Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melo, G. B. [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Bispo, Paulo José Martins [UNIFESP], Yu, Maria Cecilia Zorat [UNIFESP], Pignatari, A. C. C. [UNIFESP], Hoefling-Lima, A. L. [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.236
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33488
Resumo: Purpose To assess the distribution of microorganisms isolated from patients with bacterial endophthalmitis and their antimicrobial susceptibility.Methods Retrospective analysis of medical and microbiological records of patients with suspected diagnosis of endophthalmitis. the following information was assessed: number of presumed and culture-positive endophthalmitis cases, source of infection, microbiological result (aqueous and/or vitreous culture and Gram staining), microbial characterization and distribution, and antimicrobial susceptibility.Results A total of 107 (46%) of 231 patients with bacterial endophthalmitis showed positive results by gram stain or culture. of these, 97 (42%) patients were positive for culture only. Most of them (62%) were secondary to a surgical procedure (postoperative), 12% were posttraumatic and 26% were secondary to an unknown source or the data were unavailable. A total of 100 microorganisms were isolated (38 aqueous and 67 vitreous samples) from the 97 culture-positive cases (91% were gram-positive and 9% were gram-negative). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) (48%) were the most frequently isolated, followed by Stretococcus viridans (18%), and Staphylococcus aureus (13%). the antimicrobial susceptibility for CoNS was as follows: amikacin-91.6%, cephalothin-97.9%, ceftriaxone-50%, ciprofloxacin-62.5%, chloramphenicol-91.8%, gatifloxacin-79.5%, gentamicin-72.9%, moxifloxacin-89.5%, ofloxacin-70.8%, oxacillin-58.3%, penicillin-33.3%, tobramycin-85.4%, and vancomycin-100%.Conclusion Gram-positive bacteria were the major causes of infectious endophthalmitis in this large series, usually following surgery. CoNS was the most common isolate. of interest, susceptibility to oxacillin and fourth-generation quinolones was lower than previously published. Eye (2011) 25, 382-388; doi:10.1038/eye.2010.236; published online 18 February 2011
id UFSP_930c876f999411aee70b2b938a03f77f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/33488
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitisendophthalmitismicrobialantibiotic susceptibilitylaboratory investigationPurpose To assess the distribution of microorganisms isolated from patients with bacterial endophthalmitis and their antimicrobial susceptibility.Methods Retrospective analysis of medical and microbiological records of patients with suspected diagnosis of endophthalmitis. the following information was assessed: number of presumed and culture-positive endophthalmitis cases, source of infection, microbiological result (aqueous and/or vitreous culture and Gram staining), microbial characterization and distribution, and antimicrobial susceptibility.Results A total of 107 (46%) of 231 patients with bacterial endophthalmitis showed positive results by gram stain or culture. of these, 97 (42%) patients were positive for culture only. Most of them (62%) were secondary to a surgical procedure (postoperative), 12% were posttraumatic and 26% were secondary to an unknown source or the data were unavailable. A total of 100 microorganisms were isolated (38 aqueous and 67 vitreous samples) from the 97 culture-positive cases (91% were gram-positive and 9% were gram-negative). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) (48%) were the most frequently isolated, followed by Stretococcus viridans (18%), and Staphylococcus aureus (13%). the antimicrobial susceptibility for CoNS was as follows: amikacin-91.6%, cephalothin-97.9%, ceftriaxone-50%, ciprofloxacin-62.5%, chloramphenicol-91.8%, gatifloxacin-79.5%, gentamicin-72.9%, moxifloxacin-89.5%, ofloxacin-70.8%, oxacillin-58.3%, penicillin-33.3%, tobramycin-85.4%, and vancomycin-100%.Conclusion Gram-positive bacteria were the major causes of infectious endophthalmitis in this large series, usually following surgery. CoNS was the most common isolate. of interest, susceptibility to oxacillin and fourth-generation quinolones was lower than previously published. Eye (2011) 25, 382-388; doi:10.1038/eye.2010.236; published online 18 February 2011Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Special Lab Clin Microbiol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Special Lab Clin Microbiol, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceNature Publishing GroupUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Melo, G. B. [UNIFESP]Bispo, Paulo José Martins [UNIFESP]Yu, Maria Cecilia Zorat [UNIFESP]Pignatari, A. C. C. [UNIFESP]Hoefling-Lima, A. L. [UNIFESP]2016-01-24T14:06:13Z2016-01-24T14:06:13Z2011-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion383-387http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.236Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group, v. 25, n. 3, p. 383-387, 2011.10.1038/eye.2010.2360950-222Xhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33488WOS:000288240500016engEyeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-10-14T13:51:14Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/33488Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-10-14T13:51:14Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis
title Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis
spellingShingle Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis
Melo, G. B. [UNIFESP]
endophthalmitis
microbial
antibiotic susceptibility
laboratory investigation
title_short Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis
title_full Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis
title_fullStr Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis
title_full_unstemmed Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis
title_sort Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis
author Melo, G. B. [UNIFESP]
author_facet Melo, G. B. [UNIFESP]
Bispo, Paulo José Martins [UNIFESP]
Yu, Maria Cecilia Zorat [UNIFESP]
Pignatari, A. C. C. [UNIFESP]
Hoefling-Lima, A. L. [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Bispo, Paulo José Martins [UNIFESP]
Yu, Maria Cecilia Zorat [UNIFESP]
Pignatari, A. C. C. [UNIFESP]
Hoefling-Lima, A. L. [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo, G. B. [UNIFESP]
Bispo, Paulo José Martins [UNIFESP]
Yu, Maria Cecilia Zorat [UNIFESP]
Pignatari, A. C. C. [UNIFESP]
Hoefling-Lima, A. L. [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv endophthalmitis
microbial
antibiotic susceptibility
laboratory investigation
topic endophthalmitis
microbial
antibiotic susceptibility
laboratory investigation
description Purpose To assess the distribution of microorganisms isolated from patients with bacterial endophthalmitis and their antimicrobial susceptibility.Methods Retrospective analysis of medical and microbiological records of patients with suspected diagnosis of endophthalmitis. the following information was assessed: number of presumed and culture-positive endophthalmitis cases, source of infection, microbiological result (aqueous and/or vitreous culture and Gram staining), microbial characterization and distribution, and antimicrobial susceptibility.Results A total of 107 (46%) of 231 patients with bacterial endophthalmitis showed positive results by gram stain or culture. of these, 97 (42%) patients were positive for culture only. Most of them (62%) were secondary to a surgical procedure (postoperative), 12% were posttraumatic and 26% were secondary to an unknown source or the data were unavailable. A total of 100 microorganisms were isolated (38 aqueous and 67 vitreous samples) from the 97 culture-positive cases (91% were gram-positive and 9% were gram-negative). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) (48%) were the most frequently isolated, followed by Stretococcus viridans (18%), and Staphylococcus aureus (13%). the antimicrobial susceptibility for CoNS was as follows: amikacin-91.6%, cephalothin-97.9%, ceftriaxone-50%, ciprofloxacin-62.5%, chloramphenicol-91.8%, gatifloxacin-79.5%, gentamicin-72.9%, moxifloxacin-89.5%, ofloxacin-70.8%, oxacillin-58.3%, penicillin-33.3%, tobramycin-85.4%, and vancomycin-100%.Conclusion Gram-positive bacteria were the major causes of infectious endophthalmitis in this large series, usually following surgery. CoNS was the most common isolate. of interest, susceptibility to oxacillin and fourth-generation quinolones was lower than previously published. Eye (2011) 25, 382-388; doi:10.1038/eye.2010.236; published online 18 February 2011
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-03-01
2016-01-24T14:06:13Z
2016-01-24T14:06:13Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.236
Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group, v. 25, n. 3, p. 383-387, 2011.
10.1038/eye.2010.236
0950-222X
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33488
WOS:000288240500016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.236
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33488
identifier_str_mv Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group, v. 25, n. 3, p. 383-387, 2011.
10.1038/eye.2010.236
0950-222X
WOS:000288240500016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Eye
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 383-387
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Nature Publishing Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Nature Publishing Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268454735183872