Coping with Stress and Types of Burnout: Explanatory Power of Different Coping Strategies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089090 |
Resumo: | Background: Burnout occurs when professionals use ineffective coping strategies to try to protect themselves from work-related stress. the dimensions of 'overload', 'lack of development' and 'neglect', belonging to the 'frenetic', 'under-challenged' and 'worn-out' subtypes, respectively, comprise a brief typological definition of burnout. the aim of the present study was to estimate the explanatory power of the different coping strategies on the development of burnout subtypes.Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey with a random sample of university employees, stratified by occupation (n = 429). Multivariate linear regression models were constructed between the 'Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire', with its three dimensions - overload, lack of development and neglect-as dependent variables, and the 'Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences', with its fifteen dimensions, as independent variables. Adjusted multiple determination coefficients and beta coefficients were calculated to evaluate and compare the explanatory capacity of the different coping strategies.Results: the 'Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences' subscales together explained 15% of the 'overload' (p<0.001), 9% of the 'lack of development' (p<0.001), and 21% of the 'neglect' (p<0.001). 'Overload' was mainly explained by 'venting of emotions' (Beta = 0.34; p, 0.001); 'lack of development' by 'cognitive avoidance' (Beta = 0.21; p, 0.001); and 'neglect' by 'behavioural disengagement' (Beta = 0.40; p<0.001). Other interesting associations were observed.Conclusions: These findings further our understanding of the way in which the effectiveness of interventions for burnout may be improved, by influencing new treatments and preventive programmes using features of the strategies for handling stress in the workplace. |
id |
UFSP_f3c905b308b8a7ce55c2f26aa3d74b67 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/37437 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Montero-Marin, JesusPrado-Abril, JavierDemarzo, Marcelo Marcos Piva [UNIFESP]Gascon, SantiagoGarcia-Campayo, JavierUniv ZaragozaMiguel Servet Univ HospUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)REDIAPP Red Invest Actividades Prevent & Promoc S2016-01-24T14:35:18Z2016-01-24T14:35:18Z2014-02-13Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 9, n. 2, 9 p., 2014.1932-6203http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37437http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089090WOS000331266000101.pdf10.1371/journal.pone.0089090WOS:000331266000101Background: Burnout occurs when professionals use ineffective coping strategies to try to protect themselves from work-related stress. the dimensions of 'overload', 'lack of development' and 'neglect', belonging to the 'frenetic', 'under-challenged' and 'worn-out' subtypes, respectively, comprise a brief typological definition of burnout. the aim of the present study was to estimate the explanatory power of the different coping strategies on the development of burnout subtypes.Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey with a random sample of university employees, stratified by occupation (n = 429). Multivariate linear regression models were constructed between the 'Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire', with its three dimensions - overload, lack of development and neglect-as dependent variables, and the 'Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences', with its fifteen dimensions, as independent variables. Adjusted multiple determination coefficients and beta coefficients were calculated to evaluate and compare the explanatory capacity of the different coping strategies.Results: the 'Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences' subscales together explained 15% of the 'overload' (p<0.001), 9% of the 'lack of development' (p<0.001), and 21% of the 'neglect' (p<0.001). 'Overload' was mainly explained by 'venting of emotions' (Beta = 0.34; p, 0.001); 'lack of development' by 'cognitive avoidance' (Beta = 0.21; p, 0.001); and 'neglect' by 'behavioural disengagement' (Beta = 0.40; p<0.001). Other interesting associations were observed.Conclusions: These findings further our understanding of the way in which the effectiveness of interventions for burnout may be improved, by influencing new treatments and preventive programmes using features of the strategies for handling stress in the workplace.Research Network on Preventative Activities and Health PromotionHealth Sciences Institute of Aragon (IACS)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Univ Zaragoza, Fac Hlth Sci & Sports, Huesca, SpainUniv Zaragoza, Dept Psychiat, Zaragoza, SpainMiguel Servet Univ Hosp, Psychiat Serv, Zaragoza, SpainUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, São Paulo, BrazilUniv Zaragoza, Dept Psychol, Teruel, SpainREDIAPP Red Invest Actividades Prevent & Promoc S, Zaragoza, SpainUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, São Paulo, BrazilResearch Network on Preventative Activities and Health Promotion: RD06/0018/0017Web of Science9engPublic Library SciencePlos OneCoping with Stress and Types of Burnout: Explanatory Power of Different Coping Strategiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPORIGINALWOS000331266000101.pdfapplication/pdf182138${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/37437/1/WOS000331266000101.pdfbd7012c3ee972a7fe544af51a229fbe0MD51open accessTEXTWOS000331266000101.pdf.txtWOS000331266000101.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain57321${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/37437/2/WOS000331266000101.pdf.txt26f1e33069f7238ef1684c57f24a281cMD52open access11600/374372022-07-08 10:51:15.436open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/37437Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652022-07-08T13:51:15Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Coping with Stress and Types of Burnout: Explanatory Power of Different Coping Strategies |
