Two physically, functionally, and developmentally distinct peritoneal macrophage subsets

• Autor(a) principal: Ghosn, Eliver Eid Bou
• Data de Publicação: 2010
• Outros Autores: Cassado, Alexandra A., Govoni, Gregory R., Fukuhara, Takeshi, Yang, Yang, Monack, Denise M., Bortoluci, Karina Ramalho [UNIFESP], Almeida, Sandro R., Herzenberg, Leonard, Herzenberg, Leonore A.
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/32262; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0915000107
• topic: CD11b; F4/80; lipopolysaccharide; peritoneal cavity; thioglycolate

The peritoneal cavity (PerC) is a unique compartment within which a variety of immune cells reside, and from which macrophages (Mempty set) are commonly drawn for functional studies. Here we define two Mempty set subsets that coexist in PerC in adult mice. One, provisionally called the large peritoneal Mempty set (LPM), contains approximately 90% of the PerC Mempty set in unstimulated animals but disappears rapidly from PerC following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or thioglycolate stimulation. These cells express high levels of the canonical Mempty set surface markers, CD11b and F4/80. the second subset, referred to as small peritoneal Mempty set (SPM), expresses substantially lower levels of CD11b and F4/80 but expresses high levels of MHC-II, which is not expressed on LPM. SPM, which predominates in PerC after LPS or thioglycolate stimulation, does not derive from LPM. Instead, it derives from blood monocytes that rapidly enter the PerC after stimulation and differentiate to mature SPM within 2 to 4 d. Both subsets show clear phagocytic activity and both produce nitric oxide (NO) in response to LPS stimulation in vivo. However, their responses to LPS show key differences: in vitro, LPS stimulates LPM, but not SPM, to produce NO; in vivo, LPS stimulates both subsets to produce NO, albeit with different response patterns. These findings extend current models of Mempty set heterogeneity and shed new light on PerC Mempty set diversity, development, and function. Thus, they introduce a new context for interpreting (and reinterpreting) data from ex vivo studies with PerC Mempty set.