Clinical Features, Treatment and Prognostic Factors of Post-Transplant Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.907167 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55825 |
Resumo: | Background: Initially described as a relatively benign condition, recent studies report graft loss in up to 50% of the patients with post-transplant IgA nephropathy. There is no evidence for the best therapeutic approach, and prognostic factors remain to be elucidated. Material/Methods: Single center retrospective analysis of patients >12 years old, with clinically relevant post-transplant IgA nephropathy (proteinuria >= 1.0g/g and/or graft dysfunction) and >= 6 months follow-up after diagnosis (n=47). Results: Living donor transplants represented 85% of cases. Dysmorphic hematuria (100%), blood pressure elevation (95.7%), renal dysfunction (70.2%) and subnephrotic proteinuria (60.6%) predominated at presentation. Using the Oxford Classification, mesangial proliferation was the main histological lesion (91%). Treatment consisted mostly of blockade of the renin angiotensin system (89.4%) and modification of immunosuppression (85.1%), mainly by increasing oral steroids dose (83%), with venous pulse therapy in 63.8% of cases. Partial and complete remission occurred in 48.9% and 17% of cases, respectively. One patient died (sepsis) and 15 patients (31.9%) lost their grafts due to nephropathy. The percentage of decrease in glomerular filtration rate at diagnosis was independently associated with partial remission (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, p=0.01) and graft loss (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.20, p<0.001). Deceased donor (HR 28.04, 95% CI 4.41-178.39, p<0.001) and donor age (HR 1.1, 95% CI 1.04-1.16, p=0.001) were also risk factors for graft loss. Conclusions: Despite treatment, most patients with post-transplant IgA nephropathy in this cohort study presented unfavorable outcomes, and graft dysfunction at diagnosis appeared to be the main prognostic marker. |
id |
UFSP_8ae9db6295621cc4b10432261a1ac55f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/55825 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Clinical Features, Treatment and Prognostic Factors of Post-Transplant Immunoglobulin A NephropathyGlomerulonephritis, IgAImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationPrognosisBackground: Initially described as a relatively benign condition, recent studies report graft loss in up to 50% of the patients with post-transplant IgA nephropathy. There is no evidence for the best therapeutic approach, and prognostic factors remain to be elucidated. Material/Methods: Single center retrospective analysis of patients >12 years old, with clinically relevant post-transplant IgA nephropathy (proteinuria >= 1.0g/g and/or graft dysfunction) and >= 6 months follow-up after diagnosis (n=47). Results: Living donor transplants represented 85% of cases. Dysmorphic hematuria (100%), blood pressure elevation (95.7%), renal dysfunction (70.2%) and subnephrotic proteinuria (60.6%) predominated at presentation. Using the Oxford Classification, mesangial proliferation was the main histological lesion (91%). Treatment consisted mostly of blockade of the renin angiotensin system (89.4%) and modification of immunosuppression (85.1%), mainly by increasing oral steroids dose (83%), with venous pulse therapy in 63.8% of cases. Partial and complete remission occurred in 48.9% and 17% of cases, respectively. One patient died (sepsis) and 15 patients (31.9%) lost their grafts due to nephropathy. The percentage of decrease in glomerular filtration rate at diagnosis was independently associated with partial remission (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, p=0.01) and graft loss (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.20, p<0.001). Deceased donor (HR 28.04, 95% CI 4.41-178.39, p<0.001) and donor age (HR 1.1, 95% CI 1.04-1.16, p=0.001) were also risk factors for graft loss. Conclusions: Despite treatment, most patients with post-transplant IgA nephropathy in this cohort study presented unfavorable outcomes, and graft dysfunction at diagnosis appeared to be the main prognostic marker.Fed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Nephrol Div, Glomerulopathies Sect, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Nephrol Div, Transplantat Sect, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilHosp Rim, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Nephrol Div, Glomerulopathies Sect, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Nephrol Div, Transplantat Sect, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of ScienceInt Scientific Literature, Inc2020-07-20T16:31:15Z2020-07-20T16:31:15Z2018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion166-175application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.907167Annals Of Transplantation. Smithtown, v. 23, p. 166-175, 2018.10.12659/AOT.907167WOS000427524500001.pdf1425-9524https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55825WOS:000427524500001engAnnals Of TransplantationSmithtowninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCabral, Diogo Buarque Cordeiro [UNIFESP]Sandes-Freitas, Taina Veras de [UNIFESP]Pestana, Jose Osmar Medina [UNIFESP]Kirsztajn, Gianna Mastroianni [UNIFESP]reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-03T08:36:10Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/55825Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-03T08:36:10Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Features, Treatment and Prognostic Factors of Post-Transplant Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy |
