(DIS)INFORMATION IN TWITTER ECHO CHAMBERS: disputes over chloroquine during the Covid-19 pandemic
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Observatório |
Texto Completo: | https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/11268 |
Resumo: | In view of the large flow of information circulating on Twitter regarding the Covid-19 pandemic, this paper analyzes the polarization of the debate around the effectiveness of the use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of the disease, based on different reference systems, in addition to identifying the signs of disinformation present in the links that most circulated between March 23 and April 13, based on a base of 21,076 tweets. The analysis finds the formation of echo chambers, in a clear opposition between the use of traditional communication vehicles and sites of explicitly ideological content as sources of reference to defend a drug without proven scientific efficacy. |
id |
UFT-7_c6b69b15624a07f26f2cfe5e3be0642f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.uft.edu.br:article/11268 |
network_acronym_str |
UFT-7 |
network_name_str |
Revista Observatório |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
(DIS)INFORMATION IN TWITTER ECHO CHAMBERS: disputes over chloroquine during the Covid-19 pandemic(DES)INFORMACIÓN EN LAS CÁMARAS DE ECO DE TWITTER: disputas sobre la cloroquina en la pandemia de Covid-19(DIS)INFORMATION IN TWITTER ECHO CHAMBERS: disputes over chloroquine during the Covid-19 pandemicDisinformation DisorderEcho ChambersCovid-19TwitterSocial NetworksDisinformation DisorderEcho ChambersCovid-19TwitterSocial NetworksIn view of the large flow of information circulating on Twitter regarding the Covid-19 pandemic, this paper analyzes the polarization of the debate around the effectiveness of the use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of the disease, based on different reference systems, in addition to identifying the signs of disinformation present in the links that most circulated between March 23 and April 13, based on a base of 21,076 tweets. The analysis finds the formation of echo chambers, in a clear opposition between the use of traditional communication vehicles and sites of explicitly ideological content as sources of reference to defend a drug without proven scientific efficacy.In view of the large flow of information circulating on Twitter regarding the Covid-19 pandemic, this paper analyzes the polarization of the debate around the effectiveness of the use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of the disease, based on different reference systems, in addition to identifying the signs of disinformation present in the links that most circulated between March 23 and April 13, based on a base of 21,076 tweets. The analysis finds the formation of echo chambers, in a clear opposition between the use of traditional communication vehicles and sites of explicitly ideological content as sources of reference to defend a drug without proven scientific efficacy.Universidade Federal do Tocantins - UFT2020-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/1126810.20873/uft.2447-4266.2020v6n6a5enObservatory Journal; Vol. 6 No. 6 (2020): Disinformation, threats to democracy and opportunities for media literacy / Desinformação, ameaças à democracia e oportunidades de letramento/literacia midiática; a5enObservatorio Magazine; Vol. 6 Núm. 6 (2020): Disinformation, threats to democracy and opportunities for media literacy / Desinformação, ameaças à democracia e oportunidades de letramento/literacia midiática; a5enObservatoire Journal; Vol. 6 No. 6 (2020): Disinformation, threats to democracy and opportunities for media literacy / Desinformação, ameaças à democracia e oportunidades de letramento/literacia midiática; a5enRevista Observatório ; v. 6 n. 6 (2020): Disinformation, threats to democracy and opportunities for media literacy / Desinformação, ameaças à democracia e oportunidades de letramento/literacia midiática; a5en2447-426610.20873/uft.2447-4266.2020v6n6reponame:Revista Observatórioinstname:Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT)instacron:UFTporhttps://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/11268/18167https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/11268/18168Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Observatório info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Cecília Almeida Rodrigues Calazans, Janaina de Holanda Costa Dantas , Ivo Henrique 2022-03-04T12:58:07Zoai:ojs.revista.uft.edu.br:article/11268Revistahttps://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/oai2447-42662447-4266opendoar:2022-03-04T12:58:07Revista Observatório - Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
