Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.128 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/38120 |
Resumo: | Purpose the aim of this study is to analyze the agreement between the classifications based on morphology and diameter of vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome, as well as to correlate the morphological findings of VMT with specific maculopathies.Methods Fifty-three eyes with VMT syndrome were categorized into two classifications based on optical coherence tomography images: the VMT morphology (V- or J-shaped) and the diameter of adhesion (focal <= 1500 mu m or broad >1500 mu m).Results High correlation was seen between V-shaped and focal-VMT and between J-shaped and broad-VMT (kappa = 0.850; P < 0.001), except in four cases with broad adhesion despite the presence of a V-shaped pattern. These four cases had common characteristics to those with broad vitreal attachment regarding associated maculopathies and visual function. V-shaped VMT (n = 29) and focal-VMT (n = 25) led to tractional cystoid macular edema (CME; 79.31% and 84%, respectively) and macular hole (MH; 37.93% and 44%); J-shaped VMT (n = 24) and broad-VMT (n = 28) were associated with epiretinal membranes (ERMs; 91.66% and 92.85%, respectively) and diffuse retinal thickening (62.50% and 64.28%). the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups (BCVA logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution: V-shaped, 0.45; J-shaped, 0.46; P = 0.816; and focal, 0.50; broad, 0.42; P = 0.198).Conclusions Although highly concordant, the classification based on the diameter of the adhesion and not on the classical adhesion morphology seemed to better reflect the specific macular changes. V-shaped and focal VMT led to tractional CME and MH, while J-shaped and broad VMT were associated with ERM and diffuse retinal thickening. |
id |
UFSP_88280b867ecc0f7572a9dc4688bf4cd0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/38120 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphologyPurpose the aim of this study is to analyze the agreement between the classifications based on morphology and diameter of vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome, as well as to correlate the morphological findings of VMT with specific maculopathies.Methods Fifty-three eyes with VMT syndrome were categorized into two classifications based on optical coherence tomography images: the VMT morphology (V- or J-shaped) and the diameter of adhesion (focal <= 1500 mu m or broad >1500 mu m).Results High correlation was seen between V-shaped and focal-VMT and between J-shaped and broad-VMT (kappa = 0.850; P < 0.001), except in four cases with broad adhesion despite the presence of a V-shaped pattern. These four cases had common characteristics to those with broad vitreal attachment regarding associated maculopathies and visual function. V-shaped VMT (n = 29) and focal-VMT (n = 25) led to tractional cystoid macular edema (CME; 79.31% and 84%, respectively) and macular hole (MH; 37.93% and 44%); J-shaped VMT (n = 24) and broad-VMT (n = 28) were associated with epiretinal membranes (ERMs; 91.66% and 92.85%, respectively) and diffuse retinal thickening (62.50% and 64.28%). the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups (BCVA logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution: V-shaped, 0.45; J-shaped, 0.46; P = 0.816; and focal, 0.50; broad, 0.42; P = 0.198).Conclusions Although highly concordant, the classification based on the diameter of the adhesion and not on the classical adhesion morphology seemed to better reflect the specific macular changes. V-shaped and focal VMT led to tractional CME and MH, while J-shaped and broad VMT were associated with ERM and diffuse retinal thickening.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, BR-04023062 São Paulo, BrazilUniv Autonoma Barcelona, IUB, E-08193 Barcelona, SpainUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, BR-04023062 São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceInstituto Barraquer de Oftalmologia, Barcelona, SpainNature Publishing GroupUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Univ Autonoma BarcelonaBottos, Juliana [UNIFESP]Elizalde, J.Rodrigues, Eduardo Buchele [UNIFESP]Farah, Michel Eid [UNIFESP]Maia, M. [UNIFESP]2016-01-24T14:37:45Z2016-01-24T14:37:45Z2014-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion1107-1112http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.128Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group, v. 28, n. 9, p. 1107-1112, 2014.10.1038/eye.2014.1280950-222Xhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/38120WOS:000342064400009engEyeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2016-01-24T12:37:45Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/38120Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652016-01-24T12:37:45Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology |
title |
Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology |
spellingShingle |
Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology Bottos, Juliana [UNIFESP] |
title_short |
Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology |
title_full |
Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology |
title_fullStr |
Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology |
title_sort |
Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology |
author |
Bottos, Juliana [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Bottos, Juliana [UNIFESP] Elizalde, J. Rodrigues, Eduardo Buchele [UNIFESP] Farah, Michel Eid [UNIFESP] Maia, M. [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Elizalde, J. Rodrigues, Eduardo Buchele [UNIFESP] Farah, Michel Eid [UNIFESP] Maia, M. [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Univ Autonoma Barcelona |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bottos, Juliana [UNIFESP] Elizalde, J. Rodrigues, Eduardo Buchele [UNIFESP] Farah, Michel Eid [UNIFESP] Maia, M. [UNIFESP] |
description |
Purpose the aim of this study is to analyze the agreement between the classifications based on morphology and diameter of vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome, as well as to correlate the morphological findings of VMT with specific maculopathies.Methods Fifty-three eyes with VMT syndrome were categorized into two classifications based on optical coherence tomography images: the VMT morphology (V- or J-shaped) and the diameter of adhesion (focal <= 1500 mu m or broad >1500 mu m).Results High correlation was seen between V-shaped and focal-VMT and between J-shaped and broad-VMT (kappa = 0.850; P < 0.001), except in four cases with broad adhesion despite the presence of a V-shaped pattern. These four cases had common characteristics to those with broad vitreal attachment regarding associated maculopathies and visual function. V-shaped VMT (n = 29) and focal-VMT (n = 25) led to tractional cystoid macular edema (CME; 79.31% and 84%, respectively) and macular hole (MH; 37.93% and 44%); J-shaped VMT (n = 24) and broad-VMT (n = 28) were associated with epiretinal membranes (ERMs; 91.66% and 92.85%, respectively) and diffuse retinal thickening (62.50% and 64.28%). the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups (BCVA logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution: V-shaped, 0.45; J-shaped, 0.46; P = 0.816; and focal, 0.50; broad, 0.42; P = 0.198).Conclusions Although highly concordant, the classification based on the diameter of the adhesion and not on the classical adhesion morphology seemed to better reflect the specific macular changes. V-shaped and focal VMT led to tractional CME and MH, while J-shaped and broad VMT were associated with ERM and diffuse retinal thickening. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-09-01 2016-01-24T14:37:45Z 2016-01-24T14:37:45Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.128 Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group, v. 28, n. 9, p. 1107-1112, 2014. 10.1038/eye.2014.128 0950-222X http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/38120 WOS:000342064400009 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.128 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/38120 |
identifier_str_mv |
Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group, v. 28, n. 9, p. 1107-1112, 2014. 10.1038/eye.2014.128 0950-222X WOS:000342064400009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Eye |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1107-1112 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Nature Publishing Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Nature Publishing Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268401803067392 |