title |
Clinical Features, Treatment and Prognostic Factors of Post-Transplant Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy |
spellingShingle |
Clinical Features, Treatment and Prognostic Factors of Post-Transplant Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy Cabral, Diogo Buarque Cordeiro [UNIFESP] Glomerulonephritis, IgA Immunosuppressive Agents Kidney Transplantation Prognosis |
title_short |
Clinical Features, Treatment and Prognostic Factors of Post-Transplant Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy |
title_full |
Clinical Features, Treatment and Prognostic Factors of Post-Transplant Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy |
title_fullStr |
Clinical Features, Treatment and Prognostic Factors of Post-Transplant Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical Features, Treatment and Prognostic Factors of Post-Transplant Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy |
title_sort |
Clinical Features, Treatment and Prognostic Factors of Post-Transplant Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy |
author |
Cabral, Diogo Buarque Cordeiro [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Cabral, Diogo Buarque Cordeiro [UNIFESP] Sandes-Freitas, Taina Veras de [UNIFESP] Pestana, Jose Osmar Medina [UNIFESP] Kirsztajn, Gianna Mastroianni [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sandes-Freitas, Taina Veras de [UNIFESP] Pestana, Jose Osmar Medina [UNIFESP] Kirsztajn, Gianna Mastroianni [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cabral, Diogo Buarque Cordeiro [UNIFESP] Sandes-Freitas, Taina Veras de [UNIFESP] Pestana, Jose Osmar Medina [UNIFESP] Kirsztajn, Gianna Mastroianni [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Glomerulonephritis, IgA Immunosuppressive Agents Kidney Transplantation Prognosis |
topic |
Glomerulonephritis, IgA Immunosuppressive Agents Kidney Transplantation Prognosis |
description |
Background: Initially described as a relatively benign condition, recent studies report graft loss in up to 50% of the patients with post-transplant IgA nephropathy. There is no evidence for the best therapeutic approach, and prognostic factors remain to be elucidated. Material/Methods: Single center retrospective analysis of patients >12 years old, with clinically relevant post-transplant IgA nephropathy (proteinuria >= 1.0g/g and/or graft dysfunction) and >= 6 months follow-up after diagnosis (n=47). Results: Living donor transplants represented 85% of cases. Dysmorphic hematuria (100%), blood pressure elevation (95.7%), renal dysfunction (70.2%) and subnephrotic proteinuria (60.6%) predominated at presentation. Using the Oxford Classification, mesangial proliferation was the main histological lesion (91%). Treatment consisted mostly of blockade of the renin angiotensin system (89.4%) and modification of immunosuppression (85.1%), mainly by increasing oral steroids dose (83%), with venous pulse therapy in 63.8% of cases. Partial and complete remission occurred in 48.9% and 17% of cases, respectively. One patient died (sepsis) and 15 patients (31.9%) lost their grafts due to nephropathy. The percentage of decrease in glomerular filtration rate at diagnosis was independently associated with partial remission (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, p=0.01) and graft loss (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.20, p<0.001). Deceased donor (HR 28.04, 95% CI 4.41-178.39, p<0.001) and donor age (HR 1.1, 95% CI 1.04-1.16, p=0.001) were also risk factors for graft loss. Conclusions: Despite treatment, most patients with post-transplant IgA nephropathy in this cohort study presented unfavorable outcomes, and graft dysfunction at diagnosis appeared to be the main prognostic marker. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 2020-07-20T16:31:15Z 2020-07-20T16:31:15Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.907167 Annals Of Transplantation. Smithtown, v. 23, p. 166-175, 2018. 10.12659/AOT.907167 WOS000427524500001.pdf 1425-9524 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55825 WOS:000427524500001 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.907167 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55825 |
identifier_str_mv |
Annals Of Transplantation. Smithtown, v. 23, p. 166-175, 2018. 10.12659/AOT.907167 WOS000427524500001.pdf 1425-9524 WOS:000427524500001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Annals Of Transplantation |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
166-175 application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Smithtown |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Int Scientific Literature, Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Int Scientific Literature, Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268321294450688 |