Cefepime monotherapy is as effective as ceftriaxone plus amikacin in pediatric patients with cancer and high-risk febrile neutropenia in a randomized comparison

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pires Pereira, Carlos Alberto [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Petrilli, Antonio Sergio [UNIFESP], Carlesse, Fabianne Altruda, Vercillo Luisi, Flavio Augusto, Torres Barros da Silva, Katia Veronica, Martino Lee, Maria Lucia de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/44508
http://www.ejmii.com/issue_abstract.php?code=PDT4b0cce7d090c6
Resumo: Background and purpose: The empirical use of antibiotic therapy is widely accepted for patients with fever and neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy. The use of intravenous monotherapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients at high risk for complications is an appropriate alternative. However, few data are available for pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cefepime (CFP) monotherapy with ceftriaxone plus amikacin (CFT+AK) in children and adolescents with febrile neutropenia (FN).Methods: A prospective randomized open study of patients with lymphoma or leukemia who had fever and neutropenia during chemotherapy was conducted. Patients were randomized to receive UP or CFT+AK. The randomization was based on number lists.Results: Fifty seven patients with 125 episodes of fever and neutropenia were evaluated (CFP, 62 episodes; CFT+AK, 63 episodes). The mean neutrophil count at admission to hospital was 118.6 cells/mm(3) for patients in the CFP group and 107 cells/mm(3) for patients in the CFT+AK group. The mean duration of neutropenia was 9 days for the UP group and 8 days for the CFT+AK group. Analysis of only the first episodes for each patient showed that UP treatment was successful for 65.5% of episodes and CFT+AK was successful for 64.3% of episodes. The overall rates of success with modification were 90% for the UP group and 89% for the CFT+AK group. No major treatment-emergent toxicity was reported.Conclusion: Monotherapy with UP seems to be as effective and safe as CFT+AK for initial empirical therapy in children and adolescents with FN.
id UFSP_ce623c252b48db8b70cd017a296a409e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/44508
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Pires Pereira, Carlos Alberto [UNIFESP]Petrilli, Antonio Sergio [UNIFESP]Carlesse, Fabianne AltrudaVercillo Luisi, Flavio AugustoTorres Barros da Silva, Katia VeronicaMartino Lee, Maria Lucia deUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)2018-06-15T18:07:28Z2018-06-15T18:07:28Z2009-04-01Journal Of Microbiology Immunology And Infection. Taipei: Scientific Communications Int Ltd, v. 42, n. 2, p. 141-147, 2009.1684-1182http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/44508http://www.ejmii.com/issue_abstract.php?code=PDT4b0cce7d090c6WOS:000271205800007Background and purpose: The empirical use of antibiotic therapy is widely accepted for patients with fever and neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy. The use of intravenous monotherapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients at high risk for complications is an appropriate alternative. However, few data are available for pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cefepime (CFP) monotherapy with ceftriaxone plus amikacin (CFT+AK) in children and adolescents with febrile neutropenia (FN).Methods: A prospective randomized open study of patients with lymphoma or leukemia who had fever and neutropenia during chemotherapy was conducted. Patients were randomized to receive UP or CFT+AK. The randomization was based on number lists.Results: Fifty seven patients with 125 episodes of fever and neutropenia were evaluated (CFP, 62 episodes; CFT+AK, 63 episodes). The mean neutrophil count at admission to hospital was 118.6 cells/mm(3) for patients in the CFP group and 107 cells/mm(3) for patients in the CFT+AK group. The mean duration of neutropenia was 9 days for the UP group and 8 days for the CFT+AK group. Analysis of only the first episodes for each patient showed that UP treatment was successful for 65.5% of episodes and CFT+AK was successful for 64.3% of episodes. The overall rates of success with modification were 90% for the UP group and 89% for the CFT+AK group. No major treatment-emergent toxicity was reported.Conclusion: Monotherapy with UP seems to be as effective and safe as CFT+AK for initial empirical therapy in children and adolescents with FN.Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Inst Oncol Pediat, Escola Paulista Med, Grp Apoio Crianca Com Canc, BR-04023062 Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Infect Dis, BR-04023062 Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Inst Oncol Pediat, Escola Paulista Med, Grp Apoio Crianca Com Canc, BR-04023062 Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Infect Dis, BR-04023062 Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of Science141-147engScientific Communications Int LtdJournal Of Microbiology Immunology And InfectionCefepimeLeukemiaLymphomaNeutropeniaRiskCefepime monotherapy is as effective as ceftriaxone plus amikacin in pediatric patients with cancer and high-risk febrile neutropenia in a randomized comparisoninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP11600/445082022-02-08 11:52:11.47metadata only accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/44508Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-05-25T12:17:50.367490Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Cefepime monotherapy is as effective as ceftriaxone plus amikacin in pediatric patients with cancer and high-risk febrile neutropenia in a randomized comparison
