Optimization of soybean dna extraction under different storage and development periods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira Mesquita, Ana Carolina
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: de Andrade Figueiró, Adriana, Rodrigues Couto, Karla, de Freitas Oliveira, Marília, Juliatti, Fernando Cezar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/28343
Resumo: DNA extraction of plants with high quality is very important to researches in molecular biology. Several extraction protocols have been used to obtain soybean DNA; however, there is a lack of papers about extraction protocols optimization and the best developmental stage of the plant to collect them. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to extract high quantity and quality of DNA from fresh or frozen soybean samples, using different protocols. Moreover, we analyzed the best developmental stage of the plant to do the extraction. Fresh leaves or leaves kept for two years in the ultra-freezer were submitted to the DNA extraction protocols: Haberer et al., 1996 (modified); second modification from Haberer et al., 1996; Murray & Thompson, 1980 (modified) e Doyle & Doyle, 1990 (modified). Modified protocol of Doyle & Doyle was used to value the best stage to collect the leaves to do the DNA extraction. The samples were collected in the stages of development VC, V1, V2, V3, V4 and R5. The experiments were conducted in completely randomized design with 10 samples per treatment. The data underwent variance analysis and the averages were compared by the Tukey test (p<0.05). Through Doyle & Doyle, 1990 and Haberer et al., 1996 modified protocols, for both fresh and frozen samples, it was possible to obtain a higher total DNA concentration if compared to the other tested protocols. However, the quality of DNAs extracted by the protocol Doyle & Doyle, 1990 (modified) was superior, due to a minor molecular degradation. Besides that, the extractions made with these protocols have shown to be more efficient using frozen leaves' tissue. Higher DNA concentrations were obtained analyzing VC samples; however, there were no statistical differences between the stages VC, V2 and V3. It is suggested thereby to use modified of Doyle & Doyle for DNA extraction from soybean leaves in V2 and V3 stages of development from frozen samples, providing the collect of a large number of samples and its storage until the analysis.
id UFU-14_2251ea42f063461792839082399e8b75
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/28343
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Optimization of soybean dna extraction under different storage and development periods Glycine maxMolecular BiologyCTABAgricultural SciencesDNA extraction of plants with high quality is very important to researches in molecular biology. Several extraction protocols have been used to obtain soybean DNA; however, there is a lack of papers about extraction protocols optimization and the best developmental stage of the plant to collect them. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to extract high quantity and quality of DNA from fresh or frozen soybean samples, using different protocols. Moreover, we analyzed the best developmental stage of the plant to do the extraction. Fresh leaves or leaves kept for two years in the ultra-freezer were submitted to the DNA extraction protocols: Haberer et al., 1996 (modified); second modification from Haberer et al., 1996; Murray & Thompson, 1980 (modified) e Doyle & Doyle, 1990 (modified). Modified protocol of Doyle & Doyle was used to value the best stage to collect the leaves to do the DNA extraction. The samples were collected in the stages of development VC, V1, V2, V3, V4 and R5. The experiments were conducted in completely randomized design with 10 samples per treatment. The data underwent variance analysis and the averages were compared by the Tukey test (p<0.05). Through Doyle & Doyle, 1990 and Haberer et al., 1996 modified protocols, for both fresh and frozen samples, it was possible to obtain a higher total DNA concentration if compared to the other tested protocols. However, the quality of DNAs extracted by the protocol Doyle & Doyle, 1990 (modified) was superior, due to a minor molecular degradation. Besides that, the extractions made with these protocols have shown to be more efficient using frozen leaves' tissue. Higher DNA concentrations were obtained analyzing VC samples; however, there were no statistical differences between the stages VC, V2 and V3. It is suggested thereby to use modified of Doyle & Doyle for DNA extraction from soybean leaves in V2 and V3 stages of development from frozen samples, providing the collect of a large number of samples and its storage until the analysis.EDUFU2015-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/2834310.14393/BJ-v31n4a2015-28343Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2015): July/Aug.; 