Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.236 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33488 |
Resumo: | Purpose To assess the distribution of microorganisms isolated from patients with bacterial endophthalmitis and their antimicrobial susceptibility.Methods Retrospective analysis of medical and microbiological records of patients with suspected diagnosis of endophthalmitis. the following information was assessed: number of presumed and culture-positive endophthalmitis cases, source of infection, microbiological result (aqueous and/or vitreous culture and Gram staining), microbial characterization and distribution, and antimicrobial susceptibility.Results A total of 107 (46%) of 231 patients with bacterial endophthalmitis showed positive results by gram stain or culture. of these, 97 (42%) patients were positive for culture only. Most of them (62%) were secondary to a surgical procedure (postoperative), 12% were posttraumatic and 26% were secondary to an unknown source or the data were unavailable. A total of 100 microorganisms were isolated (38 aqueous and 67 vitreous samples) from the 97 culture-positive cases (91% were gram-positive and 9% were gram-negative). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) (48%) were the most frequently isolated, followed by Stretococcus viridans (18%), and Staphylococcus aureus (13%). the antimicrobial susceptibility for CoNS was as follows: amikacin-91.6%, cephalothin-97.9%, ceftriaxone-50%, ciprofloxacin-62.5%, chloramphenicol-91.8%, gatifloxacin-79.5%, gentamicin-72.9%, moxifloxacin-89.5%, ofloxacin-70.8%, oxacillin-58.3%, penicillin-33.3%, tobramycin-85.4%, and vancomycin-100%.Conclusion Gram-positive bacteria were the major causes of infectious endophthalmitis in this large series, usually following surgery. CoNS was the most common isolate. of interest, susceptibility to oxacillin and fourth-generation quinolones was lower than previously published. Eye (2011) 25, 382-388; doi:10.1038/eye.2010.236; published online 18 February 2011 |
id |
UFSP_930c876f999411aee70b2b938a03f77f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/33488 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitisendophthalmitismicrobialantibiotic susceptibilitylaboratory investigationPurpose To assess the distribution of microorganisms isolated from patients with bacterial endophthalmitis and their antimicrobial susceptibility.Methods Retrospective analysis of medical and microbiological records of patients with suspected diagnosis of endophthalmitis. the following information was assessed: number of presumed and culture-positive endophthalmitis cases, source of infection, microbiological result (aqueous and/or vitreous culture and Gram staining), microbial characterization and distribution, and antimicrobial susceptibility.Results A total of 107 (46%) of 231 patients with bacterial endophthalmitis showed positive results by gram stain or culture. of these, 97 (42%) patients were positive for culture only. Most of them (62%) were secondary to a surgical procedure (postoperative), 12% were posttraumatic and 26% were secondary to an unknown source or the data were unavailable. A total of 100 microorganisms were isolated (38 aqueous and 67 vitreous samples) from the 97 culture-positive cases (91% were gram-positive and 9% were gram-negative). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) (48%) were the most frequently isolated, followed by Stretococcus viridans (18%), and Staphylococcus aureus (13%). the antimicrobial susceptibility for CoNS was as follows: amikacin-91.6%, cephalothin-97.9%, ceftriaxone-50%, ciprofloxacin-62.5%, chloramphenicol-91.8%, gatifloxacin-79.5%, gentamicin-72.9%, moxifloxacin-89.5%, ofloxacin-70.8%, oxacillin-58.3%, penicillin-33.3%, tobramycin-85.4%, and vancomycin-100%.Conclusion Gram-positive bacteria were the major causes of infectious endophthalmitis in this large series, usually following surgery. CoNS was the most common isolate. of interest, susceptibility to oxacillin and fourth-generation quinolones was lower than previously published. Eye (2011) 25, 382-388; doi:10.1038/eye.2010.236; published online 18 February 2011Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Special Lab Clin Microbiol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Special Lab Clin Microbiol, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceNature Publishing GroupUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Melo, G. B. [UNIFESP]Bispo, Paulo José Martins [UNIFESP]Yu, Maria Cecilia Zorat [UNIFESP]Pignatari, A. C. C. [UNIFESP]Hoefling-Lima, A. L. [UNIFESP]2016-01-24T14:06:13Z2016-01-24T14:06:13Z2011-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion383-387http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.236Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group, v. 25, n. 3, p. 383-387, 2011.10.1038/eye.2010.2360950-222Xhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33488WOS:000288240500016engEyeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-10-14T13:51:14Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/33488Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-10-14T13:51:14Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis |
