Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Karla Rosane Aguiar
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Campo - Território
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/58245
Resumo: Cerrado has been dealing with an intense landscape shift due to the advance of agricultural frontier. The development model adopted in Brazil since the 1960s has encouraged the conservative modernization of agriculture and has emerged the “agribusiness pact”. This pact is intensified by an ideological apparatus mechanism called agro-strategies. This coordinated set of actions has been seeking to influence governmental policies due to the increase of commodities production areas. The protected areas in Cerrado play an important role to biodiversity conservancy and against the advance of the agricultural frontier. However, the agro-strategies have inflicted threats to those territories thereby it could reduce their territorial boundaries, provoking re-categorization or even causing flexibility of their protective goals. This paper aims to discuss the agricultural frontier territorial changes in Cerrado, and how agro-strategies have been acting over the conservation territories. The case which will be analyzed is the Springs of Parnaíba river national park downsizing. This protected area is located on the borders of the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia and one of the biggest production areas of the country.
id UFU-10_c49286fc9a80539bc7aea30b45d8044f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/58245
network_acronym_str UFU-10
network_name_str Campo - Território
repository_id_str
spelling Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national parkFronteira agrícola e ameaças às Unidades de Conservação no Cerrado: o caso do Parque Nacional das Nascentes do Rio ParnaíbaCerrado has been dealing with an intense landscape shift due to the advance of agricultural frontier. The development model adopted in Brazil since the 1960s has encouraged the conservative modernization of agriculture and has emerged the “agribusiness pact”. This pact is intensified by an ideological apparatus mechanism called agro-strategies. This coordinated set of actions has been seeking to influence governmental policies due to the increase of commodities production areas. The protected areas in Cerrado play an important role to biodiversity conservancy and against the advance of the agricultural frontier. However, the agro-strategies have inflicted threats to those territories thereby it could reduce their territorial boundaries, provoking re-categorization or even causing flexibility of their protective goals. This paper aims to discuss the agricultural frontier territorial changes in Cerrado, and how agro-strategies have been acting over the conservation territories. The case which will be analyzed is the Springs of Parnaíba river national park downsizing. This protected area is located on the borders of the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia and one of the biggest production areas of the country.O Cerrado passa atualmente por uma intensa mudança de sua paisagem em função do avanço da fronteira agrícola. O modelo de desenvolvimento adotado pelo Brasil especialmente a partir dos anos 1960 incentivou a modernização conservadora da agricultura e promoveu o “pacto do agronegócio”, que se intensifica mediante um aparato ideológico articulado denominado agroestratégias. Este conjunto coordenado de ações busca influenciar políticas governamentais em prol do aumento em áreas para produção de commodities. As Unidades de Conservação no bioma Cerrado assumem um importante papel para a conservação da biodiversidade frente ao avanço da fronteira agrícola. Porém, as agroestratégias impõem ameaças a esses territórios, com a possibilidade de redução de limites territoriais, recategorização e diminuição do grau protetivo destas áreas. Este artigo tem como objetivo discutir as transformações territoriais oriundas da fronteira agrícola no Cerrado e da atuação das agroestratégias sobre os territórios destinados à conservação da biodiversidade, a partir do caso de desafetação do Parque Nacional das Nascentes do Rio Parnaíba, situado na fronteira entre os estados do Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí e Bahia, e uma das regiões com maior produção agrícola do país.EDUFU2021-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/5824510.14393/RCT164017Revista Campo-Território; v. 16 n. 40 Abr. (2021); 389-4081809-6271reponame:Campo - Territórioinstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/58245/32117Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Campo-Territórioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Karla Rosane Aguiar 2021-08-02T18:14:49Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/58245Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorioPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/oaijcleps@ufu.br || campoterritorio@ig.ufu.br1809-62711809-6271opendoar:2021-08-02T18:14:49Campo - Território - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park
Fronteira agrícola e ameaças às Unidades de Conservação no Cerrado: o caso do Parque Nacional das Nascentes do Rio Parnaíba
title Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park
spellingShingle Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park
Oliveira, Karla Rosane Aguiar
title_short Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park
title_full Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park
title_fullStr Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park
title_full_unstemmed Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park
title_sort Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park
author Oliveira, Karla Rosane Aguiar
author_facet Oliveira, Karla Rosane Aguiar
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Karla Rosane Aguiar
description Cerrado has been dealing with an intense landscape shift due to the advance of agricultural frontier. The development model adopted in Brazil since the 1960s has encouraged the conservative modernization of agriculture and has emerged the “agribusiness pact”. This pact is intensified by an ideological apparatus mechanism called agro-strategies. This coordinated set of actions has been seeking to influence governmental policies due to the increase of commodities production areas. The protected areas in Cerrado play an important role to biodiversity conservancy and against the advance of the agricultural frontier. However, the agro-strategies have inflicted threats to those territories thereby it could reduce their territorial boundaries, provoking re-categorization or even causing flexibility of their protective goals. This paper aims to discuss the agricultural frontier territorial changes in Cerrado, and how agro-strategies have been acting over the conservation territories. The case which will be analyzed is the Springs of Parnaíba river national park downsizing. This protected area is located on the borders of the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia and one of the biggest production areas of the country.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/58245
10.14393/RCT164017
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/58245
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/RCT164017
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/58245/32117
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Campo-Território
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Campo-Território
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Campo-Território; v. 16 n. 40 Abr. (2021); 389-408
1809-6271
reponame:Campo - Território
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Campo - Território
collection Campo - Território
repository.name.fl_str_mv Campo - Território - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jcleps@ufu.br || campoterritorio@ig.ufu.br
_version_ 1798315122781847552