The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Domínios de Lingu@gem |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/38349 |
Resumo: | This paper supports the hypothesis that for each type of argument (or argumentative techniques) there are one or more specific argumentative operators that can only be used in certain moments and circumstances due to certain argumentative and social conditions that the type of argument demands. The argument is a term mobilized by Perelman and Tyteca (2005) and Fiorin (2015). We have, as an example, almost logical arguments; the arguments based on the structure of reality; the arguments that support the structure of the real; the dissociation of notions; etc. In this way, the objective of this work is to present the argumentative operators that can be used specifically in the type of argument by dissociation of notions (and not another), covering the relation between the pair essence / appearance and / or relations between other philosophical pairs, in the denomination of Perelman and Tyteca (2005), as means / end, consequence / principle, relative / absolute, subjective / objective, language / thought, etc. For this, we will start the text presenting a theoretical part for the development of this work, explaining, with the help of the theorists, what are the argumentative operators and how is the type of argument by dissociation of notions. Afterwards, we will present some examples and analyzes of argumentative operators that may be specific to the argumentative technique by dissociation of notions. Finally, the final considerations. |
id |
UFU-12_1be9e0c40fcda50515e2165c79b072d2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/38349 |
network_acronym_str |
UFU-12 |
network_name_str |
Domínios de Lingu@gem |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument?A relação entre alguns operadores argumentativos e a dissociação de noções: há operadores específicos para cada tipo de argumento?Operadores ArgumentativosDissociação de noçõesArgumentação na línguaArgumentative OperatorsDissociation of notionsArgumentation in languageThis paper supports the hypothesis that for each type of argument (or argumentative techniques) there are one or more specific argumentative operators that can only be used in certain moments and circumstances due to certain argumentative and social conditions that the type of argument demands. The argument is a term mobilized by Perelman and Tyteca (2005) and Fiorin (2015). We have, as an example, almost logical arguments; the arguments based on the structure of reality; the arguments that support the structure of the real; the dissociation of notions; etc. In this way, the objective of this work is to present the argumentative operators that can be used specifically in the type of argument by dissociation of notions (and not another), covering the relation between the pair essence / appearance and / or relations between other philosophical pairs, in the denomination of Perelman and Tyteca (2005), as means / end, consequence / principle, relative / absolute, subjective / objective, language / thought, etc. For this, we will start the text presenting a theoretical part for the development of this work, explaining, with the help of the theorists, what are the argumentative operators and how is the type of argument by dissociation of notions. Afterwards, we will present some examples and analyzes of argumentative operators that may be specific to the argumentative technique by dissociation of notions. Finally, the final considerations.O presente trabalho defende a hipótese de que para cada tipo de argumento (ou técnicas argumentativas) há um ou mais operadores argumentativos específicos que só podem ser utilizados em determinados momentos e circunstâncias, devido a certas condições argumentativas e sociais que o tipo de argumento exige. O argumento é um termo mobilizado por Perelman e Tyteca (2005) e Fiorin (2015). Temos, como exemplo, os argumentos quase lógicos; os argumentos fundamentados na estrutura da realidade; os argumentos que fundamentam a estrutura do real; a dissociação de noções; etc. Desse modo, o objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar os operadores argumentativos que podem ser utilizados especificamente no tipo de argumento por dissociação de noções (e não outro), abrangendo a relação entre o par essência/aparência e/ou as relações entre outros pares filosóficos, na denominação de Perelman e Tyteca (2005), como, meio/fim, consequência/princípio, relativo/absoluto, subjetivo/objetivo, linguagem/pensamento etc. Para isso, iniciaremos o texto apresentando uma parte teórica para o desenvolvimento deste trabalho, explicando, com a ajuda dos teóricos, o que são os operadores argumentativos e como é o tipo de argumento por dissociação de noções. Após, apresentaremos alguns exemplos e análises de operadores argumentativos que podem ser específicos da técnica argumentativa por dissociação de noções. Por fim, as considerações finais.PP/UFU2018-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/3834910.14393/DL33-v12n1a2018-18Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018): Número atemático; 526-550Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2018): Número atemático; 526-550Domínios de Lingu@gem; v. 12 n. 1 (2018): Número atemático; 526-5501980-5799reponame:Domínios de Lingu@geminstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/38349/21973Copyright (c) 2018 Manuel Veronezinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVeronez, Manuel2019-05-28T15:16:46Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/38349Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagemPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/oairevistadominios@ileel.ufu.br||1980-57991980-5799opendoar:2019-05-28T15:16:46Domínios de Lingu@gem - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument? A relação entre alguns operadores argumentativos e a dissociação de noções: há operadores específicos para cada tipo de argumento? |
title |
The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument? |
spellingShingle |
The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument? Veronez, Manuel Operadores Argumentativos Dissociação de noções Argumentação na língua Argumentative Operators Dissociation of notions Argumentation in language |
title_short |
The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument? |
title_full |
The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument? |
title_fullStr |
The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument? |
title_sort |
The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions: are there specific operators for each type of argument? |
author |
Veronez, Manuel |
author_facet |
Veronez, Manuel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Veronez, Manuel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Operadores Argumentativos Dissociação de noções Argumentação na língua Argumentative Operators Dissociation of notions Argumentation in language |
topic |
Operadores Argumentativos Dissociação de noções Argumentação na língua Argumentative Operators Dissociation of notions Argumentation in language |
description |
This paper supports the hypothesis that for each type of argument (or argumentative techniques) there are one or more specific argumentative operators that can only be used in certain moments and circumstances due to certain argumentative and social conditions that the type of argument demands. The argument is a term mobilized by Perelman and Tyteca (2005) and Fiorin (2015). We have, as an example, almost logical arguments; the arguments based on the structure of reality; the arguments that support the structure of the real; the dissociation of notions; etc. In this way, the objective of this work is to present the argumentative operators that can be used specifically in the type of argument by dissociation of notions (and not another), covering the relation between the pair essence / appearance and / or relations between other philosophical pairs, in the denomination of Perelman and Tyteca (2005), as means / end, consequence / principle, relative / absolute, subjective / objective, language / thought, etc. For this, we will start the text presenting a theoretical part for the development of this work, explaining, with the help of the theorists, what are the argumentative operators and how is the type of argument by dissociation of notions. Afterwards, we will present some examples and analyzes of argumentative operators that may be specific to the argumentative technique by dissociation of notions. Finally, the final considerations. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/38349 10.14393/DL33-v12n1a2018-18 |
url |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/38349 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14393/DL33-v12n1a2018-18 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/38349/21973 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Manuel Veronez info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Manuel Veronez |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PP/UFU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PP/UFU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018): Número atemático; 526-550 Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2018): Número atemático; 526-550 Domínios de Lingu@gem; v. 12 n. 1 (2018): Número atemático; 526-550 1980-5799 reponame:Domínios de Lingu@gem instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) instacron:UFU |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
instacron_str |
UFU |
institution |
UFU |
reponame_str |
Domínios de Lingu@gem |
collection |
Domínios de Lingu@gem |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Domínios de Lingu@gem - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadominios@ileel.ufu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797067716073357312 |