carcinoma, among others). Finally, the changes in the diagnoses resulting from the addition of the non-contrast-enhanced phase were evaluated. Results: Only one (0.4%; p > 0.999; non-statistically significant) out of the 244 reviewed cases had the diagnosis changed after the reading of non-contrast-enhanced images. As the secondary diagnoses are considered, 35 (14%) cases presented changes after the second analysis, as follows: nephrolithiasis (10%), steatosis (3%), adrenal nodule (0.7%) and cholelithiasis (0.3%). Conclusion: For the clinical indications of tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation of abdominal collections and hepatocellular carcinoma, the non-contrast-enhanced phase can be excluded from abdominal computed tomography studies with no significant impact on the diagnosis.Objetivo: Avaliar a necessidade da fase sem contraste nos exames de tomografia computadorizada de abdome. Materiais e Métodos: Foi realizado estudo retrospectivo, transversal e observacional, no qual foram avaliados 244 exames consecutivos de tomografia computadorizada de abdome realizados sem e com a injeção do meio de contraste. Procurou-se estabelecer, mediante análise das fases com o uso do meio de contraste (primeira análise), e posteriormente com o acréscimo da avaliação da fase sem meio de contraste (segunda análise), o diagnóstico principal e os secundários em função da indicação clínica do exame (estadiamento tumoral, abdome agudo, pesquisa de coleção abdominal e hepatocarcinoma, entre outros). Foram medidas as mudanças nos diagnósticos principais e secundários, decorrentes do acréscimo da fase sem meio de contraste. Resultados: Dos 244 casos avaliados, apenas um (0,4%; p > 0,999; não significante) teve o seu diagnóstico modificado após a leitura da fase sem meio de contraste. Com relação aos diagnósticos secundários, 35 exames (14%) foram modificados após a segunda análise, sendo: nefrolitíase (10%), esteatose (3%), nódulo de adrenal (0,7%) e colelitíase (0,3%). Conclusão: Para as indicações clínicas de estadiamento tumoral, abdome agudo, pesquisa de coleção abdominal e carcinoma hepatocelular, a supressão da fase sem meio de contraste não apresentou impacto diagnóstico expressivo.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de Medicina Department of Diagnostic ImagingEUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de Medicina Department of Diagnostic ImagingDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging Department of Diagnostic ImagingEscola Paulista de Medicina Escola Paulista de MedicinaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)UNIFESP, EPM, Department of Diagnostic ImagingEUNIFESP, EPM, Department of Diagnostic ImagingEscola Paulista de Medicina Escola Paulista de MedicinaUNIFESPSciELOColégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por ImagemUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Department of Diagnostic Imaging Department of Diagnostic ImagingCosta, Danilo Manuel CerqueiraSalvadori, Priscila SilveiraMonjardim, Rodrigo da FonsecaBretas, Elisa Almeida SathlerTorres, Lucas RiosCaldana, Rogerio PedreschiShigueoka, David Carlos [UNIFESP]Medeiros, Regina Bitelli [UNIFESP]D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:45:31Z2015-06-14T13:45:31Z2013-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion197-202application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004Radiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 46, n. 4, p. 197-202, 2013.10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004S0100-39842013000400197.pdf0100-3984S0100-39842013000400197http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7847engRadiologia Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-05T21:30:52Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/7847Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-05T21:30:52Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
Quando a fase sem contraste intravenoso é desnecessária nos exames de tomografia computadorizada do abdome? Análise retrospectiva de 244 casos
title When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
spellingShingle When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
Costa, Danilo Manuel Cerqueira
Computed tomography
Ionizing radiation
Abdomen
Contrast media
Tomografia computadorizada
Radiacao ionizante
Abdome
Meio de contraste
title_short When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
title_full When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
title_fullStr When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
title_full_unstemmed When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
title_sort When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
author Costa, Danilo Manuel Cerqueira
author_facet Costa, Danilo Manuel Cerqueira
Salvadori, Priscila Silveira
Monjardim, Rodrigo da Fonseca
Bretas, Elisa Almeida Sathler
Torres, Lucas Rios
Caldana, Rogerio Pedreschi
Shigueoka, David Carlos [UNIFESP]
Medeiros, Regina Bitelli [UNIFESP]
D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Salvadori, Priscila Silveira
Monjardim, Rodrigo da Fonseca
Bretas, Elisa Almeida Sathler
Torres, Lucas Rios
Caldana, Rogerio Pedreschi
Shigueoka, David Carlos [UNIFESP]
Medeiros, Regina Bitelli [UNIFESP]
D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Department of Diagnostic Imaging Department of Diagnostic Imaging
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Danilo Manuel Cerqueira
Salvadori, Priscila Silveira
Monjardim, Rodrigo da Fonseca
Bretas, Elisa Almeida Sathler
Torres, Lucas Rios
Caldana, Rogerio Pedreschi
Shigueoka, David Carlos [UNIFESP]
Medeiros, Regina Bitelli [UNIFESP]
D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Computed tomography
Ionizing radiation
Abdomen
Contrast media
Tomografia computadorizada
Radiacao ionizante
Abdome
Meio de contraste
topic Computed tomography
Ionizing radiation
Abdomen
Contrast media
Tomografia computadorizada
Radiacao ionizante
Abdome
Meio de contraste
description Objective: To evaluate the necessity of the non contrast-enhanced phase in abdominal computed tomography scans. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study was developed, evaluating 244 consecutive abdominal computed tomography scans both with and without contrast injection. Initially, the contrast-enhanced images were analyzed (first analysis). Subsequently, the observers had access to the non-contrast-enhanced images for a second analysis. The primary and secondary diagnoses were established as a function of the clinical indications for each study (such as tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation for abdominal collection and hepatocellular carcinoma, among others). Finally, the changes in the diagnoses resulting from the addition of the non-contrast-enhanced phase were evaluated. Results: Only one (0.4%; p > 0.999; non-statistically significant) out of the 244 reviewed cases had the diagnosis changed after the reading of non-contrast-enhanced images. As the secondary diagnoses are considered, 35 (14%) cases presented changes after the second analysis, as follows: nephrolithiasis (10%), steatosis (3%), adrenal nodule (0.7%) and cholelithiasis (0.3%). Conclusion: For the clinical indications of tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation of abdominal collections and hepatocellular carcinoma, the non-contrast-enhanced phase can be excluded from abdominal computed tomography studies with no significant impact on the diagnosis.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-07-01
2015-06-14T13:45:31Z
2015-06-14T13:45:31Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004
Radiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 46, n. 4, p. 197-202, 2013.
10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004
S0100-39842013000400197.pdf
0100-3984
S0100-39842013000400197
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7847
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7847
identifier_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 46, n. 4, p. 197-202, 2013.
10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004
S0100-39842013000400197.pdf
0100-3984
S0100-39842013000400197
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 197-202
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268349616488448