Assessment of stage T1 (TNM 1997) for renal cell carcinoma: is recommended the subdivision in T1a and T1b?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dall Oglio, Marcos Francisco [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2003
Outros Autores: Srougi, Miguel [UNIFESP], Mangini, Marcelo, Ribeiro, Eduardo [UNIFESP], Ferraz, Márcio [UNIFESP], Sañudo, Adriana [UNIFESP], Leite, Kátia Ramos Moreira [UNIFESP], Nesrallah, Luciano [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382003000200003
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1681
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: Classification TNM 1997 defines renal cell carcinoma smaller than 7 cm and confined to the kidney as stage T1. Our goal is to discuss if tumors smaller than 4 cm have the same behavior characteristics then tumors between 4 and 7 cm, to compose the same stage of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective assessment of 138 patients in stage T1 (TNM - 97), divided into 2 groups; group-1: composed of 65 patients (47%) with tumors < 4 cm, and group-2: composed of 73 patients (53%) with tumors between 4 and 7 cm. The following prognostic factors were assessed in the recurrence of the disease and survival of patients: nuclear degree, microvascular invasion, sarcomatous degeneration, and involved lymph nodes. Statistical evaluation has been accomplished through the log rank test, chi-square test, and Fishers exact text. RESULTS: Average tumor size was 2.5 cm for group-1, and 5.3 cm for group-2. In group-2, there was the predominance of worse prognostic factors, with high-grade tumors (p = 0.01) and presence of microvascular invasion (p = 0.001). Sarcomatous tumors and involvement of lymph nodes did only happen in group-2. Disease-free survival for group-1, analyzed in the median period of 36 months, was 100%, and for group 2, in the median period of 31 months, was 81% (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The results obtained allow the conclusion that the present stage T1 for renal cell carcinoma gathers tumors of different evolution, being therefore recommendable the stratification in T1a for tumors smaller than 4 cm, and T1b for tumors between 4 and 7 cm.
id UFSP_822db2b9bd4a056f79a872051d28ce0c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/1681
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Assessment of stage T1 (TNM 1997) for renal cell carcinoma: is recommended the subdivision in T1a and T1b?kidneycarcinomarenal cellneoplasm stagingprognosisclassificationsurvivalINTRODUCTION: Classification TNM 1997 defines renal cell carcinoma smaller than 7 cm and confined to the kidney as stage T1. Our goal is to discuss if tumors smaller than 4 cm have the same behavior characteristics then tumors between 4 and 7 cm, to compose the same stage of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective assessment of 138 patients in stage T1 (TNM - 97), divided into 2 groups; group-1: composed of 65 patients (47%) with tumors < 4 cm, and group-2: composed of 73 patients (53%) with tumors between 4 and 7 cm. The following prognostic factors were assessed in the recurrence of the disease and survival of patients: nuclear degree, microvascular invasion, sarcomatous degeneration, and involved lymph nodes. Statistical evaluation has been accomplished through the log rank test, chi-square test, and Fishers exact text. RESULTS: Average tumor size was 2.5 cm for group-1, and 5.3 cm for group-2. In group-2, there was the predominance of worse prognostic factors, with high-grade tumors (p = 0.01) and presence of microvascular invasion (p = 0.001). Sarcomatous tumors and involvement of lymph nodes did only happen in group-2. Disease-free survival for group-1, analyzed in the median period of 36 months, was 100%, and for group 2, in the median period of 31 months, was 81% (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The results obtained allow the conclusion that the present stage T1 for renal cell carcinoma gathers tumors of different evolution, being therefore recommendable the stratification in T1a for tumors smaller than 4 cm, and T1b for tumors between 4 and 7 cm.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM) Divisions of Urology and StatisticsUNIFESP, EPM, Divisions of Urology and StatisticsSciELOSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Dall Oglio, Marcos Francisco [UNIFESP]Srougi, Miguel [UNIFESP]Mangini, MarceloRibeiro, Eduardo [UNIFESP]Ferraz, Márcio [UNIFESP]Sañudo, Adriana [UNIFESP]Leite, Kátia Ramos Moreira [UNIFESP]Nesrallah, Luciano [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:29:58Z2015-06-14T13:29:58Z2003-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion106-112application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382003000200003International braz j urol. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, v. 29, n. 2, p. 106-112, 2003.10.1590/S1677-55382003000200003S1677-55382003000200003.pdf1677-5538S1677-55382003000200003http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1681engInternational braz j urolinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-04T06:38:33Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/1681Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-04T06:38:33Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of stage T1 (TNM 1997) for renal cell carcinoma: is recommended the subdivision in T1a and T1b?
title Assessment of stage T1 (TNM 1997) for renal cell carcinoma: is recommended the subdivision in T1a and T1b?
spellingShingle Assessment of stage T1 (TNM 1997) for renal cell carcinoma: is recommended the subdivision in T1a and T1b?