title |
Coping with Stress and Types of Burnout: Explanatory Power of Different Coping Strategies |
spellingShingle |
Coping with Stress and Types of Burnout: Explanatory Power of Different Coping Strategies Montero-Marin, Jesus |
title_short |
Coping with Stress and Types of Burnout: Explanatory Power of Different Coping Strategies |
title_full |
Coping with Stress and Types of Burnout: Explanatory Power of Different Coping Strategies |
title_fullStr |
Coping with Stress and Types of Burnout: Explanatory Power of Different Coping Strategies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Coping with Stress and Types of Burnout: Explanatory Power of Different Coping Strategies |
title_sort |
Coping with Stress and Types of Burnout: Explanatory Power of Different Coping Strategies |
author |
Montero-Marin, Jesus |
author_facet |
Montero-Marin, Jesus Prado-Abril, Javier Demarzo, Marcelo Marcos Piva [UNIFESP] Gascon, Santiago Garcia-Campayo, Javier |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Prado-Abril, Javier Demarzo, Marcelo Marcos Piva [UNIFESP] Gascon, Santiago Garcia-Campayo, Javier |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Zaragoza Miguel Servet Univ Hosp Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) REDIAPP Red Invest Actividades Prevent & Promoc S |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Montero-Marin, Jesus Prado-Abril, Javier Demarzo, Marcelo Marcos Piva [UNIFESP] Gascon, Santiago Garcia-Campayo, Javier |
description |
Background: Burnout occurs when professionals use ineffective coping strategies to try to protect themselves from work-related stress. the dimensions of 'overload', 'lack of development' and 'neglect', belonging to the 'frenetic', 'under-challenged' and 'worn-out' subtypes, respectively, comprise a brief typological definition of burnout. the aim of the present study was to estimate the explanatory power of the different coping strategies on the development of burnout subtypes.Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey with a random sample of university employees, stratified by occupation (n = 429). Multivariate linear regression models were constructed between the 'Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire', with its three dimensions - overload, lack of development and neglect-as dependent variables, and the 'Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences', with its fifteen dimensions, as independent variables. Adjusted multiple determination coefficients and beta coefficients were calculated to evaluate and compare the explanatory capacity of the different coping strategies.Results: the 'Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences' subscales together explained 15% of the 'overload' (p<0.001), 9% of the 'lack of development' (p<0.001), and 21% of the 'neglect' (p<0.001). 'Overload' was mainly explained by 'venting of emotions' (Beta = 0.34; p, 0.001); 'lack of development' by 'cognitive avoidance' (Beta = 0.21; p, 0.001); and 'neglect' by 'behavioural disengagement' (Beta = 0.40; p<0.001). Other interesting associations were observed.Conclusions: These findings further our understanding of the way in which the effectiveness of interventions for burnout may be improved, by influencing new treatments and preventive programmes using features of the strategies for handling stress in the workplace. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2014-02-13 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-24T14:35:18Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-24T14:35:18Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 9, n. 2, 9 p., 2014. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089090 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1932-6203 |
dc.identifier.file.none.fl_str_mv |
WOS000331266000101.pdf |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1371/journal.pone.0089090 |
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv |
WOS:000331266000101 |
identifier_str_mv |
Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 9, n. 2, 9 p., 2014. 1932-6203 WOS000331266000101.pdf 10.1371/journal.pone.0089090 WOS:000331266000101 |
url |
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089090 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Plos One |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
9 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Library Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Library Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/37437/1/WOS000331266000101.pdf ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/37437/2/WOS000331266000101.pdf.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bd7012c3ee972a7fe544af51a229fbe0 26f1e33069f7238ef1684c57f24a281c |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1802764153865109504 |