Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bottos, Juliana [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Elizalde, J., Rodrigues, Eduardo Buchele [UNIFESP], Farah, Michel Eid [UNIFESP], Maia, M. [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.128
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/38120
Resumo: Purpose the aim of this study is to analyze the agreement between the classifications based on morphology and diameter of vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome, as well as to correlate the morphological findings of VMT with specific maculopathies.Methods Fifty-three eyes with VMT syndrome were categorized into two classifications based on optical coherence tomography images: the VMT morphology (V- or J-shaped) and the diameter of adhesion (focal <= 1500 mu m or broad >1500 mu m).Results High correlation was seen between V-shaped and focal-VMT and between J-shaped and broad-VMT (kappa = 0.850; P < 0.001), except in four cases with broad adhesion despite the presence of a V-shaped pattern. These four cases had common characteristics to those with broad vitreal attachment regarding associated maculopathies and visual function. V-shaped VMT (n = 29) and focal-VMT (n = 25) led to tractional cystoid macular edema (CME; 79.31% and 84%, respectively) and macular hole (MH; 37.93% and 44%); J-shaped VMT (n = 24) and broad-VMT (n = 28) were associated with epiretinal membranes (ERMs; 91.66% and 92.85%, respectively) and diffuse retinal thickening (62.50% and 64.28%). the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups (BCVA logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution: V-shaped, 0.45; J-shaped, 0.46; P = 0.816; and focal, 0.50; broad, 0.42; P = 0.198).Conclusions Although highly concordant, the classification based on the diameter of the adhesion and not on the classical adhesion morphology seemed to better reflect the specific macular changes. V-shaped and focal VMT led to tractional CME and MH, while J-shaped and broad VMT were associated with ERM and diffuse retinal thickening.
id UFSP_88280b867ecc0f7572a9dc4688bf4cd0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/38120
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphologyPurpose the aim of this study is to analyze the agreement between the classifications based on morphology and diameter of vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome, as well as to correlate the morphological findings of VMT with specific maculopathies.Methods Fifty-three eyes with VMT syndrome were categorized into two classifications based on optical coherence tomography images: the VMT morphology (V- or J-shaped) and the diameter of adhesion (focal <= 1500 mu m or broad >1500 mu m).Results High correlation was seen between V-shaped and focal-VMT and between J-shaped and broad-VMT (kappa = 0.850; P < 0.001), except in four cases with broad adhesion despite the presence of a V-shaped pattern. These four cases had common characteristics to those with broad vitreal attachment regarding associated maculopathies and visual function. V-shaped VMT (n = 29) and focal-VMT (n = 25) led to tractional cystoid macular edema (CME; 79.31% and 84%, respectively) and macular hole (MH; 37.93% and 44%); J-shaped VMT (n = 24) and broad-VMT (n = 28) were associated with epiretinal membranes (ERMs; 91.66% and 92.85%, respectively) and diffuse retinal thickening (62.50% and 64.28%). the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups (BCVA logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution: V-shaped, 0.45; J-shaped, 0.46; P = 0.816; and focal, 0.50; broad, 0.42; P = 0.198).Conclusions Although highly concordant, the classification based on the diameter of the adhesion and not on the classical adhesion morphology seemed to better reflect the specific macular changes. V-shaped and focal VMT led to tractional CME and MH, while J-shaped and broad VMT were associated with ERM and diffuse retinal thickening.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, BR-04023062 São Paulo, BrazilUniv Autonoma Barcelona, IUB, E-08193 Barcelona, SpainUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, BR-04023062 São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceInstituto Barraquer de Oftalmologia, Barcelona, SpainNature Publishing GroupUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Univ Autonoma BarcelonaBottos, Juliana [UNIFESP]Elizalde, J.Rodrigues, Eduardo Buchele [UNIFESP]Farah, Michel Eid [UNIFESP]Maia, M. [UNIFESP]2016-01-24T14:37:45Z2016-01-24T14:37:45Z2014-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion1107-1112http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.128Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group, v. 28, n. 9, p. 1107-1112, 2014.10.1038/eye.2014.1280950-222Xhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/38120WOS:000342064400009engEyeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2016-01-24T12:37:45Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/38120Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652016-01-24T12:37:45Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology
title Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology
spellingShingle Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology
Bottos, Juliana [UNIFESP]
title_short Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology
title_full Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology
title_fullStr Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology
title_full_unstemmed Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology
title_sort Classifications of vitreomacular traction syndrome: diameter vs morphology
author Bottos, Juliana [UNIFESP]
author_facet Bottos, Juliana [UNIFESP]
Elizalde, J.
Rodrigues, Eduardo Buchele [UNIFESP]
Farah, Michel Eid [UNIFESP]
Maia, M. [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Elizalde, J.
Rodrigues, Eduardo Buchele [UNIFESP]
Farah, Michel Eid [UNIFESP]
Maia, M. [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Univ Autonoma Barcelona
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bottos, Juliana [UNIFESP]
Elizalde, J.
Rodrigues, Eduardo Buchele [UNIFESP]
Farah, Michel Eid [UNIFESP]
Maia, M. [UNIFESP]
description Purpose the aim of this study is to analyze the agreement between the classifications based on morphology and diameter of vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome, as well as to correlate the morphological findings of VMT with specific maculopathies.Methods Fifty-three eyes with VMT syndrome were categorized into two classifications based on optical coherence tomography images: the VMT morphology (V- or J-shaped) and the diameter of adhesion (focal <= 1500 mu m or broad >1500 mu m).Results High correlation was seen between V-shaped and focal-VMT and between J-shaped and broad-VMT (kappa = 0.850; P < 0.001), except in four cases with broad adhesion despite the presence of a V-shaped pattern. These four cases had common characteristics to those with broad vitreal attachment regarding associated maculopathies and visual function. V-shaped VMT (n = 29) and focal-VMT (n = 25) led to tractional cystoid macular edema (CME; 79.31% and 84%, respectively) and macular hole (MH; 37.93% and 44%); J-shaped VMT (n = 24) and broad-VMT (n = 28) were associated with epiretinal membranes (ERMs; 91.66% and 92.85%, respectively) and diffuse retinal thickening (62.50% and 64.28%). the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups (BCVA logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution: V-shaped, 0.45; J-shaped, 0.46; P = 0.816; and focal, 0.50; broad, 0.42; P = 0.198).Conclusions Although highly concordant, the classification based on the diameter of the adhesion and not on the classical adhesion morphology seemed to better reflect the specific macular changes. V-shaped and focal VMT led to tractional CME and MH, while J-shaped and broad VMT were associated with ERM and diffuse retinal thickening.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-09-01
2016-01-24T14:37:45Z
2016-01-24T14:37:45Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.128
Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group, v. 28, n. 9, p. 1107-1112, 2014.
10.1038/eye.2014.128
0950-222X
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/38120
WOS:000342064400009
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.128
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/38120
identifier_str_mv Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group, v. 28, n. 9, p. 1107-1112, 2014.
10.1038/eye.2014.128
0950-222X
WOS:000342064400009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Eye
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1107-1112
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Nature Publishing Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Nature Publishing Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268401803067392