1102-1106Bioscience Journal ; v. 31 n. 4 (2015): July/Aug.; 1102-11061981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/28343/16729Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2015 Ana Carolina Oliveira Mesquita, Adriana de Andrade Figueiró, Karla Rodrigues Couto, Marília de Freitas Oliveira, Fernando Cezar Juliattihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira Mesquita, Ana Carolinade Andrade Figueiró, AdrianaRodrigues Couto, Karlade Freitas Oliveira, MaríliaJuliatti, Fernando Cezar2022-05-20T01:44:01Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/28343Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-05-20T01:44:01Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Optimization of soybean dna extraction under different storage and development periods
title Optimization of soybean dna extraction under different storage and development periods
spellingShingle Optimization of soybean dna extraction under different storage and development periods
Oliveira Mesquita, Ana Carolina
Glycine max
Molecular Biology
CTAB
Agricultural Sciences
title_short Optimization of soybean dna extraction under different storage and development periods
title_full Optimization of soybean dna extraction under different storage and development periods
title_fullStr Optimization of soybean dna extraction under different storage and development periods
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of soybean dna extraction under different storage and development periods
title_sort Optimization of soybean dna extraction under different storage and development periods
author Oliveira Mesquita, Ana Carolina
author_facet Oliveira Mesquita, Ana Carolina
de Andrade Figueiró, Adriana
Rodrigues Couto, Karla
de Freitas Oliveira, Marília
Juliatti, Fernando Cezar
author_role author
author2 de Andrade Figueiró, Adriana
Rodrigues Couto, Karla
de Freitas Oliveira, Marília
Juliatti, Fernando Cezar
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira Mesquita, Ana Carolina
de Andrade Figueiró, Adriana
Rodrigues Couto, Karla
de Freitas Oliveira, Marília
Juliatti, Fernando Cezar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glycine max
Molecular Biology
CTAB
Agricultural Sciences
topic Glycine max
Molecular Biology
CTAB
Agricultural Sciences
description DNA extraction of plants with high quality is very important to researches in molecular biology. Several extraction protocols have been used to obtain soybean DNA; however, there is a lack of papers about extraction protocols optimization and the best developmental stage of the plant to collect them. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to extract high quantity and quality of DNA from fresh or frozen soybean samples, using different protocols. Moreover, we analyzed the best developmental stage of the plant to do the extraction. Fresh leaves or leaves kept for two years in the ultra-freezer were submitted to the DNA extraction protocols: Haberer et al., 1996 (modified); second modification from Haberer et al., 1996; Murray & Thompson, 1980 (modified) e Doyle & Doyle, 1990 (modified). Modified protocol of Doyle & Doyle was used to value the best stage to collect the leaves to do the DNA extraction. The samples were collected in the stages of development VC, V1, V2, V3, V4 and R5. The experiments were conducted in completely randomized design with 10 samples per treatment. The data underwent variance analysis and the averages were compared by the Tukey test (p<0.05). Through Doyle & Doyle, 1990 and Haberer et al., 1996 modified protocols, for both fresh and frozen samples, it was possible to obtain a higher total DNA concentration if compared to the other tested protocols. However, the quality of DNAs extracted by the protocol Doyle & Doyle, 1990 (modified) was superior, due to a minor molecular degradation. Besides that, the extractions made with these protocols have shown to be more efficient using frozen leaves' tissue. Higher DNA concentrations were obtained analyzing VC samples; however, there were no statistical differences between the stages VC, V2 and V3. It is suggested thereby to use modified of Doyle & Doyle for DNA extraction from soybean leaves in V2 and V3 stages of development from frozen samples, providing the collect of a large number of samples and its storage until the analysis.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/28343
10.14393/BJ-v31n4a2015-28343
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/28343
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v31n4a2015-28343
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/28343/16729
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2015): July/Aug.; 1102-1106
Bioscience Journal ; v. 31 n. 4 (2015): July/Aug.; 1102-1106
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069075398000640