Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem133 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/29881 |
Resumo: | Background. the neurokinin(l) antagonist aprepitant is effective for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. We compared aprepitant with ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.Methods. Nine hundred and twenty-two patients receiving general anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery were assigned to receive a single preoperative dose of oral aprepitant 40 mg, oral aprepitant 125 mg, or i.v. ondansetron 4 mg in a randomized, double-blind trial. Vomiting episodes, use of rescue therapy, and nausea severity (verbal rating scale) were documented for 48 h after surgery. Primary efficacy endpoints were complete response (no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy) 0-24 h after surgery and no vomiting 0-24 h after surgery. the secondary endpoint was no vomiting 0-48 h after surgery.Results. Aprepitant at both doses was non-inferior to ondansetron for complete response 0-24 h after surgery (64% for aprepitant 40 mg, 63% for aprepitant 125 mg, and 55% for ondansetron, lower bound of 1-sided 95% CI > 0.65), superior to ondansetron for no vomiting 0-24 h after surgery (84% for aprepitant 40 mg, 86% for aprepitant 125 mg, and 71 % for ondansetron; P < 0.001), and superior for no vomiting 0-48 h after surgery (82% for aprepitant, 40 mg, 85% for aprepitant, 125 mg, and 66% for ondansetron; P < 0.001). the distribution of peak nausea scores was lower in both aprepitant groups vs ondansetron (P < 0.05).Conclusions. Aprepitant was non-inferior to ondansetron in achieving complete response for 24 h after surgery. Aprepitant was significantly more effective than ondansetron for preventing vomiting at 24 and 48 h after surgery, and in reducing nausea severity in the first 48 h after surgery. Aprepitant was generally well tolerated. |
id |
UFSP_c10882743e65606ccbb6874dce0ca1e9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/29881 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgeryaprepitantclinical trialsPONVondansetronserotonin (5-hydroxy-tryptamine), antagonismBackground. the neurokinin(l) antagonist aprepitant is effective for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. We compared aprepitant with ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.Methods. Nine hundred and twenty-two patients receiving general anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery were assigned to receive a single preoperative dose of oral aprepitant 40 mg, oral aprepitant 125 mg, or i.v. ondansetron 4 mg in a randomized, double-blind trial. Vomiting episodes, use of rescue therapy, and nausea severity (verbal rating scale) were documented for 48 h after surgery. Primary efficacy endpoints were complete response (no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy) 0-24 h after surgery and no vomiting 0-24 h after surgery. the secondary endpoint was no vomiting 0-48 h after surgery.Results. Aprepitant at both doses was non-inferior to ondansetron for complete response 0-24 h after surgery (64% for aprepitant 40 mg, 63% for aprepitant 125 mg, and 55% for ondansetron, lower bound of 1-sided 95% CI > 0.65), superior to ondansetron for no vomiting 0-24 h after surgery (84% for aprepitant 40 mg, 86% for aprepitant 125 mg, and 71 % for ondansetron; P < 0.001), and superior for no vomiting 0-48 h after surgery (82% for aprepitant, 40 mg, 85% for aprepitant, 125 mg, and 66% for ondansetron; P < 0.001). the distribution of peak nausea scores was lower in both aprepitant groups vs ondansetron (P < 0.05).Conclusions. Aprepitant was non-inferior to ondansetron in achieving complete response for 24 h after surgery. Aprepitant was significantly more effective than ondansetron for preventing vomiting at 24 and 48 h after surgery, and in reducing nausea severity in the first 48 h after surgery. Aprepitant was generally well tolerated.CHU Strasbourg, Hop Hautepierre, Serv Anesthesiol Reanimat Chirurg, F-67000 Strasbourg, FranceDuke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Durham, NC 27710 USABrigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02115 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilUniv Marburg, Abt Anaesthesie & Intens Therapie, Marburg, GermanyUniv Hong Kong, Dept Anaesthesiol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R ChinaUniv Navarra Clin, Navarra 31008, SpainUniv Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USAMerck Res Labs, West Point, PA 19486 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceOxford Univ PressCHU StrasbourgDuke UnivBrigham & Womens HospUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Univ MarburgUniv Hong KongUniv Navarra ClinUniv PittsburghMerck Res LabsDiemunsch, P.Gan, T. J.Philip, E. K.Girão, Manoel João Batista Castello [UNIFESP]Eherharts, L.Irwin, M. G.Pueyo, J.Chelly, J. E.Carides, A. I.Reiss, T.Evans, J. K.Lawson, F. C.Aprepitant PONV Protocol 091 Study2016-01-24T13:48:53Z2016-01-24T13:48:53Z2007-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion202-211http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem133British Journal of Anaesthesia. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 99, n. 2, p. 202-211, 2007.10.1093/bja/aem1330007-0912http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/29881WOS:000248683000009engBritish Journal of Anaesthesiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.htmlreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2016-01-24T11:48:53Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/29881Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652016-01-24T11:48:53Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery |
