Os republicanos e a abolição

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Maria Fernanda Lombardi [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2006
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782006000200013
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3329
Resumo: This paper discusses the relationship that exists between Brazilian republicans and the idea of the abolition of slavery. The republicans did not form a monolithic bloc; figures such as Luís Gama and Silva Jardim, for example, did not dissociate the struggle for the Republic from the struggle for Abolition, thus standin in contrast to republican landowners who, without struggling directly against Abolition, made no efforts on its behalf. The most radical of republicans, those who sought to associate both struggles, would eventually have to break with the official Republican movement - cases in point, Patrocínio and Gama - or collude with Republican slave and landowners - as was the case of Silva Jardim. Cissions within the more radical field of the Republican movement contributed to strengthening the more moderate or even the conservative Republican groups that came to dominate Brazilian republicanism. Our central hypothesis is that the treatment given to the issue of abolition was fundamental in determining the shape that the Republic took on in Brazil.
id UFSP_e574ada765b5103145cbd073f72a9755
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/3329
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Os republicanos e a aboliçãoRepublicans and abolitionLes republicains et l'abolitionslaveryabolitionismrepublicanismescravidãoabolicionismorepublicanismoThis paper discusses the relationship that exists between Brazilian republicans and the idea of the abolition of slavery. The republicans did not form a monolithic bloc; figures such as Luís Gama and Silva Jardim, for example, did not dissociate the struggle for the Republic from the struggle for Abolition, thus standin in contrast to republican landowners who, without struggling directly against Abolition, made no efforts on its behalf. The most radical of republicans, those who sought to associate both struggles, would eventually have to break with the official Republican movement - cases in point, Patrocínio and Gama - or collude with Republican slave and landowners - as was the case of Silva Jardim. Cissions within the more radical field of the Republican movement contributed to strengthening the more moderate or even the conservative Republican groups that came to dominate Brazilian republicanism. Our central hypothesis is that the treatment given to the issue of abolition was fundamental in determining the shape that the Republic took on in Brazil.Ce travail discute de la relation existante entre les républicains et l'idée de l'abolition de l'esclavage. Les républicains ne formaient pas un bloc unique ; des républicains comme Luís Gama et Silva Jardim, par exemple, ne séparaient pas la lutte pour la République et la lutte pour l'Abolition, contrairement aux républicains propriétaires des terres qui, même s'ils ne se battaient pas contre l'Abolition directement, ne s'intéressaient pas à mener à bien l'Abolition. Il ne restait aux républicains plus « radicaux », qui cherchaient à associer les deux luttes, que la rupture avec le mouvement républicain officiel - ce sont les cas de Patrocínio et de Gama - ou bien l'acquiescement face aux républicains seigneurs de terres et d'esclaves - c'est le cas de Silva Jardim. Les dissonances au sein du mouvement républicain plus radical ont contribué à conforter un groupe républicain plus «modéré», voire «conservateur», qui est devenu la face dominante du républicanisme brésilien. Selon notre hypothèse centrale, la configuration la République au Brésil est fondamentalement due au traitement mis en oeuvre au sujet de l'Abolition. Notre hypothèse centrale prône que le traitement conféré au thème de l'Abolition fut essentiel pour la configuration que la République eut au Brésil.O presente trabalho discute a relação existente entre os republicanos e a idéia de abolição da escravidão. Os republicanos não formavam um bloco monolítico; republicanos como Luís Gama e Silva Jardim, por exemplo, não dissociavam a luta pela República da luta pela Abolição, diferentemente dos republicanos fazendeiros que, se não lutavam contra a Abolição diretamente, não se empenhavam na sua efetivação. Aos republicanos mais radicais, que buscavam associar as duas lutas, restou o rompimento com o movimento republicano oficial - casos de Patrocínio e Gama - ou a conivência com os republicanos senhores de terras e escravos - caso de Silva Jardim. As cisões no campo mais radical do movimento republicano contribuíram para o fortalecimento de um grupo republicano mais moderado, ou mesmo conservador, que se tornou a face dominante do republicanismo brasileiro. Nossa hipótese central é de que o tratamento dado à questão da Abolição foi fundamental na formatação que a República teve no Brasil.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)UNIFESPSciELOUniversidade Federal do ParanáUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Fernandes, Maria Fernanda Lombardi [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:36:31Z2015-06-14T13:36:31Z2006-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion181-195application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782006000200013Revista de Sociologia e Política. Universidade Federal do Paraná, n. 27, p. 181-195, 2006.10.1590/S0104-44782006000200013S0104-44782006000200013.pdf0104-4478S0104-44782006000200013http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3329porRevista de Sociologia e Políticainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-28T11:32:50Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/3329Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-28T11:32:50Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Os republicanos e a abolição
Republicans and abolition
Les republicains et l'abolition
title Os republicanos e a abolição
spellingShingle Os republicanos e a abolição
Fernandes, Maria Fernanda Lombardi [UNIFESP]
slavery
abolitionism
republicanism
escravidão
abolicionismo
republicanismo
title_short Os republicanos e a abolição
title_full Os republicanos e a abolição
title_fullStr Os republicanos e a abolição
title_full_unstemmed Os republicanos e a abolição
title_sort Os republicanos e a abolição
author Fernandes, Maria Fernanda Lombardi [UNIFESP]
author_facet Fernandes, Maria Fernanda Lombardi [UNIFESP]
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Maria Fernanda Lombardi [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv slavery
abolitionism
republicanism
escravidão
abolicionismo
republicanismo
topic slavery
abolitionism
republicanism
escravidão
abolicionismo
republicanismo
description This paper discusses the relationship that exists between Brazilian republicans and the idea of the abolition of slavery. The republicans did not form a monolithic bloc; figures such as Luís Gama and Silva Jardim, for example, did not dissociate the struggle for the Republic from the struggle for Abolition, thus standin in contrast to republican landowners who, without struggling directly against Abolition, made no efforts on its behalf. The most radical of republicans, those who sought to associate both struggles, would eventually have to break with the official Republican movement - cases in point, Patrocínio and Gama - or collude with Republican slave and landowners - as was the case of Silva Jardim. Cissions within the more radical field of the Republican movement contributed to strengthening the more moderate or even the conservative Republican groups that came to dominate Brazilian republicanism. Our central hypothesis is that the treatment given to the issue of abolition was fundamental in determining the shape that the Republic took on in Brazil.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-11-01
2015-06-14T13:36:31Z
2015-06-14T13:36:31Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782006000200013
Revista de Sociologia e Política. Universidade Federal do Paraná, n. 27, p. 181-195, 2006.
10.1590/S0104-44782006000200013
S0104-44782006000200013.pdf
0104-4478
S0104-44782006000200013
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3329
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782006000200013
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3329
identifier_str_mv Revista de Sociologia e Política. Universidade Federal do Paraná, n. 27, p. 181-195, 2006.
10.1590/S0104-44782006000200013
S0104-44782006000200013.pdf
0104-4478
S0104-44782006000200013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Sociologia e Política
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 181-195
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paraná
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paraná
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268415602327552