Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Guinsburg, Ruth [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
dARK ID: ark:/48912/0013000012w1x
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7316
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the level of agreement between behavioral and multidimensional pain assessment scales in term newborn infants submitted to an acute nociceptive stimulus. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 400 healthy term newborns who received an intramuscular injection of vitamin K during the first 6 hours of life. Two behavioral pain scales (the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain) and one multidimensional tool (the Premature Infant Pain Profile) were applied by a single observer before the procedure, during cleansing, during injection and two minutes after injection. The Cochran Q, McNemar and kappa tests were used to compare the presence and degree of agreement between the three scales. The Hotelling T2 test was used to compare the groups of newborns for which the scales showed agreement or disagreement. A generalized linear regression was used to compare the results of the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain across the four study time points. RESULTS: The neonates studied had a gestational age of 39±1 weeks, a birth weight of 3169±316 g and and postnatal age of 67±45 minutes. During the stimulus procedure, 80% of the newborns exhibited pain behaviors according to the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain, and 70% experienced pain according to the Premature Infant Pain Profile (p<0.001). The frequencies of the detection of pain using the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain and the Neonatal Facial Coding System were similar. The characteristics of the neonates were not associated with the level of agreement between the scales. CONCLUSION: The Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain behavioral scales are more sensitive for the identification of pain in healthy term newborn infants than the multidimensional Premature Infant Pain Profile scale.
id UFSP_7c1e2f825dafa18c10653e7a24c5912b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/7316
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedsidePainNewborn InfantPain MeasurementOBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the level of agreement between behavioral and multidimensional pain assessment scales in term newborn infants submitted to an acute nociceptive stimulus. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 400 healthy term newborns who received an intramuscular injection of vitamin K during the first 6 hours of life. Two behavioral pain scales (the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain) and one multidimensional tool (the Premature Infant Pain Profile) were applied by a single observer before the procedure, during cleansing, during injection and two minutes after injection. The Cochran Q, McNemar and kappa tests were used to compare the presence and degree of agreement between the three scales. The Hotelling T2 test was used to compare the groups of newborns for which the scales showed agreement or disagreement. A generalized linear regression was used to compare the results of the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain across the four study time points. RESULTS: The neonates studied had a gestational age of 39±1 weeks, a birth weight of 3169±316 g and and postnatal age of 67±45 minutes. During the stimulus procedure, 80% of the newborns exhibited pain behaviors according to the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain, and 70% experienced pain according to the Premature Infant Pain Profile (p<0.001). The frequencies of the detection of pain using the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain and the Neonatal Facial Coding System were similar. The characteristics of the neonates were not associated with the level of agreement between the scales. CONCLUSION: The Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain behavioral scales are more sensitive for the identification of pain in healthy term newborn infants than the multidimensional Premature Infant Pain Profile scale.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM) Division of Neonatal MedicineUNIFESP, EPM, Division of Neonatal MedicineSciELOFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)2009-06145-5 e 2012/50511-9Faculdade de Medicina / USPUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP]Guinsburg, Ruth [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:44:58Z2015-06-14T13:44:58Z2012-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion1165-1170application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08Clinics. Faculdade de Medicina / USP, v. 67, n. 10, p. 1165-1170, 2012.10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08S1807-59322012001000008.pdf1807-5932S1807-59322012001000008http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7316WOS:000309938100008ark:/48912/0013000012w1xengClinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-04T09:42:31Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/7316Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-12-11T20:52:24.655368Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
title Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
spellingShingle Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP]
Pain
Newborn Infant
Pain Measurement
Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP]
Pain
Newborn Infant
Pain Measurement
title_short Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
title_full Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
title_fullStr Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
title_full_unstemmed Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
title_sort Differences between uni-and multidimensional scales for assessing pain in term newborn infants at the bedside
author Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP]
author_facet Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP]
Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP]
Guinsburg, Ruth [UNIFESP]
Guinsburg, Ruth [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Guinsburg, Ruth [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arias, Maria Carmenza Cuenca [UNIFESP]
Guinsburg, Ruth [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pain
Newborn Infant
Pain Measurement
topic Pain
Newborn Infant
Pain Measurement
description OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the level of agreement between behavioral and multidimensional pain assessment scales in term newborn infants submitted to an acute nociceptive stimulus. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed on 400 healthy term newborns who received an intramuscular injection of vitamin K during the first 6 hours of life. Two behavioral pain scales (the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain) and one multidimensional tool (the Premature Infant Pain Profile) were applied by a single observer before the procedure, during cleansing, during injection and two minutes after injection. The Cochran Q, McNemar and kappa tests were used to compare the presence and degree of agreement between the three scales. The Hotelling T2 test was used to compare the groups of newborns for which the scales showed agreement or disagreement. A generalized linear regression was used to compare the results of the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain across the four study time points. RESULTS: The neonates studied had a gestational age of 39±1 weeks, a birth weight of 3169±316 g and and postnatal age of 67±45 minutes. During the stimulus procedure, 80% of the newborns exhibited pain behaviors according to the Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain, and 70% experienced pain according to the Premature Infant Pain Profile (p<0.001). The frequencies of the detection of pain using the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain and the Neonatal Facial Coding System were similar. The characteristics of the neonates were not associated with the level of agreement between the scales. CONCLUSION: The Neonatal Facial Coding System and the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain behavioral scales are more sensitive for the identification of pain in healthy term newborn infants than the multidimensional Premature Infant Pain Profile scale.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10-01
2015-06-14T13:44:58Z
2015-06-14T13:44:58Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08
Clinics. Faculdade de Medicina / USP, v. 67, n. 10, p. 1165-1170, 2012.
10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08
S1807-59322012001000008.pdf
1807-5932
S1807-59322012001000008
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7316
WOS:000309938100008
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/48912/0013000012w1x
url http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/7316
identifier_str_mv Clinics. Faculdade de Medicina / USP, v. 67, n. 10, p. 1165-1170, 2012.
10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08
S1807-59322012001000008.pdf
1807-5932
S1807-59322012001000008
WOS:000309938100008
ark:/48912/0013000012w1x
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Clinics
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1165-1170
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Medicina / USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Medicina / USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1822178951229865984
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2012(10)08