O valor da fase sem contraste na tomografia computadorizada do abdome

• Autor(a) principal: Leite, Ana Paula Klautau [UNIFESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2008
• Outros Autores: Mattos, Leandro Accardo de [UNIFESP], Pinto, Gustavo Alfredo Duarte Henriques [UNIFESP], Scaciota, Andrea Puchnick [UNIFESP], Franco, Rita Maria Aparecida Monteiro Moura [UNIFESP], Andreoni, Cássio [UNIFESP], Lederman, Henrique Manoel [UNIFESP], D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842008000500005; http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4579
• topic: Computed tomography; Contrast media; Abdomen; Tomografia computadorizada; Contraste; Abdome

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of the unenhanced phase of abdominal computed tomography in patients without a definite diagnosis or undergoing tumor staging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective and transversal study was developed with 100 consecutive patients submitted to unenhanced and contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography. Two observers evaluated all the computed tomography images in the contrast-enhanced phase (first analysis) and, later, in the unenhanced phase (second analysis) in an attempt to establish the primary and secondary diagnoses as a function of the clinical indication for the study. The frequency of changes in the diagnoses resulting from a combined analysis of the images in the pre- and post-contrast phases was evaluated. Cases with changes in the diagnosis were reviewed by clinical specialists for determining possible changes in the therapeutic approach. RESULTS: Primary and secondary diagnoses were changed in respectively 1 and 18 cases (p = 1.000; p = 0.143) as follows: steatosis, adrenal nodules, nephrolithiasis, renal cysts and hepatic calcification. In the cases where the unenhanced phase changed the diagnosis, the specialists changed the therapeutic approach in 14 of the 19 patients (73%) (p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: No significant change was observed in the primary or secondary diagnosis as a result of the findings in the unenhanced phase. However, changes in secondary diagnoses affected the therapeutic approach adopted by the specialists.