Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Campo - Território |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/58245 |
Resumo: | Cerrado has been dealing with an intense landscape shift due to the advance of agricultural frontier. The development model adopted in Brazil since the 1960s has encouraged the conservative modernization of agriculture and has emerged the “agribusiness pact”. This pact is intensified by an ideological apparatus mechanism called agro-strategies. This coordinated set of actions has been seeking to influence governmental policies due to the increase of commodities production areas. The protected areas in Cerrado play an important role to biodiversity conservancy and against the advance of the agricultural frontier. However, the agro-strategies have inflicted threats to those territories thereby it could reduce their territorial boundaries, provoking re-categorization or even causing flexibility of their protective goals. This paper aims to discuss the agricultural frontier territorial changes in Cerrado, and how agro-strategies have been acting over the conservation territories. The case which will be analyzed is the Springs of Parnaíba river national park downsizing. This protected area is located on the borders of the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia and one of the biggest production areas of the country. |
id |
UFU-10_c49286fc9a80539bc7aea30b45d8044f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/58245 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-10 |
network_name_str |
Campo - Território |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national parkFronteira agrícola e ameaças às Unidades de Conservação no Cerrado: o caso do Parque Nacional das Nascentes do Rio ParnaíbaCerrado has been dealing with an intense landscape shift due to the advance of agricultural frontier. The development model adopted in Brazil since the 1960s has encouraged the conservative modernization of agriculture and has emerged the “agribusiness pact”. This pact is intensified by an ideological apparatus mechanism called agro-strategies. This coordinated set of actions has been seeking to influence governmental policies due to the increase of commodities production areas. The protected areas in Cerrado play an important role to biodiversity conservancy and against the advance of the agricultural frontier. However, the agro-strategies have inflicted threats to those territories thereby it could reduce their territorial boundaries, provoking re-categorization or even causing flexibility of their protective goals. This paper aims to discuss the agricultural frontier territorial changes in Cerrado, and how agro-strategies have been acting over the conservation territories. The case which will be analyzed is the Springs of Parnaíba river national park downsizing. This protected area is located on the borders of the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia and one of the biggest production areas of the country.O Cerrado passa atualmente por uma intensa mudança de sua paisagem em função do avanço da fronteira agrícola. O modelo de desenvolvimento adotado pelo Brasil especialmente a partir dos anos 1960 incentivou a modernização conservadora da agricultura e promoveu o “pacto do agronegócio”, que se intensifica mediante um aparato ideológico articulado denominado agroestratégias. Este conjunto coordenado de ações busca influenciar políticas governamentais em prol do aumento em áreas para produção de commodities. As Unidades de Conservação no bioma Cerrado assumem um importante papel para a conservação da biodiversidade frente ao avanço da fronteira agrícola. Porém, as agroestratégias impõem ameaças a esses territórios, com a possibilidade de redução de limites territoriais, recategorização e diminuição do grau protetivo destas áreas. Este artigo tem como objetivo discutir as transformações territoriais oriundas da fronteira agrícola no Cerrado e da atuação das agroestratégias sobre os territórios destinados à conservação da biodiversidade, a partir do caso de desafetação do Parque Nacional das Nascentes do Rio Parnaíba, situado na fronteira entre os estados do Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí e Bahia, e uma das regiões com maior produção agrícola do país.EDUFU2021-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/5824510.14393/RCT164017Revista Campo-Território; v. 16 n. 40 Abr. (2021); 389-4081809-6271reponame:Campo - Territórioinstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/58245/32117Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Campo-Territórioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Karla Rosane Aguiar 2021-08-02T18:14:49Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/58245Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorioPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/oaijcleps@ufu.br || campoterritorio@ig.ufu.br1809-62711809-6271opendoar:2021-08-02T18:14:49Campo - Território - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park Fronteira agrícola e ameaças às Unidades de Conservação no Cerrado: o caso do Parque Nacional das Nascentes do Rio Parnaíba |
title |
Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park |
spellingShingle |
Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park Oliveira, Karla Rosane Aguiar |
title_short |
Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park |
title_full |
Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park |
title_fullStr |
Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park |
title_sort |
Agricultural frontier and threats to protected areas in Cerrado: the case of the springs of Parnaíba river national park |
author |
Oliveira, Karla Rosane Aguiar |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Karla Rosane Aguiar |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Karla Rosane Aguiar |
description |
Cerrado has been dealing with an intense landscape shift due to the advance of agricultural frontier. The development model adopted in Brazil since the 1960s has encouraged the conservative modernization of agriculture and has emerged the “agribusiness pact”. This pact is intensified by an ideological apparatus mechanism called agro-strategies. This coordinated set of actions has been seeking to influence governmental policies due to the increase of commodities production areas. The protected areas in Cerrado play an important role to biodiversity conservancy and against the advance of the agricultural frontier. However, the agro-strategies have inflicted threats to those territories thereby it could reduce their territorial boundaries, provoking re-categorization or even causing flexibility of their protective goals. This paper aims to discuss the agricultural frontier territorial changes in Cerrado, and how agro-strategies have been acting over the conservation territories. The case which will be analyzed is the Springs of Parnaíba river national park downsizing. This protected area is located on the borders of the states of Maranhão, Tocantins, Piauí and Bahia and one of the biggest production areas of the country. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/58245 10.14393/RCT164017 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/58245 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/RCT164017 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/campoterritorio/article/view/58245/32117 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Campo-Território info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Campo-Território |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Campo-Território; v. 16 n. 40 Abr. (2021); 389-408 1809-6271 reponame:Campo - Território instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Campo - Território |
collection |
Campo - Território |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Campo - Território - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
jcleps@ufu.br || campoterritorio@ig.ufu.br |
_version_ |
1798315122781847552 |