title |
Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery |
spellingShingle |
Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery Diemunsch, P. aprepitant clinical trials PONV ondansetron serotonin (5-hydroxy-tryptamine), antagonism |
title_short |
Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery |
title_full |
Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery |
title_fullStr |
Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery |
title_full_unstemmed |
Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery |
title_sort |
Single-dose aprepitant vs ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery |
author |
Diemunsch, P. |
author_facet |
Diemunsch, P. Gan, T. J. Philip, E. K. Girão, Manoel João Batista Castello [UNIFESP] Eherharts, L. Irwin, M. G. Pueyo, J. Chelly, J. E. Carides, A. I. Reiss, T. Evans, J. K. Lawson, F. C. Aprepitant PONV Protocol 091 Study |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gan, T. J. Philip, E. K. Girão, Manoel João Batista Castello [UNIFESP] Eherharts, L. Irwin, M. G. Pueyo, J. Chelly, J. E. Carides, A. I. Reiss, T. Evans, J. K. Lawson, F. C. Aprepitant PONV Protocol 091 Study |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
CHU Strasbourg Duke Univ Brigham & Womens Hosp Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Univ Marburg Univ Hong Kong Univ Navarra Clin Univ Pittsburgh Merck Res Labs |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Diemunsch, P. Gan, T. J. Philip, E. K. Girão, Manoel João Batista Castello [UNIFESP] Eherharts, L. Irwin, M. G. Pueyo, J. Chelly, J. E. Carides, A. I. Reiss, T. Evans, J. K. Lawson, F. C. Aprepitant PONV Protocol 091 Study |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
aprepitant clinical trials PONV ondansetron serotonin (5-hydroxy-tryptamine), antagonism |
topic |
aprepitant clinical trials PONV ondansetron serotonin (5-hydroxy-tryptamine), antagonism |
description |
Background. the neurokinin(l) antagonist aprepitant is effective for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. We compared aprepitant with ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.Methods. Nine hundred and twenty-two patients receiving general anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery were assigned to receive a single preoperative dose of oral aprepitant 40 mg, oral aprepitant 125 mg, or i.v. ondansetron 4 mg in a randomized, double-blind trial. Vomiting episodes, use of rescue therapy, and nausea severity (verbal rating scale) were documented for 48 h after surgery. Primary efficacy endpoints were complete response (no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy) 0-24 h after surgery and no vomiting 0-24 h after surgery. the secondary endpoint was no vomiting 0-48 h after surgery.Results. Aprepitant at both doses was non-inferior to ondansetron for complete response 0-24 h after surgery (64% for aprepitant 40 mg, 63% for aprepitant 125 mg, and 55% for ondansetron, lower bound of 1-sided 95% CI > 0.65), superior to ondansetron for no vomiting 0-24 h after surgery (84% for aprepitant 40 mg, 86% for aprepitant 125 mg, and 71 % for ondansetron; P < 0.001), and superior for no vomiting 0-48 h after surgery (82% for aprepitant, 40 mg, 85% for aprepitant, 125 mg, and 66% for ondansetron; P < 0.001). the distribution of peak nausea scores was lower in both aprepitant groups vs ondansetron (P < 0.05).Conclusions. Aprepitant was non-inferior to ondansetron in achieving complete response for 24 h after surgery. Aprepitant was significantly more effective than ondansetron for preventing vomiting at 24 and 48 h after surgery, and in reducing nausea severity in the first 48 h after surgery. Aprepitant was generally well tolerated. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-08-01 2016-01-24T13:48:53Z 2016-01-24T13:48:53Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem133 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 99, n. 2, p. 202-211, 2007. 10.1093/bja/aem133 0007-0912 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/29881 WOS:000248683000009 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem133 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/29881 |
identifier_str_mv |
British Journal of Anaesthesia. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 99, n. 2, p. 202-211, 2007. 10.1093/bja/aem133 0007-0912 WOS:000248683000009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
British Journal of Anaesthesia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.html |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.html |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
202-211 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford Univ Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford Univ Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268430695530496 |