title Cefepime monotherapy is as effective as ceftriaxone plus amikacin in pediatric patients with cancer and high-risk febrile neutropenia in a randomized comparison
spellingShingle Cefepime monotherapy is as effective as ceftriaxone plus amikacin in pediatric patients with cancer and high-risk febrile neutropenia in a randomized comparison
Pires Pereira, Carlos Alberto [UNIFESP]
Cefepime
Leukemia
Lymphoma
Neutropenia
Risk
title_short Cefepime monotherapy is as effective as ceftriaxone plus amikacin in pediatric patients with cancer and high-risk febrile neutropenia in a randomized comparison
title_full Cefepime monotherapy is as effective as ceftriaxone plus amikacin in pediatric patients with cancer and high-risk febrile neutropenia in a randomized comparison
title_fullStr Cefepime monotherapy is as effective as ceftriaxone plus amikacin in pediatric patients with cancer and high-risk febrile neutropenia in a randomized comparison
title_full_unstemmed Cefepime monotherapy is as effective as ceftriaxone plus amikacin in pediatric patients with cancer and high-risk febrile neutropenia in a randomized comparison
title_sort Cefepime monotherapy is as effective as ceftriaxone plus amikacin in pediatric patients with cancer and high-risk febrile neutropenia in a randomized comparison
author Pires Pereira, Carlos Alberto [UNIFESP]
author_facet Pires Pereira, Carlos Alberto [UNIFESP]
Petrilli, Antonio Sergio [UNIFESP]
Carlesse, Fabianne Altruda
Vercillo Luisi, Flavio Augusto
Torres Barros da Silva, Katia Veronica
Martino Lee, Maria Lucia de
author_role author
author2 Petrilli, Antonio Sergio [UNIFESP]
Carlesse, Fabianne Altruda
Vercillo Luisi, Flavio Augusto
Torres Barros da Silva, Katia Veronica
Martino Lee, Maria Lucia de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pires Pereira, Carlos Alberto [UNIFESP]
Petrilli, Antonio Sergio [UNIFESP]
Carlesse, Fabianne Altruda
Vercillo Luisi, Flavio Augusto
Torres Barros da Silva, Katia Veronica
Martino Lee, Maria Lucia de
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Cefepime
Leukemia
Lymphoma
Neutropenia
Risk
topic Cefepime
Leukemia
Lymphoma
Neutropenia
Risk
description Background and purpose: The empirical use of antibiotic therapy is widely accepted for patients with fever and neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy. The use of intravenous monotherapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients at high risk for complications is an appropriate alternative. However, few data are available for pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cefepime (CFP) monotherapy with ceftriaxone plus amikacin (CFT+AK) in children and adolescents with febrile neutropenia (FN).Methods: A prospective randomized open study of patients with lymphoma or leukemia who had fever and neutropenia during chemotherapy was conducted. Patients were randomized to receive UP or CFT+AK. The randomization was based on number lists.Results: Fifty seven patients with 125 episodes of fever and neutropenia were evaluated (CFP, 62 episodes; CFT+AK, 63 episodes). The mean neutrophil count at admission to hospital was 118.6 cells/mm(3) for patients in the CFP group and 107 cells/mm(3) for patients in the CFT+AK group. The mean duration of neutropenia was 9 days for the UP group and 8 days for the CFT+AK group. Analysis of only the first episodes for each patient showed that UP treatment was successful for 65.5% of episodes and CFT+AK was successful for 64.3% of episodes. The overall rates of success with modification were 90% for the UP group and 89% for the CFT+AK group. No major treatment-emergent toxicity was reported.Conclusion: Monotherapy with UP seems to be as effective and safe as CFT+AK for initial empirical therapy in children and adolescents with FN.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2009-04-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-06-15T18:07:28Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2018-06-15T18:07:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Journal Of Microbiology Immunology And Infection. Taipei: Scientific Communications Int Ltd, v. 42, n. 2, p. 141-147, 2009.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/44508
http://www.ejmii.com/issue_abstract.php?code=PDT4b0cce7d090c6
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1684-1182
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000271205800007
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Microbiology Immunology And Infection. Taipei: Scientific Communications Int Ltd, v. 42, n. 2, p. 141-147, 2009.
1684-1182
WOS:000271205800007
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/44508
http://www.ejmii.com/issue_abstract.php?code=PDT4b0cce7d090c6
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of Microbiology Immunology And Infection
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 141-147
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Communications Int Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Communications Int Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1783460273374363648