The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Veronez, Manuel
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Domínios de Lingu@gem
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/38349
Resumo: This paper supports the hypothesis that for each type of argument (or argumentative techniques) there are one or more specific argumentative operators that can only be used in certain moments and circumstances due to certain argumentative and social conditions that the type of argument demands. The argument is a term mobilized by Perelman and Tyteca (2005) and Fiorin (2015). We have, as an example, almost logical arguments; the arguments based on the structure of reality; the arguments that support the structure of the real; the dissociation of notions; etc. In this way, the objective of this work is to present the argumentative operators that can be used specifically in the type of argument by dissociation of notions (and not another), covering the relation between the pair essence / appearance and / or relations between other philosophical pairs, in the denomination of Perelman and Tyteca (2005), as means / end, consequence / principle, relative / absolute, subjective / objective, language / thought, etc. For this, we will start the text presenting a theoretical part for the development of this work, explaining, with the help of the theorists, what are the argumentative operators and how is the type of argument by dissociation of notions. Afterwards, we will present some examples and analyzes of argumentative operators that may be specific to the argumentative technique by dissociation of notions. Finally, the final considerations.
id UFU-12_1be9e0c40fcda50515e2165c79b072d2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/38349
network_acronym_str UFU-12
network_name_str Domínios de Lingu@gem
repository_id_str
spelling The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument?A relação entre alguns operadores argumentativos e a dissociação de noções: há operadores específicos para cada tipo de argumento?Operadores ArgumentativosDissociação de noçõesArgumentação na línguaArgumentative OperatorsDissociation of notionsArgumentation in languageThis paper supports the hypothesis that for each type of argument (or argumentative techniques) there are one or more specific argumentative operators that can only be used in certain moments and circumstances due to certain argumentative and social conditions that the type of argument demands. The argument is a term mobilized by Perelman and Tyteca (2005) and Fiorin (2015). We have, as an example, almost logical arguments; the arguments based on the structure of reality; the arguments that support the structure of the real; the dissociation of notions; etc. In this way, the objective of this work is to present the argumentative operators that can be used specifically in the type of argument by dissociation of notions (and not another), covering the relation between the pair essence / appearance and / or relations between other philosophical pairs, in the denomination of Perelman and Tyteca (2005), as means / end, consequence / principle, relative / absolute, subjective / objective, language / thought, etc. For this, we will start the text presenting a theoretical part for the development of this work, explaining, with the help of the theorists, what are the argumentative operators and how is the type of argument by dissociation of notions. Afterwards, we will present some examples and analyzes of argumentative operators that may be specific to the argumentative technique by dissociation of notions. Finally, the final considerations.O presente trabalho defende a hipótese de que para cada tipo de argumento (ou técnicas argumentativas) há um ou mais operadores argumentativos específicos que só podem ser utilizados em determinados momentos e circunstâncias, devido a certas condições argumentativas e sociais que o tipo de argumento exige. O argumento é um termo mobilizado por Perelman e Tyteca (2005) e Fiorin (2015). Temos, como exemplo, os argumentos quase lógicos; os argumentos fundamentados na estrutura da realidade; os argumentos que fundamentam a estrutura do real; a dissociação de noções; etc. Desse modo, o objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar os operadores argumentativos que podem ser utilizados especificamente no tipo de argumento por dissociação de noções (e não outro), abrangendo a relação entre o par essência/aparência e/ou as relações entre outros pares filosóficos, na denominação de Perelman e Tyteca (2005), como, meio/fim, consequência/princípio, relativo/absoluto, subjetivo/objetivo, linguagem/pensamento etc. Para isso, iniciaremos o texto apresentando uma parte teórica para o desenvolvimento deste trabalho, explicando, com a ajuda dos teóricos, o que são os operadores argumentativos e como é o tipo de argumento por dissociação de noções. Após, apresentaremos alguns exemplos e análises de operadores argumentativos que podem ser específicos da técnica argumentativa por dissociação de noções. Por fim, as considerações finais.PP/UFU2018-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/3834910.14393/DL33-v12n1a2018-18Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018): Número atemático; 526-550Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2018): Número atemático; 526-550Domínios de Lingu@gem; v. 12 n. 1 (2018): Número atemático; 526-5501980-5799reponame:Domínios de Lingu@geminstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/38349/21973Copyright (c) 2018 Manuel Veronezinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVeronez, Manuel2019-05-28T15:16:46Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/38349Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagemPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/oairevistadominios@ileel.ufu.br||1980-57991980-5799opendoar:2019-05-28T15:16:46Domínios de Lingu@gem - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument?
A relação entre alguns operadores argumentativos e a dissociação de noções: há operadores específicos para cada tipo de argumento?
title The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument?
spellingShingle The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument?
Veronez, Manuel
Operadores Argumentativos
Dissociação de noções
Argumentação na língua
Argumentative Operators
Dissociation of notions
Argumentation in language
title_short The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument?
title_full The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument?
title_fullStr The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument?
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument?
title_sort The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument?
author Veronez, Manuel
author_facet Veronez, Manuel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Veronez, Manuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Operadores Argumentativos
Dissociação de noções
Argumentação na língua
Argumentative Operators
Dissociation of notions
Argumentation in language
topic Operadores Argumentativos
Dissociação de noções
Argumentação na língua
Argumentative Operators
Dissociation of notions
Argumentation in language
description This paper supports the hypothesis that for each type of argument (or argumentative techniques) there are one or more specific argumentative operators that can only be used in certain moments and circumstances due to certain argumentative and social conditions that the type of argument demands. The argument is a term mobilized by Perelman and Tyteca (2005) and Fiorin (2015). We have, as an example, almost logical arguments; the arguments based on the structure of reality; the arguments that support the structure of the real; the dissociation of notions; etc. In this way, the objective of this work is to present the argumentative operators that can be used specifically in the type of argument by dissociation of notions (and not another), covering the relation between the pair essence / appearance and / or relations between other philosophical pairs, in the denomination of Perelman and Tyteca (2005), as means / end, consequence / principle, relative / absolute, subjective / objective, language / thought, etc. For this, we will start the text presenting a theoretical part for the development of this work, explaining, with the help of the theorists, what are the argumentative operators and how is the type of argument by dissociation of notions. Afterwards, we will present some examples and analyzes of argumentative operators that may be specific to the argumentative technique by dissociation of notions. Finally, the final considerations.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/38349
10.14393/DL33-v12n1a2018-18
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/38349
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/DL33-v12n1a2018-18
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/38349/21973
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Manuel Veronez
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Manuel Veronez
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PP/UFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PP/UFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018): Número atemático; 526-550
Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2018): Número atemático; 526-550
Domínios de Lingu@gem; v. 12 n. 1 (2018): Número atemático; 526-550
1980-5799
reponame:Domínios de Lingu@gem
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Domínios de Lingu@gem
collection Domínios de Lingu@gem
repository.name.fl_str_mv Domínios de Lingu@gem - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadominios@ileel.ufu.br||
_version_ 1797067716073357312