Dall Oglio, Marcos Francisco [UNIFESP]
kidney
carcinoma
renal cell
neoplasm staging
prognosis
classification
survival
title_short Assessment of stage T1 (TNM 1997) for renal cell carcinoma: is recommended the subdivision in T1a and T1b?
title_full Assessment of stage T1 (TNM 1997) for renal cell carcinoma: is recommended the subdivision in T1a and T1b?
title_fullStr Assessment of stage T1 (TNM 1997) for renal cell carcinoma: is recommended the subdivision in T1a and T1b?
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of stage T1 (TNM 1997) for renal cell carcinoma: is recommended the subdivision in T1a and T1b?
title_sort Assessment of stage T1 (TNM 1997) for renal cell carcinoma: is recommended the subdivision in T1a and T1b?
author Dall Oglio, Marcos Francisco [UNIFESP]
author_facet Dall Oglio, Marcos Francisco [UNIFESP]
Srougi, Miguel [UNIFESP]
Mangini, Marcelo
Ribeiro, Eduardo [UNIFESP]
Ferraz, Márcio [UNIFESP]
Sañudo, Adriana [UNIFESP]
Leite, Kátia Ramos Moreira [UNIFESP]
Nesrallah, Luciano [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Srougi, Miguel [UNIFESP]
Mangini, Marcelo
Ribeiro, Eduardo [UNIFESP]
Ferraz, Márcio [UNIFESP]
Sañudo, Adriana [UNIFESP]
Leite, Kátia Ramos Moreira [UNIFESP]
Nesrallah, Luciano [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dall Oglio, Marcos Francisco [UNIFESP]
Srougi, Miguel [UNIFESP]
Mangini, Marcelo
Ribeiro, Eduardo [UNIFESP]
Ferraz, Márcio [UNIFESP]
Sañudo, Adriana [UNIFESP]
Leite, Kátia Ramos Moreira [UNIFESP]
Nesrallah, Luciano [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv kidney
carcinoma
renal cell
neoplasm staging
prognosis
classification
survival
topic kidney
carcinoma
renal cell
neoplasm staging
prognosis
classification
survival
description INTRODUCTION: Classification TNM 1997 defines renal cell carcinoma smaller than 7 cm and confined to the kidney as stage T1. Our goal is to discuss if tumors smaller than 4 cm have the same behavior characteristics then tumors between 4 and 7 cm, to compose the same stage of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective assessment of 138 patients in stage T1 (TNM - 97), divided into 2 groups; group-1: composed of 65 patients (47%) with tumors < 4 cm, and group-2: composed of 73 patients (53%) with tumors between 4 and 7 cm. The following prognostic factors were assessed in the recurrence of the disease and survival of patients: nuclear degree, microvascular invasion, sarcomatous degeneration, and involved lymph nodes. Statistical evaluation has been accomplished through the log rank test, chi-square test, and Fishers exact text. RESULTS: Average tumor size was 2.5 cm for group-1, and 5.3 cm for group-2. In group-2, there was the predominance of worse prognostic factors, with high-grade tumors (p = 0.01) and presence of microvascular invasion (p = 0.001). Sarcomatous tumors and involvement of lymph nodes did only happen in group-2. Disease-free survival for group-1, analyzed in the median period of 36 months, was 100%, and for group 2, in the median period of 31 months, was 81% (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The results obtained allow the conclusion that the present stage T1 for renal cell carcinoma gathers tumors of different evolution, being therefore recommendable the stratification in T1a for tumors smaller than 4 cm, and T1b for tumors between 4 and 7 cm.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-04-01
2015-06-14T13:29:58Z
2015-06-14T13:29:58Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382003000200003
International braz j urol. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, v. 29, n. 2, p. 106-112, 2003.
10.1590/S1677-55382003000200003
S1677-55382003000200003.pdf
1677-5538
S1677-55382003000200003
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1681
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382003000200003
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1681
identifier_str_mv International braz j urol. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, v. 29, n. 2, p. 106-112, 2003.
10.1590/S1677-55382003000200003
S1677-55382003000200003.pdf
1677-5538
S1677-55382003000200003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 106-112
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268377368100864