(DIS)INFORMATION IN TWITTER ECHO CHAMBERS: disputes over chloroquine during the Covid-19 pandemic (DES)INFORMACIÓN EN LAS CÁMARAS DE ECO DE TWITTER: disputas sobre la cloroquina en la pandemia de Covid-19 (DIS)INFORMATION IN TWITTER ECHO CHAMBERS: disputes over chloroquine during the Covid-19 pandemic |
title |
(DIS)INFORMATION IN TWITTER ECHO CHAMBERS: disputes over chloroquine during the Covid-19 pandemic |
spellingShingle |
(DIS)INFORMATION IN TWITTER ECHO CHAMBERS: disputes over chloroquine during the Covid-19 pandemic Lima, Cecília Almeida Rodrigues Disinformation Disorder Echo Chambers Covid-19 Social Networks Disinformation Disorder Echo Chambers Covid-19 Social Networks |
title_short |
(DIS)INFORMATION IN TWITTER ECHO CHAMBERS: disputes over chloroquine during the Covid-19 pandemic |
title_full |
(DIS)INFORMATION IN TWITTER ECHO CHAMBERS: disputes over chloroquine during the Covid-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr |
(DIS)INFORMATION IN TWITTER ECHO CHAMBERS: disputes over chloroquine during the Covid-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed |
(DIS)INFORMATION IN TWITTER ECHO CHAMBERS: disputes over chloroquine during the Covid-19 pandemic |
title_sort |
(DIS)INFORMATION IN TWITTER ECHO CHAMBERS: disputes over chloroquine during the Covid-19 pandemic |
author |
Lima, Cecília Almeida Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Lima, Cecília Almeida Rodrigues Calazans, Janaina de Holanda Costa Dantas , Ivo Henrique |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Calazans, Janaina de Holanda Costa Dantas , Ivo Henrique |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Cecília Almeida Rodrigues Calazans, Janaina de Holanda Costa Dantas , Ivo Henrique |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Disinformation Disorder Echo Chambers Covid-19 Social Networks Disinformation Disorder Echo Chambers Covid-19 Social Networks |
topic |
Disinformation Disorder Echo Chambers Covid-19 Social Networks Disinformation Disorder Echo Chambers Covid-19 Social Networks |
description |
In view of the large flow of information circulating on Twitter regarding the Covid-19 pandemic, this paper analyzes the polarization of the debate around the effectiveness of the use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of the disease, based on different reference systems, in addition to identifying the signs of disinformation present in the links that most circulated between March 23 and April 13, based on a base of 21,076 tweets. The analysis finds the formation of echo chambers, in a clear opposition between the use of traditional communication vehicles and sites of explicitly ideological content as sources of reference to defend a drug without proven scientific efficacy. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/11268 10.20873/uft.2447-4266.2020v6n6a5en |
url |
https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/11268 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20873/uft.2447-4266.2020v6n6a5en |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/11268/18167 https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/11268/18168 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Observatório info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Observatório |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Tocantins - UFT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Tocantins - UFT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Observatory Journal; Vol. 6 No. 6 (2020): Disinformation, threats to democracy and opportunities for media literacy / Desinformação, ameaças à democracia e oportunidades de letramento/literacia midiática; a5en Observatorio Magazine; Vol. 6 Núm. 6 (2020): Disinformation, threats to democracy and opportunities for media literacy / Desinformação, ameaças à democracia e oportunidades de letramento/literacia midiática; a5en Observatoire Journal; Vol. 6 No. 6 (2020): Disinformation, threats to democracy and opportunities for media literacy / Desinformação, ameaças à democracia e oportunidades de letramento/literacia midiática; a5en Revista Observatório ; v. 6 n. 6 (2020): Disinformation, threats to democracy and opportunities for media literacy / Desinformação, ameaças à democracia e oportunidades de letramento/literacia midiática; a5en 2447-4266 10.20873/uft.2447-4266.2020v6n6 reponame:Revista Observatório instname:Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT) instacron:UFT |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT) |
instacron_str |
UFT |
institution |
UFT |
reponame_str |
Revista Observatório |
collection |
Revista Observatório |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Observatório - Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1798313251167010816 |