Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
dARK ID: | ark:/48912/0013000012w1x |
DOI: | 10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7316 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the level of agreement between behavioral and multidimensional pain assessment scales in term newborn infants submitted to an acute nociceptive stimulus. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 400 healthy term newborns who received an intramuscular injection of vitamin K during the first 6 hours of life. Two behavioral pain scales (the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain) and one multidimensional tool (the Premature Infant Pain Profile) were applied by a single observer before the procedure, during cleansing, during injection and two minutes after injection. The Cochran Q, McNemar and kappa tests were used to compare the presence and degree of agreement between the three scales. The Hotelling T2 test was used to compare the groups of newborns for which the scales showed agreement or disagreement. A generalized linear regression was used to compare the results of the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain across the four study time points. RESULTS: The neonates studied had a gestational age of 39±1 weeks, a birth weight of 3169±316 g and and postnatal age of 67±45 minutes. During the stimulus procedure, 80% of the newborns exhibited pain behaviors according to the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain, and 70% experienced pain according to the Premature Infant Pain Profile (p<0.001). The frequencies of the detection of pain using the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain and the Neonatal Facial Coding System were similar. The characteristics of the neonates were not associated with the level of agreement between the scales. CONCLUSION: The Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain behavioral scales are more sensitive for the identification of pain in healthy term newborn infants than the multidimensional Premature Infant Pain Profile scale. |
id |
UFSP_7c1e2f825dafa18c10653e7a24c5912b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/7316 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedsidePainNewborn InfantPain MeasurementOBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the level of agreement between behavioral and multidimensional pain assessment scales in term newborn infants submitted to an acute nociceptive stimulus. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 400 healthy term newborns who received an intramuscular injection of vitamin K during the first 6 hours of life. Two behavioral pain scales (the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain) and one multidimensional tool (the Premature Infant Pain Profile) were applied by a single observer before the procedure, during cleansing, during injection and two minutes after injection. The Cochran Q, McNemar and kappa tests were used to compare the presence and degree of agreement between the three scales. The Hotelling T2 test was used to compare the groups of newborns for which the scales showed agreement or disagreement. A generalized linear regression was used to compare the results of the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain across the four study time points. RESULTS: The neonates studied had a gestational age of 39±1 weeks, a birth weight of 3169±316 g and and postnatal age of 67±45 minutes. During the stimulus procedure, 80% of the newborns exhibited pain behaviors according to the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain, and 70% experienced pain according to the Premature Infant Pain Profile (p<0.001). The frequencies of the detection of pain using the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain and the Neonatal Facial Coding System were similar. The characteristics of the neonates were not associated with the level of agreement between the scales. CONCLUSION: The Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain behavioral scales are more sensitive for the identification of pain in healthy term newborn infants than the multidimensional Premature Infant Pain Profile scale.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM) Division of Neonatal MedicineUNIFESP, EPM, Division of Neonatal MedicineSciELOFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)2009-06145-5 e 2012/50511-9Faculdade de Medicina / USPUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP]Guinsburg, Ruth [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:44:58Z2015-06-14T13:44:58Z2012-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion1165-1170application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08Clinics. Faculdade de Medicina / USP, v. 67, n. 10, p. 1165-1170, 2012.10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08S1807-59322012001000008.pdf1807-5932S1807-59322012001000008http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7316WOS:000309938100008ark:/48912/0013000012w1xengClinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-04T09:42:31Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/7316Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-12-11T20:52:24.655368Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside |
title |
Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside |
spellingShingle |
Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP] Pain Newborn Infant Pain Measurement Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP] Pain Newborn Infant Pain Measurement |
title_short |
Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside |
title_full |
Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside |
title_fullStr |
Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside |
title_sort |
Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside |
author |
Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP] Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP] Guinsburg, Ruth [UNIFESP] Guinsburg, Ruth [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guinsburg, Ruth [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP] Guinsburg, Ruth [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pain Newborn Infant Pain Measurement |
topic |
Pain Newborn Infant Pain Measurement |
description |
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the level of agreement between behavioral and multidimensional pain assessment scales in term newborn infants submitted to an acute nociceptive stimulus. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 400 healthy term newborns who received an intramuscular injection of vitamin K during the first 6 hours of life. Two behavioral pain scales (the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain) and one multidimensional tool (the Premature Infant Pain Profile) were applied by a single observer before the procedure, during cleansing, during injection and two minutes after injection. The Cochran Q, McNemar and kappa tests were used to compare the presence and degree of agreement between the three scales. The Hotelling T2 test was used to compare the groups of newborns for which the scales showed agreement or disagreement. A generalized linear regression was used to compare the results of the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain across the four study time points. RESULTS: The neonates studied had a gestational age of 39±1 weeks, a birth weight of 3169±316 g and and postnatal age of 67±45 minutes. During the stimulus procedure, 80% of the newborns exhibited pain behaviors according to the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain, and 70% experienced pain according to the Premature Infant Pain Profile (p<0.001). The frequencies of the detection of pain using the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain and the Neonatal Facial Coding System were similar. The characteristics of the neonates were not associated with the level of agreement between the scales. CONCLUSION: The Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain behavioral scales are more sensitive for the identification of pain in healthy term newborn infants than the multidimensional Premature Infant Pain Profile scale. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-10-01 2015-06-14T13:44:58Z 2015-06-14T13:44:58Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08 Clinics. Faculdade de Medicina / USP, v. 67, n. 10, p. 1165-1170, 2012. 10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08 S1807-59322012001000008.pdf 1807-5932 S1807-59322012001000008 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7316 WOS:000309938100008 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/48912/0013000012w1x |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7316 |
identifier_str_mv |
Clinics. Faculdade de Medicina / USP, v. 67, n. 10, p. 1165-1170, 2012. 10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08 S1807-59322012001000008.pdf 1807-5932 S1807-59322012001000008 WOS:000309938100008 ark:/48912/0013000012w1x |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1165-1170 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1822178951229865984 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08 |