title |
Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis |
spellingShingle |
Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis Melo, G. B. [UNIFESP] endophthalmitis microbial antibiotic susceptibility laboratory investigation |
title_short |
Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis |
title_full |
Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis |
title_fullStr |
Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis |
title_sort |
Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis |
author |
Melo, G. B. [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Melo, G. B. [UNIFESP] Bispo, Paulo José Martins [UNIFESP] Yu, Maria Cecilia Zorat [UNIFESP] Pignatari, A. C. C. [UNIFESP] Hoefling-Lima, A. L. [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bispo, Paulo José Martins [UNIFESP] Yu, Maria Cecilia Zorat [UNIFESP] Pignatari, A. C. C. [UNIFESP] Hoefling-Lima, A. L. [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo, G. B. [UNIFESP] Bispo, Paulo José Martins [UNIFESP] Yu, Maria Cecilia Zorat [UNIFESP] Pignatari, A. C. C. [UNIFESP] Hoefling-Lima, A. L. [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
endophthalmitis microbial antibiotic susceptibility laboratory investigation |
topic |
endophthalmitis microbial antibiotic susceptibility laboratory investigation |
description |
Purpose To assess the distribution of microorganisms isolated from patients with bacterial endophthalmitis and their antimicrobial susceptibility.Methods Retrospective analysis of medical and microbiological records of patients with suspected diagnosis of endophthalmitis. the following information was assessed: number of presumed and culture-positive endophthalmitis cases, source of infection, microbiological result (aqueous and/or vitreous culture and Gram staining), microbial characterization and distribution, and antimicrobial susceptibility.Results A total of 107 (46%) of 231 patients with bacterial endophthalmitis showed positive results by gram stain or culture. of these, 97 (42%) patients were positive for culture only. Most of them (62%) were secondary to a surgical procedure (postoperative), 12% were posttraumatic and 26% were secondary to an unknown source or the data were unavailable. A total of 100 microorganisms were isolated (38 aqueous and 67 vitreous samples) from the 97 culture-positive cases (91% were gram-positive and 9% were gram-negative). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) (48%) were the most frequently isolated, followed by Stretococcus viridans (18%), and Staphylococcus aureus (13%). the antimicrobial susceptibility for CoNS was as follows: amikacin-91.6%, cephalothin-97.9%, ceftriaxone-50%, ciprofloxacin-62.5%, chloramphenicol-91.8%, gatifloxacin-79.5%, gentamicin-72.9%, moxifloxacin-89.5%, ofloxacin-70.8%, oxacillin-58.3%, penicillin-33.3%, tobramycin-85.4%, and vancomycin-100%.Conclusion Gram-positive bacteria were the major causes of infectious endophthalmitis in this large series, usually following surgery. CoNS was the most common isolate. of interest, susceptibility to oxacillin and fourth-generation quinolones was lower than previously published. Eye (2011) 25, 382-388; doi:10.1038/eye.2010.236; published online 18 February 2011 |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-03-01 2016-01-24T14:06:13Z 2016-01-24T14:06:13Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.236 Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group, v. 25, n. 3, p. 383-387, 2011. 10.1038/eye.2010.236 0950-222X http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33488 WOS:000288240500016 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.236 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33488 |
identifier_str_mv |
Eye. London: Nature Publishing Group, v. 25, n. 3, p. 383-387, 2011. 10.1038/eye.2010.236 0950-222X WOS:000288240500016 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Eye |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
383-387 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Nature Publishing Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Nature Publishing Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268454735183872 |